Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

New Scenario to Test: Battle of the Bass Strait

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> New Scenario to Test: Battle of the Bass Strait Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
New Scenario to Test: Battle of the Bass Strait - 8/8/2016 11:50:03 AM   
GeorgeCostanza


Posts: 14
Joined: 8/7/2016
From: Melbourne, Victoria
Status: offline 		Hello everybody, I have for you for my very first scenario, in what I would call it's Beta stage. It is indeed my first attempt at a scenario so any critique would be great. I would like to thank Gunner98 and his awesome missions for inspiring me to make my own.
I've designed the scenario to be mildly challenging and hopefully dramatic in its briefing/opening. Once again give me any feedback and I'll apply it in fixes across the week

Current Version: 0.5

V0.5 Hotfix:
- Increased SAM count on TG 89.1/2

V0.4 Hotfix:
- Fixed Errors in the Intro
- Fixed Spelling, Grammar and Errors in the brief (Cheers Gunner)

V0.3
- Fixed ANZUS Points
- Renamed one commander
- Added more ASF to the Liaoning
- Improved Air Defence of King Island and Launceston AB
- Added Air Defence for RAAF Point Cook

0.2 Fix:
- Fixed Point Cook RAAF Runway
- Fixed King Island Airport
- Fixed Kingscote Airport
- Touched up Scoring (including Subs now as well)
- Greatly reduced Tomahawk count
- Added Escorts for the A-50s
- Added a few more ready Fighters at the beginning for ANZUS
- Increased Chinese Bomber and Attack plane numbers
- Reduced SAM on Task Groups 89.1 and 89.2
- Added another HQ-61A at the ASM Site



Attachment (1)

< Message edited by GeorgeCostanza -- 8/10/2016 7:59:30 AM >
Post #: 1
RE: New Scenario to Test: Battle of the Bass Strait - 8/8/2016 4:52:36 PM   
Excroat3

 

Posts: 436
Joined: 1/24/2015
Status: offline 		Love the briefing and the dialogue! Just started the scenario, and here are a few pointers:

The runway at Point Cook is 1400m, and the E-737s need at least 2100m to take off, so right now they can never leave the base.
Might want to make more CAP aircraft available at start, I was overwhelmed by fighters after my first 2 planes would RTB and the Chinese kept coming
No points for destroying subs?
Might also want to lower the tomahawk count, I just kept lobbing them at the Chinese ground defenses until they ran out of SAM
Some escort for that Chinese AWACS would be helpful, as its extremely exposed currently.
The KC-130Js cannot find a taxiway to take off from for some reason
Checked the editor, and the H-6Gs at Kingscote can't find a taxiway either

Just finished, good job making this one!
Other than the beginning when I was short of CAP, this scenario was not too difficult. Any bombers that leaked past my fighters were taken care of by those extremely long ranged SAMs. If you want to increase difficulty, you could add more Chinese fighters, remove ANZUS fighters, lower ANZUS SAM counts, or a mixture of all 3. This was my score at scenario end, and I went on to finish off the Chinese carrier group.


Score: TRIUMPH - 3095
SIDE: ANZUS
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
1x F/A-18F Super Hornet
6x F/A-18C Hornet
3x F/A-18F Super Hornet
1x A/C Hangar (1x Very Large Aircraft)


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
39x AN/SSQ-53F DIFAR
52x AIM-120C-7 AMRAAM P3I.3
124x AIM-120D AMRAAM P3I.4
10x AN/ALE-55 FOTD
58x Generic Chaff Salvo [5x Cartridges]
32x RIM-174A ERAM SM-6MR Blk I
10x AIM-9X Sidewinder
4x 20mm/85 M61A2 Vulcan Burst [100 rnds]
4x RIM-162B ESSM
4x RIM-7P Sea Sparrow
12x RGM-109C Tomahawk Blk III TLAM-C
39x RGM-109E Tomahawk Blk IV TACTOM
6x 20mm/85 M61A1 Vulcan Burst [100 rnds]
6x AN/SSQ-62C DICASS
1x MU-90 Impact
4x Mk46 NEARTIP Mod 5A(SW)
1x RUM-139C VLA [Mk54]
1x Mk46 LWT Mod 2
96x AGM-84G Harpoon ICR
44x AGM-88C HARM
8x ADM-141C ITALD [Active RF]
1x AN/SSQ-62E DICASS
16x RGM-84G Harpoon ICR
8x RGM-84L Harpoon II
24x AGM-84K SLAMER-ATA
18x AGM-88E AARGM



