Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Merry Christmas, 1998 [UPDATED]

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> Merry Christmas, 1998 [UPDATED] Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Merry Christmas, 1998 [UPDATED] - 6/14/2016 6:57:28 PM   
wqc12345


Posts: 250
Joined: 12/7/2015
From: San Francisco, CA
Status: offline
This scenario is a fictional engagement between the Australian Commonwealth, US, Malaysian Forces and a fast moving Indonesian Coup.

The coup has arrayed two prongs you will to blunt, one, an outgoing invasion fleet and two, a bustling Naval Base supporting the invasion of a neighbor island. They are not mutually exclusive problems, both need to be destroyed. In addition, various other disconnected issues will need to be dealt with, from minesweeping to area defense.

I wanted to create an adaptation of Mark Gellis' Air War of Indonesia, which I loved from the moment I hit the start button. I took his idea and expanded it to include various other problems an allied force would face when dealing with remote and long distance target such as Indonesia. You will really need to look at how you coordinate fueling assets and how those assets interplay with your strike forces.

The first briefing is below, a letter from the Prime Minister of Australia to you outlining the problem and possible solutions.

SCENARIO AUTHOR: Will Coleman

********* TOP SECRET *********

25121998 0800 ZULU / 0600 LOCAL

TO: AIR MARSHALL BEN TAYLOR, SOUTH ASIAN ALLIED FORCE (SAAF)

FROM: PRIME MINISTER JOHN HOWARD

SUBJ: KELOMPOK ENAM COUP IN INDONESIA AND ONGOING CRISIS

GOOD MORNING AND MERRY CHRISTMAS AIR MARSHALL TAYLOR,

DESPITE OUR BEST DIPLOMATIC EFFORTS AND ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE, INDONESIA HAS DESCENDED INTO COMPLETE NATIONAL CHAOS.

THE INDONESIAN JAVA FRONT (IJF), OR "KELOMPOK ENAM", AS THEY LIKE TO BE REFERRED TO, IS A MILITANT MUSLIM WING OF SENIOR JAVANESE OFFICERS. AS OF NOON YESTERDAY, THIS GROUP HAS TAKEN CONTROL OF THE ENTIRE ISLAND OF INDONESIA JAVA.

WITH THE CRUMBLING INDONESIAN ECONOMY, THE IJF HAVE ENJOYED ALMOST COMPLETE POPULAR SUPPORT FROM JAKARTA, SURABAYA, CILACAP AND HASIM. WITH THIS SUPPORT, THE IJF HAVE GAINED THE LOYALTY OF MOST MILITARY AND ITS SUPPORTING INFRASTRUCTURE ON THE ISLAND OF JAVA, INCLUDING THE SURABAYA NAVAL BASE.

THE REMAINING INDONESIAN TRIBAL AND ETHNIC GOVERNING BODIES HAVE ALL BUT ACQUIESCED TO THIS COUP AND HAVE ASKED FOR REGIONAL CALM WHILE A NEW GOVERNING BODY IS CREATED VIA THE IJF IN JAKARTA. THE "KELOMPOK ENAM" HAVE ANNOUNCED ON RADIO AND TELEVISION TO "UNITE" THE COUNTRY ALONG ITS THEOCRATIC AND ETHNIC VISION.

WE BELIEVE THE IJF WILL NOT STOP WITH JUST JAVA AND OUR AMERICAN FRIENDS CONCUR. KH-11 IMPROVED CRYSTAL PASSES INDICATE INTENSE PREPARATIONS AT SURABAYA NAVAL BASE TO MOVE ON THE MORE RESOURCE RICH SUMATRA AND KALIMANTAN LAND MASSES. WE HAVE COUNTED AT LEAST 4 FAST PATROL BOATS ALONG WITH AT LEAST ONE SUBMARINE, THREE FRIGATES, AND VARIOUS LANDING ASSETS.

