Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent Page: <<   < prev  136 137 [138] 139 140   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2016 5:09:38 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		Thanks, gents. I'm reading every word and will continue to do so for another hour or two. Then I'll have to make some decisions about what to do.

BB, I had Spit Vs and some other fighters coming in from Oz. But there are so many subs lurking off Sabang that I had to divert the ships to a safter port to unload. The Spit Vs don't have the range to reach Sabang, so they'll have to serve as defense in Ceylon or perhaps in the Burma campaign. Some of the other fighters will be coming forward from Ceylon and the Assam region.

To this point it seems that even the Buffaloes, Dutch and Chinese P40Es, and Beaufighters are helpful, probably because of the quality of the pilots.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 4111
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2016 5:22:06 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

Thanks, gents. I'm reading every word and will continue to do so for another hour or two. Then I'll have to make some decisions about what to do.

BB, I had Spit Vs and some other fighters coming in from Oz. But there are so many subs lurking off Sabang that I had to divert the ships to a safter port to unload. The Spit Vs don't have the range to reach Sabang, so they'll have to serve as defense in Ceylon or perhaps in the Burma campaign. Some of the other fighters will be coming forward from Ceylon and the Assam region.

To this point it seems that even the Buffaloes, Dutch and Chinese P40Es, and Beaufighters are helpful, probably because of the quality of the pilots.

You can put bob-carrier fighters on a carrier (be sure to take off 2x their number of carrier planes first!) and fly them off to Sabang, but it would be a one-way trip because they cannot land on a carrier.

_____________________________

Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 4112
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2016 5:26:25 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		witpqs, say what? "bob-carrier fighters"? What's dat?

I think you're saying that certain land-based squadrons can be loaded onto a carrier and then flown to a land base. Of course, I know that a Marine Corsair squadron can do so. But are you saying that, say, Hurricanes or SpitVs can? (If I knew what you meant by "bob-carrier" I wouldn't have to ask.)

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 4113
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2016 5:27:12 PM   
Lecivius


Posts: 4845
Joined: 8/5/2007
From: Denver
Status: offline 		I'm hoping someone smarter than I can chime in on why his raid detection is so low. I'm not the radar gronnard that some are, but the multiple CPS-1 coverage should be giving more than 6 minutes warning of something at 36k altitude.

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 4114
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2016 5:32:57 PM   
IJV

 

Posts: 34
Joined: 11/18/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

witpqs, say what? "bob-carrier fighters"? What's dat?

I think you're saying that certain land-based squadrons can be loaded onto a carrier and then flown to a land base. Of course, I know that a Marine Corsair squadron can do so. But are you saying that, say, Hurricanes or SpitVs can? (If I knew what you meant by "bob-carrier" I wouldn't have to ask.)


non-carrier. You can load any fighter groups (at least, probably non-naval DB and FB groups as well though I couldn't say offhand) regardless of their being carrier capable or not onto carriers for transport, they won't be instantly available as they all disable as part of the loading process and have to repair, but the aircraft can fly off the carrier out to transfer range. Being carrier capable just means they can land back on the carrier.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 4115
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2016 5:34:41 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		I'll check the quality of the base force commanders. In that regard, should I be looking for officers with high "Land" or high "Air" ratings. I guessing the former, but I had better not leave it to guessing.

(in reply to Lecivius)
Post #: 4116
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2016 6:15:29 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

witpqs, say what? "bob-carrier fighters"? What's dat?

I think you're saying that certain land-based squadrons can be loaded onto a carrier and then flown to a land base. Of course, I know that a Marine Corsair squadron can do so. But are you saying that, say, Hurricanes or SpitVs can? (If I knew what you meant by "bob-carrier" I wouldn't have to ask.)


I've flown lots of P-40s off of CVEs to new islands. Works great, cuts the time to get there by a lot, and you don't have to dock to unload at a place short on docks. You do have to risk the CVEs.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 4117
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2016 6:17:03 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		I'm assuming the limited capacity of the CVE effects which squadrons (how large) can be used?