SIDE: PRC
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
20x J-16 Flying Shark [Su-27UBK Copy]
8x J-15 Flying Shark [Su-33 Copy]
16x H-6G Badger [H-6M]
19x J-15S Flying Shark [Su-33 Copy]
11x JH-7A Flounder
1x Radar (China JY-26)
1x Type 093B Shang
1x Marker (Target)
3x Type 091 Han
4x HQ-61A
1x Vehicle (China Type 571 Illuminator [HQ-61A])
1x Vehicle (China Type 571 Search [HQ-61A])
15x Z-9C Dauphin 2
2x Type 052B Luyang I [168 Guangzhou]
1x Radar (Watchman (T))
1x A-50 Mainring [KJ-2000]
1x Type 051B Luhai [167 Shenzhen]
4x Type 054A Jiangkai II [530 Xuzhou]
3x Type 071 Yuzhao [998 Kunlun Shan]
1x Type 072-III Yuting IIA [911 Tianzhushan]
3x Z-18FQ Super Frelon
1x Type 052C Luyang II [170 Lanzhou]
1x Type 052D Luyang III [173 Changsha]


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
426x Generic Active Directional Sonobuoy
66x PL-12
198x Generic Chaff Salvo [4x Cartridges]
10x Generic Flare Salvo [4x Cartridges, Single Spectral]
2x PL-8C [Python 3]
1x 30mm Gsh-30-1 Burst [30 rnds]
4x 500kg GPB
3x C-802K [YJ-82]
4x C-803K [YJ-83]
10x Generic Acoustic Decoy
94x HQ-7 Crotale [FM-80, CSA-4]
10x HQ-61A
59x SA-N-12 Grizzly [9M317]
81x HQ-16A [SA-17 Copy]
17x 100mm/55 H/PJ-87 HECVT
10x HQ-7 Crotale [FM-80] Naval
20x 30mm China H/PJ-12 [Type 730, 240 rnds]
86x Generic Chaff Rocket
47x 37mm/63 Twin Burst [20 rnds]
7x AK-630M 30mm/65 Gatling Burst [400 rnds]
39x HQ-9A
89x HQ-9B
18x Generic Flare Rocket [Single Spectral]
4x 130mm China H/PJ-38 HE
3x 30mm China H/PJ-14 [Type 1130, 500 rnds]
8x HQ-10 [FL-3000N]



SIDE: Biologics
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------






< Message edited by Excroat3 -- 8/8/2016 7:29:21 PM >

(in reply to GeorgeCostanza)
Post #: 2
RE: New Scenario to Test: Battle of the Bass Strait - 8/8/2016 10:47:47 PM   
GeorgeCostanza


Posts: 14
Joined: 8/7/2016
From: Melbourne, Victoria
Status: offline 		Cheers for the feedback Excroat, I should be able to hop in and apply those fixes this afternoon and put up a new version, many thanks!

(in reply to Excroat3)
Post #: 3
RE: New Scenario to Test: Battle of the Bass Strait - 8/8/2016 11:36:49 PM   
GeorgeCostanza


Posts: 14
Joined: 8/7/2016
From: Melbourne, Victoria
Status: offline 		Alright based of feedback I've put together some fixes. I assume there will still be some problems with it that I'm trying to root out. Any more feedback on improvements overall and gameplay fixes will be greatly appreciated. I'll attach the new version to the original post.

