Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Passing the Initiative

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Victory and Glory: Napoleon >> Passing the Initiative Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Passing the Initiative - 3/19/2016 11:26:21 PM   
grab


Posts: 265
Joined: 6/18/2005
Status: offline 		I've noticed that during a battle if I pass the initiative I lose an action point. when the enemy passes the initiative they do not lose action points. Why is this?

_____________________________

System, Intel i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz, Windows 10 Professional, 32 GB of RAM, NVidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Post #: 1
RE: Passing the Initiative - 3/20/2016 1:35:05 AM   
mercenarius


Posts: 653
Joined: 7/6/2010
Status: offline 		I think that what happened is that you won the next initiative, so you got to go again for that reason, not because the AI passed.

(in reply to grab)
Post #: 2
RE: Passing the Initiative - 3/20/2016 6:28:35 PM   
grab


Posts: 265
Joined: 6/18/2005
Status: offline 		What seems to happen at the moment is this;

1 = I win the initiative and fire a field piece and loose 1 activation point. The enemy does nothing and his action points remain the same.

2 = The enemy wins the initiate and fires an infantry unit and looses 1 activation point. I do nothing and have to pass the initiative loosing 1 action point.

3 = I win the initiative and pass it loosing 1 action point. The enemy does nothing either but does not loose an action point.




_____________________________

System, Intel i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz, Windows 10 Professional, 32 GB of RAM, NVidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti

(in reply to mercenarius)
Post #: 3
RE: Passing the Initiative - 3/20/2016 6:32:45 PM   
mercenarius


Posts: 653
Joined: 7/6/2010
Status: offline 		After passing the current initiative, you won the next initiative.

Now this does raise a point, that passing the initiative might imply that the enemy should get the next initiative (if they have any left). This is actually a design decision. You cannot rely on "waiting out" the enemy by passing one initiative.

I edited my previous post because I had forgotten this point and what I wrote was somewhat misleading.

< Message edited by mercenarius -- 3/20/2016 9:14:27 PM >

(in reply to grab)
Post #: 4
RE: Passing the Initiative - 3/21/2016 1:49:29 PM   
grab


Posts: 265
Joined: 6/18/2005
Status: offline 		Sorry if I am labouring this point but I want to be clear in my mind how the combat pulses of a battle work.

It seems to me that for each combat resolution phase of a battle all combat units have the potential to engage once within that phase until all of the action points are used.

Now if I have understood this correctly from your replies mercenaries, the game calculates who has the initiative and that player can perform combat, the game then calculates initiative again and so the process repeats until both sides action points are used up. That then completes the combat phase and the game move to the next combat phase.

_____________________________

System, Intel i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz, Windows 10 Professional, 32 GB of RAM, NVidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti

(in reply to mercenarius)
Post #: 5
RE: Passing the Initiative - 3/27/2016 4:27:17 PM   
kendrick88

 

Posts: 7
Joined: 3/27/2016
Status: offline 		If you pass the initiative, you should lose 1 action point. That makes sense. But if you do pass your turn, the enemy should automatically win the next initiative. If they also pass, they lose a point as well. Otherwise, they have to take a turn. That would work well. Both sides can essentially hold off on combat if they see no advantage in attacking. That can happen in real combat. But passing your turn and then winning initiative again can happen over and over. I have lost as many as 6 action points by passing turns, just to see what would happen. I feel that should be changed to incorporate the above suggestion.

(in reply to grab)
Post #: 6
RE: Passing the Initiative - 3/28/2016 4:14:26 PM   
EdinHouston

 

Posts: 100
Joined: 7/26/2008
Status: offline 		At first glance, I agreed with this suggestion. But then I realized that making this change would be an advantage for the French because Napoleon is so likely to win initiative rolls. It would mean that Napoleon could fire the units he wants to fire first, and then save his initiative for if/when the AI advances, and then slaughter the AI with infantry fire... and then on the next turn, slaughter the AI again because Napoleon is likely to win the initiative. It would make it very hard for the allies to attack and advance and win against a superior general like Napoleon... and its already pretty hard for them to do that with the current system. So on second thought, maybe I don't support this change because, while more realistic, it might be very unbalancing.

