Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Strategic Command Series >> Strategic Command WWII War in Europe >> After Action Reports >> RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 7:07:16 AM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

10th February 1940

I thought the attack on France had started, but it looks like the Luftwaffe have just started the softening up process.

.....



Interesting, certainly confirms that the AI is adaptive as in my test etc they went for a full invasion in late Jan 1940. Certainly indicates you can't simply expect the AI to keep to a fixed timetable in its strategic choices.

I was suspicious as some moves (like the subs to raid the Canadian convoys) were being made at the same stage as you are reporting them.

Another bonus for what is shaping up to be a really engrossing game.

_____________________________


(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 121
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 7:13:15 AM   
Orm


Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

2nd March 1940

United Kingdom and France
The Escort Flotillas continue their searching in the North Atlantic. Sadly I had moved all units except one - and the last one I moved came across the German U-boats. Unlike previous combat when I have come across subs, this time the combat took place immediately and the destroyers took a pasting. I have checked the manual but I cannot see what caused this. Whatever it was, the French 2nd Escort Flotilla has been badly mauled...


Merde!



The U-boats got the drop on the destroyers, instead of the destroyers getting the drop on the subs?

_____________________________

Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 122
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 7:19:26 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

2nd March 1940

United Kingdom and France
The Escort Flotillas continue their searching in the North Atlantic. Sadly I had moved all units except one - and the last one I moved came across the German U-boats. Unlike previous combat when I have come across subs, this time the combat took place immediately and the destroyers took a pasting. I have checked the manual but I cannot see what caused this. Whatever it was, the French 2nd Escort Flotilla has been badly mauled...


Merde!



The U-boats got the drop on the destroyers, instead of the destroyers getting the drop on the subs?
warspite1

Yes - but I would like an explanation for why. Maybe there is one but I have done all the word searches I can think of in the manual but cannot see what exactly happens.


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 123
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 7:23:14 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

10th February 1940

I thought the attack on France had started, but it looks like the Luftwaffe have just started the softening up process.

.....



Interesting, certainly confirms that the AI is adaptive as in my test etc they went for a full invasion in late Jan 1940. Certainly indicates you can't simply expect the AI to keep to a fixed timetable in its strategic choices.

I was suspicious as some moves (like the subs to raid the Canadian convoys) were being made at the same stage as you are reporting them.

Another bonus for what is shaping up to be a really engrossing game.
warspite1

When did they take Warsaw in that game?


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 124
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 7:31:57 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
23rd March 1940 - ITS WAR IN THE WEST!

Its all kicking off chez Europe.

The British and French arrive in Finland. The Finns are feeling more warm and cuddly towards the west - but Stalin has got a right cob on. The Western Allies morale increases.

But Hitler decides he can wait no longer.


We're coming for you, we're coming for youuu,
Benelux countries,
we're coming for you.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by warspite1 -- 11/20/2016 7:47:52 AM >


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 125
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 7:39:45 AM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

10th February 1940

I thought the attack on France had started, but it looks like the Luftwaffe have just started the softening up process.

.....



Interesting, certainly confirms that the AI is adaptive as in my test etc they went for a full invasion in late Jan 1940. Certainly indicates you can't simply expect the AI to keep to a fixed timetable in its strategic choices.

I was suspicious as some moves (like the subs to raid the Canadian convoys) were being made at the same stage as you are reporting them.

Another bonus for what is shaping up to be a really engrossing game.
warspite1

When did they take Warsaw in that game?



the third turn, so not that different to your experience


_____________________________


(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 126
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 7:46:03 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

10th February 1940

I thought the attack on France had started, but it looks like the Luftwaffe have just started the softening up process.

.....



Interesting, certainly confirms that the AI is adaptive as in my test etc they went for a full invasion in late Jan 1940. Certainly indicates you can't simply expect the AI to keep to a fixed timetable in its strategic choices.

I was suspicious as some moves (like the subs to raid the Canadian convoys) were being made at the same stage as you are reporting them.

Another bonus for what is shaping up to be a really engrossing game.
warspite1

When did they take Warsaw in that game?



the third turn, so not that different to your experience

warspite1

Interesting, I wonder why the Germans have waited so long?


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 127
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 7:49:29 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
23rd March 1940

As expected the Dutch cannot hold on (and neither can the Luxmbourgers), and both surrender.