Will CVs also work?

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 4118
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2016 6:22:44 PM   
JeffroK


Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline 		Re JIII's "FURBALL"

Dont forget FOW, you may not be seeing accurate numbers of japanese losses, likewise JIII may be seeing exaggerated Allied losses.

_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 4119
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2016 6:26:48 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		This campaign may turn pretty radical.

Imagine if I can boost my fighter numbers at Sabang by 250 or 300. I probably have that many in India and Assam. Some of these are Chinese Vanguards and other stuff that I wouldn't use. But there are 75 P39Ds, 16 Spitfires, probably 75 Hurricanes, and perhaps 45 Martlets. Most of these aren't tier one fighters, but they have good pilots and will take some of the pressure off the F4Fs and P40Ks, which are still the backbone of the Allied fighter corps there.

It would be whacky to strip India and Assam (especially Colombo, which is vital to this campaign). But we're getting down to brass tacks here. It's only about seven weeks until the Hellcats become available. I'd do almost anything to keep Sabang operational.

As I've said so many times, I think the Hellcats are the key to the campaign. When they come online in numbers it should be much harder for Japan to fight over the base. So if the base is still in Allied hands and in good enough shape to support combat ships and ground troops, then Sumatra gradually changes over to an offensive position. Eventually LBA assumes Sabang's defense, the Hellcats (or most of them) return to the carriers, the Allies begin to look at retaking some of the Nicobars and other bases, and John faces a growling and growing menace close to his heartland. 4EB are a threat to Singers and Palembang.

So I'll do nearly anything to keep Sabang in Allied hands and operational.

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 1/21/2016 7:31:12 PM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 4120
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2016 6:27:35 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		Can anybody confirm that base force commanding officer need high "Land" ratings (as opposed to high "Air" ratings)?

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 4121
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2016 6:29:49 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline 		So, an American CV (air capacity 90) can take on 30 or 45 Army fighters to be flown off on a one way trip (transfer)?? Which is it?

_____________________________


(in reply to JeffroK)
Post #: 4122
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2016 6:32:22 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffK

Re JIII's "FURBALL"

Dont forget FOW, you may not be seeing accurate numbers of japanese losses, likewise JIII may be seeing exaggerated Allied losses.


I think the movie replay is pretty accurate and I think the Intelligence Menu "losses today" numbers are accurate. But I think the Combat Report summaries are inaccurate.

So I usually use the Intelligence Menu for definitive information about what was lost today. If, for example, that shows 30 Tojos downed in a2a today, I think that's accurate.

Am I wrong?

(in reply to JeffroK)
Post #: 4123
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2016 7:11:55 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		I've asked so many questions that I've overwhelmed the Peanut Gallery. Much helpful information. Some questions yet unanswered. I'll be making decisions in about an hour. Advice and input is still welcome. Here are my working plans:

1. Swap out Sabang base force commanders for those that have a high "Land" rating hoping that might make the radar work better ("Air" rating wouldn't seem to apply here, but I'm not positive).

2. I'm considering two options for my fighters (I'd welcome additional suggestions):
a) Keep things pretty much as is, but reset CAP % for most squadrons from 90% to something like 50%
b) Stand down the F4Fs and P40Ks to give them a breather. Keep the "high CAP" (Corsairs at 35k and P38Gs at 39k) and the "low CAP" (P39Ds at 10k and Beaufighters at 5k). These will provide some defence against air strikes, and the low CAP shouldn't be too vulernable since they'll be 22k to 28k lower than the sweepers.

I have a slight preference for 2(a), but I'm still thinking it over.



< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 1/21/2016 8:14:59 PM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 4124
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2016 7:36:34 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

I'll check the quality of the base force commanders. In that regard, should I be looking for officers with high "Land" or high "Air" ratings. I guessing the former, but I had better not leave it to guessing.

