Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Navy Matter's story -- A2A combat with Chinese VLRAAM

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Navy Matter's story -- A2A combat with Chinese VLRAAM Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Navy Matter's story -- A2A combat with Chinese VLRAAM - 5/10/2018 12:16:04 PM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
https://navy-matters.blogspot.com/2018/05/stealth-air-to-air-combat-story.html

------------

Recently, blogger ComNavOps (CNO) released a hypothetical Air-to-Air combat in between US and China around 2020s, when both sides are fielded with substantial amount of advanced stealth fighters and missiles and caught into battle.

Despite his usual optimism to US military, his story he predicted instead is rather grim for US side. Here's how:

quote:

Stealth Air-to-Air Combat Story

The F-35C pilot was all too aware of the reason for this mission. The latest Hawkeye shootdown had been just like the others. The Chinese VLRAAM (Very Long Range Air to Air Missile) had used the American E-2D Hawkeye’s radar transmissions for detection and guidance and made its approach at Mach 6+ from well over 200 miles away. The 350 kt Hawkeye had attempted to evade but the Hawkeye’s utter lack of stealth and slow speed made escape impossible. For the Chinese, it was like shooting a turtle with a rifle – escape just wasn’t an option.

The Chinese had shot down two of the carrier group’s Hawkeyes, so far, and forced the remainder to operate 50-100 miles behind the group instead of out in front and offset to the sides where they should be to provide early warning and long distance situational awareness. The Chinese VLRAAM had effectively blinded the carrier group or, at the very least, substantially degraded their “vision” and shifted the operational and tactical advantages from the Americans to the Chinese. U.S. carrier groups were not used to operating from a tactical disadvantage and it had unsettled the group and blunted its operational usefulness.

That was about to change. The analysts on board the carrier had calculated the range of the Chinese VLRAAM and, combined with the location of known Chinese air bases, had predicted the launch point for the J-16 strike-fighter that carried the VLRAAM. The point was above a somewhat sizable island that neither side had bothered to occupy. Now, a U.S. F-35C had been tasked with ambushing the J-16.

The F-35C carried two AIM-120 AMRAAM and two AIM-9X Sidewinder missiles in its internal weapon bays. The small combat load was one of the weaknesses of the F-35 but, for this mission, it shouldn’t matter. A simple ambush against an unsuspecting J-16 carrying a very large missile, which rendered the aircraft not very maneuverable, ought to be a straightforward affair.

The J-16 was China’s version of the Sukhoi Su-35, itself an advanced and upgraded version of the venerable Su-27. To be sure, the base Su-35/J-16 was a very capable strike fighter with excellent maneuverability but it wasn’t terribly stealthy and, saddled with the VLRAAM, it wouldn’t be very fast or nimble.

As the F-35C closed to within 100 nm of the anticipated location, the pilot opted for a quick scan with the APG-81 Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar in LPI (Low Probability of Intercept) mode. The pilot was only expecting a single enemy aircraft but it didn’t hurt to be safe and sure. The LPI mode ought to prevent detection with limited use. As expected, the radar found its target and not more than 20 nm from the anticipated location. The pilot smiled. This was going to be a classic ambush. The J-16 would never know what hit it.

The F-35C carried the AIM-120D AMRAAM with a claimed range approaching 100 nm but the pilot knew that was under ideal conditions. Realistically, the probability of a hit increased with every mile closer to the target. The pilot continued to close. There was no need to rush the shot. The pilot knew that his Chinese counterpart couldn’t see the F-35 at this range so the F-35 was in no danger. As the range closed, the F-35 pilot attempted to establish an infrared track but was having trouble. Several times he thought he had the J-16 but he couldn’t hold track.

