warspite1
Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008 From: England Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: E quote:
ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote:
ORIGINAL: E quote:
ORIGINAL: warspite1 As for the stat - 1,000 killed out of 2,000, really? I find that difficult to believe, but even if its half that, that is truly shocking. That's a higher survival rate than serving on a U-boat during the war. warspite1 What has the casualty rate for a service during time of war got to do with POW's clearing mines after the war? You seem to be shocked by the mineclearing attrition rate, as if it was the worst ever. It wasn't the worst ever, is the point. Both jobs were borne of the war (where did you think these mines came from?). The mine clearing job had a higher survival rate. warspite1 "where did you think these mines came from?". Thanks, that added a lot to the discussion . The loss of the U-boat crews happened during the war. Using prisoners of war, after the war had finished, to clear mines in conditions that allowed for such casualties (though I simply don't believe 1,000 killed out of 2,000) is absolutely shocking. I don't care if its "the worst ever" or other such pointless comparison. That is totally irrelevant as what happens during a conflict should be different to what happens in time of peace.
_____________________________
England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805 
|