Code name: Red Island, 2016

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Code name: Red Island, 2016

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> Code name: Red Island, 2016

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Code name: Red Island, 2016 - 5/28/2016 6:36:23 PM

kojis

Posts: 32
Joined: 11/9/2015
Status: offline

CODE NAME: RED ISLAND 2016

Finland vs. Russia
Date/Time: 25th May 2016
Location: �land Islands
Playable Sides: Finland

Russia is trying to annex demilitarised �land Islands. Putin says it is very important strategic location to Russia keep NATO away from Baltic Sea. Same time Putin is trying to create open conflict with Finland and Sweden to prevent their possible future NATO membership. Finland and Russia sees each other as hostile, EU, NATO and Sweden does not want to take part in this conflict.

Russian code name for this operation is Red Island.
------------------------------------------------------------------

This is my first scenario so please be gentle

EDIT: Updated scenario 29.5

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by kojis -- 5/28/2016 11:32:56 PM >

Post #: 1

RE: Code name: Red Island, 2016 - 5/28/2016 7:44:36 PM

Skjold

Posts: 240
Joined: 9/29/2015
Status: offline

Hey we swedes are there in spirit, in the form of the RBS 15 :-P Jokes aside, good and fun mission. A few things i noticed:

Give the Russians side doctrine -> Radar active so they actually utilise their SAM defenses against incoming threats.

Any reason why alot of the F/A-18's carry litening pods?

You might want to group up the SAG's.

Maybe the Leningrad area (old habits die hard) could do with some additional and better SAM, such as S-300 or S-400?

Note below in the russian expenditures that they fired no SAM from their ships.

SIDE: FIN
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
2x 80 Hamina [Rauma 2]
3x F/A-18C Hornet [F-18C]
4x Radar (18045X)
2x Radar (Snow Drift [9S18M1])
1x Radar (TRS 2230)

EXPENDITURES:
------------------
6x 57mm/70 Bofors Mk3 GP Burst [4 rnds]
104x AIM-120C-7 AMRAAM P3I.3
6x DUAL TRAP Chaff/Flare
6x Generic Flare Salvo [3x Cartridges, Dual Spectral]
8x MIM-120C-7 NASAMS II [AMRAAM]
64x RB 15KA Mk3
30x RB 15M Mk3
10x Umkhonto-IR Mk2

SIDE: RUS
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
1x BDK Ropucha II [Pr.775/III]
2x BDK Ropucha II [Pr.775]
2x EM Sovremenny I [Pr.956A Sarych]
1x MPK Pauk II [Pr.1241PE Molniya-2]
1x MPK Soobrazitelny [Pr.2038.1, Mod Steregushchy]
2x MPK Steregushchy [Pr.2038.0]
3x MRK Nanuchka III [Pr.1234.1 Ovod]
4x RK Tarantul III [Pr.1241.1M]
5x SKR Parchim II [Pr.1331]
20x Su-27S Flanker B

EXPENDITURES:
------------------
21x 30mm Gsh-30-1 Burst [30 rnds]
40x AA-10 Alamo A [R-27R, MR SARH]
9x AA-10 Alamo B [R-27T, MR IR]
20x AA-10 Alamo C [R-27RE, LR SARH]
6x AA-10 Alamo D [R-27TE, LR IR]
30x AA-11 Archer [R-73]
2x AK-630M 30mm/65 Gatling Burst [400 rnds]
73x Generic Chaff Salvo [4x Cartridges]
115x PK-10 Chaff [SR-50]
20x PK-16 Chaff [TSP-60U]
9x PK-2 Chaff [TSP-47]
15x SA-17 Grizzly [9M317]
8x SS-26 Stone [9M723 Iskander-M, Penetrator]
8x SS-26 Stone RV [9M723 Iskander-M, Penetrator]
4x SS-N-22 Sunburn [P-80 Zubr]
4x SS-N-9 Siren [P-120 Malakhit]

SIDE: CIV
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------

EXPENDITURES:
------------------

< Message edited by Skjold -- 5/28/2016 7:47:36 PM >

(in reply to kojis)

Post #: 2

RE: Code name: Red Island, 2016 - 5/28/2016 8:18:33 PM

kojis

Posts: 32
Joined: 11/9/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Skjold

Give the Russians side doctrine -> Radar active so they actually utilise their SAM defenses against incoming threats.