ALARMINGLY, THE KH-11 SPOTTED SEVERAL EMPTY 3000 TEU INDONESIAN CONTAINER SHIPS IN AND AROUND THE SUNDA AND LOMBOK STRAITS (FIGURE 1) LAYING, WHAT WE BELIEVE ARE VINTAGE SOVIET FLOATING NAVAL MINES. WE BELIEVE THE IJF ARE TRYING TO HIDE THE MINE-LAYING VIA ITS COMMERCIAL VESSEL FLEET. IT SHOULD BE NOTED, WE DO NOT HAVE DEFINITIVE INTELLIGENCE INDICATING THAT THE IJF HAS INDEED MINED THE SUNDA AND LOMBOK STRAITS; HOWEVER, IF TRUE, IT PUTS THE WORLDS COMMERCIAL CONTAINER SHIP TRAFFIC IN QUITE A PREDICAMENT, AND MINE SWEEPING ACTIVITIES MUST BE EXPEDITED.


FIGURE 1

THIS ABOVE TACTIC ONLY MAKES SENSE IF THE INTENT OF THE IJF IS TO CUT OFF AUSTRALIAN/ALLIED (SAAF) INTERVENTION IN ITS FUTURE PLANS. OBVIOUSLY THIS WILL PUSH OUR AIR AND SEA CAPABILITIES TO THEIR MAX.

AMERICAN POLICY MAKERS ARE AS CONCERNED ABOUT THE IJF INTENTIONS AS THE AUSTRALIAN PARLIAMENT. PHILIPPINE CABINET MINISTERS HAVE OK'ED PLANS TO MOVE AMERICAN ASSETS INTO A LESS USED AND CLANDESTINE AIRBASE IN SOUTHERN LUZON. SADLY, MALAYSIA HAS ONLY PROMISED MINE SWEEPING GEAR BUT NO AIRBASES OR AIRCRAFT TO ASSIST IN ROLLING BACK THE PERCEIVED IJF OFFENSIVE.

THERE IS A PERSISTENT AND UNSUBSTANTIATED RUMOR, VIA RADIO CHATTER, THAT CHRISTMAS ISLAND IS A POTENTIAL TARGET FOR THE IJF. AGAIN, THIS ONLY MAKES SENSE IF THERE AIM IS TO DISABLE SAAF INTERVENTION. HOWEVER, WE HAVE PULLED OUT OF STORAGE AN OLD AN/TPS-43 AND IT'S ONLINE, IT WILL GIVE US SOME WARNING OF ANY ATTACKS BEFORE THE ARRIVING HMAS STUART. BUT CHRISTMAS ISLAND IS A SMALL OUTPOST AND IS COMPLETELY UNDEFENDED AT THIS TIME.

THIS IS THE SITUATION AS OF 6AM, DECEMBER 25TH LOCAL TIME. PLEASE USE ALL HASTE AND AVAILABLE ASSETS TO ROLL BACK THIS IJF MILITANCY, OTHERWISE, WE WILL HAVE A SOUTH ASIAN REGIONAL CATASTROPHE.

A FOLLOW-UP ORDER WITH ASSETS ATTACHED TO YOUR COMMAND WILL BE FORTHCOMING.

GOOD LUCK AND GOD SAVE THE QUEEN.

YOURS SINCERELY,

PRIME MINISTER JOHN HOWARD


********* TOP SECRET *********



CURRENT VERSION: VERSION V.17

V.17 - MAJOR UPDATE!
- removed all US F-111's
- removed several OOB items for SAAF forces
- added some exclusion zones to better assist AI in it's prosecution of effort
- added B-1's out of new AB in Guam
- Refined all triggers and events
- changed the OOB for IJF and SAAF forces to better compliment each other
- moved subs to be more of a problem for SAAF
- changed proficiency levels for both IJF and SAAF
- added new graphic in brief
- moved ships closer to action for use in intercept of IJF SAG
- removed DDG on US side and replaced with FFG (more in line with US Naval assets in 1998)
- tweaked all magazines and ammo levels for units
- fixed many scoring problems
- overall, scenario is similar to previous, but now it's more in line with OOB of forces arrayed
- really would love some play testing of this new scenario with the hope that it's better and a more challenging AI


V.16
- Added four P-3C Orion A/C for ASW/Surveillance in Java/Sunda/Lombok Straits (both US and Australian Assets)
- The point is to get your fleet into the Java Sea, this is done a number of ways, but having ASW A/C will help

V. 15
- Changed the distance of ships to engagement
- Modified a posture and updated briefing
- Changed the groupings so that SAMs/AAA and other IJF assets are identified without hitting PgUp
- Added a new player intro
- Removed ADF F-16's for F-16 Blk40's with AIM-120A's
- Changed duplicate Helo Name
- Added F-111 date clarification in briefing.

