Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues Page: <<   < prev  125 126 [127] 128 129   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/10/2017 11:20:20 AM   
User2

 

Posts: 118
Joined: 1/14/2016
Status: offline 		In the game USET-80 and USET-80K have the same PoH.
IRL USET-80 has "Vodopad" seeker (similar seeker is used at UMGT-1 light weight torpedo), while USET-80K has "Keramika" seeker (as well as TEST-71MK, SET-65K and other "K" variants). Keramika was the most advanced soviet era torpedo seeker, thus it should has higher PoH. I could not find much info about USET-80KM, most likely it has the same Keramika seeker as USET-80K.

In the game USET-80KM is labeled as non-operational. However it contradicts official documents that can be found online.


(in reply to orca)
Post #: 3781
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/12/2017 1:44:51 AM   
SlabSheetrock

 

Posts: 19
Joined: 8/21/2017
Status: offline 		Requesting MiG-31M.

Was to be equipped with uprated Soloviev D-30F6M engines, along with multimode phased-array radar. Gun was to be removed, two additional fuselage hardpoints added.

(in reply to User2)
Post #: 3782
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/12/2017 6:36:18 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline 		Happy holidays. Added anything with good info etc. to the master list from my last post. Rag has done some updates here and there as well.

Thanks!

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to SlabSheetrock)
Post #: 3783
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/12/2017 7:38:44 PM   
DrRansom

 

Posts: 167
Joined: 7/14/2013
Status: offline 		To give more details, an tested air-launched Hit-To-Kill vehicle is the NCADE.

Attached is a link to a description of the missile: http://missiledefenseadvocacy.org/missile-defense-systems-2/discontinued-programs/network-centric-airborne-defense-element-ncade/

Based on the article: Corbett, M., and Zarchan, P., “The Role of Air Power in Active Missile Defense,” U.S. Air and Space Power Journal, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2010, pp. 57–71

The NCADE has about a 150km range against an ICBM, depending upon geometry. I think 150 is most favorable.

Lastly, the article states that the aircraft will need an IRST style sensor to assist targeting.

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 3784
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/13/2017 9:32:52 PM   
Redmoose

 

Posts: 40
Joined: 8/22/2016
Status: offline 		1. The Thailand Friagate, DW-3000F is missing from database.
2. The United States database says the US retired the EP-3E Aries, but on the US Navy Website it states they have 16 Left in service

(in reply to DrRansom)
Post #: 3785
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/14/2017 3:28:30 AM   
orca

 

Posts: 501
Joined: 11/6/2013
Status: offline 		MQ-8C sensor request

Osprey 30 AESA radar
Link 16 datalink

Osprey provides a genuine multi-domain capability, with high performance sea surveillance, notably against ‘di cult targets’, land surveillance with wide swath, very high resolution ground mapping, small and low speed ground target indication, high performance air-to-air surveillance, tracking and intercept

Radar is repotedly air and surface search

https://news.usni.org/2017/12/12/fire-scout-set-to-be-forward-spotter-for-navy-surface-warfare-with-addition-of-radar-datalink
http://www.leonardocompany.com/documents/63265270/78873603/Osprey_AESA_Radar_mm08527.pdf?download_file

(in reply to Redmoose)
Post #: 3786
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/19/2017 10:05:45 AM   
butch4343

 

Posts: 327
Joined: 3/26/2015
Status: offline 		Guys

I wondered if I could request a loadout for a Scenario am working on, I have a scenario that requires C47s to drop a mix of air cargo and troops.
I notice that the DB3000 database has a Dakota in it but it lacks the load out to allow para drops. I seldom bother with the country the aircraft comes from, in my case its Guatemalan C47s am thinking of, but if you guys could update any Dak load outs in the DB3000 that would be great.

You guys I know like to have sources , the first source is the book
Rhodesian Light Infantryman 1961–80 by Neil Grant

This shows that Daks were used in a para role into the 1980s.

History of war cites the standard para load of 28 paratroopers, or upto 10000lb of cargo that could be airdropped.

http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_dakota.html

It also cites that in the 1990s still a third of air arms used the Dakota

http://www.dc-3.co.za/dc-3-in-africa/rhodesian-air-force.html

explains the Dak in service with the Rhodesian Air Forces and subsequently the Zimbabwean Air Force formed in 1980.