(in reply to kendrick88)
Post #: 7
RE: Passing the Initiative - 3/28/2016 8:55:30 PM   
Uncle_Joe


Posts: 1985
Joined: 8/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: EdinHouston

At first glance, I agreed with this suggestion. But then I realized that making this change would be an advantage for the French because Napoleon is so likely to win initiative rolls. It would mean that Napoleon could fire the units he wants to fire first, and then save his initiative for if/when the AI advances, and then slaughter the AI with infantry fire... and then on the next turn, slaughter the AI again because Napoleon is likely to win the initiative. It would make it very hard for the allies to attack and advance and win against a superior general like Napoleon... and its already pretty hard for them to do that with the current system. So on second thought, maybe I don't support this change because, while more realistic, it might be very unbalancing.


Correct. I posted the same on the Steam forum in a similar topic.


_____________________________


(in reply to EdinHouston)
Post #: 8
RE: Passing the Initiative - 3/29/2016 1:46:31 AM   
kendrick88

 

Posts: 7
Joined: 3/27/2016
Status: offline 		That is a fair point. I also recommend improving the odds of the allies winning initiative. It should be closer to 60/40. In my game, it has been more like 75/25. I'm often completely done and then the enemy gets to make 6 or 8 moves, which is a bit of a disadvantage for Napoleon really. You have to prepare for a huge amount of enemy action at the end of each round.

(in reply to Uncle_Joe)
Post #: 9
RE: Passing the Initiative - 3/29/2016 4:10:16 AM   
gdrover

 

Posts: 215
Joined: 12/4/2008
Status: offline 		Actually, winning the initiative is a big advantage. It means that you can disrupt, rout, force into square, or eliminate units that would otherwise have the ability to attack at full strength.

(in reply to kendrick88)
Post #: 10
RE: Passing the Initiative - 3/30/2016 12:58:27 AM   
kendrick88

 

Posts: 7
Joined: 3/27/2016
Status: offline 		Yes. Winning initiative is better than not winning it. But you get to a point where it feels like the pendulum swings the other way. Let's assume an absurd scenario where you win every initiative and you take all of your French actions at once. You would likely eliminate or rout a few enemy units and disrupt a few others. But after that, the enemy AI would take its entire turn all at once as well. While certainly diminished in capacity from your initial onslaught, the AI would have the luxury of taking many actions all at once. It would allow the enemy to focus multiple attacks on a single target. It could do that several times. The odds of routing or eliminating French troops would be much higher than if the AI had to sprinkle its moves throughout the turn and then had perhaps 3 or 4 actions at the end. While I have never been in this theoretical scenario, I have been in battles where the AI got 8 actions at once. It is far more devastating than turns where the AI wins initiative more often early on. I find that I would rather fight a general with a rating of 6 to 8 than a general with a rating of 3 to 5, for this reason. It provides more of a punch/counter-punch feel, with the French still seeing advantage.

(in reply to gdrover)
Post #: 11
RE: Passing the Initiative - 3/30/2016 6:09:34 PM   
EdinHouston

 

Posts: 100
Joined: 7/26/2008
Status: offline 		How about a system where you can only pass the initiative (say) twice before the enemy must take an action. That would help get rid of the situations where Napoleon is out of actions but the allies have almost all of theirs banked up.

(in reply to kendrick88)
Post #: 12
RE: Passing the Initiative - 4/1/2016 3:59:16 PM   
James Ward

 

Posts: 1183
Joined: 5/9/2000
From: Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Status: offline 		The passing of the initiative does seem weird to me too.
I thought passing meant you give the initiative to your opponent and they needed to then either act or pass. It doesn't seem to work like that. It seems like if you pass that ends the round and a new round begins.

