Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

1st Marine Div??

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> 1st Marine Div?? Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 11:23:39 AM   
MrDave

 

Posts: 152
Joined: 2/10/2005
Status: offline
My game time in the full campaign is Feb 4, 1942. I see regiments of the 2nd Marines but where is the 1st? The 1st Marine Rgt is due to arrive in May per the Reinforcement schedule. I thought the 1st had already been constituted by now.

_____________________________

In Him,
MrDave
TOAW OOBP PC ATG CoH
Post #: 1
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 11:37:44 AM   
Bearcat2

 

Posts: 577
Joined: 2/14/2004
Status: offline
7th Marine Rgt is the first unit of the 1st Mar Div to appear, it should be on the board, unless you have the variable reinforcements option. The other 2 Rgts come in may 42

< Message edited by Termite2 -- 6/23/2017 11:38:14 AM >


_____________________________

"After eight years as President I have only two regrets: that I have not shot Henry Clay or hanged John C. Calhoun."--1837

(in reply to MrDave)
Post #: 2
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 11:42:13 AM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Are you confusing the nomenclature a bit? "2nd Marines" means the 2nd Marine Regiment, not the 2nd Marine Division. Ditto "1st Marines" - that's 1st Regiment, not 1st Marine Division.

You should begin the game with two of the three 2nd Division regiments on the board: 2nd Marines and 8th Marines. The third regiment, 6th Marines, should arrive around May '42.

None of the 1st Marine Division regiments are present at start: 7th arrives around March '42 and the 1st Marines and 5th Marines around May '42.

From Wiki: "The 1st Marines stood at a low state of readiness at the beginning of the war, having just been reconstituted from cadre status; however, the regiment did possess very strong leadership at the higher levels. In June 1942, the 1st Marines set sail from San Francisco on board a mix of eight ships headed for the South Pacific. The 1st Marines landed on the island of Guadalcanal, part of the Solomon Islands, on 7 August 1942 and would fight in the Guadalcanal Campaign until relieved on 22 December 1942."

(in reply to MrDave)
Post #: 3
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 1:15:41 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

Are you confusing the nomenclature a bit? "2nd Marines" means the 2nd Marine Regiment, not the 2nd Marine Division. Ditto "1st Marines" - that's 1st Regiment, not 1st Marine Division.

You should begin the game with two of the three 2nd Division regiments on the board: 2nd Marines and 8th Marines. The third regiment, 6th Marines, should arrive around May '42.

None of the 1st Marine Division regiments are present at start: 7th arrives around March '42 and the 1st Marines and 5th Marines around May '42.

From Wiki: "The 1st Marines stood at a low state of readiness at the beginning of the war, having just been reconstituted from cadre status; however, the regiment did possess very strong leadership at the higher levels. In June 1942, the 1st Marines set sail from San Francisco on board a mix of eight ships headed for the South Pacific. The 1st Marines landed on the island of Guadalcanal, part of the Solomon Islands, on 7 August 1942 and would fight in the Guadalcanal Campaign until relieved on 22 December 1942."

Wiki is short on details in that summary. The First Marine Division was sent first to Australia to train for six months and receive some of their equipment to fill out the TOE before they were to take part in any landings. But when the Japanese started building an airstrip on Guadalcanal, Operation Shoestring was conceived to take it back and their training was cut short. They went to Guadalcanal short of everything.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 4
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 1:20:10 PM   
spence

 

Posts: 5400
Joined: 4/20/2003
From: Vancouver, Washington
Status: offline
Article of interest re: 1st Marine Division training in amphibious warfare.

https://www.uscg.mil/History/articles/CampLejeuneUSCGLJKimball2011.pdf

Interesting that the 1st Marine Division starts off at Camp Lejeune but it ends up as the home station for the 2nd Marine Division.

