Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: AESA radar performance figures in CMANO

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: AESA radar performance figures in CMANO Page: <<   < prev  113 114 [115] 116 117   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: AESA radar performance figures in CMANO - 4/24/2017 8:35:22 PM   
JamitovHymem

 

Posts: 47
Joined: 7/4/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: orca

China Type 001A aircraft carrier

Is there enough info to add? And add then update as more info becomes available?
http://chinapower.csis.org/china-aircraft-carrier-type-001a/

Some sources call it Shandong...
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/cv-17-001a-shandong-carrier-development-and-news-thread.t8035/page-117#post-449244



IMO it should be enough by now

However, the 12 degrees ski jump inclination is very unlikely, since the Kuznetsov has 12 degrees
The radar should be 346A not 346, but they got it right in the chart below

I wish they could change the tech dates of the 346 and the 346A radar in cmano

< Message edited by JamitovHymem -- 4/24/2017 8:36:42 PM >

(in reply to orca)
Post #: 3421
RE: AESA radar performance figures in CMANO - 4/25/2017 10:32:43 AM   
orion665

 

Posts: 3
Joined: 4/25/2017
Status: offline 		Requesting a set of aircraft based off the C-135 Stratolifter for a scenario I am working on:

Boeing EC-135: Specifically EC-135E and EC-135H
The Boeing EC-135 was a command and control version of the Boeing C-135 Stratolifter. Modified for the Operation Looking Glass mission, during the Cold War, EC-135 were airborne 24 hours a day to serve as flying command platforms for the military in the event of nuclear war.

Boeing WC-135 Constant Phoenix: All variants, if possible
The WC-135 Constant Phoenix is a special-purpose aircraft derived from the Boeing C-135 and used by the United States Air Force. Its mission is to collect samples from the atmosphere for the purpose of detecting and identifying nuclear explosions. It is also informally referred to as the "weather bird" or "the sniffer" by workers on the program.

I don't know how possible it would be to make the WC-135, due to the weirdness of its mission, but i do not think the EC-135 would be too difficult. Thanks in advance.

(in reply to JamitovHymem)
Post #: 3422
RE: AESA radar performance figures in CMANO - 4/25/2017 12:15:08 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JamitovHymem

quote:

ORIGINAL: orca

China Type 001A aircraft carrier

Is there enough info to add? And add then update as more info becomes available?
http://chinapower.csis.org/china-aircraft-carrier-type-001a/

Some sources call it Shandong...
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/cv-17-001a-shandong-carrier-development-and-news-thread.t8035/page-117#post-449244



IMO it should be enough by now

However, the 12 degrees ski jump inclination is very unlikely, since the Kuznetsov has 12 degrees
The radar should be 346A not 346, but they got it right in the chart below

I wish they could change the tech dates of the 346 and the 346A radar in cmano


We still dont know the CIWS loadout of the Type 001A, just as all the radars that would be installed alongside the Type 346A.

(in reply to JamitovHymem)
Post #: 3423
RE: AESA radar performance figures in CMANO - 4/25/2017 12:43:13 PM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JamitovHymem

I wish they could change the tech dates of the 346 and the 346A radar in cmano

AESA is indeed starting from 90s, and even for today is still advance and difficult to jam.

China also followed US's pace to developing GaN based sensor material, but I don't think it's be used for the current timeframe yet.

_____________________________


(in reply to JamitovHymem)
Post #: 3424
DB3000 - 4/25/2017 5:01:00 PM   
Owllord


Posts: 96
Joined: 7/15/2014
From: Tokyo, Japan
Status: offline 		Could the Japanese Type 74 tank be moved over to DB3000, as it is still in service in the years covered by that?

On that note, how inconvenient would it be in general to request new tank platforms? Is there any purpose in me requesting a list of tanks for either DB, or, given their limited actual gameplay impact, would it make more sense to request some generic tank units that roughly represent different generations of vehicles?

< Message edited by Owllord -- 4/25/2017 5:05:37 PM >

_____________________________

The artist known as Owl

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 3425
RE: AESA radar performance figures in CMANO - 4/25/2017 8:15:59 PM   
JamitovHymem

 

Posts: 47
Joined: 7/4/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dysta

quote:

ORIGINAL: JamitovHymem

I wish they could change the tech dates of the 346 and the 346A radar in cmano

AESA is indeed starting from 90s, and even for today is still advance and difficult to jam.

China also followed US's pace to developing GaN based sensor material, but I don't think it's be used for the current timeframe yet.



