Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  49 50 [51] 52 53   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/24/2016 2:48:12 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Please deploy the land two land units to Lisbon and the CA and CP to Luanda, Angola.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1501
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/24/2016 3:37:15 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		ND41 i4:
All Axis powers take combined actions.
JA moves an Amph out and picks up a 6-3 from China and a CA out to pick up a division in the S. China Sea.
Germany and Italy fly air units out to the 2-box of the BoB.
Italy moves the Italian battle fleet out to the W. Med.
Will the Allies attempt interception?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1502
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/24/2016 4:43:41 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Yes, the combined RN and French fleets will attempt to intercept. Use the RN sub in the 1 box for the attempt.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1503
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/24/2016 6:13:37 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		ND41 i4: naval
The interception failed. Fleets moves to the 3-box of CSV. The German fleet joins them there. I did not have you intercept in CSV since I knew I was stopping and having disorganize a single unit was not likely to make a difference.

I will be initiating in all zones except the Faeroes gap. You do have some air craft that could fly to CSV and BoB. I don't think you'll fly to the BoB, but CSV is possible. I will start with the W Med shortly. Let me know if you'd like to fly anything out.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1504
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/24/2016 6:20:34 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		W. Med search rolls of 6/8 result in no contact.

Well, I was wrong about BoB. You do have a couple of fighters that could fly out. Will any of the planes below react out to the BoB?






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 11/24/2016 6:23:25 PM >

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1505
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/24/2016 8:05:01 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Bay of Biscay: Hurricane & Spitfire to 0-box.

CSV: All three aircraft based in Cisneros flyout. Beafout & Hampden (using extended range) to 3-box. Skuka to 0-box.

Sorry for the delay, Thanksgiving Dinner with family. I'm stuffed.

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 11/24/2016 8:07:50 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1506
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/24/2016 8:11:35 PM   
Centuur


Posts: 8802
Joined: 6/3/2011
From: Hoorn (NED).
Status: offline 		Let me guess: the menu: turkey?

_____________________________

Peter

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1507
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/24/2016 9:02:12 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Centuur

Let me guess: the menu: turkey?

Well actually ham. We're not a big turkey family, but we do enjoy ham. We had ham, mashed potatoes, green bean casserole, creme corn, stuffing, cole slaw, cranberry sauce and rolls. For desert pumpkin and key lime pies.

There's plenty of leftovers and pro football is on (Redskins vs Cowboys). Who could ask for more. Life is good.

Happy Thanksgiving to my USA friends and to whomever else celebrates it!

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to Centuur)
Post #: 1508
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/24/2016 10:15:03 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		BoB search rolls of 10/6 means no contact.

CSV. Flew Skuka to 0-box. The Hampden at extended range can reach the 3-box, but the Beaufort cannot (range of 11 halved to 6 for reaction, only allows it to reach the 2-box). What do you wish to do with it, 2-box by itself, 0-box or stay at home?

quote:

CSV: All three aircraft based in Cisneros flyout. Beaufort & Hampden (using extended range) to 3-box. Skuka to 0-box.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1509
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/24/2016 10:49:52 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

BoB search rolls of 10/6 means no contact.

CSV. Flew Skuka to 0-box. The Hampden at extended range can reach the 3-box, but the Beaufort cannot (range of 11 halved to 6 for reaction, only allows it to reach the 2-box). What do you wish to do with it, 2-box by itself, 0-box or stay at home?

quote:

CSV: All three aircraft based in Cisneros flyout. Beaufort & Hampden (using extended range) to 3-box. Skuka to 0-box.

2-box then.


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1510
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/24/2016 11:22:45 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		CSV rnd 1:
Search rolls of 1/9 mean the axis find. They engage the 0-box only with 10 SP. Choose naval air.
GE fly F-B as a fighter.
How will the CW fly the two CVP's as bombers or fighters.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1511
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/24/2016 11:24:17 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		CVPs fly as fighters. They will stay until shot down or the status of all axis bombers is determined. As usual, when given the chance target axis bombers for abort or shoot down.

Also, the allies will stay for a possible round 2.

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 11/24/2016 11:59:47 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1512
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/25/2016 12:01:35 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		A-A went well for the allies. They shot down a Stuka (my choice versus the IT fighter) and did not lose a fighter.
I spent 2 SP decrease allied AA to no effect. Axis AA reduced the CW NAV to 0.
I used 8 SP to increase allied damage to X D 2A.
I placed the first X versus CP.
Where do you want the D and the 2nd A?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1513
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/25/2016 12:22:25 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		D on the Ramilies, second A on Ramilies if damaged, otherwise on Warspite.