Also interesting since it specifically names some ships which began amphibious warfare training with professional USCG crews in conjunction with the 1MarDiv well before the US entry into WW2

(in reply to MrDave)
Post #: 5
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 1:22:44 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
I don't think 1st Marine Division went to Australia. I think part of the division (minus 5th Marines and minus artillery) went to Auckland. It did some training around Suva (before or after Auckland, I disremember). Then it took part in Watchtower.

5th Marines were in Samoa at the time, so in its place, another regiment was attached (one that belonged to 2nd Marine Div.).

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 6/23/2017 1:25:12 PM >

(in reply to spence)
Post #: 6
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 1:27:06 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
Further on the Division/Regiment idea:

Divisions are not permanent entities. They are created as required from available regiments and usually have some additional equipment like artillery and AA, and maybe a recon battalion and combat engineer battalion. Any of these elements can be swapped out if required.

Regiments are "permanent" in the sense that their colors and history remain even if the Regiment is inactivated and has no troops, or becomes a militia formation to do some training and keep the traditions alive. When activated they fill out their ranks and indoctrinate the troops in the Regiment's history and traditions to build pride of belonging. The troops identify with their Regiment, not the Division they happen to be assigned to.

You will notice some Regiments in the game that never get assigned to a Division. They are usually called "Separate" or "Independent" after the regimental name.


_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to MrDave)
Post #: 7
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 1:29:51 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

I don't think 1st Marine Division went to Australia. I think part of the division (minus 5th Marines and minus artillery) went to Auckland. It did some training around Suva (before or after Auckland, I disremember). Then it took part in Watchtower.

5th Marines were in Samoa at the time, so in its place, another regiment was attached (one that belonged to 2nd Marine Div.).

I take my info from the TV Series and book "The Pacific", which showed the Marines in Australia both before and after Guadalcanal - but that may have been only one regiment.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 8
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 1:32:40 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
None of the 1st Marine Division regiments was in Oz before Guadalcanal.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 9
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 3:30:05 PM   
MakeeLearn


Posts: 4278
Joined: 9/11/2016
Status: offline
"Initially only the 7th Marine Regiment was in garrison on British Samoa, with the 5th Marine Regiment having just encamped at Wellington, New Zealand after disembarking from USAT Wakefield, and the 1st Marine Regiment not scheduled to arrive in New Zealand until 11 July. The 1st Raider Battalion was on New Caledonia, and the 3rd Defense Battalion was in Pearl Harbor. All of the division's units, with the 11th Marines (artillery) and 75mm howitzer armed 10th Marines battalion would rendezvous at Fiji."

"After 11 days of logistical challenges, the division, with 16,000 Marines, departed Wellington in eighty-nine ships embarked for the Solomon Islands with a 60-day combat load which did not include tents, spare clothing or bed rolls, office equipment, unit muster rolls or pay clerks. Other things not yet available to this first wave of Marine deployments were insect repellent and mosquito netting. Attached to the division was the 1st Parachute Battalion, which along with the rest of the division, conducted landing rehearsals from 28 to 30 July on Koro Island, which Major General Alexander Vandegrift described as a "disaster"."

"Following the Guadalcanal Campaign, the division's Marines were sent to Melbourne, Australia for rest and refit.[14] It was during this time that the division took the traditional Australian folk song "Waltzing Matilda" as its battle hymn. To this day, 1st Division Marines still ship out to this song being played."

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 10
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 3:38:49 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
That's partly wrong too.

The "division" didn't depart Wellington for the Solomons. Most of it did, but not all of it. As noted, the 7th Marines were at Samoa (and I think the artillery - 11th Arty? - was somewhere else too). In its place, one of 2nd Marine Division's regiments was attached to the 1st Division. It might be proper to say that the 1st Marine Division "as then constituted" participated in Watchtower, but I think the marines involved would've made the distinction.

These are all relatively insignificant details, but it's interesting that Wiki is mostly right but not completely right. It's always a good place to begin reading on a subject but it's dangerous to rely on the information.