I was thinking about late 1990s for 346 and early/late 2000s for 346A
346 is supposed to be in the 90s, however the 346A really shouldn't

Speaking of AESA, why does the J-15 in the database have an AESA radar?
They did mention recently that they plan to replace it with an AESA, but the current J-15 shouldn't have it.

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 3426
RE: AESA radar performance figures in CMANO - 4/25/2017 9:44:34 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline 		And the Type 346/A radar should have a somewhat increased range (more than 400km quoted). The Wikipedia article is surprisingly well updated and quite insightful in that regard.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_346_Radar


(in reply to JamitovHymem)
Post #: 3427
RE: AESA radar performance figures in CMANO - 4/27/2017 2:17:45 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline 		Updated our wish list up until this point. Thank you all.

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 3428
AAA magazine - 4/30/2017 2:59:21 AM   
Jorm


Posts: 545
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Melbourne
Status: offline 		delete, worked it out



< Message edited by Jorm -- 4/30/2017 3:05:33 AM >

(in reply to JamitovHymem)
Post #: 3429
RE: FC-1B/JF-17B - 4/30/2017 3:13:47 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline 		I tried to search FC-1 but no result, maybe JF-17 (#365, #3298) should add it's export code name?

And add the FC-1B/JF-17B two-seater:
http://www.janes.com/article/69915/twin-seat-jf-17b-fc-1b-fighter-makes-first-flight (notice the size increase from single seat)

quote:

Specifications provided by the Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC) state the 'FC-1 Tandem Seat Trainer' has a larger wing span (9.465 m) than that of the single-seat variant (8.5 m) as well as a slightly modified nose section.

According to Jane's All the World's Aircraft: Development & Production , a Chinese display card emerged a few years ago quoting dimensions of the new variant that differed slightly from those of the single-seater, including height (4.6 m instead of 4.7 for the single seater) and length (14.5 m instead of 14.2 m).


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJr4hBxoVfo

http://www.eastpendulum.com/fc-1b-version-biplace-de-jf-17-reussit-premier-vol (French, Refuel plume included and removable like the Blk2)
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/jf-17-fc-1-fighter-aircraft-thread.t5634/page-310#post-451041 (Translated)




< Message edited by Dysta -- 4/30/2017 3:15:29 AM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Jorm)
Post #: 3430
Couple things for the UK - 4/30/2017 6:12:39 PM   
willpope697

 

Posts: 23
Joined: 3/1/2015
Status: offline 		British army to purchase 50 AH-64Es
https://www.aerotime.aero/en/military/12768-uk-orders-50-ah-64e-apache-helicopters-from-boeing

Also plan to intergrate the brimstone missile on them
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/watch-brimstone-missile-test-fired-apache/




RAF to purchase 16 Certifiable Predator Bs to be known as protector in uk service
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/britains-new-protector-unmanned-aircraft-takes-flight/

order increased to 26
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/uk-orders-16-new-predator-b-unmanned-aircraft/



9 P8 Poseidons for the RAF with speculation that storm shadow will be incorporated
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/look-p-8-poseidon-britains-new-submarine-hunter/



Also noticed that the french have there tech demo UCAV nEUROn in the db any chace of a taranis entry the UKs UCAV tech demo
http://www.baesystems.com/en-uk/product/taranis1
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/taranis-stealth-drone-test-flights-successful/
http://www.janes.com/article/61149/more-flights-of-uk-s-taranis-ucav-possible


many thanks



(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 3431
RE: Couple things for the UK - 5/1/2017 4:02:07 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline 		Seems like the Hongdu L-15B Light Attack Fighter Trainer jet will be introduced in the PLAAF as both trainer and Q-5 replacement. Some official celebration has been taking place in the factory. Note the presence of the PLAAF roundel, which indicates that this one is not for export, but will be introduced.




^Note the F-16 styled IFF antennae

Engines are a pair of afterburning AI-222K-25F which China produced under licence from the Ukraine.

This variant also is the one featuring the multi-role PESA radar.



Some stats:



It seems to feature nine hardpoints in total (with capability to carry dual hardpoints for Sino-SDB glide bombs). The middle-hardpoint seems to be for targeting/ground-attack-sensor/gun pods. Also not the PL-12 BVRAAM.