RN aborts go to Cisnerous, Spanish Sahara. Any French aborts go to Dakar.

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 11/25/2016 12:26:50 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1514
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/25/2016 12:36:01 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		All CW units made their saving throws. 2nd round searches were 6/7 and combat ended.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1515
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/25/2016 12:41:49 AM   
Jagdtiger14


Posts: 1686
Joined: 1/22/2008
From: Miami Beach
Status: offline
quote:

and key lime pies.


Oh! My favorite!!!

Happy Thanksgiving!

< Message edited by Jagdtiger14 -- 11/25/2016 12:43:36 AM >

_____________________________

Conflict with the unexpected: two qualities are indispensable; first, an intellect which, even in the midst of this obscurity, is not without some traces of inner light which lead to the truth; second, the courage to follow this faint light. KvC

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1516
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/25/2016 12:47:07 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jagdtiger14

quote:

and key lime pies.


Oh! My favorite!!!

Happy Thanksgiving!

And a Happy Thanksgiving to you too.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to Jagdtiger14)
Post #: 1517
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/25/2016 1:08:00 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		ND41 i4:
Land attack on Lisbon went well with full support of the Italian and German navies.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1518
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/25/2016 1:09:15 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		ND41 i5
Weather is starting to looking like winter...





Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1519
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/25/2016 1:50:08 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 14. Nov/Dec 1941. Allied #5. Actions.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1520
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/25/2016 1:52:33 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 14. Nov/Dec 1941. Allied #5. Post Naval Moves. Contested Sea Areas.

The allies elect for no combat in all four contested sea areas. The axis don't have the opportunity to try.

This sums up this allied impulse. Now it's back to Pat and the axis.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1521
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/25/2016 2:40:10 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		ND41 i7:
Italy and Japan take combined actions and Germany takes a land action.
JP moves two CVs from Truk to the S. China Sea
Italy moves a CP to the W. Med
Italy flies a fighter to the 2-box of the BoB

Italy can initiate searches in 3 areas.
In the first, CSV, the search rolls of 5/5 resulted in no contact.
In the second, BoB, the axis find on rolls of 1/4. The axis engage only the 0-box with 6 SP in a naval air battle.
Both axis fighter-bombers fly fight as fighters.
Use 2 SP to decrease the allied A-A value.
In the A-A, the Italian NAV is aborted and both CW fighters are shot down.
Used 2 SP to decrease the AA to no effect. And the final 2 SP were used to move the damage from 2D to an X, which was applied to the CP. (see this and the next post).




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1522
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/25/2016 2:40:54 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		2nd of two images of the BoB rnd 1 battle.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1523
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/25/2016 2:57:16 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		BoB: Rnd 2 search rolls of 1/2 resulted in both sides finding. CW with 1 SP.
Germany makes it a naval air. One axis F-B flies as a bomber, one as a fighter. All Allied CVP fly as fighters.
A-A went three rounds. The Axis F-B flying as a bomber was aborted. The allied beaufighter and a CVP were destroyed.
AA went well for the axis.
Result was a D on the Furious which did damage the ship.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1524
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/25/2016 3:01:22 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		ND41 i7:
3rd round of searches resulted in no contact (10/5)

W. Med searches resulted in no contact on 3/7 search rolls.

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1525
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/25/2016 3:42:08 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		ND 41 i7:
turn did not end. Weather roll for i9 was a 6, which with the modifier kept the weather at a 7.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1526
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/25/2016 3:50:27 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Pat,

If the turn ends, how do you wish to handle the chits for the Nazi-Soviet pact?

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1527
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/25/2016 4:01:08 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
quote:

If the turn ends, how do you wish to handle the chits for the Nazi-Soviet pact?

All of mine to Offensive and move the highest value chit from defensive to offensive.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1528
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/25/2016 4:27:57 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 14. Nov/Dec 1941. Allied #9. Actions.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1529
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 11/25/2016 4:30:28 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 14. Nov/Dec 1941. Allied #9. Kenya.

The CW is able to retake the Nairobi, the capital of Kenya, back from the Italians.

I'm not sure if this saves Kenya or if it's conquered and then liberate by the CW?





Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1530
Page:   <<   < prev  49 50 [51] 52 53   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  49 50 [51] 52 53   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.703