Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Manila Falls

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Manila Falls Page: <<   < prev  36 37 [38] 39 40   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Manila Falls - 3/21/2016 7:29:01 PM   
Bif1961


Posts: 2014
Joined: 6/26/2008
From: Phenix City, Alabama
Status: offline 		Looks like snow on the ground Rangoon must be experiencing reverse global warming.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1111
RE: Manila Falls - 3/21/2016 7:31:13 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		The storytelling really is superb. Sometimes I'm reluctant to post as I don't want to interrupt the symmetry and flow of the AAR, cluttering it up with my comments. But if I know anything about writers (and probably any creator: musician, poet, artist, etc.), sincere compliments are much appreciated. Keep on keepin' on, Herbie.

(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 1112
RE: Manila Falls - 3/21/2016 9:00:56 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bif1961

Looks like snow on the ground Rangoon must be experiencing reverse global warming.



Shh! A new Japanese super weapon we are experiencing!

(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 1113
RE: Manila Falls - 3/21/2016 9:08:58 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

The storytelling really is superb. Sometimes I'm reluctant to post as I don't want to interrupt the symmetry and flow of the AAR, cluttering it up with my comments. But if I know anything about writers (and probably any creator: musician, poet, artist, etc.), sincere compliments are much appreciated. Keep on keepin' on, Herbie.


Wrong AAR post!

But I think those sentiments are mirrored by everyone reading that AAR!

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1114
RE: Manila Falls - 3/22/2016 6:04:19 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Allies enveloping Dacca. The addition of 18 75mm AA guns at Chittagong caused 1 2E bomber to be lost, and several damaged.




3.5K AV at Dacca, 500 to the eas, and 1.5K AV to th east east. Japanese bombers hit the middle stack with moderate results today.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 3/22/2016 6:13:52 PM >

(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 1115
RE: Manila Falls - 3/22/2016 6:29:16 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		I pulled back a lot of Iboats to refuel, rearm, repair.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1116
RE: Manila Falls - 3/24/2016 3:28:05 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Not the greatest of intercepts. I used two Chutai of Rufes (18 planes total). The pilots were 70 A2A skill, but half of them weren't very experienced.

Several messages of the Rufe's being unable to catch the bombers.

Damage was negligible from the bomber however.

Will force I hope the Allies to sweep.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1117
RE: Manila Falls - 3/24/2016 3:41:34 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Lost an Rboat to five hits from these ASW task forces. The other boats moved south to investigate the heavy radio signals intercept from yesterday and are rewarded with 10/10, 10/10 and 6/6 DL.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1118
RE: Manila Falls - 3/25/2016 4:15:06 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Allied troops always move faster than you think.

Here they stop some trains with loaded troops. My bad, I thought I had at least one more day.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 1119
RE: Manila Falls - 3/25/2016 5:52:15 PM   
Olorin


Posts: 1019
Joined: 4/22/2008
From: Greece
Status: offline 		Lowpe,
There was a debate in my AAR about x60 versus x30 R&D factories. I was claiming the x60 factories were repairing at the same rate and giving 2% daily bonus once repaired. Was I correct?

< Message edited by Olorin -- 3/25/2016 5:53:15 PM >

_____________________________

"Drang nach Osten"
--A TOAWIII AAR--

(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 1120
RE: Manila Falls - 3/25/2016 5:56:25 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Olorin

Lowpe,
There was a debate in my AAR about x60 versus x30 R&D factories. I was claiming the x60 factories were repairing at the same rate and giving 2% daily bonus once repaired. Was I correct?


Olorin,

Nope, not once has a size 60 r&d facility repaired more than 1 point, or 2 points with the engine bonus.

Sad, but true. Also, I am not sure that they repair equally, it seems size 30 repair a little faster too.

(in reply to Olorin)
Post #: 1121
RE: Manila Falls - 3/25/2016 6:00:02 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: Olorin

Lowpe,
There was a debate in my AAR about x60 versus x30 R&D factories. I was claiming the x60 factories were repairing at the same rate and giving 2% daily bonus once repaired. Was I correct?


Olorin,

Nope, not once has a size 60 r&d facility repaired more than 1 point, or 2 points with the engine bonus.

Sad, but true. Also, I am not sure that they repair equally, it seems size 30 repair a little faster too.


They repair equally fast, in terms of proportion. The formula for rate of repair is public. You can find it...somewhere. I think maybe even in the manual. A size 60 will repair to 60 at the same rate as a size 30 will repair to 30. Obviously there is variation, so this is only exactly true for a large enough sample size.

