Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  29 30 [31] 32 33   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/28/2016 8:53:14 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. Allied #6. RAF Strategic Bombing. Lillie, France.

Finally, RAF aircrews hit the mark.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 901
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/28/2016 8:53:48 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. Allied #6. China.

Post movement, no air or land combat.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 902
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/28/2016 8:54:23 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. Allied #6. Libya. Eastern Med.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 903
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/28/2016 8:54:58 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. Axis #7. Weather.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 904
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/29/2016 12:20:50 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		ND40-i7: Naval Searches
Japan is taking a land action, while the Euro axis both take combined actions.
The Germans moved to subs to the N. Atlantic and Italy moved the recently reorganized sub to CSV
I will be initiating combat in the CSV and N. Atl (but not the W. Med). I believe you have a NAV in Gibraltar that can react to the 0 or 1 box of the CSV. Will it?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 905
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/29/2016 12:23:56 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		The 2pt sub in the N. Atlantic initiated combat. Search rolls of 8/8 resulted in no contact.
The IT sub in the CSV has initiated combat. Will the CW NAV fly from Gibraltar?

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 906
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/29/2016 12:36:25 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		The CW flies the NAV to the 0-box.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 907
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/29/2016 12:51:42 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		ND40-i7: CSV Naval Combat
The Italians did find on 2/6 rolls. Engaged the zero box only with 5 surprise points, 4 of which were used to make it a sub combat. The sub was sunk by failing two consecutive damage rolls and the convoys suffered a D 3A result. No round 2.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 8/29/2016 12:52:37 AM >

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 908
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/29/2016 12:53:13 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Are previous CP abort instructions still valid (Plymouth followed by Gibraltar)?

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 909
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/29/2016 12:59:46 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Send the 3 aborted CPs to Gibraltar. Don't bother if you've already moved them I'll change them to Gibraltar when I get my turn back.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 910
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/29/2016 1:24:54 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		ND40 i7: GS and Land Attacks
GS the FR ARM successfully.
Attacked it and the Chinese out of supply CAV. Both automatics.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 911
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/29/2016 1:32:05 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Here is the EOT roll (turn continues) and the China situation. France is completely cleared of Allied units. Le Harve is the only allied controlled hex in France.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 912
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/29/2016 2:14:01 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Allied #9. Actions.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 913
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/29/2016 2:17:45 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. Allied #9. RN. Contested Sea Areas.

The RN declines the opportunity to try to initiate combat in these three contested sea areas. The axis, as the non-phasing player, isn't given the opportunity.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 914
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/29/2016 2:18:52 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. Allied #9. RN. HQ Reorg.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 915
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/29/2016 2:21:14 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. Allied #9. End of Turn.

The CW wasted Alexander's reorg of 4 CPs. This turn comes to an end.

1. The Soviets add an 8th chit to the defensive garrison pool.

2. Where do the Germans want to put their two chits?




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 916
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/29/2016 3:59:24 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		If the first chit is greater than 1 put it in the defensive pool (otherwise into the offensive pool) and later move a 1-chit from the defensive pool to the offensive pool.
If the first chit went into the offensive pool, then follow the above instructions for the 2nd chit. If both chits were 1-chits, then they both go into the offensive pool
and I'd still like to move one 1-chit from the defensive pool to the offensive pool (working on upgrading the quality of the defensive chits)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 917
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/29/2016 4:52:59 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

If the first chit is greater than 1 put it in the defensive pool (otherwise into the offensive pool) and later move a 1-chit from the defensive pool to the offensive pool.
If the first chit went into the offensive pool, then follow the above instructions for the 2nd chit. If both chits were 1-chits, then they both go into the offensive pool
and I'd still like to move one 1-chit from the defensive pool to the offensive pool (working on upgrading the quality of the defensive chits)


1. 1st chit was a 0, which went in the offensive pool.

2. 2nd chit was a 1, which also went into the offensive pool.

3. Moved a 1 chit from the defensive to the offensive pool.

Phew ...


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 918
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/29/2016 4:59:00 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. End of Turn. Destroyed Pool.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 919
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/29/2016 5:01:01 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. End of Turn. US Entry Options.

1. The USA adds a chit to the Japanese entry pool. There are 4 chits in the Japanese entry pool and 3 in the tension pool.

2. There are 4 chits in the Germany/Italy entry pool and 3 in the tension pool.

3. The USA choose no additional option this turn.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 920
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2016 12:52:54 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		ND40 EOT:
Here is the axis oil usage. Germany leaves a few plans disorganized.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 921
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2016 1:55:21 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. End of Turn. Use Oil. Active Allies.

Well, I'm not sure France and China are really all that active anymore.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 922
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2016 1:56:08 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. End of Turn. Use Oil. Neutral Allies.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 923
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2016 2:42:00 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		ND40 EOT: Axis Final Production Plan




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 924
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2016 3:45:41 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. End of Turn. Final Production. Active Allies.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 925
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2016 3:46:09 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. End of Turn. Final Production. Neutral Allies.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 926
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2016 4:19:47 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		ND40 EOT: Scrap. Only Italy scrapped a unit. No other powers (axis or allied) scrapped a unit.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 927
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2016 4:32:20 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		ND40 EOT: Axis Builds




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 928
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2016 5:21:35 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. End of Turn. Allied Builds.

China (2 BPs): MIL(2)

CW (17 BPs): CP(1) x 6, CA(1), CVP(0), NAV(3), Pilot(2), INF(3), Terr(2)

France (0 BPs):

USA (10 BPs): CVP(1), Pilot(2), BB 1st (2), TRS 1st (3), CP(1), FTR(2)

USSR (14 BPs): FTR(2), Pilot(2), MTN(4), ARM(6)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 929
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2016 5:22:37 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. End of Turn. Conquests.

Surrender China? Not yet.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 930
Page:   <<   < prev  29 30 [31] 32 33   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  29 30 [31] 32 33   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.734