At 45 nm, the pilot opted for one more quick radar scan. Sure enough, the J-16 was still there but it appeared that the aircraft had turned and was headed away at high speed. Well, the pilot thought, this was why he hadn’t fired sooner. At this range, the J-16 couldn’t outrun the F-35’s AMRAAM even though he was already headed away. As the pilot readied the shot, alarm lights and audible missile warnings startled him out of his calm routine. Frantically glancing at his threat warning screen, the pilot saw that a missile was approaching from ahead and to the left, at the 10 o’clock position. The pilot was momentarily frozen with surprise. There had been no aircraft there and yet a missile was rapidly approaching. It wasn’t possible. Shaking off the surprise, the pilot yanked the F-35’s nose into the threat to present the aircraft’s best stealth aspect, the front, waited a few more seconds to allow the missile to approach close enough, and began ejecting chaff and flares. Having received no radar warning, he assumed the missile was an infrared heat seeker but he wasn’t going to take chances and, besides, he had chaff and flares to spare.

As the chaff and flares bloomed, the pilot rolled inverted, pulled maximum G’s, and dove down to get out of the flight path of the incoming missile and its sensor’s field of view. He tried to twist his head back to look behind and see if the missile had been fooled but the F-35’s high fuselage and low canopy provided very poor rearward visibility – the F-35 was an aerial sniper not a dogfighter.

After a couple of seconds that seemed to last forever, the pilot realized that the missile must have missed since he was still alive. The frontal stealth and decoys had done their job.

Unfortunately, he still had no idea who or what had shot at him.

Recovering from the dive, he pulled level and quickly initiated a radar scan. There was still no target to be seen. Glancing at the IR display, he noted a target indicator marker ahead and below him but the indicator was not updating continuously. He knew from experience that kind of intermittent target was likely due to an aircraft with infrared suppression and a reduced heat signature. The intermittent contact occurred as the enemy aircraft maneuvered and changed aspect.

A sickening awareness quickly crept over the pilot. The only time he had encountered this type of situation had been during a series of training exercises against friendly F-22 Raptors. Then, he hadn’t been able to get usable radar returns and only intermittent IR indications. With a start, the pilot realized that he was likely facing a Chinese stealth aircraft.

The F-35 pilot was correct. Ahead and below him, a Chinese J-20 was maneuvering for a second shot on the F-35. In recognition of the F-35’s front aspect stealth, the J-20 had not even attempted to obtain a radar lock but had, instead, used its all aspect infrared search and track capability to find and track the F-35. Low on the deck, the J-20’s own heat and visual signature had been lost in the ground clutter while the F-35, high above, had been highlighted against the cold and clear sky.

The entire encounter had been a setup. The VLRAAM toting J-16 was actually a J-16D electronic warfare version mimicking a J-16 VLRAAM shooter and was now broadcasting both specific APG-81 jamming signals and broadband electronic noise to render the F-35’s radar ineffective. The Chinese had anticipated an American ambush and turned the tables. The stealthy J-20 had waited, low on the deck, watching for the F-35.

Having evaded the first missile shot from the J-20, the engagement was rapidly developing into a close range, turning encounter. The F-35’s radar couldn’t track the J-20 but neither could the J-20 track the F-35. Both aircraft were now depending on their IRST tracking and, again, neither could maintain a track long enough to generate a high probability kill shot.

The F-35 dove for the deck to negate the Chinese aircraft’s infrared advantage. As he did, he got a momentary IR indication and launched one of his two Sidewinders. Even as he launched, he saw the IR track fade as the enemy aircraft maneuvered and knew that the Sidewinder would miss as, indeed, it did.

The F-35 had catapulted from the carrier with its maximum stealth air-to-air load of 2 AMRAAMs and 2 Sidewinders. With radar useless against the J-20 stealth aircraft, that left the F-35 with only 2 Sidewinders and the pilot had just wasted one. In contrast, the J-20 had a large central belly bay which held 4x PL-21 medium range radar guided missiles, comparable to the US AIM-120 AMRAAM, and two smaller side weapon bays which held a total of 4x PL-10 short range, infrared, heat seeking, high off-boresight missiles. At this point, the Chinese aircraft had three heat seekers left to the F-35’s one.