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 6/23/2017 3:41:31 PM >

(in reply to MakeeLearn)
Post #: 11
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 3:46:48 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
I ran across a similar situation at work last week. A freelance writer submitted a Civil War story in which he quoted extensively from Company Aytch, by Sam Watkins. Later in the story, the freelance writer cited some statistics about the Army of Tennessee that struck me as incorrect. When I raised the point, the writer told me, "I got this from Sam Watkins," and then went on to explain how Watkins's book was widely quoted and was an unimpeachable source. How dare I question the statistics!

I knew better. Company Aytch is a magnificent book. Watkins wrote beautifully and movingly of his experiences in the Civil War. But he also made occasional mistakes. The statistics cited were incorrect.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 12
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 3:47:09 PM   
DRF99


Posts: 90
Joined: 9/3/2009
Status: offline
quote:

... the division, with 16,000 Marines, departed Wellington in eighty-nine ships ...


Interesting that it states that it took 89 ships to load a single division. Even assuming that this is the equivalent of an amphibious task force, this seems like a lot.

Does AE allow us to load troops using far fewer ships that were used in real life? The D-day invasion of Normandy has only 5 assault divisions and seemed to use every ship in the theatre but AE allows us to land a large number of divisions on an enemy base quite easily.

If the load costs for amphibious task forces in stock AE are too lenient, do any of the mods out there make it more difficult?


(in reply to MakeeLearn)
Post #: 13
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 3:53:57 PM   
MakeeLearn


Posts: 4278
Joined: 9/11/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DRF99

quote:

... the division, with 16,000 Marines, departed Wellington in eighty-nine ships ...


Interesting that it states that it took 89 ships to load a single division. Even assuming that this is the equivalent of an amphibious task force, this seems like a lot.

Does AE allow us to load troops using far fewer ships that were used in real life? The D-day invasion of Normandy has only 5 assault divisions and seemed to use every ship in the theatre but AE allows us to land a large number of divisions on an enemy base quite easily.

If the load costs for amphibious task forces in stock AE are too lenient, do any of the mods out there make it more difficult?





I think that's the total number of ships not just the transports. One book I have puts the transports at 23, 8 cruisers, 15 destroyers, plus the 3 carriers, BB North Carolina, 6 cruisers and numerous destroyers

(in reply to DRF99)
Post #: 14
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 3:59:39 PM   
MakeeLearn


Posts: 4278
Joined: 9/11/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

That's partly wrong too.

The "division" didn't depart Wellington for the Solomons. Most of it did, but not all of it. As noted, the 7th Marines were at Samoa (and I think the artillery - 11th Arty? - was somewhere else too). In its place, one of 2nd Marine Division's regiments was attached to the 1st Division. It might be proper to say that the 1st Marine Division "as then constituted" participated in Watchtower, but I think the marines involved would've made the distinction.

These are all relatively insignificant details, but it's interesting that Wiki is mostly right but not completely right. It's always a good place to begin reading on a subject but it's dangerous to rely on the information.



It is written with generalities and "take literally" contradictions.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 15
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 4:01:54 PM   
MakeeLearn


Posts: 4278
Joined: 9/11/2016
Status: offline
Sam Watkins??

Oh, the "Little Bug".

(in reply to MakeeLearn)
Post #: 16
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 4:03:29 PM   
GI Jive


Posts: 171
Joined: 10/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

...it took 89 ships to load a single division...


I think this is saying there were 89 ships in the invasion task force. This would include carriers and other combat ships such as cruisers and destroyers that were not actually transporting troops, equipment, vehicles or supplies. I think that game load costs are reasonable.

(in reply to DRF99)
Post #: 17
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 5:52:04 PM   
Buckrock

 

Posts: 578
Joined: 3/16/2012
From: Not all there
Status: offline
There probably were around 89 ships involved in the Operation Watchtower invasion, from CVs down to DMS and AVDs. As far as transports though, there were only 13 APs, 6 AKs and 4 APDs as part of that total.

_____________________________

This was the only sig line I could think of.

(in reply to GI Jive)
Post #: 18
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 9:20:38 PM   
JeffroK


Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline
Original question, wasnt one of its regiments on Iceland at the outbreak of war in the Pacific and took a few months to be relieved?