We have seen photos of an earlier variant with smaller radome carrying LS-6s too:



< Message edited by Hongjian -- 5/1/2017 4:05:04 PM >

(in reply to willpope697)
Post #: 3432
Predator C Avenger - 5/1/2017 4:21:40 PM   
willpope697

 

Posts: 23
Joined: 3/1/2015
Status: offline 		Any chance of a Predator C Avenger entering the DB as a Hypothetical unit although no large orders have been placed, it would be interesting to see a Stealthy UAV with the HELLADS laser and internal and external weapons in the game.

https://www.rt.com/news/hellads-drone-predator-darpa-762/
http://www.defenseone.com/technology/2015/09/drones-armed-high-energy-lasers-may-arrive-2017/121583/
http://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.asp?aircraft_id=757
http://www.ga-asi.com/predator-c-avenger


It would be interesting to see how accurate the scenario in this video would be.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPl_xKPI_5w

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 3433
RE: Predator C Avenger - 5/3/2017 3:19:35 PM   
orca

 

Posts: 501
Joined: 11/6/2013
Status: offline 		Please consider....

Saryu-class offshore patrol vessel - India

Type: Offshore patrol vessel
Displacement: 2300[1] ton
Length: 105 metres (344 ft)
Beam: 12.9 metres (42 ft)
Draught: 3.6 metres (12 ft)
Propulsion: 2 × 7,790 kW (10,450 hp) engines
Speed: 25 knots (46 km/h)
Range: 6,000 nautical miles (11,000 km) at 16 knots (30 km/h)
Complement: 8 officers and 102 sailors
Armament: 1 × 76 mm Oto melara gun with FCS, 2 × AK-630 CIWS
Aircraft carried: 1 × HAL Dhruv or 1 × HAL Chetak[2]


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saryu-class_patrol_vessel

Its in the DB see ship #2930.

< Message edited by mikmyk -- 5/3/2017 6:08:30 PM >

(in reply to willpope697)
Post #: 3434
RE: Predator C Avenger - 5/3/2017 3:27:50 PM   
Primarchx


Posts: 3102
Joined: 1/20/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: willpope697

Any chance of a Predator C Avenger entering the DB as a Hypothetical unit although no large orders have been placed, it would be interesting to see a Stealthy UAV with the HELLADS laser and internal and external weapons in the game.

https://www.rt.com/news/hellads-drone-predator-darpa-762/
http://www.defenseone.com/technology/2015/09/drones-armed-high-energy-lasers-may-arrive-2017/121583/
http://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.asp?aircraft_id=757
http://www.ga-asi.com/predator-c-avenger


It would be interesting to see how accurate the scenario in this video would be.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPl_xKPI_5w


Seconded. I've been asking for this for quite a while now.

(in reply to willpope697)
Post #: 3435
RE: Predator C Avenger - 5/3/2017 4:58:08 PM   
Coiler12

 

Posts: 1203
Joined: 10/13/2013
Status: offline 		On the subject of hypotheticals, two variants of the LPD-17 based CG/BMD ship that have been proposed as concepts.

CG-74, 2014 Proposal
Description Here
-288 Mk 41 or 144 Mk 57 VLS
-A "maximum size" version of the scalable AMDR
-Facilities for two V-22s.

CG-74, 2017 Proposal
Link here
-A more realistically fillable 96 cell VLS (exact type unspecified)
-Otherwise looks near-identical to the 2014 proposal.

(in reply to Primarchx)
Post #: 3436
RE: Predator C Avenger - 5/3/2017 5:40:54 PM   
Vici Supreme

 

Posts: 558
Joined: 12/4/2013
From: Southern Germany
Status: offline 		Just noticed that the ATARS equipment on the latest two Marine ATARS Hornets (#4106 and #4576) is absent, plus they both are equipped with Vulcan cannons. On top of that, could you please consider adding an Internal Recon loadout, similar to the RF-4s, to the ATARS Hornets in the game?

Bit of info about ATARS:
http://www.spyflight.co.uk/atars.htm
https://www.forecastinternational.com/archive/disp_pdf.cfm?DACH_RECNO=472

Thanks!


_____________________________


(in reply to Coiler12)
Post #: 3437
RE: Predator C Avenger - 5/3/2017 6:14:09 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Primarchx


quote:

ORIGINAL: willpope697

Any chance of a Predator C Avenger entering the DB as a Hypothetical unit although no large orders have been placed, it would be interesting to see a Stealthy UAV with the HELLADS laser and internal and external weapons in the game.

https://www.rt.com/news/hellads-drone-predator-darpa-762/
http://www.defenseone.com/technology/2015/09/drones-armed-high-energy-lasers-may-arrive-2017/121583/
http://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.asp?aircraft_id=757
http://www.ga-asi.com/predator-c-avenger


It would be interesting to see how accurate the scenario in this video would be.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPl_xKPI_5w


Seconded. I've been asking for this for quite a while now.


