Platoon units for USSR

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Platoon units for USSR

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Flashpoint Campaigns Series >> Platoon units for USSR

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Platoon units for USSR - 2/20/2016 9:13:31 AM

niemand303

Posts: 24
Joined: 11/12/2015
Status: offline

What I was wondering, is why NATO can use platoon-sized forces separately (allowing to spread out properly and evade large losses), while Soviets lack this ability. I was answered once that it's part of the Soviet doctrine to use companies as a tactical unit, so I decided to find any proofs for that by myself.

First of all, I must note that "doctrine" is rather a set of recommendations than rules, so that argument seems not that important.

Secondly, what I've found, looking through a 1984 handbook for Soviet officers called "Tactics" by Reznichenko (was translated in English under a title "Tactics, a Soviet way"), was following:

quote:

В связи с дальнейшим усложнением современного наступательного боя исключительное значение приобретают проявление командирами, офицерами штабов, политработниками широкой инициативы и творчества в выборе способов разгрома противника...

It says that: "Due to the complications of modern offensive combat initiative and creativity of field commanders, HQ officers and political workers, plays an exceptional role in deciding how to defeat the enemy..."

That basically justifies the divergences from the "rulebook".
Then, a couple of pages after it's followed by a scheme (not sure if forum will allow me to upload a picture), which clearly indicates that on attacking movements and meeting engagements the company should be split into platoons ("Рубеж развертывания во взводные колонны", "Line of [company] deployment into platoon columns"):

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by niemand303 -- 2/20/2016 10:21:36 AM >

Post #: 1

RE: Platoon units for USSR - 2/20/2016 12:19:08 PM

WildCatNL

Posts: 513
Joined: 3/27/2009
From: Eindhoven, the Netherlands
Status: offline

IMO, use of platoon columns (so platoon vehicles trailing behind its leader / point vehicle) simply confirms the company is the tactical unit.
If the platoon would be the tactical unit, it would deploy in line, wedge, vee, but not in column, in order to engage.

William

_____________________________

William
On Target Simulations LLC

(in reply to niemand303)

Post #: 2

RE: Platoon units for USSR - 2/20/2016 1:16:45 PM

CapnDarwin

Posts: 8467
Joined: 2/12/2005
From: Newark, OH
Status: offline

As William points out, the basic level of command and control for most Soviet combat units is the company. The company also operates well within the 500m hex foot print. NATO doctrine provides independent operation and flexibility down to platoon level. That's how we modeled the restrictions in game. In the late 80s, the Soviets added operational maneuver groups (OMGs) to their formations and those setup are more NATO like in design and operation.

_____________________________

OTS is looking forward to Southern Storm getting released!

Cap'n Darwin aka Jim Snyder
On Target Simulations LLC

(in reply to WildCatNL)

Post #: 3

RE: Platoon units for USSR - 2/20/2016 2:13:24 PM

76mm

Posts: 4688
Joined: 5/2/2004
From: Washington, DC
Status: offline

I don't believe that the quote from Soviet doctrine has anything to do with using platoons as a tactical unit. Even the tactical diagram shows platoons essentially being deployed within a company formation.

I would think that it might make sense for certain specialized units to have the ability to deploy as platoons (recon, AA, engineers, etc.) but not basic tank and mech units.

(in reply to CapnDarwin)

Post #: 4

RE: Platoon units for USSR - 2/20/2016 6:52:44 PM

niemand303

Posts: 24
Joined: 11/12/2015
Status: offline

Okay, well, maybe it's not wrong, but that still limits tactical abilities of WarPac to basically "zerg rush"-style tactics with no ability to perform any complicated maneuvers in depth given the size of maps (4 battle counters per battalion instead of 12), maybe introduce it with something like a buildup/breakdown order (WitE/WitW), which allows to spend one order point to form a unit out of platoons or break a company into platoons? Just a suggestion, seeing the abnormal power of NATO artillery it's pretty hard to play with Pact: one tanks company gets stuck on a minefield/obstacle -> gets shot once by arty -> loses a third at least of its subunits -> planes, tanks and other arty assets finish it up, while having them as platoons means that you can either "leave behind" a stuck platoon (seeing how they move in columns that would be logical that units moving behind won't make the same mistake) and act with other company assets.

