Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent Page: <<   < prev  322 323 [324] 325 326   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/4/2017 9:59:19 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
6/18/44

Fun House: see map for details.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9691
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/5/2017 6:28:14 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
6/19/44

The biggest open question has been answered: John has not committed KB to prevent Death Star and Mini Death Star from uniting in the DEI.

See map for details.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9692
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/5/2017 6:40:06 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
You still have me baffled. I can't figure out what the big deal is with taking Mindanao. It is just a POW camp, isn't it?

I understand you have a plan. You are sticking to your plan. But, I just don't get it.

I will wait though.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9693
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/5/2017 7:05:37 PM   
paullus99


Posts: 1985
Joined: 1/23/2002
Status: offline
I suspect he'd like to eliminate potential kamikaze bases in his rear, as he moves closer to the HI...if he can take those bases without taking big risks or committing lots of troops, all the better.


_____________________________

Never Underestimate the Power of a Small Tactical Nuclear Weapon...

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 9694
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/5/2017 7:28:24 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: paullus99

I suspect he'd like to eliminate potential kamikaze bases in his rear, as he moves closer to the HI...if he can take those bases without taking big risks or committing lots of troops, all the better.



Can't see that as being so all fired important. Just a nuisance really.

He flew some Judy out of there not so long ago...but it seems that can be countered easily enough.

From the combat report CR posted Manila is hanging on by a thread. Once Manila falls, the rest of Luzon can't be long.

He had a foothold in Vinh...and didn't pursue it. If you don't want Vinh, then you most likely don't want Samah.

That leaves:

Formosa/Ishigaki/Okinawa/Daito line.

I see the importance of those. I see the importance of Hokkaido and the Jima's. Scratch Jimas' since Saipan is Japanese. And why go after Marianas when you have Luzon?

So, basically I see two ways forward, the other way CR has had ample opportunity to take, and the rest is mop up.

Was it all just one big ploy hoping to draw out the KB? I just don't get it.





(in reply to paullus99)
Post #: 9695
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/5/2017 7:28:56 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

You still have me baffled. I can't figure out what the big deal is with taking Mindanao. It is just a POW camp, isn't it?

I understand you have a plan. You are sticking to your plan. But, I just don't get it.

I will wait though.


SLOC to free up his CVs from having to escort ships past potentially dangerous large airfields.

The things you don't think about when you never play as the Allies, Lowpe

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 9696
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/5/2017 7:33:56 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
paullus has it right. My LOC is a long, narrow one from Luzon to DEI to Oz. It's vulnerable to attack by sea and air, and Mindanao gives John multiple air bases for strikes and patrols. I have the time and the troops to commit there, so I'll proceed. By time, I mean that Peep Show will not begin until all of Luzon is conquered. Originally I figured that would take until August or September, so that I had a couple of months to deal with Mindanao. Luzon may fall sooner, but I should still have time.

(in reply to paullus99)
Post #: 9697
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/5/2017 7:35:29 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Loka has it right too. Both he and paullus are more succinct than I am.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9698
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/5/2017 7:37:16 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

You still have me baffled. I can't figure out what the big deal is with taking Mindanao. It is just a POW camp, isn't it?

I understand you have a plan. You are sticking to your plan. But, I just don't get it.

I will wait though.


SLOC to free up his CVs from having to escort ships past potentially dangerous large airfields.

The things you don't think about when you never play as the Allies, Lowpe


I can well understand the huge supply and fuel requirements that the Allies need on Luzon. I do see the narrow path he has.

I just don't understand the shattering importance that Japan prevents the mini DS from making it to the DS. It seems like yesterday's battle.


(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 9699
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/5/2017 7:51:37 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
I can't see how you can't see it. :) So the failure lies in my "teaching" or explaining.

The convergence of Death Star and Mini Death Star is the biggest thing going right now. It's more important than the Battle of Manila, the Luzon Campaign, and the Indochina Campaign. Things are going well for the Allies at the moment, but this convergence will provide the men, supply, fuel and ships to ramp up things about five notches.

You don't see the significance of bringing in about eight divisions plus support to add to a campaign involving ten divisions? I'm getting an 80% increase in what I can commit to Luzon and future operations. That's huge.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 9700
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/5/2017 8:06:02 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Interesting SigInt tidbits today (and pretty much every day).




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9701
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/5/2017 8:45:44 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

I can't see how you can't see it. :) So the failure lies in my "teaching" or explaining.

The convergence of Death Star and Mini Death Star is the biggest thing going right now. It's more important than the Battle of Manila, the Luzon Campaign, and the Indochina Campaign. Things are going well for the Allies at the moment, but this convergence will provide the men, supply, fuel and ships to ramp up things about five notches.

You don't see the significance of bringing in about eight divisions plus support to add to a campaign involving ten divisions? I'm getting an 80% increase in what I can commit to Luzon and future operations. That's huge.


