RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Page: << < prev 11 12 [13] 14 15 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/21/2016 2:37:35 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

no reaction to the W. Med.

In the Italian coast, if no other units entered the zone and no fighter can intercept, them react the Nav out as far as it can go (I believe that would be the 2-box). If there are fighters available, then the NAV and fighter react to the 0-box.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 361

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/21/2016 2:51:52 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

no reaction to the W. Med.

In the Italian coast, if no other units entered the zone and no fighter can intercept, them react the Nav out as far as it can go (I believe that would be the 2-box). If there are fighters available, then the NAV and fighter react to the 0-box.

Will do. By the way, the RN in the North Atlantic and Cape St. Vincent elected for no combat in both areas. Each area contained a disorganized Italian sub so the axis weren't given the opportunity to initiate.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 362

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/21/2016 2:54:13 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

JF40. Allied #11. RN. The Italian Coast. Round 1.

With no threat of allied fighters, the Italians fly their NAV out to the 2-box in the Italian Coast. However, it's the RN that are able to surprise the Italians, isolate box 0 and sink the lone Italian CP there.

Will let you know shortly how round 2 goes.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 7/21/2016 2:57:07 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 363

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/21/2016 2:56:02 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Italian Coast, round 2. Search rolls, RN 8, Italians 9. Combat ends.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 364

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/21/2016 3:00:08 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

JF40. Allied #11. West Med.

I'm not sure it was that wise for me to try to initiate a naval combat in the West Med, but I did and it was a brutal affair for both sides.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 365

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/21/2016 3:12:47 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

JF40. Allied #11. CW Artillery Ground Strike.

The spotters for the British artillery must have been at tea.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 366

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/21/2016 3:37:31 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

JF40. Allied #11. End of Turn Check.

Nothing much else really happened. I'll post some pics later, but the turn continues. Game file back to you very shortly.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 367

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/21/2016 3:51:23 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

JF40. Allied #11. End of Impulse. France.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 368

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/21/2016 3:51:52 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

JF40. Allied #11. End of Impulse. Med. North Africa.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 369

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/21/2016 3:52:26 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

JF40. Allied #11. End of Impulse. East Africa.

Opps ...

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 370

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/21/2016 3:53:14 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

JF40. Allied #11. End of Impulse. China.

Double Opps ...

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 371

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/21/2016 4:30:31 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Actions: Ge, Jp take lands and It takes a combined.
Italy moves a naval fleet with the CP into the Italian Coast. Do you wish to initiate combat.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 372

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/21/2016 4:36:13 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

Actions: Ge, Jp take lands and It takes a combined.
Italy moves a naval fleet with the CP into the Italian Coast. Do you wish to initiate combat.

No thank you. The RN politely declines. It's getting a bit hot off the Italian Coast.

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 7/21/2016 4:40:27 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 373

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/21/2016 5:00:41 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

There were a couple of air missions, shown below, for no effect.
The Italians occupy Djibouti (FR Somaliland) and force a FR CA to rebase (rolled a 6, so it avoided scuttling and capture). Where to?

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 7/21/2016 5:20:54 AM >

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 374

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/21/2016 5:22:22 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

At the moment I assumed Marseille was adequate. If not, I can change and redo up to this point. I am also making one attack this impulse, in China. Do you want it to be an assault or blitz. Normally I would have thought assault, but at this point, you may be trying to save forces and not inflict losses. I will not get back to this till about noon my time on Thursday.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 375

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/21/2016 5:23:19 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

marsellies is fine. Chinese chose blitz.

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 7/21/2016 5:27:08 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 376

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/21/2016 6:02:03 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Well, with a 17 it did not matter.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 377

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/21/2016 6:16:03 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Turn did end. Though the weather has not favored the Euro Axis plans, the long turns have definitely helped the Japanese in China. There was a Partisan place in Yellandu India, and the Allies get to place a Chinese partisan.

All subs will return to base as will the Italian CA's and NAV in the Italian Coast. The German battleship in the Baltic will drop a box. All CPs will remain where they are.

Should be no issue with moving through the preliminary production phase - I'll make any saved oil adjustments in the final production phase.

All Italian naval units return to base in La Spezia and all German sub units return to Kiel.

That should get us well through the initial portion of the EOT phases.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 378

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/21/2016 11:39:38 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Soviet-Nazi Pact. Where do you want me to put the two chits that Germany gets?

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 379

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/22/2016 1:38:55 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

One offensive, one defensive

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 380

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/22/2016 3:09:59 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

JF40. End of Turn. Partisans.

ChiComm partisan deployed on Japanese controlled RP in the north.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 381

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/22/2016 3:12:11 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

JF40. End of Turn. USA Entry Options.

The USA adds a chit to the German/Italy entry pool and choose option 15, "Resources to Western Allies." Now the USA can send its excess oil to the CW, who will certainly make good use of it.

Nazi-Soviet Pact.

Germany chooses 1 chit for the offensive and 1 chit for the defensive pool.

The Soviets choose a chit for the defensive pool.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 382

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/22/2016 4:14:57 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Axis oil usage:

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 7/22/2016 4:20:13 AM >

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 383

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/22/2016 4:35:29 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

JF40. End of Turn. Allied Use Oil.

Note: The USSR and China Required no oil.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 384

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/22/2016 5:07:30 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Axis Final Production Plans

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 385

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/22/2016 5:25:24 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

JF40. End of Turn. Final Production. Active (i.e., at war) Allies.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 386

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/22/2016 5:25:48 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

JF40. End of Turn. Final Production. Neutral Allies.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 387

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/22/2016 5:27:27 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

JF40. End of Turn. Destroyed Pool.

Brutal turn for the Chinese.

Scrap Destroyed Units: Please scrap both French Units lost (P-36A & 4-2 submarine).

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 388

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/22/2016 6:14:23 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Here is the FR scrap. The P-36A did not show up in the FR or the US scrap options (no US screen came up for me at all).
The axis did not scrap anything.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 389

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/22/2016 6:16:43 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Here are the axis builds (using the Undo box to show the builds). Note, I will be away starting about 10 am PT on Friday till Wednesday of next week. My ability to get to the game will be minimal.