If I can be of any further help then please let me know.

Kind Regards
Butch

(in reply to orca)
Post #: 3787
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/21/2017 1:27:03 AM   
B52H

 

Posts: 113
Joined: 6/28/2015
Status: offline 		Requesting the EC-135 to be added to the DBs:

- EC-135(A/B/C/D/E/G/H/J/K/L/P/Y) [Both CWDB and DB3000] - Airborne launch command center. Only loadout is "Airborne Strategic Command Post"


(in reply to butch4343)
Post #: 3788
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/22/2017 4:28:52 PM   
VIF2NE

 

Posts: 457
Joined: 7/12/2013
Status: offline 		B-1B

The AN/ALQ-153 Missile Warning System is a solid-state pulse Doppler radar used to detect missile threats. This Northrop-Grumman Electronic Sensors and Systems Division [Westinghouse] tail warning radar is carried on the B-1B and the B-52H heavy bombers. Aircraft equipped with this self-protection system were able to penetrate high-density Iraqi radar defenses to attack military targets during the Gulf War.

https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/systems/an-alq-153.htm

_____________________________


(in reply to B52H)
Post #: 3789
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/23/2017 4:19:54 AM   
orca

 

Posts: 501
Joined: 11/6/2013
Status: offline 		Request that PL-15 loadouts be added to J-16. thanks for considereing

(in reply to VIF2NE)
Post #: 3790
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/24/2017 10:01:16 PM   
orca

 

Posts: 501
Joined: 11/6/2013
Status: offline 		I’m working on a Spratly scenario and trying to model the new China military installations.


Is it possible to add these units:

Hardened missile shelter (i.e. TEL such as HQ-9)
-66 feet long and 33 feet wide
-armor
https://amti.csis.org/chinas-sam-shelters-spratlys/


Hardened point defense bunker (i.e. H/PJ-14 and H/PJ-26)
-approximately 30 feet wide
-armor
https://amti.csis.org/chinas-new

Mounts and sensors could be included or added by user in editor.

I know there is a work around by modifying existing units. However having dedicated units would be much better.









< Message edited by orca -- 12/24/2017 10:10:48 PM >

(in reply to orca)
Post #: 3791
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/26/2017 7:14:02 AM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline 		I was digging around the Chinese internet in search for informations on the KJ-2000 AWAC's Type 88 3-face AESA, and it turned out that it operated in L-Band (1200 - 1400MHz). Which seems to be old information already, dating as far back as 2011:

https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%A9%BA%E8%AD%A6-2000
https://www.aviationsmilitaires.net/v2/base/view/Variant/5173.html
https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/china/kj-2000.htm

I'm not sure which radar frequency the Type 88 uses in the database, but it might be worth it to change it to that band, barring any new and updated information that contradicts them.

(in reply to orca)
Post #: 3792
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/26/2017 2:35:36 PM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hongjian

I was digging around the Chinese internet in search for informations on the KJ-2000 AWAC's Type 88 3-face AESA, and it turned out that it operated in L-Band (1200 - 1400MHz).


Speaking of KJ-2000, I made a quick scenario of E-3G vs KJ-2000, both can be searched as predicted, but only E-3G can ID KJ-2000 in instant, while KJ-2000 gone totally oblivious about its aircraft signature -- it has to be flew at eyeball range to ID E-3G.

Tested with KJ-500, it can instantly ID E-3G once searched, both 500 and 2000 are using Type 88 radar. I can safely say the KJ-2000 ID issue need to be fixed.

< Message edited by Dysta -- 12/26/2017 2:42:58 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 3793
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/26/2017 4:00:34 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline 		Well, in the absence of data detailing the improvements made for the Type 88 and or newer AESAs developed by the 14th Institute for those new AWACS, it is hard to "improve" them, aside of maybe setting their tech-level to "late 2000s" instead of "early 2000s". But what can be changed is the operating frequency, as most information I found point to the direction that the Type 88 is in fact an L-band AESA.

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 3794
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/27/2017 7:26:42 PM   
Scorpion86

 

Posts: 239
Joined: 2/26/2017
Status: offline 		I've made another mistake in my submissions, this time regarding the variants of the G.91 used by the Portuguese and Italian Air Forces. As before, I've edited the original post, but I'll post the changes here too.

