Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Focus Pacific Beta

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Scenario Design and Modding >> RE: Focus Pacific Beta Page: <<   < prev  10 11 12 [13] 14   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/3/2016 8:10:39 AM   
paradigmblue

 

Posts: 784
Joined: 9/16/2014
From: Fairbanks, Alaska
Status: offline 		The 403rd BG has been fixed, good catch!

I'm not sure what you opponent is referring to with the DBB bases - unless they mean the ones in India? I mainly used the extended map for the Aden and Abadan differences.

(in reply to BillBrown)
Post #: 361
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/3/2016 8:14:44 AM   
paradigmblue

 

Posts: 784
Joined: 9/16/2014
From: Fairbanks, Alaska
Status: offline 		I really am sorry that this is taking so long. I manage a 14,000sf liquor store employing entry level employees, and lately outside of my core staff it has been a revolving door. I tried to take a couple weeks off to work on the mod last month, but I wound up having to come in every day to put out fires. Between that and Windows 10 installing itself without my permission (grrr), which broke WitP:AE until I did some serious tweaking, it has been very hard for me to find the time to give the mod the time it deserves.

Thank you all for your continued patience.

(in reply to paradigmblue)
Post #: 362
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/3/2016 10:03:59 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

Windows 10 installing itself without my permission

I've heard some serious bad stories about W10 but this one beats them all I think.

_____________________________

If we're all created in the image of god then why aren't we all invisible?

(in reply to paradigmblue)
Post #: 363
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/3/2016 11:21:33 AM   
paradigmblue

 

Posts: 784
Joined: 9/16/2014
From: Fairbanks, Alaska
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson

quote:

Windows 10 installing itself without my permission

I've heard some serious bad stories about W10 but this one beats them all I think.


Microsoft - unbeknownst to me - changed the update box so that if you closed it via the "X" at the top right rather than the "close" button in the text of the dialogue box it would install automatically. I saw it pop up, closed the window, then flew to another city for a few days for work. When I returned home, I was greeted by "Welcome to Windows 10". I could have tried to roll it back, but I have friends who lost files in doing so, so I've just gritted my teeth and disabled as many of the data-collection features that I can.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 364
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/3/2016 11:49:55 AM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline 		no worries PDB, we all have games keeping us occupied while we wait.

_____________________________

Hans


(in reply to paradigmblue)
Post #: 365
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/3/2016 1:18:03 PM   
btd64


Posts: 9973
Joined: 1/23/2010
From: Mass. USA. now in Lancaster, OHIO
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BillBrown

Here is what I am talking about.
4206 days after Dec 7, 1941 is June 16, 1953.





Looks exactly the same as my file. Something corrupt maybe....GP

_____________________________

Intel i7 4.3GHz 10th Gen,16GB Ram,Nvidia GeForce MX330

AKA General Patton

WPO,WITP,WITPAE-Mod Designer/Tester
DWU-Beta Tester
TOAW4-Alpha/Beta Tester

"Do everything you ask of those you command"....Gen. George S. Patton

(in reply to BillBrown)
Post #: 366
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/3/2016 1:22:46 PM   
btd64


Posts: 9973
Joined: 1/23/2010
From: Mass. USA. now in Lancaster, OHIO
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson

quote:

Windows 10 installing itself without my permission

I've heard some serious bad stories about W10 but this one beats them all I think.


My wife had win10 auto start. Being who she is, she just turned off her laptop and restarted it and no more win10....GP

_____________________________

Intel i7 4.3GHz 10th Gen,16GB Ram,Nvidia GeForce MX330

AKA General Patton

WPO,WITP,WITPAE-Mod Designer/Tester
DWU-Beta Tester
TOAW4-Alpha/Beta Tester

"Do everything you ask of those you command"....Gen. George S. Patton

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 367
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/3/2016 2:39:28 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: General Patton


quote:

ORIGINAL: BillBrown

Here is what I am talking about.
4206 days after Dec 7, 1941 is June 16, 1953.





Looks exactly the same as my file. Something corrupt maybe....GP

I don't have this scenario, but in Stock Scenario 1 all the arriving air units have six digit (YYMMDD) arrival dates, except the ones that are "9999" for some conditional arrival. Could the lack of the Day in the arrival date cause a "divide by 0" wacky result?

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to btd64)
Post #: 368
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/3/2016 2:41:05 PM   
BillBrown


Posts: 2335
Joined: 6/15/2002
Status: offline 		It seems that if you do not use a 6 digit date, it treats it as the number of days until arrival. 4206 days from Dec 7, 1941 is June 16, 1953.

And, I did not find this, my possible opponent asked me about it. He wanted to know why the 403rd BG defected and arrived in Los Angles in 1953. I looked and reported it. So it is not just my install that reports this.

