Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Torpedo Question

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Torpedo Question Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Torpedo Question - 1/21/2018 1:59:24 AM   
Rogue187

 

Posts: 146
Joined: 2/7/2005
Status: offline
Probably an old question but why are aireal torpedoes "ordered" at air HQ and not simply expended as part of base supply for aircraft squadrons that can carry torpedoes? Also, why can you only order 20 at a time? I know you can keep typing in 20 to build them but, but why not be able just type in 50 or 100? It seems like unnecessary micromanaging when you really dont know how many torpedoes you will need. Just curious.
Post #: 1
RE: Torpedo Question - 1/21/2018 4:07:41 AM   
rms1pa

 

Posts: 370
Joined: 7/4/2011
Status: offline
A.the game is not torpedos in the pacific.

B. filling Hqs with torps eats supply. use the add 20 once then go to the TOE screen and make it 100.

in-game design choices limited several historical torpedo squadrons , those dutch float planes had torpedos but not in game. there were mods to the B26 to carry torps also.
some brit torp units also limited.

some uses were very rare or never persued historicly so they were left out of game.

have fun and play on.

rms/pa

_____________________________

there is a technical term for those who confuse the opinions of an author's characters for the opinions of the author.
the term is IDIOT.

(in reply to Rogue187)
Post #: 2
RE: Torpedo Question - 1/21/2018 7:49:11 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
The developers did address this question once a long time ago. IRL torpedoes were a very expensive and hard to manufacture item. Consequently they were not available everywhere, nor in unlimited quantity anywhere.

The best way they could come up with to limit the omnipresence of torpedoes was to require and Air HQ to release them. This forces the player to decide the best place to put his air HQ, just as torpedo stocks would have been placed at strategically useful places IRL.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Rogue187)
Post #: 3
RE: Torpedo Question - 1/21/2018 12:42:05 PM   
Itdepends

 

Posts: 937
Joined: 12/12/2005
Status: offline
I believe f you turn replacements on for the Air Hq it will also convert supply on its own to maintain the level of torpedoes you set it at.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 4
RE: Torpedo Question - 1/21/2018 12:52:47 PM   
GetAssista

 

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Itdepends
I believe f you turn replacements on for the Air Hq it will also convert supply on its own to maintain the level of torpedoes you set it at.

Not quite. Maintaining the level is done through clicking TOE link on LCU screen and entering the desired number of torps there

(in reply to Itdepends)
Post #: 5
RE: Torpedo Question - 1/21/2018 3:08:02 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista

quote:

ORIGINAL: Itdepends
I believe f you turn replacements on for the Air Hq it will also convert supply on its own to maintain the level of torpedoes you set it at.

Not quite. Maintaining the level is done through clicking TOE link on LCU screen and entering the desired number of torps there


Disregard, I just repeated what you just wrote....

< Message edited by crsutton -- 1/21/2018 3:09:46 PM >


_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to GetAssista)
Post #: 6
RE: Torpedo Question - 1/21/2018 3:42:42 PM   
cardas

 

Posts: 184
Joined: 4/8/2016
Status: offline
The question as to why they are treated so specially was answered, but not the one about the 20 torpedoes at a time limit. A charitable guess from my side is that it's there to protect the player, torpedoes cost quite a lot of supply (relatively) after all. Imagine somehow accidentally ordering, say, 100000 torpedoes in Tokyo. If you somehow glossed over it and didn't notice then that's something which would actually have long term supply consequences. By having the 20 torpedo limit there's no way that you'd do such a costly mistake. Of course, the fact that you can put 9999 torpedoes as the automatic refill makes me question why the limit would be 20.

It's also noteworthy that you can't order torpedoes in an Air HQ unless you have more than 2 times the required supply in a base. That may be the reason for the 20 torpedoes at a time limit as well? Because of the special nature of ordering torpedoes it was simply easier to limit how many you could order at a time due to some blah, blah supply checks. Depends on how the behind the hood programming looks like.

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 7
RE: Torpedo Question - 1/21/2018 5:37:26 PM   
wegman58

 

Posts: 460
Joined: 12/28/2013
From: Edina, MN (FROM the Bronx)
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: cardas

The question as to why they are treated so specially was answered, but not the one about the 20 torpedoes at a time limit. A charitable guess from my side is that it's there to protect the player, torpedoes cost quite a lot of supply (relatively) after all. Imagine somehow accidentally ordering, say, 100000 torpedoes in Tokyo. If you somehow glossed over it and didn't notice then that's something which would actually have long term supply consequences. By having the 20 torpedo limit there's no way that you'd do such a costly mistake. Of course, the fact that you can put 9999 torpedoes as the automatic refill makes me question why the limit would be 20.

It's also noteworthy that you can't order torpedoes in an Air HQ unless you have more than 2 times the required supply in a base. That may be the reason for the 20 torpedoes at a time limit as well? Because of the special nature of ordering torpedoes it was simply easier to limit how many you could order at a time due to some blah, blah supply checks. Depends on how the behind the hood programming looks like.


