Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Manila Falls

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Manila Falls Page: <<   < prev  46 47 [48] 49 50   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 3:59:46 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe






Are those fishing boats?



Is that satire!

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 1411
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 4:03:07 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alfred


When you are confident of similar route paths, you could time a drop off from a single sub of mines. Although the minefield will quickly degrade (hence the importance of timing) it is almost certain the minefield will be totally unknown and thus the enemy will move right into it.

Alfred


I am trying that in Chittagong right now, in fact all my great, but slow, Iboat minelayers are there.

When I have tried it in non base hexes, my ships usually blunder into the minefield. Happened twice that I recall. I am going to try and bushwhack that convoy with surface ships.

I have seen it work very well in other AARs....I should get set up to use it more often I think.

Thanks.

(in reply to Alfred)
Post #: 1412
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 4:08:11 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alfred

Just acquiring the 6 Chinese bases shown in post #1405 to be still under Allied control is a potential 2690 VP swing and a useful decrease in the VP denominator.  There should be other Chinese bases still to be captured.  Plus this is all without taking into account the VPs from destroying Chinese devices.

Another benefit of capturing the Chinese bases is that the VP multiplier is much better than the modifier on the Indian bases which might be lost.  A better modifier and safe from Allied recapture at least until 1944 makes China a theatre which merits speedy resolution within the context of pushing at the West Coast for an auto victory.

Add the steady harvesting of strategic VPs in Australia from Allied bases which are most unlikely to be garrisoned to any noticeable degree, means the potential for achieving an auto victory remains.  Remember the real secret to a Japanese auto victory is 1944, not 1943.  The point of going for the victory in 1943 is more to cripple the Allied return effort so that the 3:1 ratio achieved in 1943 is safeguarded into 1944.  Of course with excellent play, there is always the possibility of achieving it sometime in 1943.  It is just that achieving it on 1 January 1943 is very difficult.

Alfred


I have yet to start really harvesting Chinese VPs yet. I have 12 units totally isolated to one hex just sitting and starving.

The more I think about your 43-44 VP position, the more I like it. So much so, that I am not trying for AV in 43 (although that was Olorin's original primary goal). If it happens, it will happen because the stars aligned.

The 44 AV lets you plan a little more, get better organized, and then hopefully hit with an iron fist and then counterpunch hard thru 43. Sounds like a lot of fun!

I still think there are going to be two huge end of year operations: The West Coast, and whatever Jocke has planned.

(in reply to Alfred)
Post #: 1413
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 5:25:08 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Mid November, 1942

Not a single night time encounter. I have some destroyers at risk -- we will see what happens.

I have two squadrons of Kates to continue the destruction here. I stood one down to rest and will most likely alternate them until it is all gone.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 4/22/2016 5:26:38 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1414
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 5:31:56 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Sure enough some of my destroyer near the New Hebrides end up where they shouldn't be and are savaged by dive-bombers. My bad.

Here, my good. LRCAP Chittagong.

No Allied LRCAP, no sweeps yet.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1415
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 5:41:35 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Decent day in the air, but I lost 3 destroyers being less than thorough. I should have downed 15 more planes and still had the destroyers.

Argh.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1416
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 6:16:50 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe






Are those fishing boats?



Is that satire!

They look like fishing boats.

_____________________________


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1417
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 6:21:40 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
I think there is a frigate, clipper, sailboat or junk of some type in one of the mods somewhere. The Flying Dutchman perhaps...

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 1418
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 6:23:01 PM   
Alfred

 

Posts: 6685
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: Alfred

Just acquiring the 6 Chinese bases shown in post #1405 to be still under Allied control is a potential 2690 VP swing and a useful decrease in the VP denominator.  There should be other Chinese bases still to be captured.  Plus this is all without taking into account the VPs from destroying Chinese devices.

Another benefit of capturing the Chinese bases is that the VP multiplier is much better than the modifier on the Indian bases which might be lost.  A better modifier and safe from Allied recapture at least until 1944 makes China a theatre which merits speedy resolution within the context of pushing at the West Coast for an auto victory.