Not your fault. Mine I am sure. I have played a few months of Armageddon with M-M and I was the Allies so I do know the Allied endgame somewhat.

From everything you have posted, Luzon is already done for in fact months ahead of schedule. If those fresh divisions were to unite with the Deathstar and take I don't know, you name it: Cam Ranh Bay (like WITPQS) or anywhere to the east of that all the way to Kyushu, well then I would see that too. And perhaps you will yet.

But go back a month, you basically had Japan cut in half with taking Vinh. Japan's western Army north of Moulmein was trashed. Instead of securing Vinh you took Puerto and Miri and made great strides for Manila.

I guess I was just expecting something on a grand scale that could justify not securing Vinh.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9702
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/5/2017 9:01:44 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
Grand scale moves require DS support and prepped units.
DS is tied to supporting the Philippines/DEI LOC until KB can no longer intervene while DS is away.
Had the big carrier battle happened (with KB defeated) before Vinh was recaptured by the IJA, I am sure things would have been different in the South China Sea.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 9703
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/5/2017 9:30:41 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Vinh was just deception. I took it with a para-unit and had no hope of holding it. But it got John's attention and focused him on Vietnam, where he's still focused, I think. As BBfanboy notes, there were complex practical reasons that detaching Death Star with troops to secure Vinh didn't make sense, long term. You'll probably see why later.

I think, Lowpe, that you're under the impession that the army coming in from the DEI is slated for Mindanao. It isn't. Of the eight divisions + support inbound, two of those divisions will be committed to Mindanao. They've long been prepping for the targets and the targets are worthwhile, for the reasons stated in previous posts.

Of the remaining six divisions, one is prepped for Manila (and has been for a long, long time; it may or may not be needed there). The other five are prepped for Peep Show, the next major operation. Originally I envisioned them assisting with Luzon, a campaign I expected to last through the summer months. They may or may not be needed in that capacity. But Peep Show probably won't take place until Luzon is a fate accompli. Then, roughly six to ten divisions will be available for Peep Show, the next big thing.

I could have lept around, dropping the Luzon campaign to strive for a Vietnam campaign, but in my judgment that was risky and potentially wasteful. It is hard to sustain massive operations deep inside enemy lines. To have Luzon unsecured, and to then move across the South China Sea to engage in yet another major operation, would've been too risky. It would've been "A Bridge Too Far." But taking Puerto Princesa and Miri were in proximity and within my "sphere of influence." No real danger there.

Now, certain players with vision might've done things differently and way better than I've done; but others would gotten too frisky and ended up skewering themselves.

Bottom line: I know what I'm doing and why I'm doing it. I am the python strangling the lame potbellied pig.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 9704
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/5/2017 9:42:30 PM   
MakeeLearn


Posts: 4278
Joined: 9/11/2016
Status: offline
quote:

I am the python strangling the lame potbellied pig.







Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9705
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/5/2017 10:40:23 PM   
GetAssista

 

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn
quote:

I am the python strangling the lame potbellied pig.

< image redacted >

That was pure gold
Also
quote:

ORIGINAL: HansBolter
Everyone posting should try to remember that John will eventually get to read this AAR when the game is finished.
I would recommend showing a bit of deference when it comes to criticizing his decision making and game play.
Better not to foster hard feelings later.

:D

(in reply to MakeeLearn)
Post #: 9706
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/5/2017 11:36:23 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
Bottom line: I know what I'm doing and why I'm doing it. I am the python strangling the lame potbellied pig.


I knew I should not have mentioned Vinh.

I am not trying to imply that you don't know what you are doing. Far from it. And I know that the troops aren't bound strictly for Mindanao...you have mentioned Peep show often.

I understand your reasons for not going to Vinh.

To me, the Allies doubling their strength on a deep invasion in mid 44 is normal so I don't take it as anything more than to be expected. I see why you were nervous crossing Horn Island. I don't see it necessarily as an existential threat to Japan....but understand my perspective. I had 20 Allied divisions on Hokkaido at June of 1944. To me this just seems normal...and I hope I am not implying that you are doing poorly or anything.

John is in a good position. He kept the SRA fuel flowing till June of 1944. He has a KB (but I guess in truth he really started with 2). He has a nice VP margin. His economy, to the best of my knowledge, is intact with the exception of a port strike on Hong Kong. He is losing Luzon, but mid 44 that is to be expected for Japan, even a Japan as seriously over modded as his is. If he wasn't losing at Luzon, he would be losing at the Marianas, or the Kuriles, or the SRA.

You pulled off a brilliant conquest of Luzon, so far. From your tone I simply thought the mini DS heralded an immediate fait accompli.

I guess I am a hopeless JFB and can't clearly communicate. Not like MakeeLearn! What a master, and your colorful description must be inspired somewhat by Scott's Civil War strategy. Well done to you both.



