Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: October 1944

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: October 1944 Page: <<   < prev  162 163 [164] 165 166   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: October 1944 - 7/31/2017 12:20:57 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline


I watch this game and wonder if I am playing the same game?

Well, at some point it will all become clear. I guess.


< Message edited by Lowpe -- 7/31/2017 12:24:02 PM >

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 4891
RE: October 1944 - 7/31/2017 12:46:17 PM   
zuluhour


Posts: 5244
Joined: 1/20/2011
From: Maryland
Status: offline
80,000 fires is nothing. He should be able to get to 400,000 soon. The VPs for this (I think I mentioned earlier) are huge. Don't get distracted
by it. Interesting, I don't recall any great loss to balloons. I flew at 6,ooo' and at night. Major problems for me as allied in the Strategic air
campaign: pilots (when 8th air force arrives, I had far more frames than I could use), OPs losses and recovery times, damage from NFs.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 4892
RE: October 1944 - 7/31/2017 2:55:40 PM   
Chickenboy


Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: zuluhour

80,000 fires is nothing. He should be able to get to 400,000 soon.


Yes. I know that 80,000 fires can be surpassed and that, in the grand conflagration of the Japanese cities to come, it is 'nothing' relatively. However, I am interested to know the nuts and bolts of what this particular attack means on VPs and the factories in Osaka.

_____________________________


(in reply to zuluhour)
Post #: 4893
RE: October 1944 - 7/31/2017 4:38:06 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
October 15, 1944

Running for your life. NEVER a good sign!




Attachment (1)

_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Chickenboy)
Post #: 4894
RE: October 1944 - 7/31/2017 4:38:57 PM   
Chickenboy


Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

October 15, 1944

NEVER a good sign!


"Beware the ides of October"? It'll never catch on.

_____________________________


(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 4895
RE: October 1944 - 7/31/2017 4:42:27 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
October 15, 1944
Osaka

Thought this screen might show what you need. Everything was fully repaired PRIOR to the attack.

All fires are now out on the 16th.





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by John 3rd -- 7/31/2017 4:43:49 PM >


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Chickenboy)
Post #: 4896
RE: October 1944 - 7/31/2017 4:48:19 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
Have lots more to Post but have to go to work. Will catch things up when I get home!

_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 4897
RE: October 1944 - 7/31/2017 4:54:22 PM   
Chickenboy


Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

October 15, 1944
Osaka

Thought this screen might show what you need. Everything was fully repaired PRIOR to the attack.

All fires are now out on the 16th.


From a modest raid:

10% of LI damaged
5% of HI damaged
10% of refineries damaged
5% of resources damaged
7% of manpower damaged
60% of your Ki-100-I production damaged

Anything destroyed?

Without doing the math ("damaged resource points= X VPs/point"), this appears to have been a worthwhile raid for CR. Any idea (KAFF-Tracker-KAFF) how the VP picture changed as a result of this strategic bombing?




_____________________________


(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 4898
RE: October 1944 - 7/31/2017 6:16:19 PM   
zuluhour


Posts: 5244
Joined: 1/20/2011
From: Maryland
Status: offline
It would be nice to confirm it was a manpower raid. I found that 300+ B29s over say Nagasaki, at night, at 6'ooo'
yielded 4,ooo -5,oooVP cutting LI in half. I believe I could muster well over 500 after Sept. '44.

I'm not even sure what my strategic tally was?




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by zuluhour -- 7/31/2017 6:20:28 PM >

(in reply to Chickenboy)
Post #: 4899
RE: October 1944 - 7/31/2017 6:21:12 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: zuluhour

It would be nice to confirm it was a manpower raid. I found that 300+ B29s over say Nagasaki, at night, at 6'ooo'
yielded 4,ooo -5,oooVP cutting LI in half. I believe I could muster well over 500 after Sept. '44.

I'm not even sure what my strategic tally was?





Are you getting b29s and b24s confused? That would be a ton of b29s. I lost close to 70,000 strategic vp in my one finished game. Well you had 110,000 VP so you definitely didn't have 343K vp,,,the 343,000 seems roughly right.