Hi Guys

This is the issue

https://medium.com/war-is-boring/the-u-s-air-force-was-not-fond-of-the-next-gen-predator-drone-77cb9a3d10b8

Seems to have been dropped by the USAF. I'll add as a hypothetical request but doesn't seem like it will enter service unless something is changed.

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to Primarchx)
Post #: 3438
RE: Predator C Avenger - 5/3/2017 6:20:16 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline 		Updated our DB request list to this point. Thanks!

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 3439
RE: Predator C Avenger - 5/3/2017 6:46:49 PM   
Primarchx


Posts: 3102
Joined: 1/20/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk


quote:

ORIGINAL: Primarchx


quote:

ORIGINAL: willpope697

Any chance of a Predator C Avenger entering the DB as a Hypothetical unit although no large orders have been placed, it would be interesting to see a Stealthy UAV with the HELLADS laser and internal and external weapons in the game.

https://www.rt.com/news/hellads-drone-predator-darpa-762/
http://www.defenseone.com/technology/2015/09/drones-armed-high-energy-lasers-may-arrive-2017/121583/
http://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.asp?aircraft_id=757
http://www.ga-asi.com/predator-c-avenger


It would be interesting to see how accurate the scenario in this video would be.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPl_xKPI_5w


Seconded. I've been asking for this for quite a while now.


Hi Guys

This is the issue

https://medium.com/war-is-boring/the-u-s-air-force-was-not-fond-of-the-next-gen-predator-drone-77cb9a3d10b8

Seems to have been dropped by the USAF. I'll add as a hypothetical request but doesn't seem like it will enter service unless something is changed.

Mike


I've only heard the General Atomics pov on this. Thanks for the info, Mike! Still would be good as hypothetical.

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 3440
RE: Predator C Avenger - 5/4/2017 11:46:19 AM   
Filitch


Posts: 423
Joined: 6/25/2016
From: St. Petersburg, Russia
Status: offline 		Looks like database record for SKR Admiral Sergey Gorshkov [Pr.2235.0] missing sensor group 34K1 Monolit (Band Stand). This is anti-ship missiles FCR which includes passive and active elements with OTH Targeting capability.
Pr.2235.0 has no Plank Shave 3Ts-25 Garpun-Bal radar.

http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-611.html



< Message edited by Filitch -- 5/4/2017 7:06:05 PM >

(in reply to Primarchx)
Post #: 3441
RE: Predator C Avenger - 5/5/2017 6:31:47 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline 		Non-military aircraft like airliners could use some additions.

The maiden flight of Comac C919 conducted successfully:

https://mobile.twitter.com/hashtag/c919
https://youtu.be/_PwYnTp74GM

Also the Boeing 737-8 and 9 MAX, and AirBus A.320/321neo are needed:

http://www.airbus.com/presscentre/pressreleases/press-release-detail/detail/first-a320neo-successfully-completes-first-flight/
http://www.boeing.com/commercial/737max-9

< Message edited by Dysta -- 5/5/2017 3:11:15 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Filitch)
Post #: 3442
RE: Predator C Avenger - 5/5/2017 1:55:36 PM   
Kynth

 

Posts: 31
Joined: 9/29/2014
Status: offline 		New unit request.



Could you simulate the Zephyr-S and Zephyr-T HAPS (High Altitude Pseudo Satellite) [1] unmanned aircraft please?

These are existing, large (25m-33m wingspan), solar and battery powered, very long endurance, low speed (30kn), comparatively low-cost (£4.3m), high altitude (up to 70,000') platforms being trialled to provide persistent ISR and communication relay orbits by the MOD.

I appreciate that these are not glamorous platforms, however there's a lot of potential for operating and defending highly persistent ISR and comms relays, especially with the new datalink features in the simulation engine.

The UK MOD has now bought three Zephyr-S (formerly known as Zephyr 8) [4] for trials.

Long endurance trials were held with the first pair in 2016, managing a world record 14 days. "Sustained indefinitely" trials are being held this year with the third aircraft, also pushing each aircraft's individual endurance to 30 days.

The Zephyr-T is being developed following an MOD request for the platform to be able to carry a Radar. The Zephyr-T has been test-flown and is expected to enter evaluation trials in 2018 [2].



