Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent Page: <<   < prev  182 183 [184] 185 186   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/12/2016 6:54:08 PM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline
Maybe not overlooking it as simply accepting it because nothing is going to change it.

_____________________________


(in reply to Alfred)
Post #: 5491
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/12/2016 7:04:00 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alfred

Everyone just thinks rebuilding those destroyed units at Sabang is going to be relatively easy and not impact on the staying power of other units deployed elsewhere.  You are all overlooking a major point.

The reason why players say they have no problems with American land pools, and only some inconvenience with other nationalities, is entirely due to the fact that obsolete squads returned to the pools will eventually convert to the current squad type.  That is not the case here.  Allied players do not lose 7 divs completely in mid 1943.  Those destroyed units are not returning squads to the pool to be converted.

Look at the pool screenshot.  There is only enough 1943 USA squads to fill out a single destroyed USA div.  The monthly production rate is only 80 squads.  That covers a daily destroyed rate of 3 only.

Heavy land combat will see a great deal of pressure on the pools, not now or 1-2 months, but 3+ months out.

Alfred

Alfred, I agree with your larger point but not about obsolete devices converting being the major factor. They do convert, but it takes a while to start and the rate slow. Every little bit helps, but I think the real reason that most people say they have no problems with American land pools is that their losses of squads are well within the replacement rate. Once the various units' upgrades get straightened out that is usually the case with Australian squads, too. But British and Indian squads are a different matter. The British have a paltry squad replacement rate compared to any heavy losses. The Indians have a good (and increasing) squad replacement rate but the expansion of the army stresses that even with very modest combat losses.

The loss or nerfing of a British division is a permanent cost of the Sabang op, as is the reduction of either the number of Indian units or of the strength of a number of them. Careful handling of the replacement and rebuilding process can mitigate that to some degree. Maybe some Indian units that still have a significant number of British squads can be disbanded to bolster the British rebuilding effort?

_____________________________


(in reply to Alfred)
Post #: 5492
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/12/2016 7:27:31 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
I know that Alfred. That's why I contemplated rebuilding 1st Marine Div. and one US Army Div. I won't rebuild 18th UK (at least, not anytime soon). I will rebuild the Indian division.

I'm not poo-pooing the loss of 7+ divisions. I've said before it's a historic defeat, especially this late in the game.

What I have said is that it won't effect my offensive plans the balance of 1943. I have enough divisions to do what I plan to do this year. And what I said long ago is probably on target: The Allies won't have enough to conquer everything, but I still have enough to beat Japan (if played well).

(in reply to Alfred)
Post #: 5493
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/12/2016 7:42:06 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
7/13/43

Operation Roller Coaster: No enemy sub attacks or air attacks today. No sign (yet) of KB, though John's patrols picked up many of my picket ships and an IJN DD force eliminate four of them (one xAKL, three YMS).

The reinforcing landings at Maloelap went well, but the attack unaccountable achieved very low odds. The Allies have about 100 AV ashore facing about 5 AV behind one fort but can't punch through. Prep and supply is decent. I'll rest my guys a few days and try again. I don't think there's an organic problem here, but it could become serious if KB arrives and John decides to reinforce. I don't want an enemy base on the east side of the new Allied bases.

The departure from the Marshalls goes very well, for the most part. No contact with subs and many TFs have already arrived at Pearl with 80% of the others substantially on the way. One large supply TF declined to leave Mili. I checked and double-checked each TF to make sure they had "stop unloading" orders, but I nevertheless missed this one (I think). It'll leave tonight, along with the amphib TF that just landed the reinforcements at Maloelap. The carriers and a few combat TFs will also move east. That will leave three xAK and an AM at Jaluit. They're hung out, but I want as much of the supply as possible.

All repair work is done at Tarawa, so fort building begins.

It will be interesting to see what John's plans are in this region. What will he do in the absence of major Allied shipping (assuming the Allied departure is indeed successful before KB arrives)? Lots of Allied ships will be concentrating at Pearl. Alabama and Mobile and a handful of Fletchers are en route to Balboa where the two Essex class arrive over the next three days. CVL Princeton arrives at San Fran in a week or less. But I'm going to take the chance to upgrade all ships while they're at Pearl Harbor. One USN CV is due the 10/42 upgrade. Many DDs are due various '43 upgrades. In a month, though, the US Navy (augmented by a few RN ships) will be ready to move and to meet Steroid KB.