- FIAT G.91 R/3 (’76-’93)

- Identical to the FIAT G.91/R1 (#1649), except in the following:
- Should have 3 VINTEN F95 Mk.3 reconnaissance cameras pointed front, left and right
- 2 x DEFA 552 30mm cannons instead of the Browning M3 12,7mm machineguns
- Has 4 external pylons
- In 1980 all Portuguese G.91Rs underwent upgrades in OGMA that allowed them to carry the AIM-9B
- Missing loadouts:
--- 4 x AIM-9B
--- 2 x AIM-9B + 260l drop tank
--- 4 x LAU-32/A (7 x FFAR Mk.40 each)
--- 2 x GP 500 lbs + 4 x GP 110 lbs bombs
--- 2 x GP 500 lbs + 2 x GP 250 lbs bombs
--- 4 x 250 lbs bombs
--- 2 x 300l Napalm bomb
- Other known weapons:
--- Mk20 Rockeye
--- Mk81 Snakeye
--- BL755 cluster bomb
--- 110/250/500/750 lbs GP bombs

Sources:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiat_G.91
http://walkarounds-blog.blogspot.pt/2015/02/fiat-g91.html
http://www.passarodeferro.com/2008/11/fiat-perfil-de-armamento.html
http://www.passarodeferro.com/2008/11/perfil-do-fiat-2.html
http://www.passarodeferro.com/2008/11/perfil-do-fiat-3.html
http://asasdeferro.blogspot.pt/2017/07/fiat-g91-gina.html
http://www.airvectors.net/avamx.html
http://www.avialogs.com/en/aircraft/italy/fiat/g-91/gaf-to-1f-91-r3-1-flight-manual-g91-r3.html
https://pt.scribd.com/doc/174079220/Warpaint-Series-No-49-Fiat-G-91
http://thecombatworkshop.blogspot.pt/2016/11/sidewinder-overview-part-i-aim-9b.html
http://www.emfa.pt/www/po/maisalto/conteudos/artigo.pdf

- FIAT G.91 R/4 (’66-’93)

- Identical to the FIAT G.91/R1 (#1649), except in the following:
- Should have 3 VINTEN F95 Mk.3 reconnaissance cameras pointed front, left and right
- Has 4 external pylons
- In 1980 all Portuguese G.91Rs underwent upgrades in OGMA that allowed them to carry the AIM-9B
- Missing loadouts:
--- 4 x AIM-9B
--- 2 x AIM-9B + 260l drop tank
--- 4 x LAU-32/A (7 x FFAR Mk.40 each)
--- 2 x GP 500 lbs + 4 x GP 110 lbs bombs
--- 2 x GP 500 lbs + 2 x GP 250 lbs bombs
--- 4 x 250 lbs bombs
--- 2 x 300l Napalm bomb
- Other known weapons:
--- Mk20 Rockeye
--- Mk81 Snakeye
--- BL755 cluster bomb
--- 110/250/500/750 lbs GP bombs

Sources:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiat_G.91
http://walkarounds-blog.blogspot.pt/2015/02/fiat-g91.html
http://www.passarodeferro.com/2008/11/fiat-perfil-de-armamento.html
http://www.passarodeferro.com/2008/11/perfil-do-fiat-2.html
http://www.passarodeferro.com/2008/11/perfil-do-fiat-3.html
http://asasdeferro.blogspot.pt/2017/07/fiat-g91-gina.html
http://www.avialogs.com/en/aircraft/italy/fiat/g-91/t-o-nato-1rf-g91-r4-2-1-technical-manual-organizational-maintenance-general-airplane-g91-r4.html
http://www.airvectors.net/avamx.html
https://pt.scribd.com/doc/174079220/Warpaint-Series-No-49-Fiat-G-91
http://thecombatworkshop.blogspot.pt/2016/11/sidewinder-overview-part-i-aim-9b.html
http://www.emfa.pt/www/po/maisalto/conteudos/artigo.pdf

Corrections to the database:

#1649 – G.91 R/1 Gina

- Should have 3 VINTEN F95 Mk.3 reconnaissance cameras pointed front, left and right
- When carrying the AS-20 missiles, 2 guns are removed to install the missile guidance system
- Missing loadouts:
--- 2 x GP 500lbs bombs
--- 2 x AS-20 missiles
--- 2 x 300l Napalm bombs

Sources:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiat_G.91
http://www.avialogs.com/index.php/aircraft/italy/fiat/g-91/flight-handbook-g-91-aircraft.html
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fiat_G91R_DX.jpg

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 3795
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/29/2017 2:24:35 PM   
TheOttoman

 

Posts: 139
Joined: 12/14/2017
Status: offline 		Is there a format in which database requests should be submitted (or would it be helpful to create a format), or do we just post links or requests with a "please add this", and leave it to the devs to work out the actual data?