Add the steady harvesting of strategic VPs in Australia from Allied bases which are most unlikely to be garrisoned to any noticeable degree, means the potential for achieving an auto victory remains.  Remember the real secret to a Japanese auto victory is 1944, not 1943.  The point of going for the victory in 1943 is more to cripple the Allied return effort so that the 3:1 ratio achieved in 1943 is safeguarded into 1944.  Of course with excellent play, there is always the possibility of achieving it sometime in 1943.  It is just that achieving it on 1 January 1943 is very difficult.

Alfred


I have yet to start really harvesting Chinese VPs yet. I have 12 units totally isolated to one hex just sitting and starving.

The more I think about your 43-44 VP position, the more I like it. So much so, that I am not trying for AV in 43 (although that was Olorin's original primary goal). If it happens, it will happen because the stars aligned.

The 44 AV lets you plan a little more, get better organized, and then hopefully hit with an iron fist and then counterpunch hard thru 43. Sounds like a lot of fun!

I still think there are going to be two huge end of year operations: The West Coast, and whatever Jocke has planned.



A couple of comments.

1. Some months ago when the West Coast objective was first disclosed Bullwinkle did mention that years ago I had covered it, but in the context of a land raid and early in 1942. That analysis also predated the enhanced flak performance. A late 1942 West Coast operation was also analysed but in the context of a quick follow up to a Japanese capture of Hawaii in the 3rd quarter of 1942 when the destroyed Hawaiian assets would not have had time to reconstitute themselves on the West Coast.

It follows that the specifics which apply here make it very difficult to carry off an immediate auto victory with the forthcoming WC operation. The discussion re the better targets (Portland, San Diego et al - or even going into Canada) well illustrates the problem with the late season operation. But equally it shows the potential crippling possibilities.

As long as Japan remains capable of generating a substantial supply and HI points surplus, it is much easier for Japan to reform shattered/destroyed LCU and air units than it is for the Allies to do likewise. I therefore am not concerned about the real prospect of much which is sent to the West Coast is ultimately lost. The only real risk is if during the reforming period you lack sufficient LCU to keep the Allies in check. That risk is very minimal whilst you still control the seas.

2. As to whatever your opponent has planned. Keep track of where the 4E beasties are located. Most Allied players operate their 4E where their main land campaign focus is or will be. If the beasties are mainly in CONUS then the focus is defending the WC from invasion or to soften up your position there prior to moving to evict you from the area. Likewise if they found mainly in India, or Australia/Noumea.

Alfred

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1419
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 7:05:57 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alfred

A couple of comments.

1. Some months ago when the West Coast objective was first disclosed Bullwinkle did mention that years ago I had covered it, but in the context of a land raid and early in 1942. That analysis also predated the enhanced flak performance. A late 1942 West Coast operation was also analysed but in the context of a quick follow up to a Japanese capture of Hawaii in the 3rd quarter of 1942 when the destroyed Hawaiian assets would not have had time to reconstitute themselves on the West Coast.

It follows that the specifics which apply here make it very difficult to carry off an immediate auto victory with the forthcoming WC operation. The discussion re the better targets (Portland, San Diego et al - or even going into Canada) well illustrates the problem with the late season operation. But equally it shows the potential crippling possibilities.

As long as Japan remains capable of generating a substantial supply and HI points surplus, it is much easier for Japan to reform shattered/destroyed LCU and air units than it is for the Allies to do likewise. I therefore am not concerned about the real prospect of much which is sent to the West Coast is ultimately lost. The only real risk is if during the reforming period you lack sufficient LCU to keep the Allies in check. That risk is very minimal whilst you still control the seas.

2. As to whatever your opponent has planned. Keep track of where the 4E beasties are located. Most Allied players operate their 4E where their main land campaign focus is or will be. If the beasties are mainly in CONUS then the focus is defending the WC from invasion or to soften up your position there prior to moving to evict you from the area. Likewise if they found mainly in India, or Australia/Noumea.

Alfred



I have crafted my invasion with the improved flak in mind.

If I had to do it again, a quicker invasion is better. There are two very nasty restricted Armor units that arrive in Sept or October. My planning will hopefully overcome this, but better they weren't there to begin with, nor the two divisions from Pearl.

