Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  24 25 [26] 27 28   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 11:18:23 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Attacks. Went well on two, and not so well on the last. You need to choose the unit to lose in Chung-king (it still stands).

Note, I converted the shattered in Antwerp to a retreat and therefore you lost all three units.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 8/21/2016 11:19:26 PM >

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 751
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 11:27:20 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		I'll lose the 5-2 warlord.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 752
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 11:28:14 PM   
Courtenay


Posts: 4003
Joined: 11/12/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

Oh, also, I lose the engineer again. I can only get one attack with him before I have to rebuild him. I am frustrated!!! time to sleep on this.
This seems pretty normal for engineers, it seems to me.

_____________________________

I thought I knew how to play this game....

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 753
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 11:52:29 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Europe




CW has moved a NAV and fighter to Gibraltar.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 8/21/2016 11:54:24 PM >

(in reply to Courtenay)
Post #: 754
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 11:53:00 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		China




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 755
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 11:53:34 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		E. Africa




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 756
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 11:55:40 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Turn has not ended




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 757
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 12:15:43 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #10. Actions.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 758
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 12:19:02 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #10. RN. North Sea.

The RN once again attempts to initiate a naval combat in the North Sea.

Will either or both the Luftwaffe fighters fly and, if so, to which sea box?

FYI: The RN declined the opportunity to attempt to initiate a naval combat in either Cape St. Vincent or the West Med. Since the allies moved no additional naval or air moves to those two areas the axis can't, so no naval combat in either area this impulse.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 759
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 12:53:56 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		No GE air response. The S-H is acting as good bait all on it's own.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 760
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 12:57:08 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

No GE air response. The S-H is acting as good bait all on it's own.
I swallowed it hook, line and sinker; now let's see if we can go sink that pesky German ship who dares to challenge the Royal Navy.


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 761
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 1:03:25 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #10. RN. North Sea.

Contact!

The RN declines a naval air battle, defaults to a surface battle and uses 4 of its 5 surprise points to increase damage to one destroyed. Now, let's see how accurate the RN gunners are.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 762
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 1:04:24 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #10. RN. North Sea. Round 1.

Well, at least the RN managed to finally sink the bait! That's some consolation, I guess?




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 763
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 1:08:43 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #10. RAF Strategic Bombing.

Not to be outdone by the RN, their sister branch, the RAF conducts two strategic bombing raids that hit home against both German and Italy who both lose 1 PP.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 764
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 1:28:00 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #10. China.

Post movement, no air or land combat.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 8/22/2016 1:29:45 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 765
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 1:28:39 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #10. France.

Post movement, no air or land combat.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 8/22/2016 1:29:34 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 766
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 1:29:57 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #10. End of Turn Check.

The turn continues ... now for the weather.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 767
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 1:30:36 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Sep-Oct 1940. Axis #11. Weather.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 768
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 4:26:22 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Italy a combined, JP and GE land actions

Italy moved a sub to the North Atlantic. Initiated and rolled a 1, thought my luck was turning. Then the allies roll a 2 and end up with two surprise points. Net was the Italian sub was aborted (I used the 2 CW sp to move the result against the sub up from ne to A).




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 769
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 4:27:25 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		I am initiating in the W. Med. Do you wish to fly out the NAV and fighter in Gibraltar?

I will not be initiating in CSV.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 770
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 5:04:17 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Spitfire to the 0-box.

It's my bedtime, so here are my instructions.

1. Allies will avoid the combat if they can.

2. The Spitfire will fight to the bitter end to protect the allied CPs in the West Med. That is, until the status of all axis bombers / NAVs are resolved or until its aborted or shot down. In air to air, the axis bombers are its target.

3. The allied navies will stay in the Western Med to the bitter end, regardless of what happens to the allied CPs.

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 8/22/2016 5:11:02 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 771
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 5:20:46 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		SO40 i11 W. Med Naval combat rnd 1
Both find axis 2, allies 3 -> net zero surprise points. Air to Sea combat.
Axis only fly the two NAVs as bombers. Flying the fighter as a bomber would have resulted in -1/6 AA fire, so I decided against it. Results was a damage and abort to the CW CA in the 4-box.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 772
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 5:39:06 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Axis found again in round 2.
used 4 sp to shift allied AA down. Did not matter much with rolls of 18 and 16.
shot down lead axis fighter (axis choice on -2/18) and aborted GE nav on -2/16
Allies did manage to clear a clear a bomber and shoot down the Spitfire in the end.

The bomber used 6 sp to shift up to a X 3A results. First applied to CW CP (by axis), first A on CW CA with no AA (my decision for the allies), 2 A on French CA (by axis - highest damage control, so most likely to abort), and 3 A on a CA (not much difference between options for the Allies).




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 773
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 5:50:31 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Rnd 3 was harder for me to run for you, but I did my best. Based on your instructions, I got the impression you want to keep some presence in the zone, so I made decision to optimize keeping somebody in the zone (it worked).

Searches, both rolled 3, resulting in a naval air and 3 sp for the axis.
both planes (NAV and fighter with Nav factor) fly has bombers (2 AA vs planes is ne)
Axis apply first D vs CA which it saves, so it is aborted.

Here is my logic for the second D on the CP. If I applied the D on the battleship and it is damaged it will leave the zone at the end of the turn and if it saves it is aborted. In both cases it is gone and the last A will abort the CP, leaving the zone vacant. Applying the D on the CP gives the BB a chance to save the A and stay in the zone, which it did. Hope this fits with your intent.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 774
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 5:57:45 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		I have been extremely lucky in searches in this zone this impulse. Found again with a 2-10 split.
The Resolution made both damage control rolls versus an X and a D. The zone is cleared. The FR CA will go abort towards Equatorial Africa if possible (edited in, they could only make it to Dakar in Sengal - the Italians did not intercept in CSV) and the CW units to Gibraltar.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 8/22/2016 6:01:23 AM >

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 775
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 6:06:37 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		SO40 i1 GS:
On Paris, missed.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 776
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 6:21:23 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		I overran Brest. Three ships sunk, one must rebase. I am not sure of where to rebase the Bretagne. If it goes to Rouen, you don't have any penalties for an on map BB outside of Metropolitan France. But it is in danger of capture again. I'll wait till the morning for you to have chance to weigh in.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 8/22/2016 6:22:36 AM >

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 777
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 1:06:59 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Send the surviving French BB to Rouen. If it gets overrun again, survives and has to rebase then scuttle it. I believe "backspace" will allow you to destroy it.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 778
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 2:48:31 PM   
Centuur


Posts: 8802
Joined: 6/3/2011
From: Hoorn (NED).
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rkr1958

Send the surviving French BB to Rouen. If it gets overrun again, survives and has to rebase then scuttle it. I believe "backspace" will allow you to destroy it.


You can't destroy the French BB, if it has a port to rebase to. If you can do so, than that's a bug...


_____________________________

Peter

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 779
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 4:47:13 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		One attack on St. Malo was successful




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Centuur)
Post #: 780
Page:   <<   < prev  24 25 [26] 27 28   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  24 25 [26] 27 28   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.875