Hhmm, i got tons of SAM from their ships!

(in reply to Skjold)

Post #: 3

RE: Code name: Red Island, 2016 - 5/28/2016 8:20:08 PM

Excroat3

Posts: 436
Joined: 1/24/2015
Status: offline

Pretty easy, fun to play, I liked it!

Couple of points:

After winning, looked at the editor, seems like you have some Russian aircraft at airbases that don't have a mission
Those land-based ASM are pretty strong, took out the entire eastern SAG with just 2 launchers. Maybe delete a launcher or 2 to increase difficulty
I didn't use some of my fighters, maybe cut down on number of aircraft available to players to increase difficulty
Make airbases that are not going to be attacked Single-Unit airbases to increase performance
The learjet was pretty useless tbh
Maybe decrease the amount of ships Finland has, unless you add AWACS for the Russians they can't detect the Finnish ships, so I just salvoed all of my ASMs and hid my ships after firing
Russian CAP was easy to deal with, not sure what you could do about that
Didn't lose points for losing radars

Again, fun scenario, short and sweet (but intense!)

Score: TRIUMPH - 3425
SIDE: FIN
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
4x Radar (18045X)
2x Radar (Snow Drift [9S18M1])
1x Radar (TRS 2230)
1x F/A-18C Hornet [F-18C]

EXPENDITURES:
------------------
78x RB 15KA Mk3
40x RB 15M Mk3
35x Generic Flare Salvo [3x Cartridges, Dual Spectral]
93x AIM-120C-7 AMRAAM P3I.3
1x Generic Chaff Salvo [8x Cartridges]
12x AGM-154C JSOW [BROACH]

SIDE: RUS
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
1x MPK Pauk II [Pr.1241PE Molniya-2]
5x SKR Parchim II [Pr.1331]
4x RK Tarantul III [Pr.1241.1M]
2x MPK Steregushchy [Pr.2038.0]
2x EM Sovremenny I [Pr.956A Sarych]
29x Su-27S Flanker B
5x MiG-29 Fulcrum C
3x MRK Nanuchka III [Pr.1234.1 Ovod]
1x BDK Ropucha II [Pr.775/III]
2x BDK Ropucha II [Pr.775]
1x MPK Soobrazitelny [Pr.2038.1, Mod Steregushchy]

EXPENDITURES:
------------------
8x SS-26 Stone [9M723 Iskander-M, Penetrator]
8x SS-26 Stone RV [9M723 Iskander-M, Penetrator]
84x SA-N-7 Gadfly [9M38]
28x SA-N-11b Grisom [9M311K-1] (SAMs from ships)
67x AK-630M 30mm/65 Gatling Burst [400 rnds] (this CIWS was actually pretty effective, 40% chance of hit on the RB-15s)
2x AK-630 30mm/65 Gatling Burst [400 rnds]
26x PK-16 Chaff [TSP-60U]
41x 100mm/59 A-190 Frag
3x 30mm Twin Gatling Gsh-6-30KD [375 rnds]
96x PK-10 Chaff [SR-50]
81x AK-130 130mm/54 Twin Frag Burst [2 rnds]
10x PK-2 Chaff [TSP-47]
35x AA-10 Alamo D [R-27TE, LR IR]
37x AA-10 Alamo C [R-27RE, LR SARH]
49x Generic Chaff Salvo [4x Cartridges]
52x AA-10 Alamo A [R-27R, MR SARH]
19x Generic Chaff Salvo [5x Cartridges]
24x AA-11 Archer [R-73]
12x SA-N-21c Growler [9M96]
13x 30mm Gsh-30-1 Burst [30 rnds]
7x AA-10 Alamo B [R-27T, MR IR]
4x SA-N-4a Gecko [9M33]
7x PK-10 Flare [SO-50]
1x PK-2 Flare [TST-47]

SIDE: CIV
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------

EXPENDITURES:
------------------

< Message edited by Excroat3 -- 5/28/2016 8:24:05 PM >

(in reply to kojis)

Post #: 4

RE: Code name: Red Island, 2016 - 5/28/2016 9:24:28 PM

Skjold

Posts: 240
Joined: 9/29/2015
Status: offline

I think it might be unrelated to your mission, at any rate it will make it substantially easier for the russians to identify planes approaching them and hence will be more effective in defense.
The mission is indeed a bit too easy right now.