(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9707
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/5/2017 11:53:52 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
The Allied effort was, as I've said, front-loaded. The idea was that the whittling of the Japanese navy would pay off in the end. It is. I think John's situation is far more precarious than your synopsis would suggest. And one of the most aggressive players hasn't felt able to use his carriers or combat ships in seven months. He's wobbling.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 9708
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/6/2017 1:15:29 AM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
6/20/44

A busy day across the map, from CenPac to Thailand. I'm going to post a series of smaller maps before concluding with the Fun House Map.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9709
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/6/2017 1:22:25 AM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
6/20/44

Lots going on in the DEI.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9710
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/6/2017 1:32:49 AM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
6/20/44

Important attacks to take place tomorrow at Miri and Manila.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9711
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/6/2017 1:45:46 AM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
6/20/44

Indochina: Promising Allied river crossing and shock attack at Rahaeng.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9712
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/6/2017 7:31:51 AM   
CaptBeefheart


Posts: 2301
Joined: 7/4/2003
From: Seoul, Korea
Status: offline
Things are looking good. Pescadores is interesting. There probably is a hefty CD unit here (at least there is in Ironman), so beware of that, but taking that and one or two lightly held bases on the Chinese coast nearby is about as good as taking Formosa. And don't forget that nice shipyard at Hong Kong.

EDIT: Regarding islands with big CD units but no infantry, I like doing big para drops on them. I'm not sure Pescadores would fit that bill, but it's a cheap way to take those kind of bases. Also, prep level for para drops doesn't seem to be a huge factor. Someone please correct me if they've seen otherwise.

Cheers,
CC

< Message edited by Commander Cody -- 4/6/2017 7:35:53 AM >


_____________________________

Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9713
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/6/2017 12:04:30 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Wouldn't a shock attack by paratroopers fully prepped for the target achieve these two things: (1) AV of the unit doubled for prep, and (2) defensive strength halved?

I'm going from memory here on the effects of prep and para-assault, but I think that's right.

The Aussie paratroops are only 33 AV, so doubling that isn't a big deal. But halving defensive strength is (and halving is true whatever the prep level, I realize).

The Aussies were stationed at Kodiak for something like nine months, fully prepped for Attu Island much of that time. Early in 1944, they switched prep to Manila and withdrew from Kodiak. Their transports caught up to the tail end of the Fun House invasion forces just shy of Oz. So they've been basically "training" for more than a year, always a bridesmaid.

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 4/6/2017 12:05:35 PM >

(in reply to CaptBeefheart)
Post #: 9714
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/6/2017 12:31:35 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

Wouldn't a shock attack by paratroopers fully prepped for the target achieve these two things: (1) AV of the unit doubled for prep, and (2) defensive strength halved?
Developers came out and said that is a myth.

I'm going from memory here on the effects of prep and para-assault, but I think that's right.

The Aussie paratroops are only 33 AV, so doubling that isn't a big deal. But halving defensive strength is (and halving is true whatever the prep level, I realize).

The Aussies were stationed at Kodiak for something like nine months, fully prepped for Attu Island much of that time. Early in 1944, they switched prep to Manila and withdrew from Kodiak. Their transports caught up to the tail end of the Fun House invasion forces just shy of Oz. So they've been basically "training" for more than a year, always a bridesmaid.



< Message edited by witpqs -- 4/6/2017 12:32:35 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9715
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/6/2017 12:39:34 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Zoiks. Was the myth originally in the rules? I thought so, but I read the rules eight or nine years ago. That's the kind of thing that sticks pretty well.

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 9716
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/6/2017 12:58:00 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

Zoiks. Was the myth originally in the rules? I thought so, but I read the rules eight or nine years ago. That's the kind of thing that sticks pretty well.

It was a surprise to me when it was debunked. It was the longest-standing WITP myth taken down that I know of. I don't recall the details of whether it was once that way in WITP or only a myth then, nor if it was ever in the rules (but I think not).

_____________________________


(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9717
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/6/2017 1:25:47 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Yeah, players even commonly used a house rule allowing paratroop use only if prep was high (some might've required 100%), in order to prevent abuse of the "halving" rule (or myth, as it turns out). I've always erred on the side of moderation (extreme moderation, really) in using paratroops, for that reason. In this game, I bet I've used them against occupied targets only once or twice.

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 9718
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/6/2017 1:26:28 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Drop them anyhow, there still maybe some positive effect.

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 9719
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/6/2017 1:29:37 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
The orders were entered, and the turn sent, last night. So 1st Aussie Paratroops go in at 100%. I "assume" that the AV will be doubled from 33 to 66, so there's that. It certainly won't hurt to have them.

But from now on, I guess I'll mainly use paratroops to take dot hexes and unoccupied bases.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 9720
Page:   <<   < prev  322 323 [324] 325 326   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent Page: <<   < prev  322 323 [324] 325 326   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.672