Orm
Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008 From: Sweden Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Courtenay The MTN has a garrison value of two, so put it where you need units with garrison values. That is the main reason for the USSR to build MTN units: only two BPs per garrison factor. The only other units for which that is true are MIL, which they can't build, and GAR, all of which should be built, but which have a bad tendency to die when Barbarossa hits because they can't get out of the German's way. (Of course a big GAR does very well in Leningrad, where it never wants to move.) I suspect that USSR has won the '40 garrison race. And USSR can not win the '41 race with the break the pact optional in play. So, I think, that there is no need for cheap garrison units in the West. Units best used for a 41 or even a 42 Barbarossa should be priority along with keeping Japan out should be priority. BTW. Maybe USSR should delay building fighters until better versions are in the pool.
_____________________________
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett
|