Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Directive 21 v2.0

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III >> RE: Directive 21 v2.0 Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Directive 21 v2.0 - 6/11/2014 2:13:23 PM   
Lobster


Posts: 5104
Joined: 8/8/2013
From: Third rock from the Sun.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TPOO

Well I think it is pretty clear from my post the me and Steve are the scenario designers. I think I have the right to not want mods of my scenario uploaded and discussed on the forum. No one is restricting anyone from starting their own threads on the forum.
Myself and Steve are more than happy to take any suggestions for changes to D21 into consideration but ultimately we have to be the ones to make the changes.


I am well aware that you are probably the scenario co-designer. But you most certainly did tell him he couldn't post about modding the scenario. He can talk about modding a scenario all he wants whether you like it or not. It's would be up to the forum moderator whether or not to allow that post.

(in reply to TPOO)
Post #: 151
RE: Directive 21 v2.0 - 6/12/2014 4:09:16 PM   
Alpha77

 

Posts: 2116
Joined: 9/24/2010
Status: offline 		Well ok, I´ll test my changes if time then make a new thread or mail the scen designers :)

2.3 seems improved anyway - PO seems more aggressive, with some tweaks this will be some more challenge for the German player

Noticed some problems on the SOV side with supply btw. in 43 after I ended game and checked the other side. But as it seems it is not wished to write about it in this thread I PM you guys later perhaps with more details (if wanted at all)

But it seems the interest for this game (I mean TOAW) isn´t very great anymore judging from the forum..... that´s a pity it´s such a nice system.

< Message edited by Alpha77 -- 6/12/2014 5:14:38 PM >

(in reply to Lobster)
Post #: 152
RE: Directive 21 v2.0 - 6/12/2014 5:40:29 PM   
Oberst_Klink

 

Posts: 4778
Joined: 2/10/2008
From: Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Alpha77

Well ok, I´ll test my changes if time then make a new thread or mail the scen designers :)

2.3 seems improved anyway - PO seems more aggressive, with some tweaks this will be some more challenge for the German player

Noticed some problems on the SOV side with supply btw. in 43 after I ended game and checked the other side. But as it seems it is not wished to write about it in this thread I PM you guys later perhaps with more details (if wanted at all)

But it seems the interest for this game (I mean TOAW) isn´t very great anymore judging from the forum..... that´s a pity it´s such a nice system.

Au contraire Kamerad!

Most of us are simply waiting for 3.X and look, you are constantly updating the modern .eqp, I am beta-testing and still planning on doing this -> http://gefechtsstand.wordpress.com/2012/07/01/upcoming-schwerpunkt-kharkov-project/

Klink, Oberst

< Message edited by Oberst_Klink -- 6/12/2014 6:41:10 PM >

_____________________________

My Blog & on Twitter.
Visit CS Legion on Twitter & Facebook for updates.

(in reply to Alpha77)
Post #: 153
RE: Directive 21 v2.0 - 6/12/2014 8:36:56 PM   
BigDuke66


Posts: 2013
Joined: 2/1/2001
From: Terra
Status: offline 		At least I'm waiting the next patch to get going at all.

_____________________________

JOIN The Blitz Wargaming Club
JOIN Napoleonic Wargame Club
JOIN American Civil War Game Club

(in reply to Oberst_Klink)
Post #: 154
RE: Directive 21 v2.0 - 6/12/2014 9:00:36 PM   
Freyr Oakenshield


Posts: 541
Joined: 4/25/2014
Status: offline 		Unfortunately, I'm playing a few rather long scenarios. I reckon I'll still be playing them when the patch comes out...

Would it be a good idea to update in the middle of playing FitE1 and D21? Or could that screw the games up?

< Message edited by Freyr Oakenshield -- 6/12/2014 10:01:47 PM >

(in reply to BigDuke66)
Post #: 155
RE: Directive 21 v2.0 - 6/12/2014 11:18:40 PM   
Lobster


Posts: 5104
Joined: 8/8/2013
From: Third rock from the Sun.
Status: offline 		Probably. We've had hints of some of the changes and they would not work with old scenarios...unless. Unless there is an option to play under the old game rules.

(in reply to Freyr Oakenshield)
Post #: 156
RE: Directive 21 v2.0 - 6/15/2015 12:31:54 PM   
Cfant

 

Posts: 473
Joined: 12/12/2010
Status: offline 		Hi guys!

I want to start a new game of D21 against Elmer (together with two other guys - a Heeresgruppe for each of us ). TOAW has the version 1.1 for TOAW 3.4 included. Here you talk about v2.0. What's the newest version? And where do I get it?

Thanks a lot!