Land skill is important for knowing how to get the job done , but I think you also need good Administrative skill to get the things the troops need and issue them. Can't say I have seen any developer advice on the Admin aspect, but the job of a BF is non-combat (support) so Admin should align with that.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 4125
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2016 7:39:21 PM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline 		90% is very high and will quickly lead to high fatigue.

I typically keep my CAP at 50% and boost it to 70% for situations with levels of intense attacks.

However, when I boot the CAP to 70%, I also typically force a 30% rest rate, precluding any escort missions.

_____________________________

Hans


(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 4126
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2016 7:46:46 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

I've asked so many questions that I've overwhelmed the Peanut Gallery. Much helpful information. Some questions yet unanswered. I'll be making decisions in about an hour. Advice and input is still welcome. Here are my working plans:

1. Swap out Sabang base force commanders for those that have a high "Land" rating hoping that might make the radar work better ("Air" rating wouldn't seem to apply here, but I'm not positive).

2. I'm considering two options for my fighters (I'd welcome additional suggestions):
a) Keep things pretty much as is, but reset CAP % for most squadrons from 90% to something like 50%
b) Stand down the F4Fs and P40Ks to give them a breather. Keep the "high CAP" (Corsairs at 35k and P38Gs at 39k) and the "low CAP" (P39Ds at 10k and Beaufighters at 5k). These will provide some defence against air strikes, and the low CAP shouldn't be too vulernable since they'll be 22k to 28k lower than the sweepers.

I have a slight preference for 2(a), but I'm still thinking it over.


Air combat does require alert pilots. If fatigue is getting up into the 15-20 range I would strongly consider resting pilots. For me, over 20 is mandatory rest.
But there is an option to keep some of the squadron in action while some rest. First look at the squadron pilots and get a ballpark for how many can still be effective. Then set the squadron CAP % and set the rest % needed to rest the fatigued pilots. Only the least fatigued pilots should now fly CAP.

Re: the Peanut Gallery - I am guessing that most peanuts are being roasted over the fires of R/L work at the moment and will chime in when they get home. If you think the upcoming turn is critical, ask John if he would mind if you took a little extra time to deal with some tasks. (Bonus - he will think you are setting up an invasion!)


EDIT: PS: Air Skill is needed for Air HQs (and CV skippers/TF admirals) but for an Air BF you still need land skill more than Air.

< Message edited by BBfanboy -- 1/21/2016 9:17:22 PM >

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 4127
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2016 7:48:43 PM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline 		Some of the questions are PHD level and I havent gotten my bachelors degree here yet ;]

_____________________________


(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 4128
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2016 8:28:20 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: IJV


quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

witpqs, say what? "bob-carrier fighters"? What's dat?

I think you're saying that certain land-based squadrons can be loaded onto a carrier and then flown to a land base. Of course, I know that a Marine Corsair squadron can do so. But are you saying that, say, Hurricanes or SpitVs can? (If I knew what you meant by "bob-carrier" I wouldn't have to ask.)


non-carrier. You can load any fighter groups (at least, probably non-naval DB and FB groups as well though I couldn't say offhand) regardless of their being carrier capable or not onto carriers for transport, they won't be instantly available as they all disable as part of the loading process and have to repair, but the aircraft can fly off the carrier out to transfer range. Being carrier capable just means they can land back on the carrier.

What he said!

Spell check didn't catch hitting the wrong key. I guess "bob-carrier" must be a real thing!

_____________________________

Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home

(in reply to IJV)
Post #: 4129
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2016 9:03:28 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		Orders issued. Turn sent. The wait begins.

I stood down a few fighter squadrons (mostly P40Es and Buffaloes) that seemed pretty fatigued. The rest are set to 60% CAP, 10% Rest, Range 0. I'll fiddle with the numbers a bit each turn to see what effect they have.

The Allies are down to just 278 operational fighters this turn (with another 100 in maintenance or repair). With those stood down the available numbers are probably more like 250. That's uncomfortably thin under the weight of massed attacks.