(in reply to 76mm)

Post #: 5

RE: Platoon units for USSR - 2/20/2016 11:58:31 PM

Mad Russian

Posts: 13256
Joined: 3/16/2008
From: Texas
Status: offline

The main reason is control. NATO armies emphasize control of platoons with a single officer and with NCO's having the ability to maneuver squads. The Soviet system doesn't use NCO's to implement tactical employment. There was an effort to study US/NATO command structures by the Soviets in the late 90's, I believe, but they determined it wasn't possible with their level of participation by their NCO's.

This results in the officer in charge of the Soviet company being the one directing all the elements of that unit.

Good Hunting.

MR

< Message edited by Mad Russian -- 2/21/2016 1:00:16 AM >

_____________________________

The most expensive thing in the world is free time.

Founder of HSG scenario design group for Combat Mission.
Panzer Command Ostfront Development Team.
Flashpoint Campaigns: Red Storm Development Team.

(in reply to niemand303)

Post #: 6

RE: Platoon units for USSR - 2/21/2016 7:30:57 AM

niemand303

Posts: 24
Joined: 11/12/2015
Status: offline

That's a good argument, okay, I think that might be wrong realism-wise, though I've surely heard of platoon acting separately in cases of special forces. Let it be that way. More challenge then. :)

(in reply to Mad Russian)

Post #: 7

RE: Platoon units for USSR - 2/21/2016 12:58:56 PM

CapnDarwin

Posts: 8467
Joined: 2/12/2005
From: Newark, OH
Status: offline

There are a number of platoon units in the Soviet OOB . Mainly, recon, AD, and other support type functions.

_____________________________

OTS is looking forward to Southern Storm getting released!

Cap'n Darwin aka Jim Snyder
On Target Simulations LLC

(in reply to niemand303)

Post #: 8

RE: Platoon units for USSR - 2/21/2016 2:11:25 PM

pzgndr

Posts: 3170
Joined: 3/18/2004
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Capn Darwin
There are a number of platoon units in the Soviet OOB . Mainly, recon...

This works fine using the Bn/Regt recon platoon as the Combat Reconnaissance Patrol (CRP). The Forward Security Element (FSE) is a company, followed by the Bn(-) as the Main Force. I don't have an issue with the current OPFOR units in the game.

I've commented before about the command and control differences between NATO and Warsaw Pact and how this game could better simulate all that. I don't want to rehash all that again. For now, I'm waiting to hear what's going to happen in Southern Storm with all that, and what may happen with limited orders and such.

(in reply to CapnDarwin)

Post #: 9

RE: Platoon units for USSR - 2/24/2016 4:08:54 PM

Mad Russian

Posts: 13256
Joined: 3/16/2008
From: Texas
Status: offline

This is a good time for you to list what you would like to see for the differences between NATO and the WP. Because the system is being looked at and getting closer to a final end game code it would be good to discuss now what you guys want to see in the line of Command and Control.

There is a lot going on but this is an important time in the development of the game code. So,if you have something you think should be in the code for the game going forward now is the time to bring it up.

We have all the things that have been gone over repeatedly, like movement order delays, scooting times, delays applied when you change orders, Waypoint unit modes, etc., but, it wouldn't hurt to have a constructive discussion about Command and Control. Much of that will be handled in the new system Jim is working on but it wouldn't hurt to touch base with you guys one last time to see if there is something else that could be added.

Good Hunting.

MR

_____________________________

(in reply to pzgndr)

Post #: 10

RE: Platoon units for USSR - 2/24/2016 5:58:35 PM

pzgndr

Posts: 3170
Joined: 3/18/2004
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mad Russian

This is a good time for you to list what you would like to see for the differences between NATO and the WP. Because the system is being looked at and getting closer to a final end game code it would be good to discuss now what you guys want to see in the line of Command and Control.