Operation Circus: A quiet day up here too. No sign of Half KB North, which is probably around Wake or Marcus by now. Transports, mostly barges, pulled 41st Div. from Cold Bay to Kodiak, which is overloaded. That unit will go to Anchorage. It's prepping for Buldir Island. Garrison duty at Cold Bay was assumed by a US RCT. This unit retired from Cold Bay in the spring of '42 after defeat in battle. Thereafter, transport aircraft kept it in supply in a marsh hex two hexes NE. It returned to Cold Bay recently and is rebuilt to 125 AV, sufficient to handle the defensive duty behind good forts.

Elsewhere: Several IJA divisions are still attending to the remnant support units in Sumatra. I'm attending to repostioning and fine-tuning defenses in Oz, India, Assam and China.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5494
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/12/2016 7:42:52 PM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

I know that Alfred. That's why I contemplated rebuilding 1st Marine Div. and one US Army Div. I won't rebuild 18th UK (at least, not anytime soon). I will rebuild the Indian division.

I'm not poo-pooing the loss of 7+ divisions. I've said before it's a historic defeat, especially this late in the game.

What I have said is that it won't effect my offensive plans the balance of 1943. I have enough divisions to do what I plan to do this year. And what I said long ago is probably on target: The Allies won't have enough to conquer everything, but I still have enough to beat Japan (if played well).


If you keep him chasing bones he will Banzai himself into economy collapse before 1945. Plenty of time to win even before the historical date.

_____________________________


(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5495
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/12/2016 8:55:58 PM   
poodlebrain

 

Posts: 392
Joined: 10/4/2012
From: Comfy Chair in Baton Rouge
Status: offline
quote:

Several IJA divisions are still attending to the remnant support units in Sumatra.
In the making lemonade from lemons department you can add the fuel costs of transporting and escorting the all freed up Japanese LCUs from Sumatra to wherever your opponent sends them. Your subs should have adequate time to take up stations covering the egress from Sumatra and destinations revealed by SIGINT.

Another potential method you can attack the shipping used to extract the forces from Sumatra is to send the Death Star on a raid west of Sabang and try a hit and run strike against transport shipping in or around Sabang. Your opponent may not leave adequate air strength to defend against a Death Star with over 800 of the latest aircraft with experienced pilots.

_____________________________

Never trust a man who's ass is wider than his shoulders.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5496
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/13/2016 1:13:02 AM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
7/14/43

Operation Roller Coaster: The separation process continues without major incident. No signs of enemy carriers yet, though John picked off three more picket ships today (two via DD TF and one via Judys at Marcus Island). A sub picked of badly damaged xAP Dunbarton. All other ships continue to steam due east. Many ships have already reached Pearl or are nearing.

CV Kettle Creek arrived at Balboa today. She's named for a Revolutionary War battle in northeast Georgia, February 14, 1779.

Operation Circus: No major altercations today. John is reconning Umnak Island. He's probably trying to get a feel for how strongly these islands are garrisoned. Soon the Allies will reassert themselves - placing combat ships at Adak Island, which will also take stout fighter and bomber squadrons.

Battle of Sumatra: A remnant of Allied units still survives in the jungle west of Sabang. A sub (O-20, I think) picks off a 19-point AKE.

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 4/13/2016 1:14:53 AM >

(in reply to poodlebrain)
Post #: 5497
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/13/2016 12:45:37 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
7/15/43

Roller Coaster: No sign of KB. Separation from the Marshalls and retirement to Pearl Harbor continues to go well. An IJ sub badly damaged an xAK, and took heavy damage in return. That was the only item of molestation on the day. Seven APA and 2 LSI(L) have reached Pearl. Eighteen/six are still en route. One of those APA is heavily damaged. The USN capital ships that suffered single torp hits (two fast BB, one CA, one RN BB) will begin reaching Pearl tomorrow. The American carrier TFs will arrive in three or four days.

I don't yet know if Steroid KB will make an appearance here since the Allied fleet has retired. IT depends on if and how John envisions a counterattack. SigInt report as xAKL inbound to Abmemama, the dot hex with big potential just three hexes south of Tarawa. I've shifted some good fighters and an SBD squadron to Tarawa to watch for that move. This is the kind of sign that John intends to work his defenses forward and actively.

Shock attack ordered for Maloelap tomorrow, where the IJ garrison has been working a powerful Mojo.

Circus: No sign of enemy carriers in the Aleuts and no bombardment missions by enemy capital ships. SigInt that 10th Div., recently in Sumatra, is prepping for Adak. That base has 600+ AV and will go to four forts the turn after all the bombardment damage is repaired. I'd like to see John take it on, but when the time comes that he has to make the decision, he'll opt out. Dutch Harbor garrison down to 40k.