< Message edited by Lowpe -- 7/31/2017 6:24:07 PM >

(in reply to zuluhour)
Post #: 4900
RE: October 1944 - 7/31/2017 6:28:22 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

October 15, 1944
Osaka

Thought this screen might show what you need. Everything was fully repaired PRIOR to the attack.

All fires are now out on the 16th.


From a modest raid:

10% of LI damaged
5% of HI damaged
10% of refineries damaged
5% of resources damaged
7% of manpower damaged
60% of your Ki-100-I production damaged

Anything destroyed?

Without doing the math ("damaged resource points= X VPs/point"), this appears to have been a worthwhile raid for CR. Any idea (KAFF-Tracker-KAFF) how the VP picture changed as a result of this strategic bombing?





After Tokyo there is no more important city to safeguard with respect to supply generation...and as such should be heavily protected. These results for a loss of a mere 10 B29s (and a large portion of the losses attributable to balloons and not night fighters or AA) is not hopeful for Japan with respect to a dedicated night bombing campaign.

Of course there is more to the story than what I see.

Destroyed items are very difficult to see after the fact except with tracker.


< Message edited by Lowpe -- 7/31/2017 6:29:10 PM >

(in reply to Chickenboy)
Post #: 4901
RE: October 1944 - 7/31/2017 6:50:22 PM   
zuluhour


Posts: 5244
Joined: 1/20/2011
From: Maryland
Status: offline
When you play past August '45, You will have plenty of B29s. Groups arrive on top of production. I did not get
them into range of the HI (normal range) until September.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 4902
RE: October 1944 - 7/31/2017 6:53:59 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: zuluhour

When you play past August '45, You will have plenty of B29s. Groups arrive on top of production. I did not get
them into range of the HI (normal range) until September.


Your post said sept of 44?

(in reply to zuluhour)
Post #: 4903
RE: October 1944 - 7/31/2017 6:58:17 PM   
zuluhour


Posts: 5244
Joined: 1/20/2011
From: Maryland
Status: offline
ooops! (typing this from secret "office" location where any type of personal reflectance is frowned upon by corp big shot with stock options)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 4904
RE: October 1944 - 7/31/2017 11:35:04 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
Can I have stock options?

Please...


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to zuluhour)
Post #: 4905
RE: October 1944 - 7/31/2017 11:40:34 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
OK. Serious question. He came in low. I mean LOW--2,000 Ft--and my fighters had no chance at interception. How do I deal with this? Have laready ordered some of the 20MM AA units, who are normally useless, to both Osaka and Tokyo.

Other ideas?


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 4906
RE: October 1944 - 8/1/2017 12:41:19 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
20mm AA units are not worthless...

Make sure all your ENG units are upgraded (toe upgrade).

Make sure some night fighters are down low...usually 4K. You always need to stack you night fighters, I usually like 4K, 8K, and 13K. Most are at 8K, but the low or high cap will catch them and it seems to me to that it give time for the other NFs to join the fight or the next wave.

Another tactic is to put some regular fighters down low at 2K...If I do this I usually use a 10 percent CAP as I want the planes to keep showing up for each wave. By far and away my favorite plane to do this with is a fighter Dinah...which is a dog in every other use. The regular fighters are there to disrupt the bombers and not really slug it out with them...if you have them you might want to try Georges and they might actually down some bombers. I was never in a good enough position to try them...m-m has had good luck with Randy fighters and you could also try fighter bombers.

Plus count your radar sets...make sure you have lots.

Down low sucks, but it also is a lot harder on Allied bombers...

There is at least one unit (a Chinese HQ SNLF named after a base there) that has 40mm June of 45 AA guns in it, spend the 50PP to buy them out and send them to Osaka or Tokyo or Nagasaki. Those guns are great!

Check the leaders in your AA units



< Message edited by Lowpe -- 8/1/2017 12:48:53 AM >

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 4907
RE: October 1944 - 8/1/2017 1:05:45 PM   
zuluhour


Posts: 5244
Joined: 1/20/2011
From: Maryland
Status: offline
"...If I do this I usually use a 10 percent CAP as I want the planes to keep showing up for each wave."