The Belgians are still in the fight but have taken some losses.

The Germans hit the convoys again....

More of which in a minute.


< Message edited by warspite1 -- 11/20/2016 8:27:05 AM >


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 128
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 7:51:28 AM   
xwormwood


Posts: 1149
Joined: 8/28/2000
From: Bremen, Germany
Status: offline
The DD ran into the sub, and that is what the game calls a surprise contact.

Surprised Units – are those that bump into
previously unseen enemy units during their
movement. They can defend themselves but any
remaining APs will be automatically lost


6.2.5. Surprise Contact

Fog of war provides a special combat feature that
occurs when a unit moves adjacent to a hidden
enemy unit. A message denoting Enemy Contact!
will appear when this happens. These encounters
will only result in combat if it favors the hidden
unit; otherwise, the moving unit may still attack
normally.
If the contact results in combat, then the hidden
unit (which counts as the attacker) has its readiness
increased by 25% for the combat calculation.
Additionally, the hidden unit’s combat losses will be
25% less and the moving unit’s combat losses 25%
more than they would otherwise have been.
When a surprise contact occurs at sea, the
enemy contact adjustment for the attacker only
applies when calculating attacker losses and does
not apply when calculating defender losses. For
example, if a Battleship is moving and there is
enemy contact with a Sub, the Sub becomes the
attacker. The Sub will still take 25% less damage
when calculating its losses but it will not inflict 25%
more damage on the Battleship. An encounter at
sea still favors the hidden unit, but the impact is
reduced.
Special surprise encounter effects apply to
Paratroops. For Paratroops landing on a previously
hidden enemy unit, only the Paratroops will take
losses from the surprise encounter and then
they will attempt to land in an empty adjacent
hex. If successful, the Paratroops can land and
hex. If successful, the Paratroops can land and
fight normally; otherwise, but if there is no
empty adjacent hex then they are shattered and
destroyed. If Paratroops land adjacent to a hidden
enemy unit, there is no surprise encounter and
the unit can fight normally. In other words, the
advantage in this case goes to the Paratroops.


_____________________________

"You will be dead, so long as you refuse to die" (George MacDonald)

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 129
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 7:55:24 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
5th April 1940

United Kingdom
The British have a decision to make re the Local Defence Volunteers.

For 35 MPP we can turn the well meaning, but untrained rabble that is the LDV, into:

THE HOME GUARD


As the newly installed Prime Minister Winston Churchill once said: 35 MPP? - never has so much been spent on so many to help so few*



* Not really chaps - just mucking

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by warspite1 -- 11/20/2016 7:59:11 AM >


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 130
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 8:11:29 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Xwormwood

6.2.5. Surprise Contact

warspite1

Thank-you . I need to be more inventive in my searching. I assumed this would be covered under combat - not movement


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to xwormwood)
Post #: 131
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 8:14:43 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
5th April 1940

So let's see a summary of what just happened between 23rd March and now:

I was hoping to benefit from some of the Dutch Navy - there was a DD that was not touched. But it looks like its either gone German or been destroyed.



Attachment (1)

< Message edited by warspite1 -- 11/20/2016 8:17:07 AM >


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 132
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 8:19:57 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
5th April 1940

The rain may not help the French and British take up positions. I did not really think that through....

...Good job I never liked the Dyle Plan or the Breda variant really


It's Raining Again,
Oh no my loves at an end....




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by warspite1 -- 11/20/2016 8:26:22 AM >


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 133
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 8:23:22 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
5th April 1940

Meanwhile.... for a more succinct summary, try this:


The Military Activity Summary. Like Ronseal, it does what it says on the tin



Attachment (1)

< Message edited by warspite1 -- 11/20/2016 8:24:52 AM >


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 134
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 8:35:49 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
5th April 1940

United Kingdom and France
The 2nd Submarine Flotilla is placed back on patrol off Norway.

Those pesky U-boats are proving somewhat vexatious to the spirit.

The poor French 2nd Escort Flotilla ran into the wolfpack again and got severely mauled. The 3rd (Canadian) Escort Flotilla was called to the scene but the U-boats departed once more. The French need taking out of the line so the 4th Canadian and 1st British have been called in to help the search.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by warspite1 -- 11/20/2016 8:40:19 AM >


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 135
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 8:53:24 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
5th April 1940

France and Belgium
Right then, what to do about the Battle for France? Some potential good news is that the German IV Corps, southeast of Brussels, has been heavily hit in the initial assault. Although the main focus is on creating a defensive line, this is too tempting to pass up.