Elsewhere: I have guesses and hunches where John will go next, but I'm not seeing any true indicators yet. The longest-lasting indicators of interest are reconnaissance missions in China.

I'm confident (but not positive) that John will keep KB in the Pacific to face and guard against Death Star. But what if he did pull it into the IO to cover an invasion of Ceylon or India or Oz? Unlikely, but if he did so the Allies would react by moving strongly on Kusaie, Ponape and the western Aleutians. Big land units are now well prepped for multiple targets in CenPac and NoPac. These moves wouldn't be daggers in the heart of Japan, but they would eliminate strong lodgements in what is now John's outer line of defenses. I don't think he'll withdraw KB with that possibility on the table.




(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5498
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/13/2016 2:32:08 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alfred

Everyone just thinks rebuilding those destroyed units at Sabang is going to be relatively easy and not impact on the staying power of other units deployed elsewhere.  You are all overlooking a major point.

The reason why players say they have no problems with American land pools, and only some inconvenience with other nationalities, is entirely due to the fact that obsolete squads returned to the pools will eventually convert to the current squad type.  That is not the case here.  Allied players do not lose 7 divs completely in mid 1943.  Those destroyed units are not returning squads to the pool to be converted.

Look at the pool screenshot.  There is only enough 1943 USA squads to fill out a single destroyed USA div.  The monthly production rate is only 80 squads.  That covers a daily destroyed rate of 3 only.

Heavy land combat will see a great deal of pressure on the pools, not now or 1-2 months, but 3+ months out.

Alfred



Never said it would be easy but doable with some effort. The loss of seven division is the loss of seven divisions and the squads have to come from somewhere. As I said, the British unit will probably never be rebuilt. The Indian unit is easy by simply breaking down a few of the many independent Indian brigades on the map. One marine division is fairly easy. The many US infantry divisions will take some time and planning. As said it will probably involve him breaking up a few independent US regiments.

The point is and Dan has said it as well is that the Allies eventually have more units than are necessary to win the war. In my last full campaign, there were late arriving units that I simply could not use or need. And, as Allied fire power eventually becomes overpowering, Allied casualties begin to take a dramatic drop as the war progresses.

You are right in that it is a fine edge. Dan is a risk taker and likes to put units in harms way. At this point he has no room to spare and another large loss will mean that he will be fighting with a lot of units under strength. However, if done correctly, the losses at Sabang are manageable.

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to Alfred)
Post #: 5499
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/13/2016 2:34:23 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
If he didn't see which way your carriers went when they retired, he might think he needs KB to cover any IO operation - but if he got a DL from naval search or a sub that your carriers were going back to PH he will keep KB together in CentPac.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5500
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/13/2016 3:57:30 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
To follow up on crsutton's point, I do have to guard against inefficient losses of western ground troops. That was one of the big concerns about invading Hokkaido.

John's going to have a hard time getting at any major American units in the foreseeable future. Those that are at or close to the front are garrisoning strongly held islands (like Adak and Umnak). The three big Aussie divisions of 1st Corps are likewise well entrenched.

He can and probably will go after Indian and British units in Assam. That's my best guess. Alllied air power and the defensive positions are such that (I think) I'd welcome a chance to fight John there in a defensive campaign.

John's going to create a major bulge in my lines somewhere (Oz, India or China), but I think I'm ready to fight a productive defensive war in those place while on the offensive in the Pacific.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 5501
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/13/2016 3:58:10 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

If he didn't see which way your carriers went when they retired, he might think he needs KB to cover any IO operation - but if he got a DL from naval search or a sub that your carriers were going back to PH he will keep KB together in CentPac.


John saw which way they were going. Even if he hadn't, he'd not have much doubt.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 5502
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/13/2016 4:02:17 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
In three weeks, I think Death Star transitions from avoiding KB to seeking a decisive battle. With that in mind, I'm planning carrier TF configurations something like this:

1. Enterprise, Yorktown, CVL Brandywine
2. Saratoga, Lexington, CVL Independence
3. Hornet, Essex, Wasp
4. Kettle Creek (Essex Class), Olustee (Essex Class), CVL Princeton

I also have CV Victorious (55 aircraft capacity). Can she join any of those four TFs without invoking coordination penalties due to too much air?