This may be great advice, when I had large raids the first wave or two would overwhelm the CAP, but I would
subsequently score some nice results with 6-12 plane "late comers" often driving the fires up significantly.
I wish I had saved some CRs as I recall 50% of the raid or more may show up late.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 4908
RE: October 1944 - 8/1/2017 3:38:47 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
October 16, 1944

It would appear that China is the Allies choice. GREAT! It will take a couple of months to get to Shanghai so we'll fight the delaying battle while the Homeland strengthens.

There is a Combat Assault by two IDs at Pescadores. The CD chews up a number of Allied ships and warships but the base falls on the 16th. Here is the screen:





Attachment (1)

_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 4909
RE: October 1944 - 8/1/2017 4:00:56 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
October 15-16, 1944
Naval Battles in the Formosa Strait


As detailed earlier, two STF departed Foochow on the 14th looking to try and penetrate the Allied STF screen hoping for fat, juicy targets. As expected, they cannot pierce the 547 STF that guard the good stuff. It is a NASTY night where every fight began at 2,000 Yds!

CA Tone and Chikuma + 4 DD encounter 4 American DD. DD Thatcher is sunk and two American Dds damaged in exchange for 2 TTs planted into the tender side of Chikuma. This pretty much puts the CAs out of further fighting. Though they only move 4 hexes back towards home, they are not attacked by aircraft on the 15th or 16th. It appears that Chikuma will survive--yet again as this is her third torpedoing--as she heads for Port Arthur with two damaged DDs.

CL Sakawa and Isuzu have four DDs with them as well and duke it out with multiple TFs. First the TF finds 2 US DD and sinks DD Wadleigh for little damage to themselves. The 2nd fight is then with 2 CLs and 8 DDs. CL Miami takes a Long Lance and 5 Shell hits and DD Halligan is sunk. Five other American Dds are hit and damaged. Sakawa and a DD are sunk in return.

As Isuzu attempts to retire she is sunk by SS Redfish. A--to this point--rare sinking by American SS of a Japanese warship.

The remaining 3 Japanese Dds fight four more engagements with various Allied units includingthe one pictured yesterday with BB Richeliu. Two of three DDs are sunk. The saddest example is DD Shiranui who dodges not ONE, NOT TWO, NOT THREE, but FOUR TT attacks by American Subs only to get hit by the FIFTH attack by the Tantalus. Too bad. After the third attack I was rooting her home!

Summary
For the loss of 2 CL and 4 DDs, the Americans lose 3 DDs and see damage to a modern CL and 7-9 DDs.

As stated when I sent these ships into Harm's Way, I did not expect any survives. Instead, we do get 2 CAs and 4 DDs back.



_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 4910
RE: October 1944 - 8/1/2017 4:07:40 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
As requested, here is the current VP Screen:





Attachment (1)

_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 4911
RE: October 1944 - 8/1/2017 11:19:31 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
October 17, 1944

Here we go with the Allied juggernaut beginning to MOSEY along looking for a soft spot to land troops. Not going to happen this time.

RED: Troops shuttled up from the DEI continue to get landed at both Changkwonan and Hong Kong. I shouldn't be allowed to do this but another 15,000 troops will off-load over the next 2-3 days.

PINK: Damaged CA and 3 DDs moving up to Port Arthur

ORANGE: Major landings of reinforcements either going on or occurring tomorrow.

YELLOW: Allied Fleet




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by John 3rd -- 8/1/2017 11:20:48 PM >


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 4912
RE: October 1944 - 8/1/2017 11:27:01 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
Tanker Task Force Update:

FREE: THREE Tanker Task Forces are now clear and moving either towards or past Iwo Jima. They are carrying 108,000 Fuel, 72,000 Fuel, and 72,000 Oil: 257,000 Total that WILL MAKE IT Home!

Two AK TFs carrying 49,000 Fuel to Babeldoap and Saipan to re-fuel the Fleet. Unloading today and tomorrow.

Nearly Free: Two task Forces with 89,000 Fuel and 132,000 Oil.

