Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: ROKAF KF-16C/D Block 52 will upgrade

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: ROKAF KF-16C/D Block 52 will upgrade Page: <<   < prev  106 107 [108] 109 110   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: ROKAF KF-16C/D Block 52 will upgrade - 1/13/2017 2:23:32 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: raptorx7

DB Entry #1679 SY-400 MLRS [BP-12A Capability] is missing its BP-12A munition, I tried to give it some by adding a magazine but I couldn't find it.


Did you try just adjusting the number in the weapons record?

Regardless I've reconfigured this to give it 6 MLRS and 2 BP-12A missiles by default. The MLRS are multipacked.

M

_____________________________


(in reply to Raptorx7_slith)
Post #: 3211
RE: ROKAF KF-16C/D Block 52 will upgrade - 1/13/2017 2:41:10 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: orca

Can An/SLQ-32(V)6 [SEWIP Block 2] be given to the hypothetical CG 21?


Updated

_____________________________


(in reply to orca)
Post #: 3212
RE: ROKAF KF-16C/D Block 52 will upgrade - 1/13/2017 3:20:41 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
Updated our list to this point. Anything noted has been updated. Anything not in on the to do list.

M

_____________________________


(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 3213
Sub layabled mines - 1/14/2017 12:46:51 AM   
Jorm


Posts: 545
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Melbourne
Status: offline
Would it be possible to add a few more generic submarine deployable mines, currently only the MDM-6 mine is able to be deployed whilst submerged. All others work but only while the sub is surfaced.

cheers

(in reply to Temple)
Post #: 3214
RE: ROKAF KF-16C/D Block 52 will upgrade - 1/14/2017 1:45:29 AM   
Excroat3

 

Posts: 436
Joined: 1/24/2015
Status: offline
Suggesting a couple of loadout additions to American helicopters:

#1603 - AH-64A Apache (HYPOTHETICAL LOADOUT)


AH-64 with AIM-9M, 1987 (hypothetical)

#336 - AH-1Z Viper [Super Cobra]

AH-1Z or AH-1W with AGM-122A

#1486 - AH-1T Sea Cobra

AH-1T with AGM-122A

More information about the AGM-122A ARM on helicopters, including introduction dates:
https://www.forecastinternational.com/archive/disp_old_pdf.cfm?ARC_ID=1060

< Message edited by Excroat3 -- 1/14/2017 1:48:46 AM >

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 3215
RE: ROKAF KF-16C/D Block 52 will upgrade - 1/14/2017 3:45:17 AM   
e2204588

 

Posts: 170
Joined: 7/12/2013
Status: offline
#2587 - SSM Plt (Hsiung Feng IIE LACM)
Weapon mount "Hsiung Feng IIE Quad" should use "Hsiung Feng IIE" instead of "Hsiung Feng II"

Fixed


< Message edited by mikmyk -- 1/15/2017 1:14:41 PM >

(in reply to Excroat3)
Post #: 3216
new unit Armored Plt Kürassier - 1/16/2017 9:21:17 AM   
benefant

 

Posts: 93
Joined: 6/5/2015
From: Austria
Status: offline
please add the SK105 Tank to the database


The SK105 - Kürassier is a tank produced by Steyr-Daimler-Puch (Austria).

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%BCrassier_(Panzer)

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 3217
RE: new unit Armored Plt Kürassier - 1/16/2017 9:41:55 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
J-10B spotted carrying KG-600 ECM pods on their ventral/fuselage hardpoints:




(in reply to benefant)
Post #: 3218
RE: new unit Armored Plt Kürassier - 1/16/2017 11:04:02 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
My god. Its not blurry, fog filled or in tecnicolor. A quality camera was used...maybe even an <gasp> an Iphone!

This must mean the second coming. I will be down in my bunker preparing.

Will add at some point too! Thanks!

Mike

< Message edited by mikmyk -- 1/17/2017 12:38:07 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 3219
RE: new unit Armored Plt Kürassier - 1/17/2017 1:22:29 AM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
Heh, official PLA ministry of defense releases about the last year's Red Sword exercise. They didn't know how many things they just leaked by releasing these photos...

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 3220
RE: newUnit request? - 1/17/2017 9:35:44 PM   
tjhkkr


Posts: 2428
Joined: 6/3/2010
Status: offline
Would it be possible to make the U-2 carrier capable?
I am not sure all U-2s are so, but at least some are.