By now, the engagement had closed to gun range and devolved into a turning and maneuvering dogfight – exactly the kind of engagement that the US Air Force had bet would never happen again in aerial combat. Unfortunately, for the US F-35’s, when two stealth aircraft meet, neither can effectively use their radar guided missiles and infrared missiles are unlikely to be able to track reliably enough to get a clean, high percentage shot from any aspect but the rear – the classic 6 o’clock position. This mandates the classic maneuvering dogfight in order to obtain the required position. This should have been easily predictable but the US Air Force had chosen to ignore the possibility. Now, the lightly armed and poorly maneuverable F-35 was paying the price.

With the F-35 now down on the deck and neither pilot wanting to go vertical and highlight their infrared signature against the cold upper atmosphere, the fight became a one dimensional, level turning contest just like the ancient WWI dogfights. Unfortunately, it was a dogfight the F-35 was ill-suited for with its poor turning performance, low g-limits, and poor maneuverability. The F-35 had been designed with maneuverability on par with the legacy F-16/18 and now was facing a stealth fighter equivalent to an F-22. Worse, the F-35C didn’t have an internal gun! If the pilot couldn’t get the 6 o’clock firing position for his missile, he had no other option and with only one missile remaining, even that was only a one-time option!

As the dogfight wore on with ever tighter turns, the F-35’s airspeed bled off faster than the J-20’s and the F-35 reached a point where it had no choice but to break out of the turn and go vertical or else get outturned and become a sitting duck. Getting another momentary IR lock, the F-35 pilot fired off his second and last Sidewinder and yanked back on his stick with full throttle to climb out of the turn – it was time to run for home! The pilot could only hope that the Sidewinder would occupy the Chinese pilot just long enough to allow a clean break from the engagement.

However, thanks to extensive pre-war intel obtained through cyberespionage, the Chinese pilot knew the F-35 almost as well as the US pilot did. He knew that the F-35’s Sidewinder couldn’t reliably track his fighter from this aspect. He ejected a series of flares but otherwise ignored the Sidewinder. Seeing the F-35 go vertical, he waited a heartbeat to allow the F-35 to establish its direction and then turned his nose across the F-35’s path. With better maneuverability, the J-20 was lined up and waiting as the F-35 momentarily settled on its hoped for escape path. The J-20, with an internal 30 mm autocannon, fired a three second burst which shredded the F-35 and sent it cartwheeling toward the ground.

Leveling off, the Chinese pilot released a breath he hadn’t realized he had been holding and released the stick to shake the cramps out of his hand which had had been maintaining a death grip. The fight really hadn’t been a fair one given the F-35’s small weapons load and poor maneuverability but the pilot would gladly accept any advantage he could get.

The Americans would have to come up with another way to negate the Chinese VLRAAM advantage. In the meantime, the carriers would have to be pulled back, out of range of the deadly Hawkeye-killing missile.


The keyword for a whole story is VLRAAM. It's a missile spotted on Chinese J-16 few years ago that mistaken as PL-15, but in the end its a whole different beast and have been reported by several foreign news about its firing range and intended targets -- large and 'clumsy', but strategically important aircrafts like bombers, AWACS and tankers.

CNO also just admitted it's existence.

quote:

The VLRAAM is real.

Launched by J-16, a multi-role strike-fighter that is roughly equivalent to the Russian Su-35. The Very Long Range Air to Air Missile (VLRAAM) is 19 ft long and 13 in. diameter with a range of 250-300 miles. Missile speed is Mach 6+.


As known as "PL-XX" because nobody know it's reported name in the public yet. There are some forums discussed about it and mostly they believe it will only works as best as AIM-54 in Iraq war, the PoH will very likely disastrous. However, given by the advanced AESA radar to be mass manufactured for Chinese aircrafts and missiles, the much smarter and keener "AIM-54" might eventually haunting USAF back.