Zephyr-S

ISR capability consists primarily of NIIRS 6 [3] rated EOIR sensor capable from 65,000'-70,000' with local area comms relays.

Availability 2018:







Zephyr-T

The Zephyr-T (T for "twin tail") is larger, designed to loft NIIRS 8 rated EOIR and SAR radar providing GMTI/iSAR, LIDAR, ESM and ELINT together with a more complete comms relay suite than the smaller model. This is expected to be the model that the MOD pushes into service.

Availability 2020:





Additional sources:

[1] https://airbusdefenceandspace.com/our-portfolio/military-aircraft/uav/zephyr/

[2] https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/twin-tailed-airbus-zephyr-completes-maiden-flight-424873/

[3] https://fas.org/irp/imint/niirs.htm

[4] https://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/08/18/ministry_of_defence_buys_third_zephyr_solar_drone/

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 3443
RE: Predator C Avenger - 5/5/2017 1:58:07 PM   
Kynth

 

Posts: 31
Joined: 9/29/2014
Status: offline 		(Those images are huge, sincere apologies! Any way I can edit the image tags to set to a smaller width?)

(in reply to Kynth)
Post #: 3444
RE: Predator C Avenger - 5/5/2017 2:37:21 PM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kynth

(Those images are huge, sincere apologies! Any way I can edit the image tags to set to a smaller width?)

PGD code has no image size adjustment option, but it's forgivable if you are just for one or two pictures with a size between HD and 4K.

Otherwise, try manually editing them, or use some other upload websites that supports multiple size of copies.

_____________________________


(in reply to Kynth)
Post #: 3445
RE: Predator C Avenger - 5/5/2017 3:08:25 PM   
Doctorwarthog

 

Posts: 68
Joined: 4/15/2017
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dysta

Non-military aircraft like airliners could use some additions.

The maiden flight of Comac C919 conducted successfully:

https://mobile.twitter.com/hashtag/c919
https://youtu.be/_PwYnTp74GM


As I also would like to see the Comac C919 in the database I add some stats courtesy of the ever-loved and reliable Wikipedia:

Seats 168 (1-class) / 158 (2-class)
Length 38.9 m / 127.6 ft
Wingspan 35.8 m / 117.5 ft
Height 11.95 m / 39.2 ft
MTOW 72,500 kg / 159,835 lb
ER : 77,300 kg / 170,417 lb
Maximum Payload 20,400 kg / 45,000 lb
Maximum Fuel 19,560 kg / 43,122 lb
Empty weight 42,100 kg / 92,815 lb
Turbofan (2x) CFM LEAP-1C
Thrust 31,000 lbf (137.9 kN)[54]
Cruise Mach 0.785 (450 kn; 834 km/h)
Range 4,075 km / 2,200 nm
ER : 5,555 km / 3,000 nm
Approach Speed 135 kn (250 km/h)
Takeoff 2,000 m (6,600 ft)
ER : 2,200 m (7,200 ft)
Landing 1,600 m (5,200 ft)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comac_C919

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 3446
RE: Predator C Avenger - 5/6/2017 7:53:02 PM   
B52H

 

Posts: 113
Joined: 6/28/2015
Status: offline 		OV-10G+ Combat Dragon II

I can't find much information of the sensors and loadout of this aircraft, but the OV-10 Bronco may see a comeback as a light-attack aircraft for the US military. It appears that the aircraft can carry Hydra 70mm rockets (14x), APKWS (14x), AGM-65 (2x), MK82 (2x), MK81 (4x), GBU-12 (2x), GBU-38 (2x), and GBU-54 (2x).

http://www.defensemedianetwork.com/stories/combat-dragon-ii-demonstrates-ov-10g-bronco-capabilities/

https://www.yahoo.com/news/those-old-ov-10-broncos-204500085.html

http://www.boeing.com/history/products/ov-10-bronco.page

(in reply to Doctorwarthog)
Post #: 3447
RE: Predator C Avenger - 5/7/2017 2:25:08 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline 		DB Request list updated to this point. Thank you!

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to B52H)
Post #: 3448
Mi-24 Hind - 5/7/2017 7:16:11 PM   
Zaslon

 

Posts: 283
Joined: 6/14/2015
Status: offline 		Looks like Mi-24 entries of the database are older than me.


Mi-24V with 2 B-8V20 rocket launchers with 20 rockets each one, two UB-32A-73 rocket launchers with 32 rockets each one and 4 Shturm-V ATGM. On the ground FAB-250, FAB-100 and an unindentified weapong (big and white).

