Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/10/2018 1:49:58 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline 		Jeff,

I'll post a screen shot of Intel screen this evening.

(in reply to Drakanel)
Post #: 61
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/10/2018 2:47:23 PM   
Cap Mandrake


Posts: 23184
Joined: 11/15/2002
From: Southern California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants_MatrixForum

A few turns have occurred, but scrolling down the Sink Ships list shows the following lost at Portland:
46 CVE
183 xAK
43 SC
77 TK
4 AM
28 LST
5 AK
14 YMS
3 AKA
10 APA

Yuck!!


Whoa! Hootchie Mama!I had no idea they would show up on the sunk ships list...or had forgotten that.

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 62
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/10/2018 3:20:06 PM   
Lecivius


Posts: 4845
Joined: 8/5/2007
From: Denver
Status: offline 		CVE's, tankers, and assault ships. Man, that's just plain painful

_____________________________

If it ain't broke, don't fix it!

(in reply to Cap Mandrake)
Post #: 63
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/10/2018 3:52:48 PM   
ericv

 

Posts: 325
Joined: 1/21/2012
Status: offline 		that's a lot of ships

(in reply to Lecivius)
Post #: 64
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/10/2018 3:57:04 PM   
Encircled


Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline 		77 Tankers?

Whoa, good luck getting fuel to where you need it with that sort of loss.

That means every tanker you've got afloat is irreplaceable.

_____________________________


(in reply to ericv)
Post #: 65
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/10/2018 4:17:38 PM   
Cap Mandrake


Posts: 23184
Joined: 11/15/2002
From: Southern California
Status: offline 		I think you can do it...with less efficiency..but it can be done although it will require more pre-planning for big ops.

(in reply to Encircled)
Post #: 66
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/10/2018 4:50:50 PM   
Bearcat2

 

Posts: 577
Joined: 2/14/2004
Status: offline 		Good news, you get 65 TK reinforcements for the rest of the gamw, bad news is you get 65 TK reinforcements for the rest of the game

_____________________________

"After eight years as President I have only two regrets: that I have not shot Henry Clay or hanged John C. Calhoun."--1837

(in reply to Cap Mandrake)
Post #: 67
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/10/2018 5:11:41 PM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline 		The 183 liberty ships will be just as dearly missed.

You are truly a masochist for taking this on just so you can prove your point that it isn't a "game over" cheap shot.

Have fun fighting the rest of the war with 2/3s of the assets you should have.

Are the victory points sufficient to ensure an AV before your side can even gear up enough to fight back?

_____________________________

Hans


(in reply to Bearcat2)
Post #: 68
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/10/2018 5:53:03 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline 		It may be too big a hill to climb. I consider myself better than average when it comes to logistics. So, this could turn out to be a short war if my TKs take a considerable hit somewhere along the way.

Time will tell.

(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 69
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/10/2018 6:07:29 PM   
Cap Mandrake


Posts: 23184
Joined: 11/15/2002
From: Southern California
Status: offline 		Isn't there some effect on unrestricting restricted units??

Plus, there is acceleration of the air units which is a serious advantage for the Allies. As long as you hold Seattle I think you can kick LYB ass. You just need to fight your fight with the USAAF and ground units at the start. The best place to do this is where the bases are close together and multiply overlapping and you don't need huge carrier forces to
advance....The Sundas..Java...Burma...after the emergency is dealt with in the CONUS just send half a dozen US divisions 100 B-17's and 100 P-38's to Oz or India.

Just forget about the Marshals and Marianas.

(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 70
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/10/2018 6:18:03 PM   
Cap Mandrake


Posts: 23184
Joined: 11/15/2002
From: Southern California
Status: offline 		The South Pacific, New Guinea, even Midway don't matter other than points (if you are close to Jap autovictory). Just find Curtis Lemay and give him a promotion.

Get some serious ground units to the Sundas and build up the bases on Timor for heavy bombers to wreck Balikpapan and Soerabja.

You can get US units to India with almost zero risk. You could perhaps hold Rangoon and he Andmans and even Northern Sumatra etc. etc. etc

(in reply to Cap Mandrake)
Post #: 71
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/10/2018 6:23:13 PM   
jwolf

 

Posts: 2493
Joined: 12/3/2013
Status: offline 		Given the shortage of tankers, would it make sense for the Allied counterattack to focus on the DEI? If you capture one or two of the major fuel centers there, then your subsequent fuel shipping problems would be far less than before. Of course your opponent presumably knows this as well ...

