RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Page: << < prev 35 36 [37] 38 39 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/17/2016 1:32:24 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Allied #6. West Med. Round 1.

The allies isolated the 1-box, use their surprise points to force a surface battle and to increase their naval result by 1 column.

The loaded Italian transport is sunk.

Both sides decide to stay.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1081

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/17/2016 1:37:02 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Allied #6. West Med. Round 2. Axis Surprise the Allies.

I go from the top of the mountain (after sinking the loaded Italian transport) to the abyss when the axis this round find and surprise the allied fleet in the Western Med.

1. Which sea boxes do you wish to include?

2. Naval air or other type of battle?

3. If naval air, how do you wish to fly your Luftwaffe fighters (as fighters or bombers)?

4. How do you wish to use your surprise points?

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 9/17/2016 1:38:30 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1082

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/17/2016 4:45:10 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

1. Which sea boxes do you wish to include?

2. Naval air or other type of battle?

3. If naval air, how do you wish to fly your Luftwaffe fighters (as fighters or bombers)?

4. How do you wish to use your surprise points?

1) Engage only your 3-box with 8 SP I believe.
2) Air to Sea battle (Naval air)
3) All fighters will fly as fighters. (Order: Macchi, Bf 110E, G.50, Re.2000, Bf 110D)
bomber order: He 115C, Gabbiano
4) 2 SP to move my A-A up 1, 4 SP to move your A-A down 2 (should put us at +2/-3 respectively)
If your bomber makes it through, use 2 SP to move you attack down 1 column (to ne, I believe).
If your bomber did not make it through, use my last SP to move your AA column down 1.
4a) Apply my result against your transport carrying the 5-4 MOT.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1083

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/17/2016 5:02:50 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Allied #6. West Med. Round 2 (a).

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1084

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/17/2016 5:04:04 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Allied #6. West Med. Round 2 (b).

P.S. I forgot to mention that both searches for a third round failed so the naval combat ended after the second.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 9/17/2016 5:51:16 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1085

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/17/2016 5:37:28 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Allied #6. Spain. West Med.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1086

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/17/2016 5:37:56 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Allied #6. North Africa.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1087

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/17/2016 5:41:05 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Allied #6. Egypt.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1088

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/17/2016 5:41:33 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Allied #6. Poland. Eastern Europe.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1089

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/17/2016 5:41:59 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Allied #6. Balkans.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1090

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/17/2016 5:42:28 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Allied #6. China.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1091

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/17/2016 5:42:55 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Axis #9. Weather.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1092

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/19/2016 3:24:53 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MA41 i9:
All axis powers take land actions.
CW nimrod in the Bay of Biscay can intercept the Italian bomber ground striking Bilbao. I don't believe any axis fighters could counter-intercept. Will it intercept.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1093

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/19/2016 4:42:29 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Why not. The RN will intercept.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1094

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/19/2016 4:22:50 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MA41 i9: Ground strike a-a
It took two rounds, but the bomber cleared and the nimrod aborted.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1095

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/19/2016 4:23:46 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MA41 i9: Ground strikes
One success, about as expected.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1096

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/19/2016 5:23:59 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MA41 i9: ground attack results
Glad these were high odd attacks (and that I decided not to make the lower odds attack in China), since I rolled so poorly (2 and 5). Infantry disorganized and one divisional loss for me, but I took both hexes.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1097

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/19/2016 5:33:36 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MA41 i9: EOT roll - did not end

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1098

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/22/2016 12:27:46 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Allied #12. Actions.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1099

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/22/2016 12:28:48 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Allied #12. Allied Naval. No Combat, Sea Areas.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1100

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/22/2016 12:31:36 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Allied #12. RN. Italian Coast. Search.

RN search woes continue off the Italian Coast. The allies roll a 9 and the axis a 1!

1. How would the Italians like to proceed?

2. Also, the allies will attempt to initiate combat in the Western Med? Do the axis wish to add any additional air units? The CW flew an extra fighter and nav unit to the 2-box during the Naval air phase.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1101

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/22/2016 2:58:30 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

RN search woes continue off the Italian Coast. The allies roll a 9 and the axis a 1!

1. How would the Italians like to proceed?

I will engage the 2 box only with 9 SP.
Use 4 SP to reduce your attack 2 columns to 2A.
Use 4 SP to increase my attack to X A.

I will abort the sea zone after this round - return to La Spezia.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1102

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/22/2016 3:03:00 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

2. Also, the allies will attempt to initiate combat in the Western Med? Do the axis wish to add any additional air units? The CW flew an extra fighter and nav unit to the 2-box during the Naval air phase.

Bf 109 E2 on the south coast of France will fly out to the 0-box.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1103

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/22/2016 10:30:32 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Allied #12. Italian Coast.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 9/22/2016 10:32:48 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1104

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/22/2016 10:31:53 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Allied #12. West Med.

The axis (Italians) again win the search roll and surprise the allies.

How would you wish to proceed?

New Job Posting: Looking for a New Lord of the Admiralty, Royal Navy. All interested applicants please send resume and references to 10 Downing Street, attention PM Churchill.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1105

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/23/2016 4:08:56 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

How would you wish to proceed?

I will engage the 0-box only with 9 SP I believe.
Use 4 SP to choose a surface combat.
Use 4 SP to reduce the attack against me to ne.
If I miss counted SP and the attack against me is ne, then use extra SP to move my attack up as far as possible.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1106

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/23/2016 4:53:29 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Allied #2. West Med. Surface Combat (Round 1).

Both sides stay after this initial round.

Allied (second round) search roll is a 10. Naturally, sound I expect anything else.