User2
Posts: 118
Joined: 1/14/2016 Status: offline
|
I did not try it because I'm more interested in operational weapon systems. However, looked at the mount and the projectile itself in the ingame DB viewer and an image came to my mind: SpecOps team on the shore, DDG Zumwalt 70nm away from them in the sea, EMCON A. SpecOps: This is Bravo one, do you hear me? DDG: Roger, Bravo one, this is Phenix two. Bravo1: Have a visual contact with an enemy airplane. Looks like fighter jet. My position is N31.33 E31.06. Do you copy? Phenix2: Roger, Bravo one. Bravo1: The enemy fighter's flying north-north-west. About 3000-5000m above the ground. Horizontal distance is about 2000m south-east from my position. Phenix2: Got you, Bravo one. Continue tracking target postion. Bravo1: Flying over me, altitude and direction are the same. Subsonic speed. Phenix2: Roger. Aiming at the pilot's right eye. Continue tracking. Bravo1: The target is about 1500m north-west from my position, ascendi... Holly cow! You hit it straight into the pilot's right eye while it was performing Pugachev's Cobra at afterburn throttle! Nice job! It seems that's how it is currently modeled it the game. No sensors onboard - no terminal guidance. Only downlink with INS/GPS guidance mid-course. No engines - only initial kinetic energy. Thus it should have hard time against targets perfoming high-g maneuvers. Still 90% Pok? Very arguably in my opinion. UPD: Just tried it. 6000kts (~9M) initial speed? Here is a statement from official "Congressional Research Service" paper: "When fired from 5-inch powder guns, the projectile achieves a speed of roughly Mach 3, which is roughly half the speed it achieves when fired from EMRG, but more than twice the speed of a conventional 5-inch shell fired from a 5-inch gun"
< Message edited by User2 -- 11/16/2017 8:37:32 AM >
|