Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  78 79 [80] 81 82   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/12/2017 1:41:23 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		In the hope of a longer turn, the Germans used two HQ to reorganize some front line troops and air.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2371
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/12/2017 1:42:12 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		The first part of the GE HQ reorg gamble was made (the turn did not end).




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2372
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/12/2017 3:32:51 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 19. Sep/Oct 1942. Allied #8. Actions.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2373
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/12/2017 3:33:29 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 19. Sep/Oct 1942. Allied #8. South China Sea. Attempted Sub Combat.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2374
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/12/2017 3:35:08 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 19. Sep/Oct 1942. Allied #8. Contested Sea Areas, No Combat. Cape St. Vincent. Eastern Med.

Allies made no moves into these areas, so initiation of naval combat by the axis is not possible.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2375
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/12/2017 3:36:35 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 19. Sep/Oct 1942. Allied #8. Contested Sea Areas. Norwegian Sea. Arabian Sea.

The allies elected not to try to initiate combat in either of these sea areas.

Do you wish to? If so, what are your instructions.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2376
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/12/2017 9:11:13 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
quote:

Do you wish to? If so, what are your instructions.

Yes in both.

Norwegian sea. Make it a sub combat if possible.

Arabian Sea. Make it a Naval air. Take out the CP (sink), then the sub (if available) and then the CA. Goal is to keep supply from the Med.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2377
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/12/2017 9:23:59 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 19. Sep/Oct 1942. Allied #8. Italian Subs, Norwegian Sea.

The Italians attempt to initiate a sub combat fails.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 3/12/2017 9:31:03 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2378
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/12/2017 9:31:21 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 19. Sep/Oct 1942. Allied #8. IJN, Arabian Sea.


The IJN's attempt to initiate a naval air combat fails.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2379
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/12/2017 10:15:53 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 19. Sep/Oct 1942. Allied #8. USSR. Rail. Blue Factory.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2380
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/12/2017 10:16:28 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 19. Sep/Oct 1942. Allied #8. USSR. European Front.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2381
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/12/2017 10:17:03 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 19. Sep/Oct 1942. Allied #8. USSR. Asian Front.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2382
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/12/2017 10:18:13 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 19. Sep/Oct 1942. Allied #8. Anglo-Americans. Western Front.

Newly established and vulnerable Western Front!




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2383
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/12/2017 10:19:43 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 19. Sep/Oct 1942. Allied #8. End of Turn Check.

Do you have those moments well before you do it that you're going to roll high for the end of the turn and ...




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2384
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/12/2017 10:21:18 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 19. Sep/Oct 1942. Axis #9. Weather.

... roll low for the weather when you're in desperate need for the turn to end or the weather to be bad.

This turn continues and passes to the axis with fine weather everywhere!




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2385
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/13/2017 3:06:03 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		SO42 i9
Japan and Italy take combined actions. Germany takes a land action.

JP flew a fighter to the 4-box of the Solomons and a fighter to the 3-box of the Arabian Sea.
JP is moving a 7 counter fleet into the Solomons. Will the Japanese attempt an interception. If so who initiates?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2386
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/14/2017 1:29:38 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		No interception.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2387
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/14/2017 2:09:17 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		SO42 i9 Naval Searches:
Japan moved the fleet above onto the New Zealand Coast 2-box. Subs scattered across several zones.
Italians moved a CP into the E. Med.

E. Med, the Italians initiated but rolls of 7/3 resulted in no combat.
Arabian sea rolls (new sub and fighter in zone) of 8/10 resulted in no combat.
SCS, I did not initiate and the allies don't have an option.
CS, I did not initiate and the allies don't have an option.
The Solomons, I did not initiate but the allies will have the option (will you?). Image shown below.
The Tasman Sea rolls of 10/5 resulted in no combat.
In Polynesia rolls of 9/6 resulted in no combat.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 3/14/2017 2:12:03 AM >

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2388
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/14/2017 2:10:09 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		In Cape Naturaliste rolls of 2/2 resulted in a battle and the CP being sunk.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2389
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/14/2017 2:11:20 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		And finally in the New Zealand Coast, the allies get the drop on the Japanese with rolls of 8/1. How do you wish to proceed?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2390
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/14/2017 2:14:30 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Note, I have some prep work to do this evening for school and may not get back to this till much later.

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2391
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/14/2017 2:17:34 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

Note, I have some prep work to do this evening for school and may not get back to this till much later.
As much as I would like to fight the IJN just has too much of an advantage. Use 4 SPs to avoid combat.


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2392
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/14/2017 5:30:17 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		How about the Solomons. You can initiate if you wish.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2393
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/14/2017 1:06:10 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

How about the Solomons. You can initiate if you wish.
No thank you.


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2394
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/14/2017 10:43:59 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		SO42 i9 Ground Strikes
I have several ground strikes. No interceptions possible.
In the one below, the AA in the hex being ground struck could fire (guaranteeing me at least one disorganized unit in the hex).
Will the AA fire? If it fires it will be with 8 AA factors resulting in -1/6 AA roll.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 3/14/2017 10:44:31 PM >

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2395
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/15/2017 1:04:29 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		The Soviet AA will NOT fire against the German aircraft.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2396
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/15/2017 5:15:09 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		SO42 i9 GS
Looks like the AA should have fired. Both units in that hex were hit. Other ground strikes (this and the next post) were not as successful - though the Japanese did get lucky).




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 2397
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/15/2017 5:15:41 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		2nd GS post




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2398
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/15/2017 5:17:07 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		SO42 i9 Movement
First is an overrun by the Germans that opened up the plains north of the Caucuses and south of the Don to Manstein's Army of the Crimea.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2399
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 3/15/2017 5:20:51 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		SO42 Land Attacks (4 in two post)
First land attack in Siberia. Japanese did use HQ support. Won the hex, but only destroyed one of the corp. I converted the shatter to a retreat (did not want the unit to show up on the European map). Though if I shattered it, I believe the two disorganized planes in Vladivostok would not have reorganized because they would have had no path to oil. I may regret this next turn.

Other three attacks are automatic.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 2400
Page:   <<   < prev  78 79 [80] 81 82   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  78 79 [80] 81 82   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.859