Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  46 47 [48] 49 50   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/10/2016 10:13:38 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		SO41 i5: ground strikes
I assumed the two CW CVP (one in CSV and one in W. Med) would not intercept the Stuka since I had plenty of fighters to counter intercept.
If I was only to get one unit, this was the one.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1411
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/11/2016 10:34:11 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 13. Sep/Oct 1941. Allied #7. Actions.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1412
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/11/2016 10:35:05 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 13. Sep/Oct 1941. Allied #7. Post RN Naval Moves. Contested Sea Areas.

No combat and no opportunity for the axis to try to initiate.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1413
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/11/2016 10:39:51 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 13. Sep/Oct 1941. Allied #7. RAF Ground Strikes x 2.

Desperate times call for desperate measurements. The brave young men of RAF bomber command take off from airfields in Spanish and French Morocco without fighter support and on desperate low odds missions to disrupt axis ground and air forces threatening Gibraltar.

Do you wish to intercept either or both of these missions?

If so, which fighters do you assigned and how do you allocate them for the intercept(s)?





Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1414
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/11/2016 11:26:28 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Bf 109 E-4 will intercept near Gibraltar.
Bf 109 E-2 will intercept over Seville.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1415
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/11/2016 11:57:37 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 11. Sep/Oct 1941. Allied #7. RAF Ground Strikes.

Both ground strikes attempted by the RAF were defeated. The Hampden in the first ground strike voluntary aborted.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 11/11/2016 11:58:16 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1416
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/11/2016 11:58:42 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 11. Sep/Oct 1941. Allied #7. CW Reorg.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1417
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/11/2016 11:59:03 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 11. Sep/Oct 1941. Allied #7. End of Turn Check.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1418
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/12/2016 12:00:20 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 11. Sep/Oct 1941. Axis #9. Weather.

Pat, back to you with fine weather in the North Temperate. I'm headed out and probably won't be back for at least an hour or two.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1419
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/12/2016 2:11:49 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		SO41 i9:
Actions: GE Land, JP and IT combined
Italy moves sub to Faeroes Gap and a Fighter to the 2-box of the W. Med

Initiate searches in 4 zones.
CSV, Gabbiano, rolls 8-8 results in no combat
W. Med, Freccia (just flew out), rolls 10-9 results in no combat
Faeroes Gap, sub, rolls of 5-1, with the one the Swordfish, which I flew out to the zero box for you, could engage in a air sea battle. Used 4 SP to move the attack up two columns to a X on the sub, which it failed and thereby sunk.
BoB, Macchi, rolls of 10-5 allow the CW to avoid the combat.

No luck at sea when and where I need it.

Below is the GE ground strikes on Gibraltar. You can fly the two CVP as fighters. I do have a 4 pt fighter that could counter intercept. Last time I passed for you, but with clear weather and only one GE fighter to counter intercept, you may have other thoughts. Any interception?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1420
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/12/2016 11:14:54 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		No interceptions.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1421
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/12/2016 9:02:04 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		SO41 i9:
Ground strikes went well (flipped the remaining organized units in Gibraltar).
Para-dropping on Gibraltar, do the CVPs wish to intercept as fighters? They can be counter intercepted.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1422
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/13/2016 12:55:21 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		No intercepts. Sorry for the delay. Been out all day and I'm still out. Son had green power race event.

But I will use maximum defensive shore bombardment.

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 11/13/2016 1:40:22 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1423
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/13/2016 2:50:07 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		SO41 i9: Land Attack
Paradrop was successful.
Three CW CA's provided defensive shore bombardment.
German bomber provided 3 pts of ground support (based on you early decisions, I did not intercept with the CVP's. If you were to intercept, the paradrop was the mission to stop - the extra +1 for a paradrop is work a lot more than these ground factors).
I declined the notional, the extra factor was not work the extra +1 for a disrupted defender.

Assumed you'd wanted assault, and then rolled just like the naval searches... high. Which was very nice for the axis. This marks the first time I have ever taken Gibraltar and it shows that it is best to be lucky and roll high on land attacks.

I shattered your HQ. It was toss up between him and the MECH, but assumed you'd want him back sooner than the MECH.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 11/13/2016 2:51:37 AM >

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1424
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/13/2016 2:54:19 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		US Entry roll for the fall of Gibraltar. It must have happened right as the World Series completed game 7.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1425
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/13/2016 3:04:15 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		SO41 i9:
Air Supply.

The GE transport flies to reorganize the 5-2 ART. Your CVP in the W Med could have intercepted. Based on your past decisions I decided not to intercept (I could have counter intercepted).




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1426
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/13/2016 3:07:53 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		SO41 i9: EOT roll.
Turn continues.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1427
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/13/2016 4:56:48 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 13. Sep/Oct 1941. Allied #11. Operation Felix is a Reality!

The Commonwealth is in shock. The "Union Jack" no longer flies over Gibraltar.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 11/13/2016 6:42:46 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1428
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/15/2016 12:50:25 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Pat,

Given the good chance that the turn will end on my next impulse, if it does how do you wish to handle the Nazi-Soviet chits?

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1429
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/15/2016 12:55:27 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Both new ones to offense. Move the 6 in the defense pool to the offense pool.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1430
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/15/2016 1:29:00 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 13. Sep/Oct 1941. Allied #11. Actions.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1431
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/15/2016 1:32:21 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 13. Sep/Oct 1941. Allied #11. RN. Contested Sea Areas.

No combat. The RN avoided moving into or down in any of the contested sea areas with organized axis units.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1432
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/15/2016 1:33:09 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 13. Sep/Oct 1941. Allied #11. Spain. Cape St. Vincent. Western Med. Western, North Africa.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1433
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/15/2016 1:33:41 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 13. Sep/Oct 1941. Allied #11. Western Africa.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1434
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/15/2016 1:34:10 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 13. Sep/Oct 1941. Allied #11. Eastern Med.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1435
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/15/2016 1:34:39 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 13. Sep/Oct 1941. Allied #11. Eastern Europe.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1436
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/15/2016 1:35:17 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 13. Sep/Oct 1941. Allied #11. End of Turn Check.

This turn continues ...




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1437
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/15/2016 1:35:48 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 13. Sep/Oct 1941. Axis #13. Weather.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1438
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/16/2016 12:56:53 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		SO41 i13: Naval Combat
Italy took a land. Japan and German take combines.
JP moved a CA to a Chinese port with a division in it and a CV to Canton from the homeland.
Germany moved their fleet out to the BoB 3-box.

In CSV the 6pt TAC Ju87D initiated searches. Rolls of 5/7 meant the Italian NAV in the 4-box found. It engage the CW CA in the 2-box with 5 surprise points in a naval air battle.
AA was not effective against a single bomber.
IT used 4 SP to move the damage on the CA up from ne to D and the CA failed it's damage control roll and is damaged.
I assume you will stay for round 2.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1439
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/16/2016 1:04:49 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Round 2: search rolls of 6/3 allowed the CW to engage the 2-box only with 4 surprise points, which were used to avoid the combat.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1440
Page:   <<   < prev  46 47 [48] 49 50   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  46 47 [48] 49 50   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.656