Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably Historically

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably Historically Page: <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/22/2018 1:10:57 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. Axis #8. The Eastern Front. Land Combat 1 & 2 of 4.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 451
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/22/2018 1:11:25 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. Axis #8. The Eastern Front. Land Combat 3 & 4 of 4.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 452
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/22/2018 1:47:06 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. Allied #9. USSR. Factory at Dneproetrovsk railed to Baku.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 453
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/22/2018 1:47:44 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. Turn Ends. Destroyed & Repair Pools.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 454
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/22/2018 1:48:15 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. Partisan. Pusan, Korea.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 455
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/22/2018 1:48:59 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. US Entry.

Lend lease to USSR ... on the agenda for next turn.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 456
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/22/2018 1:52:32 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. End of Turn. Liberation.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 457
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/22/2018 1:52:37 AM   
Courtenay


Posts: 4003
Joined: 11/12/2008
Status: offline 		The reason Tripoli had a three factor defense was that the CW had one MECH in the attack, so the AT gun was doubled. The odds would have been higher if you left the MECH out, but +21 is +21, no matter what.

_____________________________

I thought I knew how to play this game....

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 458
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/22/2018 1:53:40 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. End of Turn*. The Eastern Front.

*actually, post reinforcements, turn 13, Sep/Oct 1941.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 459
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/22/2018 2:01:13 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. End of Turn*. USSR & IJA Stand Off. Far East.

*actually, post reinforcements, turn 13, Sep/Oct 1941.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 460
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/22/2018 2:01:40 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. End of Turn*. China.

*actually, post reinforcements, turn 13, Sep/Oct 1941.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 461
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/22/2018 2:02:16 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. End of Turn*. Truk.

*actually, post reinforcements, turn 13, Sep/Oct 1941.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 462
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/22/2018 2:02:51 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. End of Turn*. France.

*actually, post reinforcements, turn 13, Sep/Oct 1941.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 463
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/22/2018 2:03:22 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. End of Turn*. Libya.

*actually, post reinforcements, turn 13, Sep/Oct 1941.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 464
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/22/2018 2:03:47 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. End of Turn*. Italian Coast. West Med.

*actually, post reinforcements, turn 13, Sep/Oct 1941.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 465
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/22/2018 2:04:09 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. End of Turn*. East Med.

*actually, post reinforcements, turn 13, Sep/Oct 1941.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 466
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/22/2018 2:04:43 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. Partisan Numbers & Probabilities.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 467
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/22/2018 2:05:23 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. Economic Reports.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 468
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/22/2018 2:06:25 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 13. Sep/Oct 1941. Remove Air.

Can't remove Belgium air because it's in the wrong place! It's home country is Canada ... should have make it Great Britain!




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 469
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/22/2018 2:06:51 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 13. Sep/Oct 1941. Trade.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 470
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/22/2018 2:07:15 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 13. Sep/Oct 1941. Initiative.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 471
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/22/2018 2:08:41 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Courtenay

The reason Tripoli had a three factor defense was that the CW had one MECH in the attack, so the AT gun was doubled. The odds would have been higher if you left the MECH out, but +21 is +21, no matter what.
Thanks! Usually more is better, but not under those circumstances. Need to remember this for the future.


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to Courtenay)
Post #: 472
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/22/2018 3:21:16 AM   
Courtenay


Posts: 4003
Joined: 11/12/2008
Status: offline 		If you are using the internment optional rule, rebase the Belgian plane to Dublin. That will get rid of it, and you get the pilot back.

< Message edited by Courtenay -- 4/22/2018 5:23:10 AM >

_____________________________

I thought I knew how to play this game....

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 473
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/22/2018 5:17:42 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Courtenay

If you are using the internment optional rule, rebase the Belgian plain to Dublin. That will get rid of it, and you get the pilot back.

Would never had thought of that. Thanks for the tip.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to Courtenay)
Post #: 474
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/27/2018 2:59:50 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 13. Sep/Oct 1941. Summary.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 475
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/27/2018 3:01:46 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 13. Sep/Oct 1941. Axis #1. The Italian RM.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 476
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/27/2018 3:02:19 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 13. Sep/Oct 1941. Axis #1. The Italian RM. Bay of Biscay.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 477
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/27/2018 3:03:08 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 13. Sep/Oct 1941. Allied #3. The Royal Navy. The British 8th Army, Libya.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 4/27/2018 3:05:34 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 478
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/27/2018 3:03:44 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 13. Sep/Oct 1941. Allied #3. The Royal Navy. The Italian Coast.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 479
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 4/27/2018 3:05:11 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 13. Sep/Oct 1941. Allied #3. USSR Rails Factory at Leningrad to Omsk.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 480
Page:   <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably Historically Page: <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.391