But no - they only provide 1 point per day. The only reason to have a larger factory is if you are going to switch it to production and want it to be producing more than 30 per month when it switches. I can think of several airframes where this is the case.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1122
RE: Manila Falls - 3/25/2016 6:22:19 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: Olorin

Lowpe,
There was a debate in my AAR about x60 versus x30 R&D factories. I was claiming the x60 factories were repairing at the same rate and giving 2% daily bonus once repaired. Was I correct?


Olorin,

Nope, not once has a size 60 r&d facility repaired more than 1 point, or 2 points with the engine bonus.

Sad, but true. Also, I am not sure that they repair equally, it seems size 30 repair a little faster too.


They repair equally fast, in terms of proportion. The formula for rate of repair is public. You can find it...somewhere. I think maybe even in the manual. A size 60 will repair to 60 at the same rate as a size 30 will repair to 30. Obviously there is variation, so this is only exactly true for a large enough sample size.

But no - they only provide 1 point per day. The only reason to have a larger factory is if you are going to switch it to production and want it to be producing more than 30 per month when it switches. I can think of several airframes where this is the case.


Yep, you are correct as far as I know.

Just pointing out the ancedotal evidence I have witnessed here.

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 1123
RE: Manila Falls - 3/25/2016 6:24:27 PM   
Olorin


Posts: 1019
Joined: 4/22/2008
From: Greece
Status: offline 		I see. I could swear I was consistenly seeing a 2% gain in my previous games, but I must be mistaken.

_____________________________

"Drang nach Osten"
--A TOAWIII AAR--

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 1124
RE: Manila Falls - 3/25/2016 6:35:51 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Olorin

I see. I could swear I was consistenly seeing a 2% gain in my previous games, but I must be mistaken.


Probably a patch? Maybe? Maybe it works that way in realistic r&d off?

(in reply to Olorin)
Post #: 1125
RE: Manila Falls - 3/25/2016 9:04:25 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: Olorin

I see. I could swear I was consistenly seeing a 2% gain in my previous games, but I must be mistaken.


Probably a patch? Maybe? Maybe it works that way in realistic r&d off?


Sure doesn't.

2% per day would mean engine bonus.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1126
RE: Manila Falls - 3/26/2016 2:12:02 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		2nd Week of October, 1942

I made a mistake last turn, with not stopping training some units, and they pay the price today.

This day's mistake is not moving a sighted sub, and losing one.

But, we are moving forward with our date of destiny.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 1127
RE: Manila Falls - 3/26/2016 2:12:29 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Lots of Allied shipping.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1128
RE: Manila Falls - 3/26/2016 2:13:18 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		A wonderfully designed SAG for the Allies. At least I think so, as I didn't double check the destroyers.






Allies have moved another 4E squadron here, and my attempt at getting him to sweep because of the Rufes, failed. He bombed anyway.



Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 3/26/2016 2:32:18 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1129
RE: Manila Falls - 3/26/2016 2:15:01 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		I get to take my time with the turn, since Jocke can't flip a turn until after Easter. I hope to put the time to good use, but family might beckon too much.

Happy Easter btw!


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1130
RE: Manila Falls - 3/26/2016 2:27:31 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Pacific Northwest




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 1131
RE: Manila Falls - 3/26/2016 3:40:54 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		I fully expect a battleship bombardment of Chittagong tonight. Moonlight is 3%.

So, to try and create some "friction," to steal a term from another AAR, I am dropping two (2) fields of 40 Type 88 mines bringing the total to just shy of 300 total mines at Chittagong. These subs have been sitting for days awaiting a ripe opportunity.

The Type 88 is a very potent mine and Iboat dropped.

Then to add to the mix, I have maxed night naval search over Chittagong and restricted it to Chittagong hoping to get some good detection on the bombarding forces.

In addition, I set yesterday 45 Betties to night naval attack. So tonight they should be ready to fly.

And, I am sweeping Diamond Harbor with 40 A6M5s hoping to catch Allied bleeding CAP -- perhaps from his carriers or from Calcutta.

I have dispatched a sub to Diamond Harbor to rescue pilots. Hopefully they won't blow up on a mine or get nailed by ASW.

I have put another group of Betties at a 20,000 foot torpedo attack with lots of escorts and a range just shy of Calcutta and the uber CAP there.

And finally, this very small squadron of 2 destroyers (very nice surface destroyers) will run into Chittagong. I like using very small squadrons, and this will be a good use of the tactic (I would prefer a third destroyer).

I wish I could add some midget subs and mtbs to the mix...but can't yet.

