Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  55 56 [57] 58 59   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/13/2016 4:39:52 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 15. Jan/Feb 1942. Allied #12. USN, No Combat. Central Pacific.

... and the Japanese aren't given the opportunity to try.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1681
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/13/2016 4:40:38 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 15. Jan/Feb 1942. Allied #12. French Navy, No Combat. Cape Verde Basin.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1682
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/13/2016 4:43:35 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 15. Jan/Feb 1942. Allied #12. USSR, Rail.

The blue factory at Kiev was railed east to Stalinsk.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1683
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/13/2016 4:44:19 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 15. Jan/Feb 1942. Allied #12. USSR.

Post movement, no air or land combat.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1684
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/13/2016 4:45:42 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 15. Jan/Feb 1942. Allied #12. UK.

Yanks are spotted in central and northern UK.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1685
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/13/2016 4:46:21 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 15. Jan/Feb 1942. Allied #12. The Mediterranean Front.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1686
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/13/2016 4:46:53 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 15. Jan/Feb 1942. Allied #12. Burma. India.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1687
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/13/2016 4:47:34 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 15. Jan/Feb 1942. Allied #12. Malaya. Philippines.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1688
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/13/2016 4:48:11 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 15. Jan/Feb 1942. Allied #12. The Solomons. Bismarck Sea.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1689
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/13/2016 4:51:20 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 15. Jan/Feb 1942. Allied #12. End of Turn Check.

This turn (barely) comes to an end on a roll of 6 against a 60% chance of ending.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1690
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/13/2016 4:52:38 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 15. Jan/Feb 1942. Destroyed and Repair Pools.

Back to Pat for axis preliminary production.

Good night all, past my bedtime.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1691
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/13/2016 4:46:42 PM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline
So...Japan captured a Convoy Point from China.

Fascinating, Captains.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1692
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/14/2016 12:01:59 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
quote:

So...Japan captured a Convoy Point from China.

Fascinating, Captains.

Yes, apparently Ronnie had China build a single CP with the single BP that China had saved the turn preceding her surrender to the Japanese. Therefore it was on the spiral at surrender and went to Japan.

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 1693
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/14/2016 12:21:13 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

quote:

So...Japan captured a Convoy Point from China.

Fascinating, Captains.

Yes, apparently Ronnie had China build a single CP with the single BP that China had saved the turn preceding her surrender to the Japanese. Therefore it was on the spiral at surrender and went to Japan.
It was a present for China's new rulers.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1694
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/14/2016 4:41:35 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
JF42 EOT: Axis Oil Usage





Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1695
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/14/2016 11:49:55 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 15. Jan/Feb 1942. End of Turn. Use Oil. Allied.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1696
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/14/2016 10:39:32 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 15. Jan/Feb 1942. End of Turn. Final Production. Allies.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1697
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/14/2016 11:55:07 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
JF42 Axis Final Production.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1698
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/15/2016 12:04:39 AM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rkr1958

No Soviet reaction to the attack on Cernauti.


If I was the Soviets I would raise a hearty round of Vodka toasts over this one, which along with the advance into Bessarabia in general, netted the Russians 11 Build Points for little tactical advantage for Army Group Rumania, due to the production rules in WiF. Four more infantry armies will now meet the onrushing panzers in the summer of 1942.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1699
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/15/2016 2:49:01 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian


quote:

ORIGINAL: rkr1958

No Soviet reaction to the attack on Cernauti.


If I was the Soviets I would raise a hearty round of Vodka toasts over this one, which along with the advance into Bessarabia in general, netted the Russians 11 Build Points for little tactical advantage for Army Group Rumania, due to the production rules in WiF. Four more infantry armies will now meet the onrushing panzers in the summer of 1942.


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 1700
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/15/2016 5:18:11 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
JF42 Axis Builds
GE (39): 3x pilots, 2x FIG2, 2x LND2, TERR, INF, MTN, INF HQ, MECH, ARM
IT (10): pilot, FIG2, sub-fu, INF HQ
JP (23): 3x pilot, CVP1, FIG2, 3x CP, CV2-fu, CV1-fu, CV2-fd, sub-fu, sub-fd, INF-div

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1701
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/15/2016 12:40:04 PM   
Centuur


Posts: 8802
Joined: 6/3/2011
From: Hoorn (NED).
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian


quote:

ORIGINAL: rkr1958

No Soviet reaction to the attack on Cernauti.


If I was the Soviets I would raise a hearty round of Vodka toasts over this one, which along with the advance into Bessarabia in general, netted the Russians 11 Build Points for little tactical advantage for Army Group Rumania, due to the production rules in WiF. Four more infantry armies will now meet the onrushing panzers in the summer of 1942.


Agreed. Germany should have taken all of Bessarabia this turn, since that would have given the USSR only a 0,25 extra multiplier on production if they want to take out Bessarabia in the first turn of the war. Now, the Soviets have 0,5 production multiplier extra...


_____________________________

Peter

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 1702
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/15/2016 11:15:57 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 15. Jan/Feb 1942. End of Turn. Production. Allies.

CW (28 BPs): FTR(3) x 2, Pilot(2) x 2, INF HQ(5), Terr(2) x 2, CP(1) x 3, AMPH 2nd(3), TRS 2nd(3)

France (0 BPs):

USA (54 BPs): O-Chit(15), CV 2nd(3), TRS 2nd(3), BB 2nd(4), CA 2nd(3), CV 1st(2), TRS 1st(2), CP(1) x 2, RN CA Repair(1) x 2, CVP(1) x 2, FTR(3) x 2, Pilot(2) x 3, GAR(2) x 2

USSR (39 BPs): INF(3) x 3, INF HQ(5), ARM HQ(8), ARM(6), MECH(5), MIL(2) x 3

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to Centuur)
Post #: 1703
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/15/2016 11:18:16 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 15. Jan/Feb 1942. Conquest. Malaya Completely Conquered by Japan.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1704
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/15/2016 11:18:53 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 15. Jan/Feb 1942. Conquest. Hong Kong Completely Conquered by Japan.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1705
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/15/2016 11:19:21 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 15. Jan/Feb 1942. Conquest. French Indo China Completely Conquered by Japan.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1706
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/15/2016 11:19:53 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 15. Jan/Feb 1942. Victory Totals. Optional Rules.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1707
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/15/2016 11:20:28 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 15. Jan/Feb 1942. Global Maps.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1708
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/16/2016 12:17:00 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
MA42 Axis Reinforcements.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1709
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 12/16/2016 1:29:21 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 16. Mar/Apr 1942. Deploy Units. CW.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1710
Page:   <<   < prev  55 56 [57] 58 59   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  55 56 [57] 58 59   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.781