There is a lot going on but this is an important time in the development of the game code. So,if you have something you think should be in the code for the game going forward now is the time to bring it up.

We have all the things that have been gone over repeatedly, like movement order delays, scooting times, delays applied when you change orders, Waypoint unit modes, etc., but, it wouldn't hurt to have a constructive discussion about Command and Control. Much of that will be handled in the new system Jim is working on but it wouldn't hurt to touch base with you guys one last time to see if there is something else that could be added.

Good Hunting.

MR

Again, I don't want to rehash all that; it's all still there from a year ago at Limited Orders, FPC-RS vs Assault!. It all depends on what you guys decide to do with having limited orders or not, how many are provided for the TOCs, what orders "count" against the limits versus what doesn't, etc. Assault! provided an interesting C2 game mechanic that could be emulated in whole or in part, but it wasn't perfect; nothing is. I think the general idea is worth considering, at least as a benchmark for whatever alternative(s) are being considered. At the end of the day we should be able to see some noticeable differences between NATO and Soviet/Warsaw Pact C2 that compels players/AI to adopt different tactics.

(in reply to Mad Russian)

Post #: 11

RE: Platoon units for USSR - 3/1/2016 2:12:01 AM

Mad Russian

Posts: 13256
Joined: 3/16/2008
From: Texas
Status: offline

Okay.

We offered.

Good Hunting.

MR

_____________________________

(in reply to pzgndr)

Post #: 12

RE: Platoon units for USSR - 3/1/2016 10:45:02 PM

Deathtreader

Posts: 1039
Joined: 4/22/2003
From: Vancouver, Canada.
Status: offline

Hi,

Not being an expert on how the command delay is being determined currently, I'm just going to put this out there......

How about a tiered set of command delays that varies by formation level as opposed to the "global" one size fits all that we have today. Depending on a host of factors (such as no. of HQ's) sections/platoons/companies/battalions/regt's could have their own unique variable command delay. Formation "A" could currently be at 21 minutes while formation "B" could currently be at 29 minutes etc. etc. Probably a programming nightmare

.

I'm not complaining and am perfectly content with the current system but am just offering an alternative per your invitation.

Rob.

_____________________________

So we're at war with the Russkies eh?? I suppose we really ought to invade or something. (Lonnnng pause while studying the map)
Hmmmm... big place ain't it??
- Sir Harry Flashman (1854)

(in reply to Mad Russian)

Post #: 13

RE: Platoon units for USSR - 3/1/2016 10:53:16 PM

CapnDarwin

Posts: 8467
Joined: 2/12/2005
From: Newark, OH
Status: offline

Rob,

We are looking at something like that for Southern Storm with more cause and effect of range of action to need to bump up to the next HQ to get approval and thus added delays on top of readiness, jamming, losses etc.

_____________________________

OTS is looking forward to Southern Storm getting released!

Cap'n Darwin aka Jim Snyder
On Target Simulations LLC

(in reply to Deathtreader)

Post #: 14

RE: Platoon units for USSR - 3/2/2016 12:43:51 AM

pzgndr

Posts: 3170
Joined: 3/18/2004
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Capn Darwin
We are looking at something like that for Southern Storm with more cause and effect of range of action to need to bump up to the next HQ to get approval and thus added delays on top of readiness, jamming, losses etc.

Somehow the game should account for planning, contingency orders, FRAGOs, etc. It's not like every new "order" is going to be a complete 5-paragraph OPORD from scratch requiring higher approvals and such. Which is one reason I was irked when we found out the "On Call" only works for arty and not as a means for regular units to be standing by to immediately execute a [pre-planned] order. Perhaps that will make it into Southern Storm. Or something along those lines? Just a suggestion...

(in reply to CapnDarwin)

Post #: 15