Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably Historically

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably Historically Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 3/25/2018 9:51:48 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. Initiative.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 301
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 3/27/2018 4:37:41 AM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline 		very Churchillian on delivering the Alexander HQ - ram the Tiger convoy right through the Med when things start to get tight in Egypt

a bit less Churchillian having the Wavell HQ lead that one attack; Winston would have insisted there be a motorized division included to absorb any needed losses, though his war didn't work the way WiF does. I bet he would have designated an Indian div, maybe a South African one.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 302
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 3/28/2018 2:05:37 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian

very Churchillian on delivering the Alexander HQ - ram the Tiger convoy right through the Med when things start to get tight in Egypt

a bit less Churchillian having the Wavell HQ lead that one attack; Winston would have insisted there be a motorized division included to absorb any needed losses, though his war didn't work the way WiF does. I bet he would have designated an Indian div, maybe a South African one.
I can't remember the exact year but I'd say it was sometime around the 6th grade (i.e., 1969-1970), when one of my classmates mention to our teacher that he saw an "old" picture of Winston Churchill holding up a peace sign. If it was the 6th grade then it would have been Mrs. Olgbee. Anyway, we were amazed ... peace sign in the 40's? We thought that was a recent invention (i.e., 1960's) of the hippies? That's when she informed us that he was flashing a "V" for victory and not a peace sign. True story.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 303
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 3/30/2018 7:04:31 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. Summary.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 304
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 3/30/2018 7:05:44 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. Allied #1. RN.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 305
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 3/30/2018 7:06:32 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. Axis #4. Regina Mariana (RM)




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 306
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 3/30/2018 7:07:14 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. Axis #4. East Med. RN Initiates.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 307
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 3/30/2018 7:07:56 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. Axis #9 Germany Aligns Bulgaria.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 308
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 3/30/2018 7:08:47 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. Axis #9. Axis Initiate. West Med.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 309
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 3/30/2018 7:09:15 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. Axis #9. Axis Initiate. Bay of Biscay.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 310
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 3/30/2018 7:12:19 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. Axis #9. IJA Land Combat.

Wow, the axis took it on the chin this impulse. They're 3 for 3 in unfavorable results. This botched land combat by the IJA had a real chance of turning the southern flank of Chaing and his Nationalist Chinese. Not only do the Chinese Nationalist hold but they cause the destruction of three Japanese armies.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 311
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 3/30/2018 7:13:56 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. China.

Actually, the positions at the start of turn 9 (Jan/Feb 1941).




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 312
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 3/30/2018 7:14:49 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. Destroyed & Repair Pools.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 313
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 3/30/2018 7:15:35 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. USE.

Poor chit draw ... no additional US entry options selected this turn.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 314
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 3/30/2018 7:16:03 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. Economic Reports.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 3/30/2018 7:17:09 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 315
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 3/30/2018 7:18:01 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. Unit Build Pools.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 3/30/2018 7:23:54 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 316
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 3/30/2018 7:25:26 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Axis Scrapped.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 317
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 3/30/2018 7:26:34 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Allied Scrapped.

Editor's note: I scrapped all "named" ships that are sunk by (house) rule.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 318
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 3/30/2018 7:27:42 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Trade.

No changes this turn.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 319
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 3/30/2018 7:28:14 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Initiative.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 320
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 3/30/2018 7:28:34 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Balkans.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 321
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 3/30/2018 7:28:54 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Egypt.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 322
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 3/30/2018 7:29:12 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. France.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 323
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 3/30/2018 7:29:54 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Manchuria, Mongolia and Korea.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 324
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 3/30/2018 7:30:16 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. China.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 325
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/1/2018 1:26:44 PM   
Centuur


Posts: 8802
Joined: 6/3/2011
From: Hoorn (NED).
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rkr1958

Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. USE.

Poor chit draw ... no additional US entry options selected this turn.





This is something I don't understand at all. If you look at the Chinese front, it becomes clear that the Chinese need to build aircraft. To do so, they need the US to choose the two options (1 and 17) allowing them to do so. With Germany about to declare war on Greece and Yugoslavia, it's perfectly sound to choose those two options at this moment. And if you get tension, that's pretty good, since option 34 needs tension to rise...

_____________________________

Peter

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 326
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/1/2018 3:14:24 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Centuur
This is something I don't understand at all. If you look at the Chinese front, it becomes clear that the Chinese need to build aircraft. To do so, they need the US to choose the two options (1 and 17) allowing them to do so. With Germany about to declare war on Greece and Yugoslavia, it's perfectly sound to choose those two options at this moment. And if you get tension, that's pretty good, since option 34 needs tension to rise...
I've missed that opportunity for the next turn, as I've already drawn and have the tensions, but not entry level, required for 34(17). But after that options 1 & 17 will be my next considerations, after 34(17). For lend lease through don't I also need to reopen the Burma Road (option 24) too? And, if I do, can the Japanese close the road again Politically? I've just never really been a Chinese aircraft guy. But then again, I've never had much luck defending China against good players.


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to Centuur)
Post #: 327
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/1/2018 3:34:21 PM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline 		Hopefully the USN has finished deploying to Pearl, so tension rolls can be manipulated.

The Chinese need their aircraft if their factories are being bombed routinely. Otherwise they need their Infantry units, and they need all of them. The Petes and especially the 1940 Zeroes can be the best zappers of Chinese Build Points that the Japanese have if China fights in the air a lot.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 328
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/1/2018 7:03:51 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian

Hopefully the USN has finished deploying to Pearl, so tension rolls can be manipulated.

They've moved their old ww1 battleships out to Pearl but the carriers are there yet. It'll be a priority to get them out there next turn. However, their initial 6 or so naval moves (i.e., 2 impulses worth) are used to get escorts to the 0-box in the East Coast and North Atlantic.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 329
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/1/2018 7:05:05 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Summary.

A lot happened this turn.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 330
Page:   <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably Historically Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.016