Mi-24V (Mi-35) and Mi-24P (Mi-35P) have some missing weapons:

Generic LLTV -> Raduga-Sh LLTV
Generic FLIR -> Raduga-Sh FLIR
Generic Laser Designator -> Raduga-Sh Laser Designator

This is the list of weapons that can be loaded by Mi-24V/Mi-24P:
ATGM: 8 missiles 9M114 Shturm-V (AT-6 'Spiral'). Typical 4 missiles in outer hardpoints.
Rockets:
S5 of 57 mm in UB-32A-73 rocket launchers with 32 rockets each one. 2 or 4
S-8 of 80mm in B-8V20 rocket launchers with 20 rockets each one. 2 or 4
S-13 of 122 mm. in B-13L rocket launchers with 5 rockets each one. 2 or 4
S-24A/B of 240 mm. Can load 4 maximum (one per hardpoint except outer harpoints).
Gunpods:
UPK-23-250 of 23 mm. 2 in inner hardpoints
GUV-8700 universal gunpod in 9-A-669 configuration (YakB gatling machine gun an two 7,62 mm machine guns) or 9-A-800 (grenade launcher).
Bombs:
4 FAB-50/-100/-250
2 FAB-500. (in inner hardpoints)
2 Napalm bombs ZB-500. (in inner hardpoints)
2 Submunition container KMGU-2 (anti tank or antipersonnel bomblets). (in inner hardpoints)
PTB-450 fuel tank (capable of transport 4), commonly 2 are used.

Website of Ukroboronservice is good source I guess:
https://en.uos.ua/produktsiya/aviakosmicheskaya-tehnika/13-mi-24v

Mi-24V with a pair of UPK-23-250 gun pods and two UB-32A-73 Rocket launckers with 32 S-5 rockets each.
http://russianplanes.net/id155530
http://russianplanes.net/id7299

Mi-24P with 2 shturm-V ATGM, 2 bombs FAB-50 or FAB-100 and 2 B-8V20 rocket launchers with 20 S-8 rockets each.
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/1/3/8/2065831.jpg?v=v40

Mi-24V with ATGM launcher in the middle hardpoint.
http://russianplanes.net/id125045

Mi-24V with 2 UB-32A-73 Rocket launckers with 32 S-5 rockets each.
http://russianplanes.net/id49029

Mi-24 with 4 UB-32A-73 Rocket launckers with 32 S-5 rockets each.
https://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/row/mi-24-DFST9209230.jpg

A typical configuration. Only with two B-8V20 rocket launchers with 20 S-8 rockets each.
http://russianplanes.net/id95229

Mi-24 with four B-8V20 rocket launchers with 20 S-8 rockets each.
http://russianplanes.net/id71406

Ferry configuration. With 2 PTB-450 fuel tanks (450 liters).
http://russianplanes.net/id64002

Czech Mi-24V with UPK-23-250 and GUV-8700 (in 9-A-669 config) on display.
http://www.blueskyrotor.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/cannons_Mi35-300x218.jpg

Mi-24V with weapons on display. 8 Shturm-V ATGM and a pair of B-8V20 rocket launchers mounted. GUV-8700 gunpod, KMGU container and UB-32A-73 Rocket launchers resting in ground.


More interesting photos: http://www.16va.be/galeries_aa/mi-24/imgcol/index.html



< Message edited by Zaslon -- 5/7/2017 7:19:49 PM >

_____________________________


Kids think about Iran and Amateurs think about Russia, but professionals think about China

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 3449
RE: Su-35S MAWS - 5/9/2017 6:49:05 AM   
Luckysmoker

 

Posts: 3
Joined: 5/9/2017
Status: offline 		I am new to this game, but i want to point out a possible mistake in a database.
Real-life Su-35S do have a MAWS, (it can be seen widely implemented in regular squadrons, not only test or advanced training like the one in Lipetsk) so i guess this is how it shold be in CMANO.
But, as I understand, as a new user I am not allowed to post links to pics yet. Anyway, detailes about this system can be found if you google for picteres using this russian phrase: "оптико электронные системы су-35".

Update:
I took a screenshot from the official buklet issued by the knaapo - manufacturer of the Su-35S.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Luckysmoker -- 5/11/2017 11:10:59 AM >

(in reply to Zaslon)
Post #: 3450
Page:   <<   < prev  113 114 [115] 116 117   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: AESA radar performance figures in CMANO Page: <<   < prev  113 114 [115] 116 117   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.703