But how true could it be? CMANO could be the best platform to replicate his story, but in DB3000 there is no such missile yet.

_____________________________

Post #: 1
RE: Navy Matter's story -- A2A combat with Chinese VLRAAM - 5/10/2018 1:46:41 PM   
Dragon029


Posts: 76
Joined: 10/31/2015
Status: offline
I'll have to provide a proper response tomorrow, but I see multiple issues with this hypothetical, such as there only being a single F-35,that the J-20 carried 2x PL-10 per side bay, that the AIM-9X couldn't get a lock from a side or front aspect, etc.

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 2
RE: Navy Matter's story -- A2A combat with Chinese VLRAAM - 5/10/2018 1:57:07 PM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dragon029

I'll have to provide a proper response tomorrow, but I see multiple issues with this hypothetical, such as there only being a single F-35,that the J-20 carried 2x PL-10 per side bay, that the AIM-9X couldn't get a lock from a side or front aspect, etc.

His story will lead to nowhere if there's no simulator to replicate that.

If you want to response to his story, maybe at his blog page is a better option.

_____________________________


(in reply to Dragon029)
Post #: 3
RE: Navy Matter's story -- A2A combat with Chinese VLRAAM - 5/10/2018 4:39:33 PM   
ExNusquam

 

Posts: 513
Joined: 3/4/2014
From: Washington, D.C.
Status: offline
This reads like one of Bill Sweetman's wet dreams.

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 4
RE: Navy Matter's story -- A2A combat with Chinese VLRAAM - 5/11/2018 1:17:49 AM   
Primarchx


Posts: 3102
Joined: 1/20/2013
Status: offline
So the Chinese arrange a perfect ambush of a single, unescorted F-35 (without a gun!) using untested systems with a military that hasn't fought a significant battle since the 1970s. America will never stand a chance!

(in reply to ExNusquam)
Post #: 5
RE: Navy Matter's story -- A2A combat with Chinese VLRAAM - 5/11/2018 3:22:45 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Primarchx

So the Chinese arrange a perfect ambush of a single, unescorted F-35 (without a gun!) using untested systems with a military that hasn't fought a significant battle since the 1970s. America will never stand a chance!

This part does annoys me if every adversaries would only pick a fight preemptively because of the technological disadvantages. I know all the offensive weapons are designed for crippling enemy strong positions before they could react, hence the strike doctrine (and to call J-20 a strike fighter previously for its large initial firepower, but then compromised because of the lesser stealth and engine performance when dogfight happens), but so far I am certain this is exactly how modern military works, you don't give enemy any chance before, during and after the battle.

As for the training, actually combat exprience does matter in the age that lack of reliance to smart computing and simulations. Given by US accused and banned CPU sales to China, fearing they will make supercomputers to simulate conventional and nuclear attacks. I will not be surprised China will only accelerate the field of advance weaponries that doesn't require a lot of trial by errors.

Of course, if you do expect Chinese missile operators will slack off like in Syria with SA-22, then it is a whole different matter.

< Message edited by Dysta -- 5/11/2018 3:25:59 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Primarchx)
Post #: 6
RE: Navy Matter's story -- A2A combat with Chinese VLRAAM - 5/11/2018 10:59:45 AM   
Cik

 

Posts: 671
Joined: 10/5/2016
Status: offline
well, it's mostly just a matter of it being a semi-unrealistic scenario.

combat planes don't fly alone. this reads like someone played 10 minutes of ace combat and then decided that they would write a short story.

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 7
RE: Navy Matter's story -- A2A combat with Chinese VLRAAM - 5/11/2018 12:59:16 PM   
Tailhook

 

Posts: 293
Joined: 1/18/2015
Status: offline
Adding on, I don’t recall ever hearing anyone say the J-20 is meant to be F-22/SU-57 level maneuverable, so that’s another part of the argument I don’t buy.