If John flies sweeps again (I think he will), he'll notice the reduced numbers and might draw alot of conclusions. But there is relief in the future. In addition to the 100 currently unavailable while in maintenance, there are at least three or four squadrons that can fly into Sabang from SEAC bases as soon as their aircraft are serviceable. And then comes the operation to transfer short-legged fighters from SEAC to Sabang via carrier. That's fraught with some risk since the carriers will be involved, but it's got to be done.

Thanks for all the help, gents. Now let's sit back and see what happens.

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 1/21/2016 10:05:44 PM >

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 4130
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2016 9:19:07 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline 		The advantage of keeping CAP down in the 40 to 60% range is you will have a consistent number of fighters up wave after wave unless he gets lucky and has move than one air group show up and you get hit hard by it. This way, if he decides to send his bombers, you will have fighters left to take a shot at them.

_____________________________


(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 4131
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2016 9:37:55 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

I'm assuming the limited capacity of the CVE effects which squadrons (how large) can be used?

Will CVs also work?


27-31 planes are the most common limits for USN CVEs. A lot of fighter units work at that. CVs should work too. Never done it, but I see no reason they wouldn't, one-way.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 4132
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2016 9:51:56 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		I wonder if John has been sending "everything he has" (as far as Tojos and Tonys) or if he's been holding back squadrons so that he can commit them fresh next turn? If its the former, his fighters should be more in need of rest than mine are (though he has the Zeros if he wants to commit them).

I picked up more good help today, plus thinking through things in new ways. I've got lots more to learn, but all of this has been instructive.

I still have one major lingering question about flying off LB fighters from carriers. Say I stripped Yorktown of all aircraft (I wouldn't, but just say) and parked her in port. Could she then load and later fly off 90 Hurricanes or Spitfires or whatever? Or is the number halfed (I got that impression for a post in here, perhaps NYGiants).

One person (Hans Bolter???) said that information about enemy aircraft downed is subject to FOW. My understanding is that the Combat Report lists of enemy planes downed is unreliable. However, I believe that the actual turn replay (the "movie") is accurate, so that, if you were so inclined, you could watch and keep a tally and it would be accurate. Also, I think the main Intelligence Menu carries accurate totals. Anybody know differently?




(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 4133
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2016 9:52:56 PM   
zuluhour


Posts: 5244
Joined: 1/20/2011
From: Maryland
Status: offline 		I see success with 30% CAP at their best high alt bands, layered with radar present. P40s at 13-15 m/ft.  When I set them to 50% and higher I see quick fatigue
and less response to successive waves. My 2 cent. I presume adequate ground support and sufficient runway space. It really seems to help with a solid air rating
on a HQ leader as well. 

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 4134
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2016 9:57:05 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		I've got the HQ and a level eight airfield with a ton of support.

It's funny, though. For several games now I've used 90% CAP with range set to 0 (when range isn't an issue) and fatigue was never a problem.

Now, that's not the case when range is set higher. But often range 0 is fine when soley interested in protecting a base, as is the case here.

But I am fiddling with CAP percentages to see if it affects how the fighters manage against successive waves. Next turn its 60% CAP, 10% Rest, range 0. Let's see what happens.

(in reply to zuluhour)
Post #: 4135
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/22/2016 6:10:28 AM   
CaptBeefheart


Posts: 2301
Joined: 7/4/2003
From: Seoul, Korea
Status: offline 		There are a couple of things to consider which might help you. For one, boosting that airfield to level 9 would mean you could host unlimited air units without penalty. I personally think that's more important than expending some supply or handing him a level 9 field if he takes the base--after all, you're playing to win this battle. Also, you might look at downgrading those RAAF Spit Vs to Kittyhawks if their ferry range gets them to Sabang, and then upgrading back to Spits. That would take some time, but may be better than risking flattops a la Wasp to Malta.