V0.2
- Fixed Point Cook RAAF Runway
- Fixed King Island Airport
- Fixed Kingscote Airport
- Touched up Scoring (including Subs now as well)
- Greatly reduced Tomahawk count
- Added Escorts for the A-50s
- Added a few more ready Fighters at the beginning for ANZUS
- Increased Chinese Bomber and Attack plane numbers
- Reduced SAM on Task Groups 89.1 and 89.2
- Added another HQ-61A at the ASM Site

(in reply to GeorgeCostanza)
Post #: 4
RE: New Scenario to Test: Battle of the Bass Strait - 8/9/2016 2:59:30 AM   
Gunner98

 

Posts: 5508
Joined: 4/29/2005
From: The Great White North!
Status: offline 		Giving this one a go. Plays very nice, just fending off the oncoming A2A and A2S ftrs at the moment. Going well but still burning up a lot of AMRAAMs on the Flying Sharks.

One problem noticed. Points are awarded not deducted when an ANZUS AC is shot down:


2016-02-03 8:34 PM: Score changed from 180 to 195. Reason: Event Action: 'PLA Aircraft Destroyed' has been fired (part of Event: 'PLA Aircraft Destroyed')

2016-02-03 8:34 PM: Score changed from 195 to 225. Reason: Event Action: 'ANZUS AC Lost' has been fired (part of Event: 'ANZUS Aircraft Lost')

2016-02-03 8:38 PM: Score changed from 225 to 240. Reason: Event Action: 'PLA Aircraft Destroyed' has been fired (part of Event: 'PLA Aircraft Destroyed')


B

(in reply to GeorgeCostanza)
Post #: 5
RE: New Scenario to Test: Battle of the Bass Strait - 8/9/2016 3:09:14 AM   
GeorgeCostanza


Posts: 14
Joined: 8/7/2016
From: Melbourne, Victoria
Status: offline 		Thanks for that, I'll touch that up along with some more improvements in a few hours with V0.3

(in reply to Gunner98)
Post #: 6
RE: New Scenario to Test: Battle of the Bass Strait - 8/9/2016 8:30:31 AM   
GeorgeCostanza


Posts: 14
Joined: 8/7/2016
From: Melbourne, Victoria
Status: offline 		Some more fixes. I'll attach the new version to the original post.

V0.3
- Fixed ANZUS Points
- Renamed one commander
- Added more ASF to the Liaoning
- Improved Air Defence of King Island and Launceston AB
- Added Air Defence for RAAF Point Cook

_____________________________

'I'm the opposite of every man you've ever met' - George Costanza, 1994

(in reply to GeorgeCostanza)
Post #: 7
RE: New Scenario to Test: Battle of the Bass Strait - 8/10/2016 3:56:29 AM   
magi

 

Posts: 1529
Joined: 2/1/2014
Status: offline 		i am enjoying this.... am pleased you made the above mentioned improvements... it seams to me that group 89.1 & 89.2 could have a few more sam's also......

(in reply to GeorgeCostanza)
Post #: 8
RE: New Scenario to Test: Battle of the Bass Strait - 8/10/2016 4:16:32 AM   
GeorgeCostanza


Posts: 14
Joined: 8/7/2016
From: Melbourne, Victoria
Status: offline 		I'll go back and revise the SAM numbers for V0.5, keep an eye out for it in the next 24 hours

_____________________________

'I'm the opposite of every man you've ever met' - George Costanza, 1994

(in reply to magi)
Post #: 9
RE: New Scenario to Test: Battle of the Bass Strait - 8/10/2016 5:24:18 AM   
magi

 

Posts: 1529
Joined: 2/1/2014
Status: offline 		okidokie.... thanks....

(in reply to GeorgeCostanza)
Post #: 10
RE: New Scenario to Test: Battle of the Bass Strait - 8/11/2016 5:51:17 AM   
magi

 

Posts: 1529
Joined: 2/1/2014
Status: offline 		got a message... need to check your flight size on missions off the liaoing... make flt size 2 instead of 4....

i just looked.... i think 4 units is the way you want it....

i wouldnt mind some asm's and harms at point cook and king island.... i didnt notice that all the harpoons were at launceston till now.... that was a mistake... i should have retired aircraft there after their ata missions.... i should have checked but you might want to put that in the brief....