Even if the answer is no, thank you, as always!




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Remember that the evil which is now in the world will become yet more powerful, and that it is not evil which conquers evil, but only love -- Olga Romanov.

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 3221
New Unit Global Express - 1/20/2017 3:06:23 AM   
BathtubAdmiral

 

Posts: 13
Joined: 1/19/2017
Status: offline
Hi! Would it be possible to add Bombardier Global 5000 to Commercial Aircrafts? German Air Force Special Air Mission Wing uses it beside A340 for VIP transport. I hate to force Chancellor Merkel getting in a placeholder CRJ. Thanks!

(in reply to tjhkkr)
Post #: 3222
Propulsion A400M - 1/20/2017 3:12:08 AM   
BathtubAdmiral

 

Posts: 13
Joined: 1/19/2017
Status: offline
Correction: The A400M has got FOUR Engines instead of two ...

Fixed....

< Message edited by mikmyk -- 1/24/2017 8:39:17 PM >

(in reply to BathtubAdmiral)
Post #: 3223
RE: Propulsion A400M - 1/20/2017 8:15:55 PM   
Zaslon

 

Posts: 283
Joined: 6/14/2015
Status: offline
Brazilian Mirage IIIBR ( #1249 #1250 ) are classified as Recon type. It looks strange. Please check it. Thanks.

Unstranged. Thanks!


< Message edited by mikmyk -- 1/24/2017 8:41:04 PM >


_____________________________


Kids think about Iran and Amateurs think about Russia, but professionals think about China

(in reply to BathtubAdmiral)
Post #: 3224
RE: Propulsion A400M - 1/21/2017 6:00:02 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
Got an issue with the Type 054A Jiangkai-II Frigate's HQ-16A SAM.
Tested them against close-by air-targets, but they do not fire. Weapon allocation screen says that it is unable to connect with mandatory datalink.


A look into the db entry for the 054A frigates shows that, while they have SA-17/SA-N-12 Command Datalink [8 Channels], they do lack the SA-17/SA-N-12 Missile Datalink that is required for the HQ-16A (but not the SA-17 or the HQ-16B). Same missile datalink also seems to be lacking for the HQ-16A SAM launcher facility, but I havent tested it yet whether it works or not.

So, I'd suggest to either add the required SA-17/SA-N-12 Missile Datalink for all platforms using the HQ-16A - or, in case of the Type 054A Frigate, give it the HQ-16B, which already went into service some years ago.

(Also, official sources about the HQ-16B state that it is an active radar missile and not semi-active: http://english.chinamil.com.cn/view/2016-09/13/content_7256402.htm)

(in reply to Zaslon)
Post #: 3225
Possible minor change to SA-6a GAINFUL data - 1/21/2017 7:20:20 PM   
CV60


Posts: 992
Joined: 10/1/2012
Status: offline
Here are a some minor changes to DB3000 Weapon_1825 the SA-6a GAINFUL 9M336:

Database gives weight of 599 Kg, and a range of 1.5-13 nm, and an target altitude of 250-46,000 feet AGL, with a missile speed of 1290-1740 knts and a warhead of 59kg.

According to the sources below, these numbers should be (ussing the initial production Kub, IOC 1967):

Weight: 630 kg
Range: 3.2-11.9 nm
target alt: 328-22,965 ft
Warhead:57 kg

For the Kub-M3 (IOC 1976) the numbers would be:
Weight: 630 kg
Range: 2.15-13.50 nm
target alt: 65-26,247 ft
Warhead:57 kg

The sources below (except the OPFOR guide) also say the max speed is 600 m/s (1166 knts). OPFOR gives the missile speed at 700 m/s. However, this seems a little low to me, and I wonder if this 600 m/s represents the initial boost phase velocity.

[edited: Yep, the 600 m/s must be the boost phase. The missile eventually accelerates to approx. Mach 2.8, according to http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-2K12-Kvadrat.html ]


IHS. "2K12 Kub." Land Warfare Platforms: Artillery & Air Defence, 01 April 2016; "2K12 Kub/Kvadrat Self Propelled Air Defence System / SA-6 Gainful" Air Power Australia. Accessed January 21, 2017. http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-2K12-Kvadrat.html. (citing http://pvo.guns.ru/russia/index33.htm) ; US Army.; OPFOR WORLDWIDE EQUIPMENT GUIDE, Vol 2: Airspace and Air Defense Systems. TRADOC DCSINT Threat Support Directorate, December 2011, pg. 6-71 (available at http://cgsc.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p4013coll11/id/2090)

< Message edited by CV60 -- 1/25/2017 2:21:18 PM >

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 3226
RE: Propulsion A400M - 1/22/2017 1:56:09 AM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hongjian

Got an issue with the Type 054A Jiangkai-II Frigate's HQ-16A SAM.
Tested them against close-by air-targets, but they do not fire. Weapon allocation screen says that it is unable to connect with mandatory datalink.