Also, is there anywhere a list of gaps in the database where information needs to be sourced?

(in reply to Scorpion86)
Post #: 3796
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/29/2017 3:28:14 PM   
Bashkire

 

Posts: 38
Joined: 2/23/2015
Status: offline 		More to the point: where is the database to see what's being worked on? The link in the first post doesn't work.

(in reply to TheOttoman)
Post #: 3797
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 12/30/2017 10:22:58 AM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tailhook

Request that the Super Hornets get an option for some updated loadouts, based on some searching I've done around the web.

4x LRASM loadout


2x LRASM, 2x HARM/AARGM of some sort (wonder if this could be 4x and 2x, with a centerline tank. Short Range loadout)


4x JSM





I started looking into this one but the 4x LRASM loadout hasn't actually flown? Anyone got details?

The 4x Harpoon loadout was cleared recently and is already in the database.

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to Tailhook)
Post #: 3798
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 12/30/2017 3:03:47 PM   
TheOttoman

 

Posts: 139
Joined: 12/14/2017
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy

I started looking into this one but the 4x LRASM loadout hasn't actually flown? Anyone got details?

The 4x Harpoon loadout was cleared recently and is already in the database.


It hasn't been fielded yet, and it's still testing at Pax River.

"A long gap in U.S. activity is ending with plans to field a limited quantity of Long-Range Anti-Ship Missile (Lrasm) versions of Lockheed Martin’s Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (Jassm) on B-1Bs in 2018 and F/A-18E/Fs in 2019. The Navy plans a competition in 2017 for its Offensive Anti-Surface Warfare (OASuW) requirement. This will pit a surface-launched Lrasm against the Tomahawk from Raytheon, which will also pitch Kongsberg’s JSM for air-launched needs."

http://aviationweek.com/defense/arming-new-platforms-will-push-value-missiles-market

So the Air Force gets it this year, and the navy gets it next year

< Message edited by TheOttoman -- 12/30/2017 3:08:01 PM >

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 3799
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 12/31/2017 11:01:28 AM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline 		Thanks Think we should wait then, since 4x LRASMs may not actually be an operational loadout?


Anyone got photos of F-35s carrying (twin) AMRAAM rails externally?


_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to TheOttoman)
Post #: 3800
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 1/1/2018 4:15:45 AM   
Dragon029


Posts: 76
Joined: 10/31/2015
Status: offline 		The F-35 isn't being certified for external AMRAAM carriage in SDD / with Block 3F. It's definitely physically capable of doing it, but because the F-35 is meant to be operating stealthily on OCA / DCA missions there's been no customer requirement (and therefore no separation testing) to clear the plane for external AMRAAM carriage. The F-35 is cleared for AIM-9X and AIM-132 ASRAAM carriage on the outer wing hardpoints, but only really for additional self-defence capability when also carrying external air-to-ground munitions.

< Message edited by Dragon029 -- 1/1/2018 4:16:19 AM >

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 3801
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 1/1/2018 7:20:44 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline 		Interesting, thanks!

Do you know if the 6x 2000lb JDAM loadout will be an operational loadout? I.e. expected to be used in a shooting war.

Also from carriers?

< Message edited by emsoy -- 1/1/2018 7:22:10 PM >

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to Dragon029)
Post #: 3802
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/1/2018 8:22:39 PM   
I1066

 

Posts: 77
Joined: 10/22/2013
Status: offline 		There seem to be a hard limit for the minimum operating depth for towed array sonars.
This limit makes all the towed arrays practically useless on on any of the platformas operating in the Baltic Sea.

There are many documents and references online where Towed array sonars are used in littoral and shallow waters of a depth of 15m, so something needs to be done to make these sonar system work as they do in real life.