< Message edited by magi -- 8/11/2016 7:44:02 AM >

(in reply to magi)
Post #: 11
RE: New Scenario to Test: Battle of the Bass Strait - 8/11/2016 9:25:32 AM   
Jorm


Posts: 545
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Melbourne
Status: offline 		cool, downloading now :-)

SIDE: ANZUS
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
2x 20mm/85 Vulcan M163A1 [1100 rnds]
1x E-2C Hawkeye 2000
2x E-737 Wedgetail
9x F/A-18C Hornet
6x F/A-18E Super Hornet
3x F/A-18E Super Hornet
7x F/A-18F Super Hornet
10x F/A-18F Super Hornet
1x NH90 TTH [MRH90 Taipan]
1x SSN 778 New Hampshire [Virginia Class, Flight II]


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
5x 20mm/85 M61A1 Vulcan Burst [100 rnds]
7x 20mm/85 M61A2 Vulcan Burst [100 rnds]
1x ADC Mk2 Mod 0 Torpedo Decoy
2x ADC Mk2 Mod 3 Torpedo Decoy
2x ADC Mk3 Mod 1 Torpedo Countermeasure
2x ADC Mk4 Mod 1 Sonar Jammer
8x ADM-141C ITALD [Active RF]
4x AGM-84D Harpoon IC
34x AGM-84G Harpoon ICR
7x AGM-88C HARM
69x AIM-120C-7 AMRAAM P3I.3
235x AIM-120D AMRAAM P3I.4
39x AIM-9X Sidewinder
37x AN/ALE-55 FOTD
25x AN/SSQ-53F DIFAR
187x Generic Chaff Salvo [5x Cartridges]
33x Generic Flare Salvo [3x Cartridges, Dual Spectral]
26x MIM-120B HUMRAAM [AMRAAM]
4x Mk46 NEARTIP Mod 5A(SW)
8x RGM-109C Tomahawk Blk III TLAM-C
87x RGM-109E Tomahawk Blk IV TACTOM
9x RIM-162A ESSM
32x RIM-162B ESSM
12x RIM-174A ERAM SM-6MR Blk I
24x RIM-66M-2 SM-2MR Blk IIIA
8x RIM-7P Sea Sparrow



SIDE: PRC
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
2x A-50 Mainring [KJ-2000]
18x H-6G Badger [H-6M]
4x HQ-61A
24x J-15 Flying Shark [Su-33 Copy]
16x J-15S Flying Shark [Su-33 Copy]
22x J-16 Flying Shark [Su-27UBK Copy]
17x JH-7A Flounder
1x Radar (China JY-26)
1x Radar (Watchman (T))
1x Type 051B Luhai [167 Shenzhen]
1x Type 052B Luyang I [168 Guangzhou]
1x Type 054A Jiangkai II [530 Xuzhou]
3x Type 091 Han
1x Type 093B Shang
2x Vehicle (China Type 571 Illuminator [HQ-61A])
2x Vehicle (China Type 571 Search [HQ-61A])
6x Z-9C Dauphin 2


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
12x 100mm/55 H/PJ-87 HECVT
9x 30mm China H/PJ-12 [Type 730, 240 rnds]
1x 30mm Gsh-30-1 Burst [30 rnds]
4x AK-630M 30mm/65 Gatling Burst [400 rnds]
17x C-802K [YJ-82]
24x C-803K [YJ-83]
120x FAB-500M-54 GPB
8x Generic Acoustic Decoy
443x Generic Active Directional Sonobuoy
40x Generic Chaff Rocket
338x Generic Chaff Salvo [4x Cartridges]
39x Generic Flare Salvo [4x Cartridges, Single Spectral]
52x HQ-16A [SA-17 Copy]
19x HQ-61A
62x HQ-7 Crotale [FM-80, CSA-4]
3x HQ-7 Crotale [FM-80] Naval
8x HQ-9A
25x HQ-9B
191x PL-12
6x PL-8A [Python 3]
12x PL-8C [Python 3]
32x SA-20b Gargoyle [48N6E2]
68x SA-N-12 Grizzly [9M317]
4x Yu-7