Old Changes:
- Added a Fast Frigate to Christmas Island TG
- Modified SAM Magazines
- Changed point distribution and amounts
- Scenario ends ONLY when Primary and Secondary Objectives are met
- You get penalized higher for certain events
- Broke up Southern Fleet into two task groups
- Fixed triggers for enemy
- Added a true random weather event to scenario
- Modified routes of some enemy A/C
- Added CAP A/C to the Human Player to supplement North
- Fixed CAP Missions for Enemy forces
- Fixed Helo ASW work IJF mission and Helo surface compliment
- Fixed Commercial Mission, planes not going to airports and getting shot down
- Added correct posture triggers
- Fixed Tomahawk Missile initial load-out problem
- Changed All enemy Radar/Sites to no auto-detect (you need to fly recon)
- Added ROE penalties if NOT followed (READ ROE)
- Spell checked the entire scenario
- Message pop-ups should be limited to one-time only



Attachment (1)

< Message edited by wqc12345 -- 8/17/2016 10:52:35 PM >
Post #: 1
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 6/14/2016 9:52:31 PM   
Excroat3

 

Posts: 436
Joined: 1/24/2015
Status: offline
Before I jump in, just a few points

Maybe don't make all the IJF radars visible at start? I took the ROE given to me as I could fire right away, so I popped all the radars with Tomahawks from the DDG group. I also sent about 30 at the naval base, and actually ended the scenario because I got a ton of points from demolishing the base.


Score: TRIUMPH, 520 points

SIDE: South Asian Allied Forces (SAAF)
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
43x RGM-109C Tomahawk Blk III TLAM-C



SIDE: Indonesian Java Front
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
2x 35mm Twin Oerlikon [UAR-1021 Skyguard FCR]
9x Building (Barracks)
1x Building (Very Large Leadership Compound)
1x Bunker (COMINT Station)
3x Radar (Generic 2D Air Search Radar [Long-Range])
2x Structure (Naval Dock)
1x Structure (Pier [Extra Large, 200-500m])
1x Vehicle (UAR-1021 Skyguard)


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
1x AIM-7M Sparrow III
1x AIM-9P-4 Sidewinder





(in reply to wqc12345)
Post #: 2
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 6/14/2016 9:57:17 PM   
wqc12345


Posts: 250
Joined: 12/7/2015
From: San Francisco, CA
Status: offline
Thanks a lot man. I should have known better than allow that. I'll fix it. The point is to recon first and escalate... I'll post a new one shortly.

(in reply to Excroat3)
Post #: 3
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 6/14/2016 11:01:01 PM   
wqc12345


Posts: 250
Joined: 12/7/2015
From: San Francisco, CA
Status: offline
ok, version 2 posted.. let me know what you think?

(in reply to wqc12345)
Post #: 4
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 6/15/2016 6:12:43 PM   
wqc12345


Posts: 250
Joined: 12/7/2015
From: San Francisco, CA
Status: offline
New Version up.

(in reply to wqc12345)
Post #: 5
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 6/16/2016 3:38:50 AM   
Rory Noonan

 

Posts: 2816
Joined: 12/18/2014
From: Brooklyn, NY
Status: offline
Just started playing this. Looks great, I think I've found a new favourite. Now I have to split my time between this scenario and Hearts of Iron IV

The only thing I am missing is a submarine element; the RAN had the Oberon class diesel boats Otama and Onslow as well as the new Collins class boats Collins and Farncomb at this point in time, and they were used quite extensively for ISR around Indonesia during peace and the 1999 INTERFET mission. I suppose a USN nuclear attack boat would be assigned to the area too, but it might be too 'overpowered' for the Indonesian forces to go up against.

(in reply to wqc12345)
Post #: 6
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 6/16/2016 4:04:44 AM   
wqc12345


Posts: 250
Joined: 12/7/2015
From: San Francisco, CA
Status: offline
Thanks Man... Yea, I toyed with that piece and decided against it.. At first I had one RAN sub then decided against it.

Anyway, please let me know how you do when you're done, I've fixed the press the easy button tomahawk issue and made it what I think is rather fun to play.

Best

(in reply to Rory Noonan)
Post #: 7
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 6/16/2016 5:11:03 AM   
Rory Noonan

 

Posts: 2816
Joined: 12/18/2014
From: Brooklyn, NY
Status: offline
7 hours in and having a blast, thanks!