(in reply to Cap Mandrake)
Post #: 72
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/10/2018 6:27:31 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: HansBolter

The 183 liberty ships will be just as dearly missed.

You are truly a masochist for taking this on just so you can prove your point that it isn't a "game over" cheap shot.

Have fun fighting the rest of the war with 2/3s of the assets you should have.

Are the victory points sufficient to ensure an AV before your side can even gear up enough to fight back?


This is exactly the game that some of us live to fight! The challenge!

(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 73
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/10/2018 7:24:33 PM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: HansBolter

The 183 liberty ships will be just as dearly missed.

You are truly a masochist for taking this on just so you can prove your point that it isn't a "game over" cheap shot.

Have fun fighting the rest of the war with 2/3s of the assets you should have.

Are the victory points sufficient to ensure an AV before your side can even gear up enough to fight back?





This is exactly the game that some of us live to fight! The challenge!




More power to ya Lowpe.


I really don't harbor any animosity toward anyone, I just have a completely different perspective than many other regulars here.

Maybe players like me would be more satisfied with things if more Japanese players wanted this kind of challenge instead of constantly seeking for easy mode victories.



< Message edited by HansBolter -- 5/10/2018 7:26:12 PM >

_____________________________

Hans


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 74
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/10/2018 7:28:31 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline 		Allied players have lost CVs, massive territory, and some shipping. But not to this degree.
It will be an unique challenge as most Allied player will see this AAR and remember to garrison their major industrial cities with a division of troops.

Right now keeping "Fortress Timor" supported and a possible reinforcement of the Aleutians is high on mu list for the next few months.


Note: I see all the air groups I got, but was there a separate amount of just airframes that come in?

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 75
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/10/2018 7:48:42 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants_MatrixForum

Allied players have lost CVs, massive territory, and some shipping. But not to this degree.
It will be an unique challenge as most Allied player will see this AAR and remember to garrison their major industrial cities with a division of troops.

Right now keeping "Fortress Timor" supported and a possible reinforcement of the Aleutians is high on mu list for the next few months.


Note: I see all the air groups I got, but was there a separate amount of just airframes that come in?


Just catching up here.

They've lost that much, just not so early.

It's CVEs remember, so not really critical. That said, I'd be more worried about their air groups (and are they listed as lost? Can you buy them back?). Those It's 1200+ airframes and (semi-)trained pilots you'll miss.

It is a challenge, but the allies have other ways of winning the war. I look forward to your plans. I think you'll need to play a lot of scrappy small-ball here. Fight in areas where you can island hop forever. Timor would be a good start. You've got to get a LOT more there though. Pile some of the Brit and Aussie troops on.

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 76
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/10/2018 8:11:44 PM   
Cap Mandrake


Posts: 23184
Joined: 11/15/2002
From: Southern California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants_MatrixForum

Allied players have lost CVs, massive territory, and some shipping. But not to this degree.
It will be an unique challenge as most Allied player will see this AAR and remember to garrison their major industrial cities with a division of troops.

Right now keeping "Fortress Timor" supported and a possible reinforcement of the Aleutians is high on mu list for the next few months.


Note: I see all the air groups I got, but was there a separate amount of just airframes that come in?



Look at Salt Lake (see Bullwinkle's post page 1)

quote:

Invasion Mobilstn Supply Convoy arrives at Salt Lake City

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 77
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/10/2018 10:31:39 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline 		That is some serious points to overcome for ships sunk.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Cap Mandrake)
Post #: 78
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/10/2018 11:32:44 PM   
Cap Mandrake


Posts: 23184
Joined: 11/15/2002
From: Southern California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants_MatrixForum

That is some serious points to overcome for ships sunk.





well, the good news is it seems the CVE air groups seem not to have been lost.

The point thingy is not really fair or realistic. Not one of those CVE's has even been started or perhaps even the designs been finished or the steel been shipped. There was a large existing shipyard at the start of the war and another Kaiser shipyard on the Willamette opened by early '42. What would really be lost is the infrastructure.