For that matter, does anybody see any problems with TF arrangements like this? I could spread them out a bit more, but escorts then become problematic, as I have to devote so many to carrier TFs that I'd be short on combat TFs.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5503
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/13/2016 4:17:54 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
In three weeks, Death Star will be ready to set sail from Pearl Harbor with more than 1,100 aircraft (including CVE compliments). I think that's sufficient to take on Steroid KB on neutral ground or ground that favors the Allies. I think there is such ground available given John's preference to react aggressively and defend forward.

Until now, Death Star was at a disadvantage. I was willing to move only if I achieved surprise and local carrier superiority. For a variety of reasons, the Allies achieved those conditions in the Aleutians and CenPac.

Death Star is no longer at a disadvantage. That doesn't mean that it's impervious, can't lose in battle, or won't blunder into a tough wolf pack. What id does mean is that I don't have to wait to achieve surprise or until I think a Half KB is upgrading. Death Star will be ready to move forward and seek battle. It will allow the Allies to move in the near term or Roi-Namur/Kwajalein and/or Amchitka.

That's why Circus and Roller Coaster were so important. Instead of having to steam into enemy controlled waters to take on a strong set of interlocking airfields guarding bases that John has had more than a year to fortify, the Allies have already done those things successfully. Now the Allies have a strong set of interlocking arifields guarding bases adjacent to John's bases. I might not win the pending battles, but the chances are much better than before. And friendly waters with good bases and CAP are right there if needed.

The question is how does John perceive this? We know he's always aggressive. We've all seen him react strongly to both Allied operations in the Pacific. Does he feel that time is against Steroid KB, so that he'd rather seek Decisive Battle now, before the Allies grow even stronger? Or does he instead conserve KB, loitering on the periphery and seeking a chance to strike?

I think he'll choose the latter course of action.

But the time in which the Allies would also loiter, so that both sides would dance about afraid to commit, has ended. Now it's a matter of preparation, massing force, and moving forward.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5504
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/13/2016 4:32:38 PM   
BillBrown


Posts: 2335
Joined: 6/15/2002
Status: offline
Keep in mind that there is no actual coordination penalty, but if a TF fails the check the chance of uncoordination is doubled.
In other words, failing the check does not mean you will have uncoordinated strikes, but the possibility is doubled. I have found that
having a TF leader with high air rating, and very good air unit commanders mitigates the possibility quite well.
I tend to use larger TFs than you are showing, 4 x CVs and 1 or 2 CVLs in each when I have them.

< Message edited by BillBrown -- 4/13/2016 4:34:14 PM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5505
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/13/2016 4:40:42 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Thanks, Bill. Those are good thoughts on the subject.

(in reply to BillBrown)
Post #: 5506
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/13/2016 5:48:06 PM   
Lecivius


Posts: 4845
Joined: 8/5/2007
From: Denver
Status: offline
I personally use 3 CV's and 1 CVL per group. I may just be lucky, but '43 forward I have never had much of an issue. Just my .02

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5507
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/13/2016 7:20:01 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Thanks. That would free up some escorts. :)

(in reply to Lecivius)
Post #: 5508
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/13/2016 7:32:41 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
What do I think John should do now? Another way of putting this is: What tactics would worry me the most?

I believe John will use his "Sumatra Recovered" dividend to pour troops into Burma and southern China. He'll move overland into Assam in an effort to sever the Allied troops at and near Akyab, Sabang and Ramree Island from India proper. He'll also move into China from Burma. At the same time, he'll resume offensive operations in main China - here I'm thyinking he'll take hard looks at two vectors: Toyun and Sian.

In the Pacific, he'll work to garrison and defend islands while looking for opportunities to strike advantageously with his carriers and combat ships. I don't think he should push his reinforcements right to the Allied doorstep to contest those places, but I think he will because of his competitive nature. He's not desperate enough to risk KB against uncertain or bad odds, so I think he'll loiter and probe and await opportunities.

Since India, Assam and China have been quiet sectors for more than a year, Allied troops are dug in (though I've found that some shifting around is necessary). In India and Assam, I'm moving a few units to strengthen the garrisons at Cox's Bazaar and Chittagong against any amphibious op designed to really isolate Assam. I don't think such a move is likely, but it's possible. Here the Allied airforce is pretty strong now. What I want to do (here and in China) is to allow John to move on entrenched troops, which should be somewhat costly for him. Then, whenever and wherever his stacks enter Allied bases, Allied 4EB (protected by fighters) will strike.