And if your base is well supplied, you can always order more than one batch of 20.

(in reply to cardas)
Post #: 8
RE: Torpedo Question - 1/21/2018 6:38:00 PM   
spence

 

Posts: 5400
Joined: 4/20/2003
From: Vancouver, Washington
Status: offline
quote:

in-game design choices limited several historical torpedo squadrons , those dutch float planes had torpedos but not in game. there were mods to the B26 to carry torps also.
some brit torp units also limited.

some uses were very rare or never persued historicly so they were left out of game.


The original designer seems to have bought into the prewar Japanese Doctrine that had the lesser surface ships (cruisers and destroyers), aircraft and submarines of the Combined Fleet would be whittling down the American Battle-line as it advanced across the Pacific before "The Decisive Battle" between the USN and IJN. The G3 and G4 bombers were designed with that purpose in mind. That why their cruisers and destroyers carried torpedo reloads.

Operations Research shows that the Japanese reliance on torpedoes effectiveness was overblown. Although able to produce spectacular results at times such results were far to rare to have a strategic effect. Although many Allied twin-engine bombers could be rigged to carry torpedoes like the G3s and G4s the Allies recognized that the increased training required to deliver torpedoes effectively (such as that received by the groups which sank POW and Repulse) and the cost of the constant maintenance of torpedoes were not justified by the results obtainable with torpedoes rather than bombs so the Allies (Americans anyways) did not pursue an operational torpedo-bombing capability for their twin-engine bombers (torpedo capability was rigged and tested on the B-26, various B-25 versions, the PV-1 and PV-2. As far as I know it was only used operationally by B-26s at Midway and in the Aleutians although there is a photo of one being loaded onto a PV-1 in the Aleutians during a snowstorm (probably not for show).

(in reply to wegman58)
Post #: 9
RE: Torpedo Question - 1/21/2018 7:03:25 PM   
Zorch

 

Posts: 7087
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline
Very interesting.
I wonder how many torpedoes a B-17 could carry.

(in reply to spence)
Post #: 10
RE: Torpedo Question - 1/21/2018 7:13:03 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: spence

quote:

in-game design choices limited several historical torpedo squadrons , those dutch float planes had torpedos but not in game. there were mods to the B26 to carry torps also.
some brit torp units also limited.

some uses were very rare or never persued historicly so they were left out of game.


The original designer seems to have bought into the prewar Japanese Doctrine that had the lesser surface ships (cruisers and destroyers), aircraft and submarines of the Combined Fleet would be whittling down the American Battle-line as it advanced across the Pacific before "The Decisive Battle" between the USN and IJN. The G3 and G4 bombers were designed with that purpose in mind. That why their cruisers and destroyers carried torpedo reloads.

Operations Research shows that the Japanese reliance on torpedoes effectiveness was overblown. Although able to produce spectacular results at times such results were far to rare to have a strategic effect. Although many Allied twin-engine bombers could be rigged to carry torpedoes like the G3s and G4s the Allies recognized that the increased training required to deliver torpedoes effectively (such as that received by the groups which sank POW and Repulse) and the cost of the constant maintenance of torpedoes were not justified by the results obtainable with torpedoes rather than bombs so the Allies (Americans anyways) did not pursue an operational torpedo-bombing capability for their twin-engine bombers (torpedo capability was rigged and tested on the B-26, various B-25 versions, the PV-1 and PV-2. As far as I know it was only used operationally by B-26s at Midway and in the Aleutians although there is a photo of one being loaded onto a PV-1 in the Aleutians during a snowstorm (probably not for show).



Yeah is is probably a little out of whack to have given the capability to Catalinas and Japanese 4E patrol bombers as well.
We know they did it, but it was extremely rare. However, it is fun in the game though..

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to spence)
Post #: 11
RE: Torpedo Question - 1/21/2018 8:36:42 PM   
MakeeLearn


Posts: 4278
Joined: 9/11/2016
Status: offline
A Martin B-26 Marauder of the 70th BS, 38th BG armed with a torpedo on Fiji during 1942.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 12
RE: Torpedo Question - 1/21/2018 10:08:19 PM   
geofflambert


Posts: 14863
Joined: 12/23/2010
From: St. Louis
Status: offline
Air HQ's are required in the game for an inventory of aerial torpedos to be available, within the command radius of that HQ. This is the game's simulation of the diffuculty of obtaining them. Nonetheless, all you need is one of these HQs and sufficient supply to produce them on demand. The number 20 is arbitrary and just serves to make you think about what it is you are doing. If you could put any number in there you wanted you could easily exhaust the supply and therefor the operations of a major base.

(in reply to MakeeLearn)
Post #: 13
RE: Torpedo Question - 1/22/2018 2:03:58 AM   
spence

 

Posts: 5400
Joined: 4/20/2003
From: Vancouver, Washington
Status: offline
quote:

Very interesting.
I wonder how many torpedoes a B-17 could carry.


I have no idea if the bomb bays were big enough to hold an aerial torpedo or four(weight-wise they could do that and still have a decent range). Are you going to work up a Mod with that capability?