Example:
http://geospectrum.ca/towed-reelable-active-passive-sonar-traps/


< Message edited by I1066 -- 1/1/2018 8:23:55 PM >

(in reply to User2)
Post #: 3803
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/2/2018 3:15:47 AM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline 		Correct, the minimum depth is set on a per-system basis. Is TRAPS used operationally?

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to I1066)
Post #: 3804
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/2/2018 3:18:54 AM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline 		Please see question on F-35 JDAM loadout above.

Anyone got any photos of a Super Bug carrying 4x Harpoons and 2x HARMs?

Or a vanilla bug carrying 4x Harpoons or 2x Harpoons and 2x HARMs?

Thanks!

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 3805
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/2/2018 5:12:48 AM   
Scorpion86

 

Posts: 239
Joined: 2/26/2017
Status: offline 		Hey guys! Another post regarding aircraft of the Portuguese Air Force! Some of these aircraft are/were also used by the Spanish Air Force. And also, happy new year, guys! :)

- Alpha Jet A (’92-…)

- Ex-German aircraft, identical to #65, except where noted.
- Avionics:
---RWR: SPS-1000
---Counter-measures: AN/ALE-40
- Uses CRV7 rockets instead of SNEB.
- The “BL.755 CB, Heavy, Multi-Store Rack” loadout cannot use drop tanks, as the BL.755 cannot be used in multi-store racks.

Sources:
http://www.emfa.pt/www/aeronave-4-dassault-dornier-alpha-jet
http://www.avialogs.com/en/aircraft/europe-and-consortiums/dassault-dornier/alpha-jet/gaf-to-1f-ajet-1-flight-manual-alpha-jet.html
https://comum.rcaap.pt/bitstream/10400.26/21435/1/14_CapJoaoBoita_TII_VF.pdf

- C-212-100 Aviocar (’74-’11) [Portugal] and T.12B [Spain]

- Engines: 2 x Garret-Air Research TPE-331-5-251C (776hp)
- Cargo:
--- 18 passengers
--- 16 paratroopers
--- 2 metric tons of cargo

Sources:
http://www.airvectors.net/avc212.html
http://www.emfa.pt/www/po/esquadra/link-502-005.002.001.002.003-c-212-aviocar
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/CASA_C-212_Aviocar
http://www.operacional.pt/ate-sempre-aviocar/
https://altimagem.blogspot.pt/2014/08/casa-c-212-aviocar-primeira-parte.html
https://altimagem.blogspot.pt/2014/08/casa-c-212-aviocar-segunda-parte.html

- C-212-100 ECM Aviocar (’77-’04) [Portugal] and TM.12D [Spain]

- Engines: 2 x Garret-Air Research TPE-331-5-251C (776hp)
- EW equipment:
--- SIGINT: SIGINT Multispectral Airborne (SIGMA) System
--- ESM: AMES (Direction Finding, 2-18GHz)
--- ELINT/ECM: ARIES-A (ELINT: C-J bands, ECM: D-J bands)
--- COMINT/COMJAM: Smart Guard/Fast Jam (VHF-UHF)

Sources:
http://www.airvectors.net/avc212.html
http://www.emfa.pt/www/po/esquadra/link-502-005.002.001.002.003-c-212-aviocar
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/CASA_C-212_Aviocar
http://www.operacional.pt/ate-sempre-aviocar/
https://altimagem.blogspot.pt/2014/08/casa-c-212-aviocar-primeira-parte.html
https://altimagem.blogspot.pt/2014/08/casa-c-212-aviocar-segunda-parte.html
https://www.intelpage.info/47-grupo-mixto-de-las-fuerzas-aereas-espanolas.html
http://bacteriosclub.blogspot.pt/2011/11/guerra-electronica-y-operaciones-sigint_19.html
 
- C-212-300MP Aviocar (’93-’11)

- Engines: 2 x Garret-Air Research TPE-331-10R-513C (925hp)
- Carries 2 500l external fuel tanks
- Sensors:
--- Radar: AN/APS-128
--- SLAR: MSS 6000

Sources:
http://www.airvectors.net/avc212.html
http://www.emfa.pt/www/po/esquadra/link-502-005.002.001.002.003-c-212-aviocar
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/CASA_C-212_Aviocar
http://www.operacional.pt/ate-sempre-aviocar/
https://altimagem.blogspot.pt/2014/08/casa-c-212-aviocar-primeira-parte.html
https://altimagem.blogspot.pt/2014/08/casa-c-212-aviocar-segunda-parte.html
http://www.planobrazil.com/o-barato-que-sai-caro-upgrade-do-radar-de-busca-dos-c-212-uruguaios-ficara-mais-cara-que-os-proprios-avioes/
https://uppsagd.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/mss_6000_brochure-june-2011.pdf

Corrections:

#65 – Alpha Jet A

- The “BL.755 CB, Heavy, Multi-Store Rack” loadout cannot use drop tanks, as the BL.755 cannot be used in multi-store racks.