A look into the db entry for the 054A frigates shows that, while they have SA-17/SA-N-12 Command Datalink [8 Channels], they do lack the SA-17/SA-N-12 Missile Datalink that is required for the HQ-16A (but not the SA-17 or the HQ-16B). Same missile datalink also seems to be lacking for the HQ-16A SAM launcher facility, but I havent tested it yet whether it works or not.

So, I'd suggest to either add the required SA-17/SA-N-12 Missile Datalink for all platforms using the HQ-16A - or, in case of the Type 054A Frigate, give it the HQ-16B, which already went into service some years ago.

(Also, official sources about the HQ-16B state that it is an active radar missile and not semi-active: http://english.chinamil.com.cn/view/2016-09/13/content_7256402.htm)


This is a game issue that should be fixed next update.

Will look at hq16b as info evolves.

Mike


< Message edited by mikmyk -- 1/22/2017 1:57:19 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 3227
RE: Propulsion A400M - 1/22/2017 7:32:42 AM   
JamitovHymem

 

Posts: 47
Joined: 7/4/2016
Status: offline




Iranian F-14 with R-27(likely also has the R73)
F-4 with C-802

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 3228
RUSSIAN EW UNITS - 1/23/2017 11:43:43 AM   
Fer_Cabo

 

Posts: 111
Joined: 9/17/2015
Status: offline
Could you please add:

-Murmansk-BN
-Borisoglebsk-2
-Rtut-BM

You can find info and links about all of them here: http://www.russiadefence.net/t2461p240-russian-electronic-warfare-systems

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 3229
RE: Possible minor change to SA-6a GAINFUL data - 1/23/2017 8:32:39 PM   
PN79

 

Posts: 173
Joined: 1/3/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CV60

Here are a some minor changes to DB3000 Weapon_1825 the SA-6a GAINFUL 9M336:

Database gives weight of 599 Kg, and a range of 1.5-13 nm, and an target altitude of 250-46,000 feet AGL, with a missile speed of 1290-1740 knts and a warhead of 59kg.

According to the sources below, these numbers should be (ussing the initial production Kub, IOC 1967):

Weight: 630 kg
Range: 3.2-11.9 nm
target alt: 328-22,965 ft
Warhead:57 kg

For the Kub-M3 (IOC 1976) the numbers would be:
Weight: 630 kg
Range: 2.15-13.50 nm
target alt: 65-26,247 ft
Warhead:57 kg

The sources below (except the OPFOR guide) also say the max speed is 600 m/s (1166 knts). OPFOR gives the missile speed at 700 m/s. However, this seems a little low to me, and I wonder if this 600 m/s represents the initial boost phase velocity.


IHS. "2K12 Kub." Land Warfare Platforms: Artillery & Air Defence, 01 April 2016; "2K12 Kub/Kvadrat Self Propelled Air Defence System / SA-6 Gainful" Air Power Australia. Accessed January 21, 2017. http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-2K12-Kvadrat.html. (citing http://pvo.guns.ru/russia/index33.htm) ; US Army.; OPFOR WORLDWIDE EQUIPMENT GUIDE, Vol 2: Airspace and Air Defense Systems. TRADOC DCSINT Threat Support Directorate, December 2011, pg. 6-71 (available at http://cgsc.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p4013coll11/id/2090)


Hello,

Please if there is time to touch SA-6 Gainfull also rename missiles from 9M336 to correct: 3M9 for SA-6A and 3M9M3 for SA-6B. I don't know why 9M336 is used in connection with SA-6 but it is wrong as it is actually different missile (Verba).