I have been keeping track of the 4E, and no surprise they are showing up at Noumea and India. Their numbers are on the decline in Canada.

(in reply to Alfred)
Post #: 1420
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 7:17:36 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Mid November, 1942

25 percent moonlight...

Thunderstorms...

The British come calling....

How will my smaller task forces work out....

Is a donnybrook! Are you ready to rumble!!!!




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1421
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 7:23:08 PM   
Olorin


Posts: 1019
Joined: 4/22/2008
From: Greece
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

If I had to do it again, a quicker invasion is better.



At this point I'm inclined to agree. An invasion immediately after PH falls has much better chances of success.


_____________________________


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1422
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 7:26:27 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Outgunned, outnumbered.

Just the way we like it!




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1423
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 7:33:33 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Is there no end to the number of Japanese destroyers here?

The night lengthens, the weather worsens, and where oh where are the Japanese Heavy Cruisers?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1424
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 7:38:47 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
The carnage is incredible....




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1425
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 7:42:29 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
And where are the IJN Cruisers?

Daylight comes...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1426
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 7:47:56 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
More, we want more!




The Grayson opened up with 50 caliber machine guns...we responded with 12.7 cm hits and then the Long Lance, at very short range!

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 4/22/2016 8:01:26 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1427
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 7:51:28 PM   
Lecivius


Posts: 4845
Joined: 8/5/2007
From: Denver
Status: offline
What, are those Brits throwing biscuits by now?

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1428
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 7:58:59 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
The butcher's bill...




Saved from air attack by bad weather...Chittagong is pounded by heavy bombers and swept by fighters.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 4/22/2016 8:04:30 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1429
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 8:01:55 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Imagine That!!




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 4/22/2016 8:03:09 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1430
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 8:04:58 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lecivius

What, are those Brits throwing biscuits by now?


Pretty much. It took daylight for them to sink two Destroyers...

(in reply to Lecivius)
Post #: 1431
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 8:11:38 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Home of the Phoenix?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1432
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 8:15:33 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Hmmm.,




I think those two ships are the Hawkins and escort limping back. The Exeter and Devonshire both went down I think...does that add up to 5 Walrus.

Hawkins took one mine hit.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 4/22/2016 8:22:50 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1433
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 8:22:50 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Jocke requested I send him the replay...

I wish I could read his AAR tonight!

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1434
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 8:27:21 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
For Andav.

Tanks gone Wild!




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 4/22/2016 8:59:31 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1435
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 8:30:27 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
And finally, soon these guys will have to retreat I think.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1436
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 9:45:45 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
I have 156 mines, all ship killer type 88s.

What hex should I mine?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1437
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 9:52:16 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

I have 156 mines, all ship killer type 88s.

What hex should I mine?




Use the F6 hot key to see the hex side codes. White = pass ships & LCU, Blue = pass ships, Green = pass LCU, Red = pass neither, Purple = pass LCU (river-crossing).



_____________________________


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1438
RE: Manila Falls - 4/22/2016 10:22:55 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Jocke requested I send him the replay...

I wish I could read his AAR tonight!


That is a bad series of engagements for the Brits, who usually do better considering working torps and experienced crews. Well done on your part. Whatever you're doing, keep doing it! Trading DD for CA is not good for the Allied VP ratio!

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1439
RE: Manila Falls - 4/23/2016 1:26:22 AM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alfred

As long as Japan remains capable of generating a substantial supply and HI points surplus, it is much easier for Japan to reform shattered/destroyed LCU and air units than it is for the Allies to do likewise. I therefore am not concerned about the real prospect of much which is sent to the West Coast is ultimately lost.


Finally. Someone that agrees with my thinking, at least out loud. Which is not to say that there isn't a real (and cumulatively heavy) cost to reforming destroyed units. Takes a few months to get them back up to average XP, but that's fine.

(in reply to Alfred)
Post #: 1440
Page:   <<   < prev  46 47 [48] 49 50   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Manila Falls Page: <<   < prev  46 47 [48] 49 50   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.781