(in reply to EdinHouston)
Post #: 13
RE: Passing the Initiative - 4/1/2016 5:50:56 PM   
Froz

 

Posts: 6
Joined: 3/31/2016
Status: offline 		I agree that the current mechanics are not the best, especially as it's so unclear how it works.

In my recent game I was fighting lvl 3 general with my lvl 5 general. I was defending. On the first turn, I passed my initiative up till it was 0, while enemy still had 10. Next turn, surprise, he got to move first! :D This was really wierd.

Bigger issue to me is something different though. It's true that usually when enemy has the end of one turn, you get the beginning of the next turn, so it kind of balances it out, except of one thing - disruption, especially of cavalry units. Cavalry that is attacking later in the turn is very often going to have more bonuses then the cavalry of the higher initiative side. That's because it will get bonus for attacking tired cavalry and possibly another bonus if the defending cavalry was disrupted. It doesn't work the other way around, as disruption is cancelled at the beginning of the turn - so enemy cavalry disrupted by attacking you have a high chance to get disruption cancelled before you can counterattack. This happens a lot, as cavalry has a bonus to cancel disruption at the start of turn. It often means that you either should not use your cavalry to attack or take high risk, that enemy will kill or at least route you after you made your attack.

In general I have to say I don't like how cancelling disruption works. Maybe it would be better if instead of once per turn for everyone, it would be some small chance after each action on the battlefield (with similar modifiers to the current ones). Alternatively it could work similarly to getting back routed units, but during the battle. Double click on disrupted unit and you use one action to try getting it back in shape. Of course there would have to be be more actions for both sides each turn available.

(in reply to James Ward)
Post #: 14
RE: Passing the Initiative - 4/6/2016 7:22:18 PM   
bobarossa

 

Posts: 262
Joined: 6/11/2002
From: Columbus, Ohio USA
Status: offline 		I'm on my second attempt at a campaign and I hate the pass intiative implementation. If I try to get the enemy to take a move, I usually have from 0 to 2 moves left before he moves. This basically allows him to move up to my troops without me being able to fire back at his tired units. If I move up to him, he always gets to shoot my tired troops. Having a big initiative bonus is more of a negative than a positive.

(in reply to Froz)
Post #: 15
RE: Passing the Initiative - 4/6/2016 9:44:44 PM   
Uncle_Joe


Posts: 1985
Joined: 8/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bobarossa

I'm on my second attempt at a campaign and I hate the pass intiative implementation. If I try to get the enemy to take a move, I usually have from 0 to 2 moves left before he moves. This basically allows him to move up to my troops without me being able to fire back at his tired units. If I move up to him, he always gets to shoot my tired troops. Having a big initiative bonus is more of a negative than a positive.


It may seem that, but try using one of your 4-rated leaders up against Wellington. Trust me, you won't enjoy having 4-5 enemy units activate the next turn before you even get up to bat. ;)

_____________________________


(in reply to bobarossa)
Post #: 16
RE: Passing the Initiative - 4/8/2016 2:19:02 AM   
gdrover

 

Posts: 215
Joined: 12/4/2008
Status: offline 		Yup.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Uncle_Joe



quote:

ORIGINAL: bobarossa

I'm on my second attempt at a campaign and I hate the pass intiative implementation. If I try to get the enemy to take a move, I usually have from 0 to 2 moves left before he moves. This basically allows him to move up to my troops without me being able to fire back at his tired units. If I move up to him, he always gets to shoot my tired troops. Having a big initiative bonus is more of a negative than a positive.


It may seem that, but try using one of your 4-rated leaders up against Wellington. Trust me, you won't enjoy having 4-5 enemy units activate the next turn before you even get up to bat. ;)

quote:

It may seem that, but try using one of your 4-rated leaders up against Wellington. Trust me, you won't enjoy having 4-5 enemy units activate the next turn before you even get up to bat. ;)


< Message edited by gdrover -- 4/8/2016 2:20:24 AM >

(in reply to Uncle_Joe)
Post #: 17
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Victory and Glory: Napoleon >> Passing the Initiative Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.703