Sources:
http://www.avialogs.com/en/aircraft/europe-and-consortiums/dassault-dornier/alpha-jet/gaf-to-1f-ajet-1-flight-manual-alpha-jet.html

#1648 – G.91Y Gina

- Should have 3 DE OUDE DELFT TA7M2 reconnaissance cameras pointed left, right and vertically plus a FAIRCHILD KA60C panoramic camera pointed front
- When carrying the AS-20 missiles, a gun is removed to install the missile guidance system
- Missing loadouts:
--- LAU-10/A (4 x Zuni) rocket pod (up to 4)
--- Mk83 bomb (up to 2)
--- AS-20 missile (up to 4)

Sources:
http://www.avialogs.com/index.php/aircraft/italy/fiat/g-91/aa-1f-91y-1-istruzioni-e-norme-per-il-poltaggio-per-il-velivolo-g-91y.html
https://pt.scribd.com/doc/174079220/Warpaint-Series-No-49-Fiat-G-91

< Message edited by Scorpion86 -- 11/20/2018 3:51:40 PM >

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 3806
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/2/2018 9:17:30 PM   
SlabSheetrock

 

Posts: 19
Joined: 8/21/2017
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheOttoman

Is there a format in which database requests should be submitted (or would it be helpful to create a format), or do we just post links or requests with a "please add this", and leave it to the devs to work out the actual data?

Also, is there anywhere a list of gaps in the database where information needs to be sourced?


quote:

ORIGINAL: Bashkire

More to the point: where is the database to see what's being worked on? The link in the first post doesn't work.


These are both extremely important questions to ask.

(in reply to TheOttoman)
Post #: 3807
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/3/2018 2:44:04 AM   
TheOttoman

 

Posts: 139
Joined: 12/14/2017
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy

Please see question on F-35 JDAM loadout above.

Anyone got any photos of a Super Bug carrying 4x Harpoons and 2x HARMs?

Or a vanilla bug carrying 4x Harpoons or 2x Harpoons and 2x HARMs?

Thanks!




< Message edited by TheOttoman -- 1/3/2018 2:50:35 AM >

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 3808
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/3/2018 2:45:19 AM   
TheOttoman

 

Posts: 139
Joined: 12/14/2017
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SlabSheetrock


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheOttoman

Is there a format in which database requests should be submitted (or would it be helpful to create a format), or do we just post links or requests with a "please add this", and leave it to the devs to work out the actual data?

Also, is there anywhere a list of gaps in the database where information needs to be sourced?


quote:

ORIGINAL: Bashkire

More to the point: where is the database to see what's being worked on? The link in the first post doesn't work.


These are both extremely important questions to ask.

To which I have seen no answer for.

(in reply to SlabSheetrock)
Post #: 3809
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/3/2018 3:05:57 AM   
TheOttoman

 

Posts: 139
Joined: 12/14/2017
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: I1066

There seem to be a hard limit for the minimum operating depth for towed array sonars.
This limit makes all the towed arrays practically useless on on any of the platformas operating in the Baltic Sea.

There are many documents and references online where Towed array sonars are used in littoral and shallow waters of a depth of 15m, so something needs to be done to make these sonar system work as they do in real life.

Example:
http://geospectrum.ca/towed-reelable-active-passive-sonar-traps/


I believe the way the Swedes were able to do it a couple of years ago, they basically went to all the places Russian (and American) subs were found forty years ago and used smaller arrays. Even still, you lose a lot of resolution due to the lack of length, and ultimately it isn't effective as you point out. You could also be a mean Swede and get all your fishing boat captain pals to go to an area and flood it with active sonar / fish finders

(in reply to I1066)
Post #: 3810
Page:   <<   < prev  125 126 [127] 128 129   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues Page: <<   < prev  125 126 [127] 128 129   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.904