WRONG, that was 6th Marines.

< Message edited by JeffK -- 6/23/2017 9:26:27 PM >


_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to Buckrock)
Post #: 19
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 9:40:07 PM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MrDave

My game time in the full campaign is Feb 4, 1942. I see regiments of the 2nd Marines but where is the 1st? The 1st Marine Rgt is due to arrive in May per the Reinforcement schedule. I thought the 1st had already been constituted by now.


warspite1

Info below largely from Frank's marvellous Guadalcanal but other sources used to.

quote:

7th Marine Rgt is the first unit of the 1st Mar Div to appear, it should be on the board, unless you have the variable reinforcements option. The other 2 Rgts come in may 42


The arrivals in game can be shown to roughly match that below. The 1st Marine Division was constituted but by April 1942 “the 1st Marine Division represented a title, not a tactical unit” (Frank – Guadalcanal)

1st Marine Division – Major-General AA Vandegrift

7th Marine Regiment – other regiments were stripped to bring fully up to strength and the 7th Marines sailed for Samoa on 10th April 1942.

5th Marine Regiment – this regiment had been reduced in order to bring the 7th Marines up to strength and to assist the formation of the 1st Raider Battalion.

1st Marine Regiment – this was at cadre status until as recently as March, when it was filled out. One transport and two cargo ships carried the men and their equipment.

The 11th Marine Regiment - provided the divisional artillery
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
quote:

The First Marine Division was sent first to Australia to train for six months and receive some of their equipment to fill out the TOE before they were to take part in any landings.


On the 29th April 1942 Admiral King ordered an amphibious force stationed in the South Pacific. The 1st Marine Division would be the core of that force.

The 5th Marines, the divisional HQ and sundry divisional assets sailed for Wellington, New Zealand (not Australia) on the 20th May and arrived there on the 14th June.

The 1st Marines and the remaining divisional assets sailed in 8 ships for New Zealand in June, arriving in early July.

For Watchtower the two regiments (1st and 5th) of the division would be supplemented by:

2nd Marine Regiment – which was detached from the 2nd Marine Division to replace the 7th Marines – and sailed from San Diego on four ships and rendezvoused with the rest of the landing force en-route to Guadalcanal.

1st Raider Battalion – was at Noumea, New Caledonia in training there and was picked up by four destroyer-transports en-route

3rd Defence Battalion - sailed for Fiji from Hawaii on the 22nd July where it met up with the main convoy.

1st Parachute Battalion - sailed initially for New Zealand in June and then to Fiji the following month. Must have been picked up en-route but no details as to which ships.

There is mention of the 10th Marine Battalion in Wiki but Frank and Mueller don't mention this unit for Watchtower.

The 1st Marine Division left New Zealand on the 22nd July 1942.

It arrived off Fiji on the 26th and a rehearsal was carried out.

The fleet then set sail for Guadalcanal on the 31st July.


quote:

"After 11 days of logistical challenges, the division, with 16,000 Marines, departed Wellington in eighty-nine ships embarked for the Solomon Islands with a 60-day combat load which did not include tents, spare clothing or bed rolls, office equipment, unit muster rolls or pay clerks. Other things not yet available to this first wave of Marine deployments were insect repellent and mosquito netting. Attached to the division was the 1st Parachute Battalion, which along with the rest of the division, conducted landing rehearsals from 28 to 30 July on Koro Island, which Major General Alexander Vandegrift described as a "disaster"."


quote:

Interesting that it states that it took 89 ships to load a single division.



The 1st Marine Division was thus heavily reinforced with effectively an extra regiment thanks to the three additional battalions; 1,959 officers and 18,146 men.

There was not enough room on the 23 transports - not 89. The bulk of the ships were the escorting warships.

