Problem with Editor

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Problem with Editor

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Tech Support >> Problem with Editor

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Problem with Editor - 3/25/2018 2:39:36 PM

SvenNyqvist

Posts: 47
Joined: 7/13/2007
Status: offline

I have noticed (after several years) that some LCU are defined in the editor but do not appead in the scenario.
Example: Scen 2 has 43rd Div and 100th Div defined to appear at the start (location 3072 and 3854) but the divisions do not appear. The same applies to the divisions in location 3855 - 3857. What is this???
I have been able to define new units in free slots in my own scenarios.
Any ideas?

_____________________________

Post #: 1

RE: Problem with Editor - 3/25/2018 4:05:37 PM

RichardAckermann

Posts: 271
Joined: 12/4/2015
Status: offline

Those divisions may be in game in form of their smaller component units.
Do those divisions have a correct date to appear?

(in reply to SvenNyqvist)

Post #: 2

RE: Problem with Editor - 3/25/2018 4:09:58 PM

SvenNyqvist

Posts: 47
Joined: 7/13/2007
Status: offline

You are right. The division in 3854 - 3857 have components which havn't turned up yet. I assume that is the case for 43rd division as well (I havn't found the pieces).
Problem resolved!

(in reply to RichardAckermann)

Post #: 3

RE: Problem with Editor - 3/25/2018 5:10:09 PM

witpqs

Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

You might also notice some other units which are "emergency reinforcements" which arrive only in case some specific place or other is invaded or invaded during a certain period.

_____________________________

Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home

(in reply to SvenNyqvist)

Post #: 4