In the Pacific, the plan is to try to use blunt force to strike hard at enemy held bases close to Allied bases. This means Roi-Namur, Kwajalein, and Amchitka are on the short list. Once those fall, Eniwetok, Kusaie, and the western Aleutians are viable. And there are neuatral waters (unprotected by intelocking airfields) that I'm willining to hit: Wake in particular, but eventually Marcus. Tabituea is a possibility, but at this moment I prefer to let John worry about bases like Taby and Lunga and Noumea, expending energy to either reinforce them or withdraw their garrisons.

That's alot of things on agenda, which is why I say the Allies have sufficient ground troops to handle things for the balance of the year.

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 4/13/2016 7:35:17 PM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5509
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/13/2016 7:47:08 PM   
jwolf

 

Posts: 2493
Joined: 12/3/2013
Status: offline
I suppose it's possible the Japanese could make some progress in a major ground campaign in India or China -- but it would take a very long time to do so, committing a large number of ground and air forces to make it work. Meanwhile, those forces would not be available in the Pacific, and that IMHO is where the war will be decided.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5510
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/13/2016 8:27:30 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BillBrown

Keep in mind that there is no actual coordination penalty, but if a TF fails the check the chance of uncoordination is doubled.
In other words, failing the check does not mean you will have uncoordinated strikes, but the possibility is doubled. I have found that
having a TF leader with high air rating, and very good air unit commanders mitigates the possibility quite well.
I tend to use larger TFs than you are showing, 4 x CVs and 1 or 2 CVLs in each when I have them.


Agree with Bill, I never split my six original carriers but keep them together. The reason is that I think the risk of lack of coordination is small. I much more fear one TF reacting towards the enemy and getting crushed. When I have more carriers I go for three to four big and two small in each TF-depending on the number of fast BBs I have as I like to have at least one in each TF.


< Message edited by crsutton -- 4/13/2016 8:40:20 PM >


_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to BillBrown)
Post #: 5511
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/13/2016 8:40:47 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
That's interesting. I've kept my carriers in two-CV TFs throughout the war. We haven't had any carrier battles, though we came close a couple of times.

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 5512
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/13/2016 9:36:48 PM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline
What they said. I like to go with 3-4 fleet CV's in a group.

If the chance of disruption is 5% and it doubles to 10% it really is not that big a factor. Unfortunately, notbody including the Dev's is going to disclose the exact chance of disruption.



_____________________________


(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5513
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/13/2016 9:37:01 PM   
JeffroK


Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline
In 1943, 3 CV * 1 CVL.

Have your new bases got mines, ACM & CD guns, any other lessons from Sabang to avoid the "Isolate & cut out" approach?

_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5514
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/13/2016 9:47:24 PM   
poodlebrain

 

Posts: 392
Joined: 10/4/2012
From: Comfy Chair in Baton Rouge
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffK

In 1943, 3 CV * 1 CVL.

Have your new bases got mines, ACM & CD guns, any other lessons from Sabang to avoid the "Isolate & cut out" approach?
Don't forget the PT Boats. They are useful even if they do nothing more than cause the Japanese to use some OPs when trying to conduct bombardment missions.


_____________________________

Never trust a man who's ass is wider than his shoulders.

(in reply to JeffroK)
Post #: 5515
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/13/2016 11:12:02 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Tarawa, Jaluit and Dutch Harbor have CD guns. None of the bases have mines yet, though minelayers are lurking.

But the fate of Sabang had nothing to do with mines, ACM and CD guns. It had 900+ mines and three ACM. Those didn't stop bombardments, which were the undoing of Sabang. CD guns wouldn't aided there, either. Nor would they have helped stop an invasion of Sabang or Langsa, because John didn't invade. He had ports of his own and marched overland.

CD guns and mines wouldn't play a big role in the coming campaigns either. I'm not overly impressed with the effect of guns against BBs, and John knows how to use BBs. What's going to stop John here is that these are islands, he doesn't have the option of landing at another base and marching overland, and the Allied have stout infantry garrisons and plenty of supply at these bases. I don't see John trying, but if he did, the Allies can respond in strength (both in air and sea, unlike the Sumatran campaign, which was early). Also, the Allies have interlocking airfields.

No, this is not a later version of Sumatra.

(in reply to poodlebrain)
Post #: 5516
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/14/2016 1:41:17 AM   
BillBrown


Posts: 2335
Joined: 6/15/2002
Status: offline
The one thing that CD units at Sabang would have done is to fire on the minesweepers John sent in. It would have made it slower and costlier.