From http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USN/USN-CN-Solomons/USN-CN-Solomons-6.html

To utilize to the utmost the troop-carrying capacity of the ships available, all excess supplies and equipment were eliminated and even normal supplies were radically curtailed. Divided into 13 classifications, equipment and supplies were taken aboard in varying quantities as follows:

Group 1, individual equipment (all the weapons, mess gear, clothes, etc., which an officer or enlisted man could carry on his person).--All of this was taken.

Group 2, baggage.--Officers were limited to one clothing roll, one bedding roll or one handbag. Enlisted men were permitted to take aboard only what they could carry in their knapsacks.

Group 3, office equipment (typewriters, pencils, paper, etc.)--All these were taken. Included in this category were medical supplies, of which enough were taken for 60 days.

Group 5, supplementary equipment.--This was reduced to necessary cleaning materials for weapons only.
Group 6, mess equipment.--This was restricted to a very few field kitchens and water bags, vacuum food carriers, camp kettles, and coffee mills.

Group 7, camp equipment (tents, etc.).--Tents were provided only for the sick bay.

Group 8, transportation (motor vehicles).--Only 50 percent of the available vehicles were taken, except amphibious tractors, all of which were taken.

Group 9, special equipment (camouflage, chemical warfare, etc.).--This category was reduced materially.

Group 10, ammunition.-- Ten units of fire, one unit of fire being the ammunition necessary to operate a weapon in one day of fighting.

Group 11, automatic supplies (rations for men, gas and oil for vehicles, etc.).--Enough for 60 days.

Group 12, replacement supplies (spare parts for guns, vehicles, etc.).--All available were taken.

Group 13, post exchange articles.--Only necessary items like soap, matches, razor blades and cigarettes were taken. No candy.


< Message edited by warspite1 -- 6/24/2017 12:09:16 AM >


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to MrDave)
Post #: 20
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 9:50:34 PM   
Jorge_Stanbury


Posts: 4320
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Toronto and Lima
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn
not yet available (...) were insect repellent and mosquito netting.


89 ships and they forgot insect repellent... the horror, the horror

(in reply to MakeeLearn)
Post #: 21
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 10:05:35 PM   
JeffroK


Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline
Warspite,

the following answers you questions above

http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USN/USN-CN-Solomons/USN-CN-Solomons-13.html

For those Hyperwar followers, it seems to be revitalised.

_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 22
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 10:22:16 PM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffK

Warspite,

the following answers you questions above

http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USN/USN-CN-Solomons/USN-CN-Solomons-13.html

For those Hyperwar followers, it seems to be revitalised.
warspite1

Thanks - I can see the 1st Raider Battalion - and have amended my post, but cannot see reference to where the other two battalions were prior to Watchtower.


< Message edited by warspite1 -- 6/23/2017 10:31:25 PM >


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to JeffroK)
Post #: 23
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 11:01:01 PM   
JeffroK


Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline
3rd Defence Bn USMC, from wiki
The battalion was stationed at the Marine Barracks, Pearl Harbor during the 7 December 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor. Immediately following the events at Pearl Harbor, 3d Defense Battalion provided reinforcements for the outlying US garrisons at Midway, Johnston, and Palmyra Islands. During this time the battalion also added two additional batteries in May 1942, Battery K under the Machine Gun Group and Battery L (20mm AA Btry). On 22 May 1942 the battalion’s anti-aircraft group consisting of H&S, D, E, F, L & K batteries were sent back to Midway Island via the USS Kitty Hawk (AKV-1). They arrived at Midway on 26 March and would take part in the Battle of Midway on 4–5 June 1942. Following the fighting at Midway the detachment returned to Hawaii on 15 June 1942. At this time the 3’ AA Group was re-designated as the 90mm Group and the Machine Gun Group was re-designated as the Machine Gun Group. Searchlight battery was made part of the 90mm Group at this time. After the reorganization, the battalion spent most of July 1942 preparing for future offensive amphibious operations.
Guadalcanal Campaign
3rd Defense Battalion with a 90 mm antiaircraft gun at Guadalcanal

On 21 July 1942 the battalion embarked upon the USS Zeilin (APA-3) and USS Betelgeuse (AKA-11) heading for Guadalcanal. On 7 August 1942, the 3d Defense Battalion, landed along with the 1st Marine Division's on Guadalcanal.