Only issue I've seen so far is that the IJF keeps shooting down civilian AC--17 so far--which triggers a message I've seen 17 times now. No biggie, but it slows down gameplay for me.

(in reply to wqc12345)
Post #: 8
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 6/16/2016 5:45:33 AM   
wqc12345


Posts: 250
Joined: 12/7/2015
From: San Francisco, CA
Status: offline
Fixed!! Thanks man.. won't display a continual message and fixed the no-nav zone to limit the A/C entering. Also, made sure postures were set correctly for IJF and Civilian A/C

(in reply to Rory Noonan)
Post #: 9
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 6/18/2016 7:30:47 PM   
wqc12345


Posts: 250
Joined: 12/7/2015
From: San Francisco, CA
Status: offline
Added some tweaks to this scenario.. specifically air cover for invading fleet and some CAP support in the north.

(in reply to wqc12345)
Post #: 10
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 6/20/2016 10:51:09 PM   
wqc12345


Posts: 250
Joined: 12/7/2015
From: San Francisco, CA
Status: offline
version 13 up.. should be almost final

(in reply to wqc12345)
Post #: 11
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 6/23/2016 1:47:55 AM   
wqc12345


Posts: 250
Joined: 12/7/2015
From: San Francisco, CA
Status: offline
Anymore feedback on this scenario from players? I would love to hear good and bad with it, since I really tried to polish it up and make it a worthy challenge.

(in reply to wqc12345)
Post #: 12
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 6/23/2016 2:35:52 AM   
TurboRUSH

 

Posts: 21
Joined: 8/18/2015
Status: offline
Just started the scenario last night. I'll try to get a few hours in tonight and try to provide meaningful feedback. The setting of the scenario is definitely interesting. Thanks for all your work.

(in reply to wqc12345)
Post #: 13
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 6/24/2016 12:14:12 PM   
Jorm


Posts: 545
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Melbourne
Status: offline
deleted till i play more
J




< Message edited by Jorm -- 6/24/2016 12:26:13 PM >

(in reply to wqc12345)
Post #: 14
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 6/24/2016 6:14:15 PM   
wqc12345


Posts: 250
Joined: 12/7/2015
From: San Francisco, CA
Status: offline
Hey man. Got your message. All the tanker support is US based, and chopped to the Australians. The Aussies did have some indigenous tanker support, but it was limited.

(in reply to Jorm)
Post #: 15
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 6/26/2016 11:59:26 PM   
TurboRUSH

 

Posts: 21
Joined: 8/18/2015
Status: offline
DB Version: 835
Results: Major Victory - 510 points (Scenario auto-ended after I scored 510 points though I will continue to play until time runs out)

Very polished and awesome scenario. The mission briefing is very well written providing an excellent overview of the situation and clear objectives. First task was to use my Recon assets to look for the enemy task force and targets at Surabaya. The faster RF-111s reached Java before the U-2 and used the terrain to locate SA-5 targets and the SA-15s! The recon assets were used also lure fighters into the air for the fighter sweeps. Easy pickings with the SAAF & US AF having sparrows whereas the Indonesians only had Aim-9s... except for few occasional surprises.

Things I like about the scenario:

-Having to recon to find targets. No radars and stationary targets already in place and ready to be Tomahawked.
-Great messages and events (especially the homage to Mark Gellis)
-Long distances between airbases and the targets requiring good coordination between support assets, fighters, and strikers.
-Civilian traffic.
-Like the idea of having Christmas Island as an alternate airbase. Also the dilemma to defend it or leave it to its fate. I chose latter as I didn't want to spread my resources on too broad of a front.

Thing I did not like:
-Scoring may be a bit too generous. I only sank 6 ships and didn't even touch Surabaya yet I had a major victory. Maybe the damage to Christmas Island should be a bigger points penalty. It'll make the decision to defend or leave it alone much tougher.
-SA-5 ammo seemed bit low. All 3 SA-5 sites that were detected fired only 26 missiles total. I assume they ran dry. I was hoping to use my SEAD assets to neutralize the SAM sites but the SAM sites shot of all their missiles at max range without doing any damage.