(in reply to Cik)
Post #: 8
RE: Navy Matter's story -- A2A combat with Chinese VLRAAM - 5/11/2018 11:28:29 PM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tailhook

Adding on, I don’t recall ever hearing anyone say the J-20 is meant to be F-22/SU-57 level maneuverable, so that’s another part of the argument I don’t buy.


It will be true if China don't hurry up with WS-10 TVC test, so far only one J-10B has it.

Maybe the blogger still can't be certain if Chinese-imported Su-35s can carry domestic VLRAAM or PL-15, if yes, both J-16 and J-20 will becomes irrelevant, but posting grave risk in front of AIM-120D if getting too close.

_____________________________


(in reply to Tailhook)
Post #: 9
RE: Navy Matter's story -- A2A combat with Chinese VLRAAM - 5/14/2018 8:42:46 PM   
shania

 

Posts: 7
Joined: 11/2/2016
Status: offline
So 1 vs 1, unrealistic load out - realistic will be 4x AIM-120 internal + maybe 2x 9x external. No DAS, EOTS with unrealistic detection/tracking ranges, aspect lock on with 9X etc (he should stick with very bad visibility if he wants get reduce IR factor. C is no B, so there is not bad rearward visibility.

Clear to say author cant write good fiction...

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 10
RE: Navy Matter's story -- A2A combat with Chinese VLRAAM - 5/15/2018 3:37:31 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
This blog has over 110 comments after a week, and it's very rare on Navy Matters. If not his faulty speculation, his posts may not draws a lots of people like that.

Mostly they are circulating why US don't deploy more AEWs or ignoring other factors like you guys had said, yet his response is the air units and commands are overrelying to AEW, as if it's a spine for a whole system. It doesn't necessarily be true especially for F-35, they are basically mini-AEWs with substantial firepower, even the weapon bay issues does occur. Also, his error is why he don't put F-22s to stop J-16 before they could launch VLRAAMs effectively.

He surely will write a grand novel with 100k words just to describe this battle with all the details covered, which he couldn't.

_____________________________


(in reply to shania)
Post #: 11
RE: Navy Matter's story -- A2A combat with Chinese VLRAAM - 10/5/2018 8:27:31 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
He is back with this topic again, but not making another story:

https://navy-matters.blogspot.com/2018/09/goodbye-poseidon-and-hawkeye.html

This time he is solely putting his pessimistic expectations to MPA and AEW aircrafts when VLRAAM is challenging their skies. His major concern is, there are so many super long range missiles exist for different targets and mostly ended up become a hoax, except the A2A scenario:

quote:

As we’ve noted on many occasions, range is a very misleading attribute. Without accurate targeting the longest ranged missile in the world is useless. This is why the “carrier killer” ballistic missile is such a hollow threat. In this case, however, the U.S. aircraft may provide the Chinese with all the targeting they need. An E-2 Hawkeye or AWACS has to radiate in order to do its job and, in effect, provides a massive “shoot me” beacon for the enemy. This was acceptable in the past since no enemy had an air-to-air (A2A) missile with sufficient range to reach the Hawkeye/AWACS which typically operated well back from the active combat area. Now, however, with missiles that can reach 200-300 miles, “well back” isn’t even remotely far enough back. Of course, we can pull our radar aircraft even further back but that’s a mission kill, isn’t it?

The U.S. counts heavily on AWACS as a force multiplier in aerial combat. Our individual fighters can remain passive and undetected while the AWACS/E-2 direct them. If we can no longer count on this advantage then aerial combat becomes just a ‘who’s got the best fighter’ contest and the Russians and Chinese are steadily closing that gap thanks to the mediocre F-35 basket that the West has placed all their eggs in.


He did however put some suggestions regarding to the VLRAAM threat, and as expected there are lots of comments talking around it as well.