Further, the lack of air-raid warning time is a mystery to me. Are those BFs in good order, meaning disruption, experience, morale, etc? Not sure how much those factors would affect it, but would be interesting to know.

As an AFB, I see this as a great Guadalcanal opportunity for you (meaning you'll grind the IJ forces as he pours more and more resources into the battle).

Best of luck!

Cheers,
CC

_____________________________

Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 4136
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/22/2016 11:11:58 AM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		Commander, the airfield is an 8.87. It will reach level 9 in four or five days.

There was a good discussion in here a few days ago about whether I should turn off base-building to concentrate on forts since a big battle is coming and since Sabang is clear terrain (currently with 4.2 forts). I ultimately decided to continue building the airfield since it was so close to level 9.

Sabang hasn't been attack and thus every unit there is in great shape in terms of morale, fatigue, etc. The base forces look good.

Good idea on the Spit Vs. It's going to take me awhile to get them up and running as Vs. Then I'll have to rebase them. Then'll I'll have to change then to Kittyhawk III to get them to Sabanb from Ceylon. This'll probably take 10 days total due to some factors I won't mention, but the fewer squadrons needing carrier help the better.

Could proximity be an issue - the fact that John's fighters are coming from Georgetown, Alor Star, etc., which are only six or seven hexes away?

If anybody has a good radar tip, let me know.

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 1/22/2016 12:14:51 PM >

(in reply to CaptBeefheart)
Post #: 4137
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/22/2016 12:19:20 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

Commander Cody: For one, boosting that airfield to level 9 would mean you could host unlimited air units without penalty.


My understanding is that the Level 9 AF allows unlimited numbers of air units without suffering coordination penalties on operating them, but you still need enough air support to handle the number of aircraft/engines at the base if you want timely repairs and maintenance. The good news is that if you have units or part units stood down to rest those aircraft are not accumulating fatigue so you air support can concentrate on the other aircraft.

About the radar: The early radars did not have much ability to penetrate rain but the later radars were better. If there is an upgraded radar model available in the game I would turn off upgrades of other BFs so that Sabang can get the newer version.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 4138
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/22/2016 1:00:01 PM   
Lecivius


Posts: 4845
Joined: 8/5/2007
From: Denver
Status: offline 		The CPS-1 radar was not early radar. It was mid-late war radar. Used in Normandy, it was picking up German movement over Germany with high precision, and was in use into the early 50's. I found a reference to a thread in a Matrix forum on various radars. I'm gonna try to hunt it down today, work allowing.

<edit>

I have found the following, but it only refers to fire control, not air search.

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3684150&mpage=1&key=radar�

<edit>

I can't find it :( Hopefully Alfred will stumble across this, he is far better versed than I at such things.

< Message edited by Lecivius -- 1/22/2016 4:27:46 PM >

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 4139
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/22/2016 4:55:31 PM   
Alfred

 

Posts: 6685
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffK

Re JIII's "FURBALL"

Dont forget FOW, you may not be seeing accurate numbers of japanese losses, likewise JIII may be seeing exaggerated Allied losses.


I think the movie replay is pretty accurate and I think the Intelligence Menu "losses today" numbers are accurate. But I think the Combat Report summaries are inaccurate.

So I usually use the Intelligence Menu for definitive information about what was lost today. If, for example, that shows 30 Tojos downed in a2a today, I think that's accurate.

Am I wrong?


Just taking a short break from the revision project.

Not 100% correct.

The aircraft lost screen from the Intelligence Menu still has some FOW on enemy losses. It is usually by far the most accurate but still not 100% accurate.

Nor is the Combat Animation quite 100% accurate either. Not all critical hits result in a downed visual sighting. These may or may not be subsequently credited on the aircraft lost screen as operational losses.

Alfred

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 4140
Page:   <<   < prev  136 137 [138] 139 140   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent Page: <<   < prev  136 137 [138] 139 140   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.421