SIDE: Biologics
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------





< Message edited by Jorm -- 8/11/2016 1:05:43 PM >

(in reply to GeorgeCostanza)
Post #: 12
RE: New Scenario to Test: Battle of the Bass Strait - 8/11/2016 9:56:04 AM   
GeorgeCostanza


Posts: 14
Joined: 8/7/2016
From: Melbourne, Victoria
Status: offline 		Magi a lot of the ammunition choices were made in the interest of balance, I didn't want to give a plethora of missiles so as to make targeting more tactical

_____________________________

'I'm the opposite of every man you've ever met' - George Costanza, 1994

(in reply to magi)
Post #: 13
RE: New Scenario to Test: Battle of the Bass Strait - 8/11/2016 4:44:51 PM   
Excroat3

 

Posts: 436
Joined: 1/24/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GeorgeCostanza

Magi a lot of the ammunition choices were made in the interest of balance, I didn't want to give a plethora of missiles so as to make targeting more tactical

This was one of the things I really liked about the scenario, I destroyed the last Chinese ship of the CVBG with Mavericks because I was out of everything else

(in reply to GeorgeCostanza)
Post #: 14
RE: New Scenario to Test: Battle of the Bass Strait - 8/12/2016 6:24:03 AM   
magi

 

Posts: 1529
Joined: 2/1/2014
Status: offline 		oh darn....

(in reply to Excroat3)
Post #: 15
RE: New Scenario to Test: Battle of the Bass Strait - 8/12/2016 9:30:02 AM   
GeorgeCostanza


Posts: 14
Joined: 8/7/2016
From: Melbourne, Victoria
Status: offline 		Thanks for all your help everyone! I'll begin work on the sequel soon, and prep this scenario to be put on the community thread

< Message edited by GeorgeCostanza -- 8/12/2016 9:36:18 AM >

_____________________________

'I'm the opposite of every man you've ever met' - George Costanza, 1994

(in reply to GeorgeCostanza)
Post #: 16
RE: New Scenario to Test: Battle of the Bass Strait - 8/27/2016 5:19:37 AM   
Rory Noonan

 

Posts: 2816
Joined: 12/18/2014
From: Brooklyn, NY
Status: offline 		Finally got some free time to play this. Had a blast, thank you very much.

My only suggestions for improvement are perhaps changing WCS / WRA / opportunity targets for the surface vessels; once the enemy aircraft were out of the way I was able to attack the surface groups with submarines and surface vessels with near impunity.

The air battle, however, was a challenge! I particularly liked that I needed to manage my resources carefully early in the mission.

Next play through I won't be so careless with my ISR aircraft!

SIDE: ANZUS
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
10x F/A-18C Hornet
6x F/A-18F Super Hornet
3x F/A-18F Super Hornet
1x Radar (AN/MPQ-64 Sentinel)
2x AP-3C Orion
1x E-2C Hawkeye 2000
1x SH-2G(I) Seasprite
1x MH-60R Seahawk


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
218x AIM-120D AMRAAM P3I.4
141x Generic Chaff Salvo [5x Cartridges]
35x AIM-9X Sidewinder
21x AN/ALE-55 FOTD
16x RIM-174A ERAM SM-6MR Blk I
77x AIM-120C-7 AMRAAM P3I.3
8x 20mm/85 M61A2 Vulcan Burst [100 rnds]
38x RGM-109E Tomahawk Blk IV TACTOM
11x Generic Flare Salvo [3x Cartridges, Dual Spectral]
38x MIM-120B HUMRAAM [AMRAAM]
14x RIM-66M-2 SM-2MR Blk IIIA
3x AN/SSQ-53F DIFAR
4x Mk46 NEARTIP Mod 5A(SW)
14x RIM-162B ESSM
17x AGM-88C HARM
8x AGM-65F Maverick IR
2x MU-90 Impact
1x AN/ALE-50 [RT-1646/ALE]
4x RIM-162A ESSM
6x 20mm/85 M61A1 Vulcan Burst [100 rnds]
8x AGM-114M Hellfire II
4x 12.7mm/72 Burst [20 rnds]
8x ADM-141C ITALD [Active RF]
4x AGM-84D Harpoon IC
48x AGM-84G Harpoon ICR
8x RGM-84L Harpoon II
16x RGM-84G Harpoon ICR
2x AGM-119B Penguin Mk2 Mod 7
36x Mk48 Mod 7 ADCAP CBASS
7x HYDRA APKWS II 70mm Rocket [WGU-59/B]
4x 127mm/54 WP
66x 127mm/62 Mk187 HE-MFF [Mk64 HiCap Body, Mk419 Fuse]
43x 127mm/54 HE-PD [HiCap]



