Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues Page: <<   < prev  132 133 [134] 135 136   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/29/2018 10:19:46 PM   
Gratch1111

 

Posts: 171
Joined: 12/21/2010
Status: offline 		The Lightning F.3 uses the Red Top missile but the text is for the Hawk SAM missile while the data is from the Red Top

Czech Republic(2005), Thailand(ok), Hungary(2003) and South Africa(ok) all uses the JAS 39 Griffin C/D

Brazil has ordered the Gripen NG operational from 2019, they are also interested in a aircraft carrier version(Hypo)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saab_JAS_39_Gripen

New sub(2 at least, might be 3), A26 delivered in 2022, 2024, ?

A19 Gotland(Gotland+Halland) to be improved to almost A26 class by 2018-2019

Sweden to use Patriot PAC 3, starting in 2020 https://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=2054&artikel=6816242

Sweden should have these Hypo units

Visby Corvette with Umkhonto SAM(Hypo)








(in reply to ExNusquam)
Post #: 3991
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/30/2018 4:33:17 PM   
KLAB


Posts: 355
Joined: 2/27/2007
Status: offline 		https://pp.userapi.com/c840323/v840323720/7c1d6/abaVkq89BTM.jpg

Just in case it doesn't migrate from the News thread courtesy of Triode,
Can we update the SU-30SM with the R-77-1 load outs please?
The link photo is a Russian Navy SU-30SM but presumably the R-77-1 is being carried by all Russian Su-30SM's now?

Thanks for consideration and for a great sim.
K

_____________________________


(in reply to ExNusquam)
Post #: 3992
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/30/2018 4:47:38 PM   
Zaslon

 

Posts: 283
Joined: 6/14/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KLAB

https://pp.userapi.com/c840323/v840323720/7c1d6/abaVkq89BTM.jpg

Just in case it doesn't migrate from the News thread courtesy of Triode,
Can we update the SU-30SM with the R-77-1 load outs please?
The link photo is a Russian Navy SU-30SM but presumably the R-77-1 is being carried by all Russian Su-30SM's now?

Thanks for consideration and for a great sim.
K

probably before 2018, don't you think?

_____________________________


Kids think about Iran and Amateurs think about Russia, but professionals think about China

(in reply to KLAB)
Post #: 3993
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/30/2018 4:56:40 PM   
KLAB


Posts: 355
Joined: 2/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Zaslon


quote:

ORIGINAL: KLAB

https://pp.userapi.com/c840323/v840323720/7c1d6/abaVkq89BTM.jpg

Just in case it doesn't migrate from the News thread courtesy of Triode,
Can we update the SU-30SM with the R-77-1 load outs please?
The link photo is a Russian Navy SU-30SM but presumably the R-77-1 is being carried by all Russian Su-30SM's now?

Thanks for consideration and for a great sim.
K

probably before 2018, don't you think?


I'd like to think so and agree that it's been implied as a key weapon from the outset but TASS announced in March that the SU-30SM had only just been declared "fully Operational" implying the R-77-1 was up and running. Is it just a coincidence that a few weeks later the first R-77-1 equipped photo appears?
I'd be happy with R-77-1 from when the first cheque for a production run was signed in about 2015. I'd have to go and check threads for exact dates.
K

< Message edited by KLAB -- 4/30/2018 8:38:40 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Zaslon)
Post #: 3994
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/1/2018 1:48:47 AM   
Gratch1111

 

Posts: 171
Joined: 12/21/2010
Status: offline 		India - Viraat Carrier

1 Hangar 50 Aircraft
1 Open Parking 60 Aircraft

Had between 25-37 Aircraft/Helicopters at any time

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INS_Viraat

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Hermes_(R12)

https://www.militaryfactory.com/ships/detail.asp?ship_id=INS-Viraat-R22

http://www.military-today.com/navy/viraat.htm

(in reply to KLAB)
Post #: 3995
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/1/2018 5:46:33 AM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline 		JD-15/J-17 carrierborne EW plane has flown. Basically just like the JD-16 already in the database, just carrier-capable.