< Message edited by BillBrown -- 6/3/2016 2:55:44 PM >

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 369
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/3/2016 3:05:13 PM   
btd64


Posts: 9973
Joined: 1/23/2010
From: Mass. USA. now in Lancaster, OHIO
Status: offline 		I didn't add the day part of the delay, but when I went into the editor a few minutes ago, program seems to of defaulted to June 1st all by itself. I think correcting the nation had something to do with it....GP

< Message edited by General Patton -- 6/3/2016 3:08:45 PM >

_____________________________

Intel i7 4.3GHz 10th Gen,16GB Ram,Nvidia GeForce MX330

AKA General Patton

WPO,WITP,WITPAE-Mod Designer/Tester
DWU-Beta Tester
TOAW4-Alpha/Beta Tester

"Do everything you ask of those you command"....Gen. George S. Patton

(in reply to BillBrown)
Post #: 370
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/3/2016 5:12:27 PM   
1EyedJacks


Posts: 2244
Joined: 3/12/2006
From: The Eastern Sierras
Status: offline 		Cruiser with AC over-stacked. Is this 3/8 intended? Otherwise I think you've gotta remove the 5 Rufe. In reality, I don't think a CA could carry that many FP...






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by 1EyedJacks -- 6/3/2016 5:15:06 PM >

_____________________________

TTFN,

Mike

(in reply to btd64)
Post #: 371
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/4/2016 2:16:06 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: 1EyedJacks

Cruiser with AC over-stacked. Is this 3/8 intended? Otherwise I think you've gotta remove the 5 Rufe. In reality, I don't think a CA could carry that many FP...






Is it in an Air Transport TF?

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to 1EyedJacks)
Post #: 372
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/4/2016 2:49:16 AM   
BillBrown


Posts: 2335
Joined: 6/15/2002
Status: offline 		This is from a page back:

The Mogami and Azuma have more planes than it can fly due to a conversion issue. It can convert to a version that can field 11 FP, allowing it to operate both the FP squadron and the Rufe float fighters. Until you make the conversion (7/42) simply transfer the Rufes off these ships, and then back on when (if) they are converted.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 373
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/4/2016 3:58:53 AM   
paradigmblue

 

Posts: 784
Joined: 9/16/2014
From: Fairbanks, Alaska
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: General Patton


quote:

ORIGINAL: BillBrown

Here is what I am talking about.
4206 days after Dec 7, 1941 is June 16, 1953.





Looks exactly the same as my file. Something corrupt maybe....GP

I don't have this scenario, but in Stock Scenario 1 all the arriving air units have six digit (YYMMDD) arrival dates, except the ones that are "9999" for some conditional arrival. Could the lack of the Day in the arrival date cause a "divide by 0" wacky result?


In my version of the files, the delay is 420601. Why your version is 4206 instead I'm not sure, but it will be correct in the final version.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 374
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/4/2016 4:13:18 AM   
paradigmblue

 

Posts: 784
Joined: 9/16/2014
From: Fairbanks, Alaska
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BillBrown

This is from a page back:

The Mogami and Azuma have more planes than it can fly due to a conversion issue. It can convert to a version that can field 11 FP, allowing it to operate both the FP squadron and the Rufe float fighters. Until you make the conversion (7/42) simply transfer the Rufes off these ships, and then back on when (if) they are converted.


+1

This is exactly the issue here. Unfortunately there is no way in the editor to conditionally assign planes to a ship based on its conversion status. I could have chosen to have the planes arrive on the conversion availability date, but because there is no way of knowing exactly when/if the player will decide to make the conversion, the planes instead arrive on the cruiser at game start. The player can use those Rufe groups as they see fit, but they're in-game and available if the player decides to make the conversion.

As a side-note, for Japanese players of Focus Pacific, you'll notice that you get a lot more Rufe groups assigned to ships. These float fighters can be surprisingly effective in disrupting allied naval attacks on your surface TFs. Allied players also get a float fighter in Focus Pacific in the form of the Dewoitine HD.780, but they would have to sacrifice their naval search planes to field them.

(in reply to BillBrown)
Post #: 375
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/4/2016 1:47:05 PM   
btd64


Posts: 9973
Joined: 1/23/2010
From: Mass. USA. now in Lancaster, OHIO
Status: offline 		Para, Don't forget the drum roll. Or Toot.....GP

_____________________________

Intel i7 4.3GHz 10th Gen,16GB Ram,Nvidia GeForce MX330

AKA General Patton

WPO,WITP,WITPAE-Mod Designer/Tester
DWU-Beta Tester
TOAW4-Alpha/Beta Tester

"Do everything you ask of those you command"....Gen. George S. Patton

(in reply to paradigmblue)
Post #: 376
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/5/2016 3:21:44 AM   
paradigmblue

 

Posts: 784
Joined: 9/16/2014
From: Fairbanks, Alaska
Status: offline 		Uploading installer of release version to dropbox now, I'll need some volunteers to insure that the installer is working correctly with a fresh upgraded install of WitP:AE, and then I'll publicly link the installer.