< Message edited by spence -- 1/22/2018 2:07:50 AM >

(in reply to geofflambert)
Post #: 14
RE: Torpedo Question - 1/22/2018 11:43:20 AM   
jmalter

 

Posts: 1673
Joined: 10/12/2010
Status: offline
The HQa can purchase torps, but one should also click over to set its TOE to maintain a desired # of torps, and set its Replacements ON.

I always keep at least 1 USN PBY-5 airgroup staffed with high NavT pilots. The planes can carry 2 torps each & can deliver serious smack. Based in NE Oz & supported by a torp-supplied HQa, these Cats have often proved essential to defending Port Moresby from IJ cruiser bombardment & amph assault.

(in reply to spence)
Post #: 15
RE: Torpedo Question - 1/22/2018 2:15:02 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: spence

quote:

Very interesting.
I wonder how many torpedoes a B-17 could carry.


I have no idea if the bomb bays were big enough to hold an aerial torpedo or four(weight-wise they could do that and still have a decent range). Are you going to work up a Mod with that capability?




B17s could probably not carry any torpedoes internally. They were restricted by the wing which was one single intact wing that made up the under body of the aircraft-limiting it's bomb load and the bomb size that they could carry. B24 did not have wings like that and could carry a lager load in tonnage and size. Just google B17 bomb bay to see how really small they actually were.

< Message edited by crsutton -- 1/22/2018 2:19:40 PM >


_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to spence)
Post #: 16
RE: Torpedo Question - 1/22/2018 2:49:57 PM   
MakeeLearn


Posts: 4278
Joined: 9/11/2016
Status: offline
”Miss Torpedo” 1952




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by MakeeLearn -- 1/22/2018 2:50:09 PM >

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 17
RE: Torpedo Question - 1/22/2018 6:34:38 PM   
jmalter

 

Posts: 1673
Joined: 10/12/2010
Status: offline
Hurrah for Miss Torpedo 1952!

Ughfortunately, I'm set to 'use historical' in my prefs, so most often I get the "Missed Torpedo" message.

(in reply to MakeeLearn)
Post #: 18
RE: Torpedo Question - 1/22/2018 9:51:19 PM   
rustysi


Posts: 7472
Joined: 2/21/2012
From: LI, NY
Status: offline
Watching a documentary lately, it stated that it required 4000 man-hours to construct each German torpedo. Seems to me that similar efforts were required by everyone else. That adds up to two years of labor by one person for each warhead!!! Given that and what I've heard about their maintenance its hardly surprising they were not ubiquitous.

_____________________________

It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb

(in reply to jmalter)
Post #: 19
RE: Torpedo Question - 1/22/2018 10:06:58 PM   
Zorch

 

Posts: 7087
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn

”Miss Torpedo” 1952




She's no dud!

(in reply to MakeeLearn)
Post #: 20
RE: Torpedo Question - 1/22/2018 10:36:42 PM   
Bearcat2

 

Posts: 577
Joined: 2/14/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: spence

quote:

in-game design choices limited several historical torpedo squadrons , those dutch float planes had torpedos but not in game. there were mods to the B26 to carry torps also.
some brit torp units also limited.

some uses were very rare or never persued historicly so they were left out of game.


The original designer seems to have bought into the prewar Japanese Doctrine that had the lesser surface ships (cruisers and destroyers), aircraft and submarines of the Combined Fleet would be whittling down the American Battle-line as it advanced across the Pacific before "The Decisive Battle" between the USN and IJN. The G3 and G4 bombers were designed with that purpose in mind. That why their cruisers and destroyers carried torpedo reloads.

Operations Research shows that the Japanese reliance on torpedoes effectiveness was overblown. Although able to produce spectacular results at times such results were far to rare to have a strategic effect. Although many Allied twin-engine bombers could be rigged to carry torpedoes like the G3s and G4s the Allies recognized that the increased training required to deliver torpedoes effectively (such as that received by the groups which sank POW and Repulse) and the cost of the constant maintenance of torpedoes were not justified by the results obtainable with torpedoes rather than bombs so the Allies (Americans anyways) did not pursue an operational torpedo-bombing capability for their twin-engine bombers (torpedo capability was rigged and tested on the B-26, various B-25 versions, the PV-1 and PV-2. As far as I know it was only used operationally by B-26s at Midway and in the Aleutians although there is a photo of one being loaded onto a PV-1 in the Aleutians during a snowstorm (probably not for show).




My father flew[ 47thBG] in A20's; in January/Feb 1942 they flew with the USN Mk XIII torpedo, they never used in combat as they were flying out of Fresno to guard against a Japanese invasion of California. They never carried them after that time because they were transferred to the ETO.
BTW the 47th had 4 squadrons with 25/24 planes in each Sq for a group total of 99

_____________________________

"After eight years as President I have only two regrets: that I have not shot Henry Clay or hanged John C. Calhoun."--1837

(in reply to spence)
Post #: 21
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Torpedo Question Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.922