I am hoping several things. That perhaps a mine hits a battleship, the ships are spotted at Chittagong and suffer a night torpedo attack by the destroyers, and then an aerial attack, followed on by being finished off during the morning by a daytime attack as they don't retreat far and the sweeping Zeroes divert some LRCAP.

It is a lot to ask, and probably nothing will happen, but these kind of combined holistic attacks are bread and butter to me.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 3/26/2016 3:43:41 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1132
RE: Manila Falls - 3/26/2016 5:09:50 PM   
Alfred

 

Posts: 6685
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline 		If you have a high confidence level on the data shown in post #1131, it is going to be very tough to achieve anything worthwhile in Oregon and Washington.  OTOH Prince Rupert is not heavily garrisoned.

Which makes one return to the issue of how to set up your maskirovka.  After all, leaving it so late in the campaigning season the West Coat operation is very much dependent on a good maskirovka.

Terrace and Prince George are usually not well garrisoned.  They can be very vulnerable to a para coup de main.  That would both set up good road blocks and allow for strategic movement from Prince Rupert to make the threat of moving on the big Canadian industrial centres before USA reinforcements arrive a credible threat.

Therefore with the low garrison displayed, an initial landing at Prince Rupert, supported by your surrounding airfields and the long distance from Allied airfields which can support Allied fighters, could tempt your opponent to move his reserves north into Canada.  You of course would be landing with the minimum of force necessary to secure Prince Rupert (naturally with a buffer to cover the fort levels there) but your main invasion force would be of shore to land and drive on the real targets in America.  With luck those real targets will be weakened by either having part of their garrisons moved to defeat your "silly" move on Prince Rupert or the reserves earmarked for their reinforcement instead moved up north.

Alfred

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1133
RE: Manila Falls - 3/27/2016 12:58:02 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Alfred

If you have a high confidence level on the data shown in post #1131, it is going to be very tough to achieve anything worthwhile in Oregon and Washington.  OTOH Prince Rupert is not heavily garrisoned.

Which makes one return to the issue of how to set up your maskirovka.  After all, leaving it so late in the campaigning season the West Coat operation is very much dependent on a good maskirovka.

Terrace and Prince George are usually not well garrisoned.  They can be very vulnerable to a para coup de main.  That would both set up good road blocks and allow for strategic movement from Prince Rupert to make the threat of moving on the big Canadian industrial centres before USA reinforcements arrive a credible threat.

Therefore with the low garrison displayed, an initial landing at Prince Rupert, supported by your surrounding airfields and the long distance from Allied airfields which can support Allied fighters, could tempt your opponent to move his reserves north into Canada.  You of course would be landing with the minimum of force necessary to secure Prince Rupert (naturally with a buffer to cover the fort levels there) but your main invasion force would be of shore to land and drive on the real targets in America.  With luck those real targets will be weakened by either having part of their garrisons moved to defeat your "silly" move on Prince Rupert or the reserves earmarked for their reinforcement instead moved up north.

Alfred


We are so on the same page here.

(in reply to Alfred)
Post #: 1134
RE: Manila Falls - 3/27/2016 1:03:49 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Jocke is back unexpectedly early, and I just finished the turn prior to Easter Egg hunts and Celebrations. Well, not much chance of hunts when your kids are grown, but a nice family gathering later and service.

I am interested to see if I predicated the bombardment of Chittagong correctly, and what all my various actions will do.

I am also taking some actions out at the New Hebrides, really designed as nothing more than skirmishing and distraction from the west coast.

Finally, I am preparing for the Indian campaign to morph into the Burma Campaign. More on this later.

Plus of course, the west coast invasion continues to be planned, reconned, prepared, and deceived for.


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1135
RE: Manila Falls - 3/27/2016 4:23:27 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		This intel gives me great hope for the West Coast invasion.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 1136
RE: Manila Falls - 3/27/2016 4:25:04 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Really quiet day...

no bombardment of Chittagong, but the Allies are getting into position to do so.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1137
RE: Manila Falls - 3/27/2016 5:28:28 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Ok,in the New Hebrides,I am trying a new (& dare I say risky) surface action group designed to take on the Boise Task force powerhouse.

Not sure how it will work out, here is hoping for the best.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1138
RE: Manila Falls - 3/27/2016 5:29:05 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline 		...is Coos Bay really empty?

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1139
RE: Manila Falls - 3/27/2016 5:34:39 PM   
Encircled


Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline 		I'm very impressed that you are still going ahead with this plan!

_____________________________


(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 1140
Page:   <<   < prev  36 37 [38] 39 40   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Manila Falls Page: <<   < prev  36 37 [38] 39 40   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.719