Shannon V. OKeets
Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005 From: Honolulu, Hawaii Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Zartacla In a current solitaire game, Romania refused the Bessarabian demand and war ensued. German and Italian peacekeepers were unable to keep the Soviets from advancing beyond the disputed territory but have effectively blocked Soviet advances into Ploesti and Bucharest, so the war continues. Meanwhile, 2 Romanian units have left the country and wandered through Soviet controlled Eastern Poland. They move in, take a hex or two, and retreat into German territory before the Soviets can pin them down, and the Soviets are not able to retake the hexes because they are converted to German control as soon as Romanian units occupy them. Even when they finally catch and destroy the pesky Romanians, they can't even advance after combat. This has allowed German units to advance much closer to the Soviet border prior to Barbarossa. Is this correct? If Russia retreats back to Bessarabia and Germany enforces a peace, what happens to those hexes taken by Romanian units? In this scenario, why would Germany ever give the Soviets Bessarabia for free? Seems like far too good a deal for Germany when you combine the US entry benefits with the border situation. This is already on my task list. But, like you, I am not sure how to handle the hexes in East Poland that the Rumanian's have 'taken'. Minor countries are not suppose to 'own' hexes outside of their home country. Hence they are marked as controlled by their parent major power (Germany). Once peace is enforced, it would seem reasonable to make them controlled by the USSR (again). That wouldn't be difficult to code since it would happen as part of the USSR gaining control of Bessarabia as part of the Enforced Peace routines. But if peace is not enforced, them having Germany remain in control seems correct. === This could also come up for Finland.
_____________________________
Steve Perfection is an elusive goal.
|