Edit: Oh and yeah, i had a major victory despite having the russians successfully land. I am guessing that isnt intended? You can always make it so a successfull landing you lose alot of points

< Message edited by Skjold -- 5/28/2016 9:43:25 PM >

(in reply to Excroat3)

Post #: 5

RE: Code name: Red Island, 2016 - 5/28/2016 9:29:36 PM

wild_Willie2

Posts: 2934
Joined: 10/8/2004
From: Arnhem (holland) yes a bridge to far...
Status: offline

Yes, a very interesting scenario, but a bit to easy as it is.
I would have the Russian CAP already on station when the game starts. If you are now quick enough, you can sink most of the Russian vessels before their CAP even arrives on station.
Overall, a very nice scenario. Well done.

W.

Score: 3750

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
4x Radar (18045X)
2x Radar (Snow Drift [9S18M1])
1x Radar (TRS 2230)
6x F/A-18C Hornet [F-18C]

SIDE: RUS
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
1x Radar (Flat Face E [P-19, Kasta 2E2 Upgrade])
4x RK Tarantul III [Pr.1241.1M]
2x EM Sovremenny I [Pr.956A Sarych]
1x MPK Pauk II [Pr.1241PE Molniya-2]
5x SKR Parchim II [Pr.1331]
3x MRK Nanuchka III [Pr.1234.1 Ovod]
2x MPK Steregushchy [Pr.2038.0]
30x Su-27S Flanker B
10x MiG-29 Fulcrum C
1x Radar (Back Net [P-80])
1x Radar (P-70)
2x BDK Ropucha II [Pr.775]
1x MPK Soobrazitelny [Pr.2038.1, Mod Steregushchy]
1x BDK Ropucha II [Pr.775/III]

_____________________________

In vinum illic est sapientia , in matera illic est vires , in aqua illic es bacteria.

In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there are bacteria.

(in reply to Excroat3)

Post #: 6

RE: Code name: Red Island, 2016 - 5/30/2016 12:07:34 AM

AlexGGGG

Posts: 685
Joined: 9/25/2014
Status: offline

I ran out of AMRAAMs at 7 hours to go while having score 2825. JSOW seem to be in short supply as well.

SIDE: FIN
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
4x Radar (18045X)
2x Radar (Snow Drift [9S18M1])
1x Radar (TRS 2230)
8x F/A-18C Hornet [F-18C]

SIDE: RUS
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
3x RK Tarantul III [Pr.1241.1M]
2x BDK Ropucha II [Pr.775]
2x SKR Parchim II [Pr.1331]
1x MPK Pauk II [Pr.1241PE Molniya-2]
1x EM Sovremenny I [Pr.956A Sarych]
1x MPK Steregushchy [Pr.2038.0]
2x MRK Nanuchka III [Pr.1234.1 Ovod]
1x BDK Ropucha II [Pr.775/III]

8x Su-30M2 Flanker G
31x Su-27S Flanker B
10x MiG-29 Fulcrum C

(in reply to wild_Willie2)

Post #: 7

RE: Code name: Red Island, 2016 - 5/30/2016 12:21:04 AM

AlexGGGG

Posts: 685
Joined: 9/25/2014
Status: offline

Actually ASuW weapons seems to be enough.

All in all nice confined-quarters scenario even without extra AMRAAMs.

(in reply to AlexGGGG)

Post #: 8

RE: Code name: Red Island, 2016 - 6/1/2016 5:14:27 PM

kojis

Posts: 32
Joined: 11/9/2015
Status: offline

Thanks for testing, updated version attached in first post or at steam workshop.