First Army's III Corps, consisting of the 1st Moroccan and 2nd North African Infantry Divisions, head north to an area south of Brussels, there to launch a limited attack over the Dyle to try and push back the German IV Corps. Although the Germans hold, the German corps is seriously weakened and the 35th Infantry Division loses over half its strength in beating off the determined French attack.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by warspite1 -- 11/20/2016 9:17:30 AM >


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 136
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 9:21:49 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
5th April 1940

United Kingdom, Belgium and France
The British and French then concentrate on forming a cohesive line along the Franco-Belgian border. The French concentrate the last of their MPP on bringing whatever units (including the Belgians in Brussels) up to strength. The fighter group remains on the ground (as do the bombers due to the lack of air support) and is upgraded.

The Allies try and form some kind of reserve using the:
- British III Corps (south of Calais)
- French II and Reserve Corps (at Sedan)
- XLIV and IX Corps (Nancy)





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by warspite1 -- 11/20/2016 9:27:25 AM >


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 137
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 9:35:34 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
5th April 1940

United Kingdom
The UK seem to have a nice wedge (technical term) of MPP but cannot spend anymore on research as they have met their maximum.

Building a fighter unit and an MTB unit are therefore the order of the day. The XII Corps in Egypt are also further bolstered, as is Gort in France.

< Message edited by warspite1 -- 11/20/2016 9:42:37 AM >


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 138
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 9:38:41 AM   
n0kn0k

 

Posts: 564
Joined: 6/23/2007
Status: offline
Bring your HQ's up to strength and attach them to the frontline units. Don't bother with the maginot line. One trick i always use is to swap out the armies from the maginot line for corps before the war starts.

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 139
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 9:42:13 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: n0kn0k

Bring your HQ's up to strength and attach them to the frontline units. Don't bother with the maginot line. One trick i always use is to swap out the armies from the maginot line for corps before the war starts.
warspite1

Why is there a separate counter for Gort and the BEF and the Corps please??


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to n0kn0k)
Post #: 140
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 9:45:39 AM   
n0kn0k

 

Posts: 564
Joined: 6/23/2007
Status: offline
Not sure what you mean as i'm a young lad playing with 3d units only. I know very little of the counters.

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 141
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 9:50:26 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: n0kn0k

Not sure what you mean as i'm a young lad playing with 3d units only. I know very little of the counters.
warspite1

Listen laddie don't you adopt that tone with me - you should respect your elders and betters.... oh and GET OFF MY LAWN




What I mean is, the BEF is the army. Sure it has army level units but its strength is the Corps (and divisions within) that make it up. So why in this game can the BEF (army) have the same strength as a corps?

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to n0kn0k)
Post #: 142
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 9:55:29 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
So - WHY do you swap out the armies for Corps? Aren't these essentially the same thing?

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 143
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 10:15:49 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
One thing I think needs some attention is the way the reports are presented. Because of the alternate turns the happenings that take place in the Axis turn are not included in the summary one can call up using the l hot key.

Also the MPP for the Allies comes up when the Allies finish their turn - but presumably relates to the next Allied turn. If so this should be reported with the rest of the Allied reports at the start of their turn.

This came up as I ended my last turn. I had to quickly take a screen shot before it disappeared and the AI carried on with the German turn.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 144
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 10:27:45 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
14th April 1940

All sorts going down now

- The Allied Flotillas in the North Atlantic are hit by Rough Seas - I think one of them had a reduction in strength points as a result.

- USSR have successfully researched Advanced Aircraft

- The Home guard replaces the LDV

- The US operate Cash and Carry with the British - cheers

- WSC orders Operation Valentine - a landing in the Faroes.

More on these to follow.....





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by warspite1 -- 11/20/2016 10:47:22 AM >


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 145
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 10:36:23 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
25th April 1940

United Kingdom and France
The destroyers fail to find the U-boats - and to compound matters, the units of the 1st Destroyer Flotilla have suffered storm damage (strength reduced from 10 to 9).

The elite troops that assisted the Finns are back in the UK. For 10 MPP each these can be sent to Narvik to try and take back the town from General Dietl's 3rd Mountain Division.