Here you can see what is actually written on SA-6 missile:

http://www.brigadyr.net/pozemni_technika/raketovy_komplet_2k12m3_kub/raketa_3m9/2.htm

http://www.brigadyr.net/pozemni_technika/raketovy_komplet_2k12m3_kub/raketa_3m9/raketa_3m9.htm


Altitudes and names adjusted




< Message edited by mikmyk -- 1/24/2017 8:34:01 PM >

(in reply to CV60)
Post #: 3230
RE: Possible minor change to SA-6a GAINFUL data - 1/24/2017 1:34:58 PM   
spec111

 

Posts: 157
Joined: 9/30/2014
Status: offline
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audacious-class_aircraft_carrier

Hello! Please add Audacious class into DB3000 too. It will be cool to use this CVs with Bucaneers in what-if Falklands War. =)

_____________________________


(in reply to PN79)
Post #: 3231
RE: Possible minor change to SA-6a GAINFUL data - 1/24/2017 2:03:26 PM   
Primarchx


Posts: 3102
Joined: 1/20/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: spec111

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audacious-class_aircraft_carrier

Hello! Please add Audacious class into DB3000 too. It will be cool to use this CVs with Bucaneers in what-if Falklands War. =)


I second this! Plus RN Phantoms, Buccs, etc.

(in reply to spec111)
Post #: 3232
RE: Possible minor change to SA-6a GAINFUL data - 1/24/2017 2:03:27 PM   
spec111

 

Posts: 157
Joined: 9/30/2014
Status: offline
Where is carrier-capable Bucaneers? I want them too.

_____________________________


(in reply to spec111)
Post #: 3233
RE: Possible minor change to SA-6a GAINFUL data - 1/24/2017 4:18:59 PM   
Dimitris

 

Posts: 13282
Joined: 7/31/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: spec111
Where is carrier-capable Bucaneers? I want them too.


Quite certain they're already in there. NI #10 would be impossible without them.

_____________________________


(in reply to spec111)
Post #: 3234
RE: Possible minor change to SA-6a GAINFUL data - 1/24/2017 5:52:26 PM   
Primarchx


Posts: 3102
Joined: 1/20/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sunburn

quote:

ORIGINAL: spec111
Where is carrier-capable Bucaneers? I want them too.


Quite certain they're already in there. NI #10 would be impossible without them.


Isn't NI using the CWDB? We're asking for RN CTOL carrier assets for DB3K.

(in reply to Dimitris)
Post #: 3235
RE: Possible minor change to SA-6a GAINFUL data - 1/24/2017 10:48:09 PM   
Gunner98

 

Posts: 5508
Joined: 4/29/2005
From: The Great White North!
Status: offline
Here is an interesting hypothetical for the USN BBs - a bit of a monstrosity I would think but very cool.

http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/us-navys-ultimate-dream-weapon-russia-feared-merging-super-19166


B

(in reply to Primarchx)
Post #: 3236
RE: Possible minor change to SA-6a GAINFUL data - 1/24/2017 11:12:26 PM   
Kitchens Sink

 

Posts: 402
Joined: 5/4/2014
Status: offline
Sorta reminds me of the BBG 72 Arsenal (Hypothetical Unit) currently in the database....no Harriers on that one though. The Arsenal is very fun to put into a scenario and blow up the general Theater of Operations.

(in reply to Gunner98)
Post #: 3237
RE: Possible minor change to SA-6a GAINFUL data - 1/25/2017 12:40:07 AM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
Pretty sure Paul has this unit in the CWDB.

_____________________________


(in reply to Kitchens Sink)
Post #: 3238
RE: Possible minor change to SA-6a GAINFUL data - 1/25/2017 10:28:14 AM   
Gunner98

 

Posts: 5508
Joined: 4/29/2005
From: The Great White North!
Status: offline
There she is! DBID#669 BB 61 Iowa (Surface Combatant (Aviation Capable)

Any chance we could get her ported over to DB3K as it was considered for a late 80's conversion. Might be able to use her in an upcoming scenario.

Thanks

B

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 3239
RE: Possible minor change to SA-6a GAINFUL data - 1/25/2017 12:06:43 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Gunner98

There she is! DBID#669 BB 61 Iowa (Surface Combatant (Aviation Capable)

Any chance we could get her ported over to DB3K as it was considered for a late 80's conversion. Might be able to use her in an upcoming scenario.

Thanks

B


Have to think about it. Its a big of stretch.

Thanks

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to Gunner98)
Post #: 3240
Page:   <<   < prev  106 107 [108] 109 110   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: ROKAF KF-16C/D Block 52 will upgrade Page: <<   < prev  106 107 [108] 109 110   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.484