_____________________________


(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 12
RE: Navy Matter's story -- A2A combat with Chinese VLRAAM - 10/5/2018 8:15:28 PM   
Rebel Yell


Posts: 470
Joined: 6/21/2003
From: The Woodlands, TX USA
Status: offline
quote:

If we can no longer count on this advantage then aerial combat becomes just a ‘who’s got the best fighter’ contest and the Russians and Chinese are steadily closing that gap thanks to the mediocre F-35 basket that the West has placed all their eggs in.






_____________________________

I used to enjoy these forums. So many people that need the green dot now.

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 13
RE: Navy Matter's story -- A2A combat with Chinese VLRAAM - 11/2/2018 9:06:21 PM   
KungPao


Posts: 333
Joined: 4/25/2016
From: Red China
Status: offline
I accidently experienced a similar scenario in CMANO, but it is a F-35B ambushed a lone J-20. No fancy dogfight, just 4 AIM-120 get the job done.

In COW scenario Showpieces, I opened the editor and added several J-20 to PLAAF. The purpose is to having these J-20s intercept any US target getting close to the mainland.
There is one group's mission trigger condition incorrectly setup. So a lone J-20 took off, chasing after the E-2D. unfortunately, his courage invited death.
The E-2D's long wave length radar picked up J-20 at 101nm, E-2D shared the information with USMC's F-35B instantly. F-35B's EOTS identified the target as a fighter at 66nm, then classified it as J-20 at 30nm.

4 AIM-120 shot , 2 hits. J-20 going down in flames

quote:



10:15:36 AM - 10:15:36 AM - Contact: Fighter #866 has been classified as: J-20 Mighty Dragon - Determined as: Hostile (Classification by: Green Knight #6 (F-35B Lightning II) [Sensor: EOTS [IRST]] at 29.2 nm)

10:13:46 AM - 10:13:46 AM - Contact: BOGEY #866 has been type-classified as: Fighter (Classification by: Green Knight #6 [Sensor: EOTS [IRST]] at 66.3 nm)

10:13:03 AM - 10:13:03 AM - New contact! Designated BOGEY #866 - Detected by J/FPS-4 15th AC&W [Sensors: J/FPS-4] at 245deg - 101nm








Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Sir? Do you want to order a Kung Pao Chicken or a Kung Fu Chicken?

(in reply to Rebel Yell)
Post #: 14
RE: Navy Matter's story -- A2A combat with Chinese VLRAAM - 11/3/2018 1:12:09 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KungPao

I accidently experienced a similar scenario in CMANO, but it is a F-35B ambushed a lone J-20. No fancy dogfight, just 4 AIM-120 get the job done.

In COW scenario Showpieces, I opened the editor and added several J-20 to PLAAF. The purpose is to having these J-20s intercept any US target getting close to the mainland.
There is one group's mission trigger condition incorrectly setup. So a lone J-20 took off, chasing after the E-2D. unfortunately, his courage invited death.
The E-2D's long wave length radar picked up J-20 at 101nm, E-2D shared the information with USMC's F-35B instantly. F-35B's EOTS identified the target as a fighter at 66nm, then classified it as J-20 at 30nm.

4 AIM-120 shot , 2 hits. J-20 going down in flames



The thing is it’s not what J-20 fires the mysterious VLRAAM (called PL-XX, not in game). I made a scenario called Northern Phantoms, 4x J-20 with 24x PL-15 are still barely equal to 2x F-35A with one E-3 watch over them.

It’s the J-16 to fire the PL-XX, after J-20 spotted where E-2/E-3 is and then just DITCH. F-35 will automatically chase J-20 when AWACS find them, but this is exactly what J-16 wanted.

If both J-16 and J-20 can CEC the PL-XX while the AWACS is stripped bare, then it will did what NavyMatter’s author feared.

< Message edited by Dysta -- 11/3/2018 1:14:57 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to KungPao)
Post #: 15
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Navy Matter's story -- A2A combat with Chinese VLRAAM Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.828