The Allies - for their own reasons both agree - the British because this sort of thing excites Churchill and the French because they are keen to take the war away from France.

The British sends the Home Fleet to sea to the Norwegian Coast. (No idea if this is needed or affects the Narvik operation but seems like the right thing to do).

The Home Fleet - Admiral of the Fleet Sir Charles Forbes
BB - Nelson (Flagship) Rodney
CV - Glorious, Courageous
CL - 2nd Cruiser Squadron (Southampton, Glasgow, Newcastle, Birmingham)
DD - 2nd Destroyer Flotilla


Fighters and Swordfish on CAP - we don't want another repeat of Juno



Attachment (1)

< Message edited by warspite1 -- 11/20/2016 11:19:34 AM >


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 146
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 10:47:13 AM   
n0kn0k

 

Posts: 564
Joined: 6/23/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: n0kn0k

Not sure what you mean as i'm a young lad playing with 3d units only. I know very little of the counters.
warspite1

Listen laddie don't you adopt that tone with me - you should respect your elders and betters.... oh and GET OFF MY LAWN




What I mean is, the BEF is the army. Sure it has army level units but its strength is the Corps (and divisions within) that make it up. So why in this game can the BEF (army) have the same strength as a corps?


Ahh i get it now dear sir.

The BEF is just an army unit in this case. Try to rightclick the counter and check the properties.
Both might have strength 10 on the counter, but since an army is bigger, their fighting capability stats are higher.
Just look at the picture. I've added a corps stats on the right.
So they each have the same number of points, but an armies point is effectively worth more.
With unit upgrades those stats increase even more.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 147
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 11:03:17 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: n0kn0k


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: n0kn0k

Not sure what you mean as i'm a young lad playing with 3d units only. I know very little of the counters.
warspite1

Listen laddie don't you adopt that tone with me - you should respect your elders and betters.... oh and GET OFF MY LAWN




What I mean is, the BEF is the army. Sure it has army level units but its strength is the Corps (and divisions within) that make it up. So why in this game can the BEF (army) have the same strength as a corps?


Ahh i get it now dear sir.

The BEF is just an army unit in this case. Try to rightclick the counter and check the properties.
Both might have strength 10 on the counter, but since an army is bigger, their fighting capability stats are higher.
Just look at the picture. I've added a corps stats on the right.
So they each have the same number of points, but an armies point is effectively worth more.
With unit upgrades those stats increase even more.



warspite1

Mmm a) thanks for all your help here b) I don't think that is a great design feature though... good job I'm having a blast


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to n0kn0k)
Post #: 148
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 11:17:14 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
25th April 1940

France and Belgium
The Belgians survive and a big shout goes out to the French IX Army, holding the northwestern Ardennes sector, who have taken a bit of a pasting but in doing so have allowed the Western Allies to maintain their line unbroken. Their place in the line has been taken by 2nd Corps.

The Germans used infantry and Fallschirmjager only, keeping the panzers back for the big breakthrough no doubt....

The French use all their MPP to rebuild and reinforce. The Belgian defenders of Brussels are almost out of time and so the French do not throw good money after bad in reinforcing this unit.

United Kingdom
The British build their first tank unit and reinforce O'Connor in the desert.

USA
An Escort Carrier is built and the remainder saved

USSR
The USSR MPP is pathetic! - suffice to say there is nothing to spend their 38 MPP on....




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by warspite1 -- 11/20/2016 12:54:56 PM >


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 149
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW - 11/20/2016 11:56:29 AM   
n0kn0k

 

Posts: 564
Joined: 6/23/2007
Status: offline
quote:

Mmm a) thanks for all your help here b) I don't think that is a great design feature though... good job I'm having a blast


It's more like Panzer General and Civilisation this way.

Knowing 10 is the maximum you can strengthen up to makes it easier to keep an overview on what you have to reinforce and what not.

There is an exception though for some units. With each experience point you can overstrengthen a unit 1 point also.

And with time you will know in general how "good" a corps will do vs a tank unit with upgrades etc. It's part of the depth in the game.

For me as a casual wargamer (mostly turn based fantasy games here) it's a lot easier to follow then some of the more complex games around.

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 150
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Strategic Command Series >> Strategic Command WWII War in Europe >> After Action Reports >> RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.938