Loading: Two Task Forces with up to 140,000 Oil and Fuel.

Coming to DEI: One AO Task Force with the potential load of 80,000 Fuel.

CRAZY and I love it!

BANZAI!


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 4913
RE: October 1944 - 8/1/2017 11:36:12 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
Wanted to thank several contributors. I had not done a hex-by-hex check of the Home Islands and found many LCU available to take upgrades but had not turned it on. Have done that over the last two turns (a CRAPLOAD of clicking) and saw 50+ units upgrade yesterday and another 30-40 today.

THANKS!


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 4914
RE: October 1944 - 8/2/2017 6:55:56 AM   
adarbrauner

 

Posts: 1496
Joined: 11/3/2016
From: Zichron Yaaqov, Israel; Before, Treviso, Italy
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

October 15-16, 1944
Naval Battles in the Formosa Strait


As detailed earlier, two STF departed Foochow on the 14th looking to try and penetrate the Allied STF screen hoping for fat, juicy targets. As expected, they cannot pierce the 547 STF that guard the good stuff. It is a NASTY night where every fight began at 2,000 Yds!

CA Tone and Chikuma + 4 DD encounter 4 American DD. DD Thatcher is sunk and two American Dds damaged in exchange for 2 TTs planted into the tender side of Chikuma. This pretty much puts the CAs out of further fighting. Though they only move 4 hexes back towards home, they are not attacked by aircraft on the 15th or 16th. It appears that Chikuma will survive--yet again as this is her third torpedoing--as she heads for Port Arthur with two damaged DDs.

CL Sakawa and Isuzu have four DDs with them as well and duke it out with multiple TFs. First the TF finds 2 US DD and sinks DD Wadleigh for little damage to themselves. The 2nd fight is then with 2 CLs and 8 DDs. CL Miami takes a Long Lance and 5 Shell hits and DD Halligan is sunk. Five other American Dds are hit and damaged. Sakawa and a DD are sunk in return.

As Isuzu attempts to retire she is sunk by SS Redfish. A--to this point--rare sinking by American SS of a Japanese warship.

The remaining 3 Japanese Dds fight four more engagements with various Allied units includingthe one pictured yesterday with BB Richeliu. Two of three DDs are sunk. The saddest example is DD Shiranui who dodges not ONE, NOT TWO, NOT THREE, but FOUR TT attacks by American Subs only to get hit by the FIFTH attack by the Tantalus. Too bad. After the third attack I was rooting her home!

Summary
For the loss of 2 CL and 4 DDs, the Americans lose 3 DDs and see damage to a modern CL and 7-9 DDs.

As stated when I sent these ships into Harm's Way, I did not expect any survives. Instead, we do get 2 CAs and 4 DDs back.





Very ggod results indeed, considered the odds!

But, ideally: could have been brought more raiding parties/fleets, including heavies, possibly even Musashi? And the greatest possible number of PTs flottillas; with the heaviest CAP you could gather?
Ideally, fleet commanders could have been choosen with low aggressivity, to aid to a "hit and run" raiding tactic; alternatively, a search pattern/line could be set with first end "inside" enemy's nest and the other further off toward home, mission or full speed and "low" threat setting;

and why not with night air attacks as well as dressing?


would you also consider one/more than one kami strikes of 100+ fast airplanes each, escorted by very big fighter formation (300-400 or more Franks/Georges/Sams), from high-very high altitude?

< Message edited by adarbrauner -- 8/2/2017 6:58:28 AM >

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 4915
RE: October 1944 - 8/2/2017 9:45:14 AM   
modrow

 

Posts: 1100
Joined: 8/27/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

Summary
For the loss of 2 CL and 4 DDs, the Americans lose 3 DDs and see damage to a modern CL and 7-9 DDs.

As stated when I sent these ships into Harm's Way, I did not expect any survives. Instead, we do get 2 CAs and 4 DDs back.




It may be just me, but I think you should look at your victory -if it is one- either as

"For the loss of 2 CL and 4 DDs, the Americans lose 3 DDs."

or as

"For the loss of 2CL and 4DDs and damage to 1 CA and 3DDs (or is it 4?), the Americans lose 3DDs and see damage to a modern CL and 7-9 DDs."