Suggestions:
-The naval element seems to be irrelevant. Both the northern and southern task force were too far away to have any impact on the scenario. The Northern TF had few Tomahawks but that was it. All the damage was done with air power. Maybe have the TF closer to Java at the start of the scenario. Neither task force had any chance of engaging the enemy TF NE of Surabaya.
-Concentrate the Indonesian fighter assets closer together instead of having them all over Java. The fighters were too spread out and it wasn't a challenge to divide & conquer creating 2:1 to 4:1 matchups.


(in reply to wqc12345)
Post #: 16
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 6/27/2016 12:28:17 AM   
wqc12345


Posts: 250
Joined: 12/7/2015
From: San Francisco, CA
Status: offline
Thanks sooooo much man. I will make some edits and updates based on your feedback. Additionally, I was worried about the scoring and how it would impact game play, and you really helped me. Thanks again!!

(in reply to TurboRUSH)
Post #: 17
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 7/1/2016 8:25:33 PM   
wqc12345


Posts: 250
Joined: 12/7/2015
From: San Francisco, CA
Status: offline
New Version up based on Turbo's feedback!! Thanks Turbo!

(in reply to wqc12345)
Post #: 18
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 7/28/2016 7:47:16 PM   
wqc12345


Posts: 250
Joined: 12/7/2015
From: San Francisco, CA
Status: offline
New version 15 up. please let me know your thoughts.

Please re-download the new one, since the old one had some magazine problems with bases and I didn't notice it when I updated the DB.

< Message edited by wqc12345 -- 7/28/2016 9:27:54 PM >

(in reply to wqc12345)
Post #: 19
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 7/28/2016 10:21:23 PM   
Gunner98

 

Posts: 5508
Joined: 4/29/2005
From: The Great White North!
Status: offline
Wqc

Just taking a look at this one. It's in my favorite era and the scope is along my liking.

A couple very preliminary comments, :

-small point but two of the Helo's have the same name: The SH-70 on HMAS Success and the SH-60 on USS Ramage are both named 'Golf #1' (that's the problem with using the games auto name function)

Based on some research I did for Northern Fury, there are some USAF airframe issues:

-The last F-111F's were already retired in 96 and the Spark-Varks in May of 98: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Dynamics_F-111_Aardvark#F-111F. Replaced by F-15E's
-It is unlikely, not impossible, that you would have any Air National Guard F-16s using the F-16 ADF in this situation for several reasons:
--By 98 many of the F-16 ADFs had been swapped out for Blk 30 & 40's in the ANG
--The ADF was purpose built for NORAD
--The USAF Reserve only flies Blk 30/32 F-16s, although they may have had Blk 25 in 98. Not sure, never CJs or ADFs.
--PACAF had the better part of 3 Wings of F-16 (one in Japan (2 Sqn), one in Korea (2 Sqn), another in Korea with 1 Sqn paired with A-10s, and a Sqn in Alaska)
This is an excellent site for anything F-16 related, I've done a lot of double checking and these guys have most if not all the answers: http://www.f-16.net/f-16_users.html
There was one F-15E Sqn in PACAF, based in Alaska. 90th FS has since switched to F-22 but they were F-15E in 98 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/90th_Fighter_Squadron
Current F-15E info is available here: http://www.f-15e.info/joomla/en/operators/131-f-15e-unites

Hope this helps, sorry I didn't check this out earlier.

B


(in reply to wqc12345)
Post #: 20
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 7/28/2016 10:24:48 PM   
wqc12345


Posts: 250
Joined: 12/7/2015
From: San Francisco, CA
Status: offline
Yea, the F-111 dates I'm aware of.. I decided to throw them in for commonality with the Australians.. as for the F-16's, I can switch out for the proper ones, I wanted one for High cover and the other for SEAD support.. and the Helo's, thanks for the name issue.

(in reply to Gunner98)
Post #: 21
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 7/29/2016 4:52:36 AM   
magi

 

Posts: 1529
Joined: 2/1/2014
Status: offline
this sounds better now... gonna try it....

(in reply to wqc12345)
Post #: 22
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 7/29/2016 8:15:27 AM   
magi

 

Posts: 1529
Joined: 2/1/2014
Status: offline
well i am starting this.... the only thing that really sticks out in an unusual way... is the fact that i cant find any fixed wing long endurance patrol/asw aircraft... which seems unusually improbable given the national forces involved.. the mission.. and the vast environment...