_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 24
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 11:03:24 PM   
JeffroK


Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline
The Paramarines

1st Parachute Bn USMC, same place.

The first cohort of Marines paratroopers trained at NAS Lakehurst in New Jersey in October 1940, eventually becoming the 1st Marine Parachute Battalion. They were followed by a second group in December 1940, forming the 2nd Marine Parachute Battalion. A third class trained at Camp Kearny in San Diego, California in early 1941, eventually forming the 3rd Marine Parachute Battalion. After the United States entered World War II, the training program was stepped up, and a special training camp and parachute training school was opened temporarily at Camp Elliott in San Diego in May 1942, next to Camp Kearny, moving to purpose-built accommodation nearby at Camp Gillespie in September 1942. A second training camp and parachute training school opened at Hadnot Point on the New River in North Carolina in June 1942, but closed in July 1943.

The 1st Parachute Battalion was attached to the 1st Marine Division for the invasion of Guadalcanal. On 7 August 1942 the unit conducted an amphibious assault on the small island of Gavutu and later seized the neighboring island of Tanambogo with other Marine units. The battalion later moved to Guadalcanal fighting alongside the 1st Marine Raiders in the Tasimboko raid and the Battle of Edson's Ridge. The high casualties suffered by the Marine paratroopers led the battalion to be moved to Camp Kiser in Tontouta, New Caledonia in September.


_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to JeffroK)
Post #: 25
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 11:07:45 PM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffK

3rd Defence Bn USMC, from wiki
The battalion was stationed at the Marine Barracks, Pearl Harbor during the 7 December 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor. Immediately following the events at Pearl Harbor, 3d Defense Battalion provided reinforcements for the outlying US garrisons at Midway, Johnston, and Palmyra Islands. During this time the battalion also added two additional batteries in May 1942, Battery K under the Machine Gun Group and Battery L (20mm AA Btry). On 22 May 1942 the battalion’s anti-aircraft group consisting of H&S, D, E, F, L & K batteries were sent back to Midway Island via the USS Kitty Hawk (AKV-1). They arrived at Midway on 26 March and would take part in the Battle of Midway on 4–5 June 1942. Following the fighting at Midway the detachment returned to Hawaii on 15 June 1942. At this time the 3’ AA Group was re-designated as the 90mm Group and the Machine Gun Group was re-designated as the Machine Gun Group. Searchlight battery was made part of the 90mm Group at this time. After the reorganization, the battalion spent most of July 1942 preparing for future offensive amphibious operations.
Guadalcanal Campaign
3rd Defense Battalion with a 90 mm antiaircraft gun at Guadalcanal

On 21 July 1942 the battalion embarked upon the USS Zeilin (APA-3) and USS Betelgeuse (AKA-11) heading for Guadalcanal. On 7 August 1942, the 3d Defense Battalion, landed along with the 1st Marine Division's on Guadalcanal.

warspite1

Osprey states the 6th Marine Defence Battalion was on Midway but doesn't mention the 3rd. Nothing in Shattered Sword.


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to JeffroK)
Post #: 26
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 11:10:39 PM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffK

The Paramarines

1st Parachute Bn USMC, same place.

The first cohort of Marines paratroopers trained at NAS Lakehurst in New Jersey in October 1940, eventually becoming the 1st Marine Parachute Battalion. They were followed by a second group in December 1940, forming the 2nd Marine Parachute Battalion. A third class trained at Camp Kearny in San Diego, California in early 1941, eventually forming the 3rd Marine Parachute Battalion. After the United States entered World War II, the training program was stepped up, and a special training camp and parachute training school was opened temporarily at Camp Elliott in San Diego in May 1942, next to Camp Kearny, moving to purpose-built accommodation nearby at Camp Gillespie in September 1942. A second training camp and parachute training school opened at Hadnot Point on the New River in North Carolina in June 1942, but closed in July 1943.