Interesting history of the Portland area shipyards in WWII

https://oregonencyclopedia.org/articles/kaiser_shipyards/#.WvTR02d0yUk

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 79
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/10/2018 11:38:40 PM   
Cap Mandrake


Posts: 23184
Joined: 11/15/2002
From: Southern California
Status: offline 		It seems they let you off easy on the TK losses.

quote:

In all, 2,711 Liberty ships were built from the nation’s shipyards between 1941 and 1945. Oregonship built 330 Liberty ships, along with 99 Victory ships and 33 Attack Transports. The Vancouver Shipyard’s output included 16 Liberty ships, 31 Victory ships, 49 escort carriers, 21 troop transport ships, and 30 LST landing ships. .

(in reply to Cap Mandrake)
Post #: 80
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/11/2018 10:00:10 AM   
traskott


Posts: 1546
Joined: 6/23/2008
From: Valladolid, Spain
Status: offline 		Zero chance of got those ships back if u reconquer the city??

(in reply to Cap Mandrake)
Post #: 81
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/11/2018 10:15:04 AM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: traskott

Zero chance of got those ships back if u reconquer the city??


Once they are cancelled they are gone. It is not realistic as the work would have been sent to other yards that were not damaged and the yards would be re-built once recaptured.

Another example of how the game has a limited framework and is not very flexible with extreme scenario's. Not suggesting the game could be this flexible without an enormous amount of work for very few games that are played in this manner.

_____________________________


(in reply to traskott)
Post #: 82
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/11/2018 12:03:25 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline 		Guys,

This is a simulation of a war and is based on a 15 year old system. Unless they come up with AE3 and start from scratch, there will be limitations. I took up this PBEM due to them. How can the Allies overcome such a huge set back and still win the war? After playing WTIP/AE for over 13 years, this is a challenge to try. Like Lowpe in southern Cali as Japan, the Allies will have some obstacles to over come.

(in reply to Mike McCreery)
Post #: 83
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/11/2018 12:25:46 PM   
Cap Mandrake


Posts: 23184
Joined: 11/15/2002
From: Southern California
Status: offline 		Agreed. I love this game. I took my laptop on a vacation to Sun Valley and my own mom made fun of me.

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 84
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/11/2018 1:24:28 PM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants_MatrixForum

Guys,

This is a simulation of a war and is based on a 15 year old system. Unless they come up with AE3 and start from scratch, there will be limitations. I took up this PBEM due to them. How can the Allies overcome such a huge set back and still win the war? After playing WTIP/AE for over 13 years, this is a challenge to try. Like Lowpe in southern Cali as Japan, the Allies will have some obstacles to over come.


Not sure what you expect from the peanut gallery as you are a very competent player.

India can get fuel from Abadan in a CS so you could substitute a lot of very short legged cargo ships to handle the fuel instead of tankers. There is substantially less shipping to worry about keeping in fuel supply ~ 300 ships so the loss of the tankers is mediated somewhat.

Because of the current setup and your lack of escorts a push from Australia north through the DEI seems the best course of the war as you always have territory in range of LBA.


_____________________________


(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 85
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/11/2018 1:34:35 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Not sure what you expect from the peanut gallery as you are a very competent player.


I'm having my doubts right now vs Nathan (njp72) as my ground forces in China and India keep getting crushed. I've made some mistakes in both theaters, so I just look at the twice monthly mega-reinforcements for a mini-morale booster.

(in reply to Mike McCreery)
Post #: 86
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/11/2018 1:37:39 PM   
njp72

 

Posts: 1372
Joined: 9/20/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants_MatrixForum

quote:

Not sure what you expect from the peanut gallery as you are a very competent player.


I'm having my doubts right now vs Nathan (njp72) as my ground forces in China and India keep getting crushed. I've made some mistakes in both theaters, so I just look at the twice monthly mega-reinforcements for a mini-morale booster.


Nah, you will be fine

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 87
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/11/2018 2:21:24 PM   
Lecivius


Posts: 4845
Joined: 8/5/2007
From: Denver
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: njp72
Nah, you will be fine



Oh, sure!






Attachment (1)

_____________________________

If it ain't broke, don't fix it!

(in reply to njp72)
Post #: 88
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/11/2018 2:30:25 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline 		+1

(in reply to Lecivius)
Post #: 89
RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) - 5/13/2018 1:22:15 AM   
Bif1961


Posts: 2014
Joined: 6/26/2008
From: Phenix City, Alabama
Status: offline 		She made fun of you right before mother's day? She is walking on thin ice.

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 90
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Invasion USA!! Dontra85 (J) vs NY59Giants (A) Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.983