SIDE: PRC
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
26x J-16 Flying Shark [Su-27UBK Copy]
24x JH-7A Flounder
24x J-15 Flying Shark [Su-33 Copy]
24x H-6G Badger [H-6M]
27x J-15S Flying Shark [Su-33 Copy]
1x Radar (China JY-26)
2x A-50 Mainring [KJ-2000]
1x Type 093B Shang
3x Type 091 Han
1x Radar (Watchman (T))
2x Vehicle (China Type 571 Search [HQ-61A])
2x Vehicle (China Type 571 Illuminator [HQ-61A])
8x HQ-61A
24x HQ-7 [FM-80, CSA-4]
12x HY-2 Twin
3x Vehicle (China YLC-6)
6x Z-18FQ Super Frelon
17x Z-9C Dauphin 2
1x Marker (Target)
2x Type 052B Luyang I [168 Guangzhou]
1x Type 052C Luyang II [170 Lanzhou]
1x Type 052D Luyang III [173 Changsha]
1x Type 001 Shi Lang [16 Liaoning, Ex-Varyag]
3x Type 071 Yuzhao [998 Kunlun Shan]
1x Type 072-III Yuting IIA [911 Tianzhushan]
1x Type 051B Luhai [167 Shenzhen]
2x Type 054A Jiangkai II [530 Xuzhou]


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
180x Generic Active Directional Sonobuoy
120x PL-12
315x Generic Chaff Salvo [4x Cartridges]
37x Generic Flare Salvo [4x Cartridges, Single Spectral]
6x PL-8C [Python 3]
12x Generic Acoustic Decoy
62x HQ-7 Crotale [FM-80, CSA-4]
4x HQ-61A
48x FAB-500M-54 GPB
2x C-803K [YJ-83]
58x HQ-9B
76x HQ-16A [SA-17 Copy]
31x SA-N-12 Grizzly [9M317]
19x HQ-9A
12x 100mm/55 H/PJ-87 HECVT
12x 30mm China H/PJ-12 [Type 730, 240 rnds]
12x Generic Chaff Rocket
1x HQ-10 [FL-3000N]
11x HQ-7 Crotale [FM-80] Naval
23x 37mm/63 Twin Burst [20 rnds]
4x China Towed Acoustic Decoy
51x AK-176 76mm/60 HE Burst [2 rnds]
2x AK-630M 30mm/65 Gatling Burst [400 rnds]
1x FQF-6000 Anti-Torpedo Depth Charge Salvo [10 rnds]
1x Yu-7



SIDE: Biologics
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------




(in reply to GeorgeCostanza)
Post #: 17
RE: New Scenario to Test: Battle of the Bass Strait - 8/28/2016 2:13:09 AM   
Rory Noonan

 

Posts: 2816
Joined: 12/18/2014
From: Brooklyn, NY
Status: offline 		Almost forgot - The PRC subs have their radar set to 'active', this is how I found them and killed them quite early in the mission. SSP 039 Yuan's plotted course also takes it into very shallow water (~30ft, well into broaching depth) off Flinders Island, making it easy to detect.

(in reply to Rory Noonan)
Post #: 18
RE: New Scenario to Test: Battle of the Bass Strait - 8/30/2016 10:41:59 AM   
GeorgeCostanza


Posts: 14
Joined: 8/7/2016
From: Melbourne, Victoria
Status: offline 		Thanks mate, will try to stick those improvements in this week, gotta find the time though

_____________________________

'I'm the opposite of every man you've ever met' - George Costanza, 1994

(in reply to Rory Noonan)
Post #: 19
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> New Scenario to Test: Battle of the Bass Strait Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.438