The 1st Parachute Battalion was attached to the 1st Marine Division for the invasion of Guadalcanal. On 7 August 1942 the unit conducted an amphibious assault on the small island of Gavutu and later seized the neighboring island of Tanambogo with other Marine units. The battalion later moved to Guadalcanal fighting alongside the 1st Marine Raiders in the Tasimboko raid and the Battle of Edson's Ridge. The high casualties suffered by the Marine paratroopers led the battalion to be moved to Camp Kiser in Tontouta, New Caledonia in September.

warspite1

Yes but doesn't say how it got there. Could have been part of 5th Marines or 1st Marines when they sailed separately for New Zealand or, like the Raider battalion, could have been elsewhere.


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to JeffroK)
Post #: 27
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 11:28:15 PM   
MakeeLearn


Posts: 4278
Joined: 9/11/2016
Status: offline
"After a pre-dawn bombardment on 7 August 1942 Company A of the 1st Marine Parachute Battalion landed on Gavutu in Higgins boat against little opposition. B & C Companies were not as fortunate and had to land under heavy fire. Bitter fighting ensued for the next two days until they secured their objective, Hill 148. The units 20 percent casualty rate was the highest of any unit fighting to secure a foothold on Guadalcanal. Because of the battalions depleted manpower, the unit was attached to Edson's Raider Battalion by General Vandegrift at the end of August on Tulagi. On September 8th the 1st Marine Parachute Battalion and the 1st Raider Battalion landed on Guadalcanal under cover of darkness and conducted a raid against Japanese positions near the village of Tasimboko. After this highly successful raid the Marine parachute battalion remained on Guadalcanal occupying defensive positions atop Lunga Ridge. It later became known as Edson's Ridge because of the success of Edson's 1st Raider Battalion and the 1st Marine Parachute Battalion against repeated ferocious banzai attacks by the Japanese in their attempt to recapture Henderson Field."

http://www.ww2-airborne.us/units/1stmarine/1st_marine.html


"The 1st Parachute Battalion entrained for Norfolk, VA on 7 June, where it embarked in the USS MIZAR on 10 June and sailed via the Panama Canal for Wellington, New Zealand, arriving and disembarking on 11 July 1942. On 18 July, it boarded the USS HEYWOOD and sailed for Koro, Fiji Islands, where it underwent rehearsals of the Guadalcanal operation.

http://www.jpagac.com/Paramarines2.pdf

< Message edited by MakeeLearn -- 6/23/2017 11:32:43 PM >

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 28
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 11:32:00 PM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
All I was wondering was how it, and the 3rd Defence Battalion got to Guadalcanal i.e. where had they been based earlier that year?

Edit: Just seen the edit. Right so the paratroopers were in Fiji and would have needed to be picked up en route. 1 down - 1 to go

< Message edited by warspite1 -- 6/23/2017 11:42:11 PM >


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to MakeeLearn)
Post #: 29
RE: 1st Marine Div?? - 6/23/2017 11:57:08 PM   
MakeeLearn


Posts: 4278
Joined: 9/11/2016
Status: offline
They had been moving around prior to...

"In July 1942, Nimitz ordered the 3rd Defense Battalion from Hawaii to provide coast and antiaircraft protection for the Guadalcanal Landing Force. The battalion sailed on board the Betelquese and the Zeilin on 22 July to rendezvous with 1st Marine Division in the Fiji Islands for the assault on Guadalcanal. Thus, when the 3rd Defense Battalion's light antiaircraft batteries went ashore, it became the first defense battalion to participate in an offensive landing. The battalion landed antiaircraft artillery batteries on both Guadalcanal and Tulagi islands, ...."

A very informative PDF on the Defense Battalions:
https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc279378/m2/1/high_res_d/1002656626-maynard.pdf




< Message edited by MakeeLearn -- 6/24/2017 12:00:30 AM >

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> 1st Marine Div?? Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.141