(in reply to Lobster)
Post #: 157
RE: Directive 21 v2.0 - 6/15/2015 2:24:07 PM   
sPzAbt653


Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: offline 		v2.3 can be found here : Link no longer valid

< Message edited by sPzAbt653 -- 5/23/2018 10:08:36 PM >

(in reply to Cfant)
Post #: 158
RE: Directive 21 v2.0 - 6/15/2015 7:12:49 PM   
Cfant

 

Posts: 473
Joined: 12/12/2010
Status: offline 		Thank you :)

(in reply to sPzAbt653)
Post #: 159
RE: Directive 21 v2.0 - 6/16/2015 8:57:39 AM   
Cfant

 

Posts: 473
Joined: 12/12/2010
Status: offline 		Is there an OOB for the german forces of the scenario?

(in reply to Cfant)
Post #: 160
RE: Directive 21 v2.0 - 6/16/2015 2:18:43 PM   
sPzAbt653


Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: offline 		There used to be one floating around somewhere, I suspect when I lost a computer I lost it. However, recently when we did the TGW scenario we used the D21 OOB as a reference and that produced the attached file. Only the larger units are included as for TGW we combined as much as we could. Pay no attention to the notes at the bottom [everything below the 'Formation Count = 125] as they only applied to TGW. Maybe you can use this:

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Cfant)
Post #: 161
RE: Directive 21 v2.0 - 6/16/2015 5:28:28 PM   
Cfant

 

Posts: 473
Joined: 12/12/2010
Status: offline 		Thank you :) Could this be the right OOB? https://mauzesblog.wordpress.com/201...der-of-battle/

By the way, there will be an AAR, in german, but pictures tell more then words ;)

http://www.si-games.com/forum/showthread.php?t=28110

(in reply to sPzAbt653)
Post #: 162
RE: Directive 21 v2.0 - 7/6/2015 9:23:00 PM   
simcityrefund

 

Posts: 64
Joined: 5/11/2015
Status: offline 		does this work against ai on the latest 3xbb exe? Are the scenarios where Directive21 2.3 was donwloaded from upgraded or just the Directive21 that is upgraded? what scenario can be played from that site agaisnt the ai? When I started the directive21 2.3 I had wrong equipment text pop up whathapen?

< Message edited by ifailmore -- 7/6/2015 10:28:17 PM >

(in reply to Cfant)
Post #: 163
RE: Directive 21 v2.0 - 7/6/2015 9:29:38 PM   
governato

 

Posts: 1079
Joined: 5/6/2011
From: Seattle, WA
Status: offline
ALL scenario that play with TOAWIII (v3.4 or older) are fully playable with 3XBb. It is this simple.


(in reply to simcityrefund)
Post #: 164
RE: Directive 21 v2.0 - 7/7/2015 6:16:04 AM   
sPzAbt653


Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: offline
quote:

Are the scenarios where Directive21 2.3 was donwloaded from upgraded or just the Directive21 that is upgraded? what scenario can be played from that site agaisnt the ai? When I started the directive21 2.3 I had wrong equipment text pop up whathapen?


Regarding the download site [Dizium], compare the version # of what you have to the version # on the site, that will tell you if there is a later version available.

PO Versions are stated as such in the scenario briefings.

EQP File Error - Go back to page 1, post #22. Start there and eventually you should be able to figure it out.

(in reply to simcityrefund)
Post #: 165
RE: Directive 21 v2.0 - 7/8/2015 1:09:14 PM   
Numdydar

 

Posts: 3211
Joined: 2/13/2004
Status: offline 		Do you think this will be updated to use the new features in the new patch that just came out?

(in reply to sPzAbt653)
Post #: 166
RE: Directive 21 v2.0 - 7/8/2015 2:12:40 PM   
sPzAbt653


Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: offline 		What do you suggest ?

(in reply to Numdydar)
Post #: 167
RE: Directive 21 v2.0 - 7/8/2015 5:09:51 PM   
Oberst_Klink

 

Posts: 4778
Joined: 2/10/2008
From: Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: sPzAbt653

What do you suggest ?


This?

Was sollen wir tun?

Klink, Oberst


_____________________________

My Blog & on Twitter.
Visit CS Legion on Twitter & Facebook for updates.

(in reply to sPzAbt653)
Post #: 168
RE: Directive 21 v2.0: THANKS! - 7/13/2016 1:27:05 PM   
serumph

 

Posts: 13
Joined: 9/4/2011
Status: offline 		I am going to start a new game because at Turn 9 an entire Russian armored division interdicted the rail line supplying Army Group Centre and the staff had insufficient rear area coverage to detect it, much less eliminate it. Franz Halder has cleaned house, and we are go, again. Thanks again to the designers of this brilliant solitaire scenario! Playing 2.3!

_____________________________

Gerry

(in reply to Oberst_Klink)
Post #: 169
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III >> RE: Directive 21 v2.0 Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.859