(in reply to magi)
Post #: 23
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 7/29/2016 6:19:39 PM   
wqc12345


Posts: 250
Joined: 12/7/2015
From: San Francisco, CA
Status: offline
Sadly, that's part of the mission, to force the player to move helo assets into the Java sea. I could add some P-3's to Australia, I'll see what this does to gameplay.

(in reply to magi)
Post #: 24
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 7/29/2016 8:19:04 PM   
wqc12345


Posts: 250
Joined: 12/7/2015
From: San Francisco, CA
Status: offline
ok, based on magi's feedback, I decided to add some P-3's to the game.. I just worry that the Harpoon loadouts on them will make mincemeat of the invasion SAG, but it seems to be not the case.. anyway, I've updated it to version 16.

(in reply to wqc12345)
Post #: 25
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 7/30/2016 8:36:49 AM   
magi

 

Posts: 1529
Joined: 2/1/2014
Status: offline
thank you sir.... i added a few in my game play....
how does the weather effect recon.... im just at the point of getting them in the AO..... i can go lo and fast with the f111 but im concerned im wasting my mission with the U2... ive not used them much before....

managing the space time sortie tempo is the hardest part... and waiting for sead/dead strike loadouts to get rid of their radar.....

(in reply to wqc12345)
Post #: 26
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 8/1/2016 12:45:25 PM   
Gunner98

 

Posts: 5508
Joined: 4/29/2005
From: The Great White North!
Status: offline
Ran through this last night. The scenario ended when I sank an LPD.


spoiler:

Both LPDs were lagging behind the escorts. They were putting along at 14knts, while the main group was pushing forward at 18knts


Also, the scenario ended when I sank one of the two LPDs and had not yet used those F-111 on the base, took me a bit by surprise. You may want to set up a counter side to accumulate points, for instance, add one point for each LPD sank and end the game when it reaches 'exactly 2'. This gives the designer much more control on when the game ends.

I would be careful with the P-3s, that Harpoon loadout in a mid intensity fight like this is an excellent tool, and very powerful (long range, nice radars, a sniper essentially). If you want to force the F-111 attack, you may want to use the counter trick but set the win threshold so you need to sink the LPDs and hit the base.

Nice scenario BTW.

B

(in reply to magi)
Post #: 27
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 8/1/2016 4:34:33 PM   
wqc12345


Posts: 250
Joined: 12/7/2015
From: San Francisco, CA
Status: offline
Bart. Do you have that code? Can you paste it or pm me with it? I'd like to review something that someone has created for that kind of event. Or if your doing it via the regular time triggers?

(in reply to Gunner98)
Post #: 28
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 8/1/2016 10:35:55 PM   
Gunner98

 

Posts: 5508
Joined: 4/29/2005
From: The Great White North!
Status: offline
No special coding, just regular stuff.

-Set up a non-playing side. I usually call mine 'marker', useful for all sorts of stuff like starting a timer, hiding RPs etc. Make it blind to save computing speed.
-Set an action that gives the marker side victory points, it doesn't mater how you do the scoring but the aim is to accumulate the effects of events (i.e. points)
-Set up a trigger based on points

So the player side(s) get their own VPs just like normal, but the VPs that go to the marker side are only for counting. So it allows you to track events without affecting the players victory level.
In this example, say 10 pts for each LPD, 2 for each FF/FFL, 1 for each hanger (or whatever) destroyed. You then base the 'End scenario event at e.g. 30 pts or whatever it takes that the player has likely sank both LPDs, several escorts and several land targets.

Not using this method makes it harder to figure out when to end the scenario as it is usually based on one trigger only and if the player does that first it makes it a short game.

No lua magic involved (otherwise I probably couldn't figure it out

B

(in reply to wqc12345)
Post #: 29
RE: Merry Christmas, 1998 - 8/1/2016 11:52:22 PM   
wqc12345


Posts: 250
Joined: 12/7/2015
From: San Francisco, CA
Status: offline
Thanks for the great!!!! idea. That is awesome.

BTW, I didn't want to add the P-3's to the scenario for just that reason.. snipers.. I'm working on refining ruby slipper + working on some of the new command beta stuff, but I'll revamp Merry Christmas soon, I have a ton more code to add and refine with that scenario.

(in reply to Gunner98)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> Merry Christmas, 1998 [UPDATED] Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

3.750