< Message edited by BillBrown -- 4/14/2016 1:42:26 AM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5517
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/14/2016 3:17:35 AM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Roller Coaster conquests, with TFs returning to Pearl.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to BillBrown)
Post #: 5518
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/14/2016 3:18:16 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline
You have enough bases that you will hold air superiority once the fields are built up. Maleolap and the rest of the bases are doomed or will be neutralized. Islands are the toughest for the Japanese to defend because their first line fighters are not suited to the fields. Level 3 service makes them too vulnerable.

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5519
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/14/2016 4:32:22 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
7/16/43

Roller Coaster: Maloelap fell today on a 2:1 shock attack (the defenders there had some kind of mojo or moxie or something). The operation is winding down now - all eight primary targets have been secured, the Allied position is strong, and all ships have broken contact and are well en route to Pearl Harbor or already there.

Enemy subs are still lurking, and plenty of Allied ships are still at sea, so there may be additional losses. In particular, I have my eye on two damaged APA (one heavily, one moderately), hoping that they can limp home safely. Four Allied capital ships were damaged by single torp hits: CA Indianapolis is in the yards at Pearl and needs about 27 days to repair; BB South Dakota is too, and needs 90+ days. Washington will arrive in a few days and shouldn't need a great deal of time; BB Resolution suffered moderate damage and will probably require something on the order of SD's work.

This op was not without cost: I lost CA Portland, an APA, two AO, and two DE. Those were the most costly losses and will be missed the most. There were also a modest number of xAP, xAK, and other small craft. I did not lose any men or aircraft to speak of.

In return, the Allies took eight enemy bases, including three or four with shore guns (Jaluit, Wotje, Mili, and I think Ailinglaplap or Maloelap had them). The garrisons were not particularly strong - Tarawa with two naval guard units was the stiffest. Altogether, John might have lost 20k men. He only lost a couple of small craft and I think five or six subs suffered heavy damage.

John's greatest cost was in aircraft - he lost 500+, mainly Zeroes, Judys, Jills, Kates and Netties. The Allies lost less than 50 - maybe considerably less (and most of those to ops).

To my way of thinking, the Allies successfully and at an most acceptable investment made the important opening leap across open water to encroach upon John's defensive perimeter. I now have a strongly held position close to additional important enemy bases. This opens up good possibilities for future attacks that don't require moving deep into enemy territory. The Allies also have multiple vectors of attack avaialbe - south towards the Solomons and adjacent territory, west towards Ponape and Truk, or northwest to Wake and Marcus. The closer targets - Kawj, Roi, Eniwetok and Kusaie - will be hit, probably relatively soon.

Ross made the point that the Marshalls and Gilberts are not intrinisically vital ground. But they can be. First, any terrrain anywhere can become critical if one or both sides deem it so. In this case, if John is willing to fight hard over his remaining Marshalls holdings, the terrain is de facto critical. I think he will, but he may also pull back, in which case the Allies move forward in small steps until eventually John does fight. That's a viable path to victory, I think.

Importantly, Roller Coaster served me well because it worked so well in tandem with Circus. I was able to move rapidly from one theater to the next (Circus landings began in late May, Roller Coaster in late June) before John could bring his battewagons to bear (they were still committed in Sumatra). And I was fortunate that I knew the exact location of Half KB North throughout the campaign and had a strong (and I think accurate) idea that the other Half KB was in port upgrading. Roller Coaster would not have gone forward into the unknown. Instead, I would have waited another eight weeks, when Death Star would have been ready to take on the unknown.

Now, instead of leading a big amphibious op into a nest of enemy held islands, Death Star will lead a big amphibious op into a concentration of friendly islands to pick off vulnerable (though dangerous) enemy bases. The difference in risk level is enormous.

So, yes, Roller Coaster has been remarkably successful.

Circus: Unless John bombards Adak tonight, forts will go to level four. The Allies are about ready to insert the Fletcher TF there and then to re-load the airfield to resume working on Amchitka Island (whcih has been reinforced). At the moment, I'm leaning towards returning to the Marshalls prior to moving on Amchitka, but I'm not positive.

Dutch Harbor garrison down to 38k. I'm pulling out one USN base force and I'll pull out a few more AA units, and then Dutch can stand on its own without overstacking worries. The port is currently at 4.54. It will be built to six (with an AE and Naval Support, that should be sufficient for replenishing even BB main guns). Then I'll build the 0(0) airfield to level one.

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 4/14/2016 4:37:39 PM >

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 5520
Page:   <<   < prev  182 183 [184] 185 186   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent Page: <<   < prev  182 183 [184] 185 186   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.094