Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Should ZOCs be a little more "sticky"

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Strategic Command Series >> Strategic Command WWII War in Europe >> Should ZOCs be a little more "sticky" Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Should ZOCs be a little more "sticky" - 2/20/2017 1:48:04 PM   
wie201

 

Posts: 793
Joined: 11/9/2002
From: Fairfax, VA, USA
Status: offline
Just putting this out there as more of a discussion point. Example. In a HTH game an infantry unit attacks forward, takes losses, and still has the points to waltz past (and between) enemy units to delve two more hexes deep into enemy territory. Yes, I know its supply is kinda screwed, and it may get cut off and destroyed, but it just seems to us to be a "bit" too much for infantry. Tanks, OK.

BTW, said same unit retreated, again splitting enemy units in doing so. He later admitted he just did it so I would take a national moral hit, which I did, but that is OK. I just don't have enough units to cover every single hex, but am trying!

Love the game! Just curious what other people think.

Post #: 1
RE: Should ZOCs be a little more "sticky" - 2/20/2017 2:37:09 PM   
Capitaine

 

Posts: 1043
Joined: 1/15/2002
Status: offline
In other strategic games like AH's "Third Reich" there were no ZOCs at all. At this hex scale (20 miles?) I'm not sure they're appropriate beyond what we have.

(in reply to wie201)
Post #: 2
RE: Should ZOCs be a little more "sticky" - 2/20/2017 2:45:37 PM   
Flaviusx


Posts: 7750
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline
As I recall armor units in Third Reich did have ZOCs.

This game doesn't suffer from an excess of mobility in relation to the time scale involved and I see no need to make ZOCs stickier. If anything, creating breakthroughs gets harder as the game progresses.

_____________________________

WitE Alpha Tester

(in reply to Capitaine)
Post #: 3
RE: Should ZOCs be a little more "sticky" - 2/20/2017 4:41:14 PM   
Capitaine

 

Posts: 1043
Joined: 1/15/2002
Status: offline
You're right. Forgot about that. Of course, they were mobile and I guess the ZOC reflected their ability to cover more ground; sort of like an interception concept.

(in reply to Flaviusx)
Post #: 4
RE: Should ZOCs be a little more "sticky" - 2/20/2017 4:45:09 PM   
James Taylor

 

Posts: 638
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Corpus Christi, Texas
Status: offline
Infiltration tactics have always been apart of real war exploits. These movement mechanics are a vast improvement over what we've had in the past.

_____________________________

SeaMonkey

(in reply to Capitaine)
Post #: 5
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Strategic Command Series >> Strategic Command WWII War in Europe >> Should ZOCs be a little more "sticky" Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.844