Just my point of view.

Hartwig

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 4916
RE: October 1944 - 8/2/2017 11:26:19 AM   
Timotheus

 

Posts: 481
Joined: 12/13/2013
Status: offline
I am reading this.
Fantastic literary work this, and as a bonus a decent player of the game shows us how it's done.

Controversy: I am a big fan of the game engine squashing any "gaminess". The game allows civilian ship "pickets" - I think the game engine should prioritize the biggest threats as targets for the carrier air... so that 100 Kates wouldn't go for an AKL while 5 Kates go for the Lexington...

In fact, I am shocked that there isn't an extra setting on "Preferred Targets" for each naval task force (and their air component): you could want to prioritize civilian, carrier or standard (everything targetted)...

I blame the game engine - this should have been addressed.

Oh yeah: I have not caught up to the latest post, it will take me some time. Refuse to read so no spoilers for me until I get here.... to 2017 (am a few years behind ).

< Message edited by Timotheus -- 8/2/2017 11:27:59 AM >


_____________________________

NEWBIE GUIDE Distant Worlds Universe
http://tinyurl.com/k3frrle

War in the Pacific Poradnik po Polsku
http://tinyurl.com/nxd4cesh

INSTALL WITPAE on modern PC
https://tinyurl.com/l5kr6rl

(in reply to modrow)
Post #: 4917
RE: October 1944 - 8/2/2017 1:30:19 PM   
JohnDillworth


Posts: 3100
Joined: 3/19/2009
Status: offline
Unfortunately, you could also look at it as the IJN lost 25% of their remaining cl's and 5% of their dd's and the allies lost some pocket change. 1:1 exchanges are not wins at any point in the game, much less now

_____________________________

Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly

(in reply to modrow)
Post #: 4918
RE: October 1944 - 8/2/2017 1:37:11 PM   
adarbrauner

 

Posts: 1496
Joined: 11/3/2016
From: Zichron Yaaqov, Israel; Before, Treviso, Italy
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Timotheus

I am reading this.
Fantastic literary work this, and as a bonus a decent player of the game shows us how it's done.

Controversy: I am a big fan of the game engine squashing any "gaminess". The game allows civilian ship "pickets" - I think the game engine should prioritize the biggest threats as targets for the carrier air... so that 100 Kates wouldn't go for an AKL while 5 Kates go for the Lexington...

In fact, I am shocked that there isn't an extra setting on "Preferred Targets" for each naval task force (and their air component): you could want to prioritize civilian, carrier or standard (everything targetted)...

I blame the game engine - this should have been addressed.

Oh yeah: I have not caught up to the latest post, it will take me some time. Refuse to read so no spoilers for me until I get here.... to 2017 (am a few years behind ).


Timotheus, you know the game engine and AI prioritize air attacks on valuable targets. Particularly unvaluable targets are object of a strike, in AI logic and processing, only if no other more worthy target is available, and many times not at all. But I think you this very well indeed.

(in reply to Timotheus)
Post #: 4919
RE: October 1944 - 8/2/2017 1:40:12 PM   
adarbrauner

 

Posts: 1496
Joined: 11/3/2016
From: Zichron Yaaqov, Israel; Before, Treviso, Italy
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: hartwig.modrow


It may be just me, but I think you should look at your victory -if it is one- either as

"For the loss of 2 CL and 4 DDs, the Americans lose 3 DDs."

or as

"For the loss of 2CL and 4DDs and damage to 1 CA and 3DDs (or is it 4?), the Americans lose 3DDs and see damage to a modern CL and 7-9 DDs."

Just my point of view.

Hartwig


You could see it in this way also, that Japan traded ships which soon may become useless for money worth targets.

Where ever have you seen a Japanese minor surface fleet confront vis a vis main American surface battle group at the end of 1944 and get results?

(in reply to modrow)
Post #: 4920
Page:   <<   < prev  162 163 [164] 165 166   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: October 1944 Page: <<   < prev  162 163 [164] 165 166   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

3.016