RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Page: << < prev 74 75 [76] 77 78 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 2/22/2017 2:07:43 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Round 2: Italy had 4 SP. Surface. Spend 2 SP to decrease their damage column to ne and 2 SP to increase the allied damage to 2D 3A. Damaged one CA and aborted the other.

Round 3 searches of 8/10 ended the combat. I aborted the two CW CA to Suez, though one goes onto the repair pool. He can be adjusted later if you wish him to be elsewhere.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2251

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 2/22/2017 2:13:26 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Next up is the BoB (the last one for this impulse).
The axis do not add any planes to the sea zone.
The image below shows the options for the allies. Nothing can reach the 3-box, but they can reach the 0-box.
Will you react any out to the sea zone?

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2252

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 2/22/2017 2:40:27 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

RAF Whirlwind, both Beau-fighters and US P-38F fighter to the 1-box. Any that can't reach to the 0-box.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2253

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 2/22/2017 4:08:51 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

In BoB search rolls of 9/3 result in the allies 3-box finding with 8 surprise points. You could avoid or engage. If you engage please provide instructions.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2254

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 2/22/2017 4:17:14 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Avoid please.

Off to bed now.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2255

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 2/22/2017 4:53:22 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

JA42 i7: Ground Strikes, just two.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2256

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 2/22/2017 5:33:21 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

JA42 i7: Axis Land Attacks
There are 5 declared land attacks, all in Russia.
No German ground support nor HQ support.
Russian ground support shown along with possible axis interceptors.
I'll make the attacks in forest and clear blitz's and assume you'll make the swamp and cities assaults.
Any interceptions?

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2257

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 2/22/2017 10:48:44 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

No intercepts. No support.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2258

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 2/22/2017 11:59:18 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

The 5 attacks all resulted in modified 23's.
First 3 in this image.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2259

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 2/22/2017 11:59:47 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Last two in this image.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2260

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 2/23/2017 12:00:48 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

JA42 i7 EOT
And to my displeasure the turn ended on the first opportunity. Another impulse in Russia would have been nice.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2261

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 2/23/2017 12:05:24 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

JA42 i7 EOT
And to my displeasure the turn ended on the first opportunity. Another impulse in Russia would have been nice.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2262

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 2/23/2017 12:19:27 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

JA42 EOT Partisan
And more to your liking, one partisan showed up in the NEI.
I placed the NEI partisan in the one oil hex that it could be place in. Feel free to move it if you wish, but not in the ZOC of one of my units.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2263

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 2/23/2017 2:58:00 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. End of Turn. Destroyed Pool.

Losses were definitely one-side this turn.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2264

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 2/23/2017 10:22:03 PM

WIF_Killzone

Posts: 277
Joined: 4/30/2009
Status: offline

Ahhh, the mud and then winter, Russia is saved, and no major cities taken, bye-bye Germany :) hehehe.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2265

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 2/24/2017 12:07:51 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: WIF_Killzone

Ahhh, the mud and then winter, Russia is saved, and no major cities taken, bye-bye Germany :) hehehe.

Your encouragement is much appreciated, Comrade Editor.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to WIF_Killzone)

Post #: 2266

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 2/24/2017 12:46:02 AM

brian brian

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline

Sep/Oct is a big turn during Barbarossa. The sun can shine for long stretches, some years.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2267

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 2/24/2017 1:19:05 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

Ahhh, the mud and then winter, Russia is saved, and no major cities taken, bye-bye Germany :) hehehe.

Yes, the weather has been terrible for most of the game (GE perspective), perhaps this coming winter will be different. Up to this point we have had long turns and that changed. ;-)

(in reply to WIF_Killzone)

Post #: 2268

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 2/24/2017 1:19:48 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

JA42 EOT GE IT oil usage

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2269

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 2/24/2017 1:20:14 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

And JP oil usage

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2270

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 2/24/2017 3:34:54 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. End of Turn. Use Oil. Allies.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2271

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 2/24/2017 11:17:49 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

JA42 EOT Axis Final Production.
Note, the Austrian oil appears to be AWL (Away Without Leave). I'm checking to see if it was there in past production cycles. I'll be posting a bug report shortly.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2272

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 2/25/2017 3:48:23 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. End of Turn. Final Production. Allies.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2273

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 2/25/2017 10:16:20 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

JA42 EOT Axis Builds

GE (43):
3x pilots, FIG2, LND2, LND3
sub-fu, sub-fd,
2x MECH, INF, MOT, mot-div, inf-div, AT-gun

IT (10):
pilot, FIG2, 3x TERR

JP (24):
2x pilot, LND3
sub-fu, CA-rp, CV2-fd, CP
ARM HQ, ENG-div

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2274

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 2/25/2017 11:44:33 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. End of Turn. CW Builds.