(in reply to btd64)
Post #: 377
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/5/2016 3:35:20 AM   
BillBrown


Posts: 2335
Joined: 6/15/2002
Status: offline 		I will be more than happy to do a test install. What do I need to do to get the file(s)?

< Message edited by BillBrown -- 6/5/2016 3:38:11 AM >

(in reply to paradigmblue)
Post #: 378
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/5/2016 3:42:08 AM   
paradigmblue

 

Posts: 784
Joined: 9/16/2014
From: Fairbanks, Alaska
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BillBrown

I will be more than happy to do a test install. What do I need to do to get the file(s)?

As soon as it's done uploading (I'm in Alaska and my internet speeds aren't the best) I'll pm you the link.

(in reply to BillBrown)
Post #: 379
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/5/2016 3:43:36 AM   
BillBrown


Posts: 2335
Joined: 6/15/2002
Status: offline 		You mean you don't have a 40/40MB connection?

(in reply to paradigmblue)
Post #: 380
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/5/2016 3:54:39 AM   
paradigmblue

 

Posts: 784
Joined: 9/16/2014
From: Fairbanks, Alaska
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BillBrown

You mean you don't have a 40/40MB connection?


Try 612kB peak DL and about half that upload.

(in reply to BillBrown)
Post #: 381
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/5/2016 3:58:01 AM   
BillBrown


Posts: 2335
Joined: 6/15/2002
Status: offline 		Bummer.

(in reply to paradigmblue)
Post #: 382
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/5/2016 3:59:31 AM   
DOCUP


Posts: 3073
Joined: 7/7/2010
Status: offline 		If I'm still online, I will help you out.

(in reply to BillBrown)
Post #: 383
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/5/2016 4:13:32 AM   
BillBrown


Posts: 2335
Joined: 6/15/2002
Status: offline 		PM sent, installer worked fine, the Soviets are active in 71 and not in 72. I did not check much else yet.

(in reply to DOCUP)
Post #: 384
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/5/2016 4:53:49 AM   
paradigmblue

 

Posts: 784
Joined: 9/16/2014
From: Fairbanks, Alaska
Status: offline 		Looks like the installer is missing a file for scen 75, which is Patton's version of Focus Pacific. Once I get that from him I'll repackage the installer, upload it, and share the file.

I still have some known art issues, but they're not show-stopping, and patching in new atop and atopalpha files is easy enough when/if I find a collaborator that is better with Photoshop than I am.

(in reply to BillBrown)
Post #: 385
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/5/2016 4:56:27 AM   
BillBrown


Posts: 2335
Joined: 6/15/2002
Status: offline 		I didn't know about scenario 75.

(in reply to paradigmblue)
Post #: 386
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/5/2016 5:05:54 AM   
1EyedJacks


Posts: 2244
Joined: 3/12/2006
From: The Eastern Sierras
Status: offline 		Hi, can I get the link for the updated version of Focus Pacific please? Or is the link on pg 1 of this thread the updated installer?


_____________________________

TTFN,

Mike

(in reply to BillBrown)
Post #: 387
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/5/2016 5:13:51 AM   
paradigmblue

 

Posts: 784
Joined: 9/16/2014
From: Fairbanks, Alaska
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: 1EyedJacks

Hi, can I get the link for the updated version of Focus Pacific please? Or is the link on pg 1 of this thread the updated installer?



Here you go - this is not the official release, as I'm waiting on a file from Patton so his version of Focus Pacific can be incorporated. Once I have it, I will repackage the installer, upload it and create a new thread for the release version with the final release.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/xz83dl3xlrm3kxu/Focus%20Pacific%20Release.exe?dl=0

< Message edited by paradigmblue -- 6/5/2016 5:47:24 AM >

(in reply to 1EyedJacks)
Post #: 388
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/5/2016 5:29:53 AM   
1EyedJacks


Posts: 2244
Joined: 3/12/2006
From: The Eastern Sierras
Status: offline 		1.7.11.25.9 sound righteous?

_____________________________

TTFN,

Mike

(in reply to paradigmblue)
Post #: 389
RE: Focus Pacific Beta - 6/5/2016 5:31:21 AM   
1EyedJacks


Posts: 2244
Joined: 3/12/2006
From: The Eastern Sierras
Status: offline 		& btw - thanx!

_____________________________

TTFN,

Mike

(in reply to 1EyedJacks)
Post #: 390
Page:   <<   < prev  10 11 12 [13] 14   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Scenario Design and Modding >> RE: Focus Pacific Beta Page: <<   < prev  10 11 12 [13] 14   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.281