Updated with a clearer picture. The ELINT pods have been modified compared to the JD-16...

< Message edited by Hongjian -- 5/2/2018 6:21:06 AM >

(in reply to Gratch1111)
Post #: 3996
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/1/2018 11:30:35 PM   
tjhkkr


Posts: 2428
Joined: 6/3/2010
Status: offline 		I have been asking for a Arapaho conversion for a long time; I did not know you implemented it with the RO/RO.
Thank you very much!

_____________________________

Remember that the evil which is now in the world will become yet more powerful, and that it is not evil which conquers evil, but only love -- Olga Romanov.

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 3997
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/2/2018 7:02:56 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline 		Hello

Marine F-35B get GBU-49 loads

http://www.janes.com/article/79174/gbu-49-to-meet-urgent-moving-target-requirement-for-usmc-f-35bs




(in reply to tjhkkr)
Post #: 3998
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/3/2018 1:15:16 PM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hongjian

JD-15/J-17 carrierborne EW plane has flown. Basically just like the JD-16 already in the database, just carrier-capable.

Updated with a clearer picture. The ELINT pods have been modified compared to the JD-16...

Speaking of ELINT, there's a discussion about J-15D and J-16D/J-17 are capable to simultaneously jam and collect hostile electronic emissions, because they are installed with antennas to receive them.

The difference is, J-15D is using more efficient one-blade antenna on top of a pod, compare to J-16D's separated antenna fins for different bandwidths.



< Message edited by Dysta -- 5/4/2018 5:43:37 AM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 3999
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/3/2018 10:32:45 PM   
hellfish6


Posts: 843
Joined: 6/15/2008
Status: offline 		Could we have a single unit port, sorta like the single-unit airfields? Maybe small (1-2 commercial ships), medium (3-6), large (6-10) and commercial-sized (11+) versions.

_____________________________


(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 4000
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/4/2018 9:15:32 PM   
SunlitZelkova

 

Posts: 209
Joined: 3/7/2018
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hellfish6

Could we have a single unit port, sorta like the single-unit airfields? Maybe small (1-2 commercial ships), medium (3-6), large (6-10) and commercial-sized (11+) versions.


There already is one.

http://cmano-db.com/facility/2980/

_____________________________

Formerly known as Project2035, TyeeBanzai, and FlyForLenin

(in reply to hellfish6)
Post #: 4001
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/4/2018 9:44:58 PM   
hellfish6


Posts: 843
Joined: 6/15/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FlyForLenin


quote:

ORIGINAL: hellfish6

Could we have a single unit port, sorta like the single-unit airfields? Maybe small (1-2 commercial ships), medium (3-6), large (6-10) and commercial-sized (11+) versions.


There already is one.

http://cmano-db.com/facility/2980/


Ugh, yeah, I just realized I was working with an older version of the database. Thanks.

_____________________________


(in reply to SunlitZelkova)
Post #: 4002
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/5/2018 9:47:51 PM   
orca

 

Posts: 501
Joined: 11/6/2013
Status: offline 		Requests for sensors/mounts to help model the US navy FFG(X).

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/news/naval-exhibitions/2018/sna-2018/5867-sna-2018-contenders-for-the-u-s-navy-ffg-x-frigate-program.html

ALaMO 57 mm guided smart ammunition
MK 332 Mod 0 High-Explosive, 4-Bolt Guided (HE-4G) projectile
Suggest similar hit% as 76mm DART
http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/news/naval-exhibitions/2018/sna-2018/5847-l3-to-provide-alamo-57-mm-guided-smart-ammunition-for-us-navy-lcs-ffg.html
https://www.l3t.com/video/advanced-low-cost-munitions-ordnance-alamo-guided-projectile

EASR
3 faced fixed array (2x2x2 radar modular assembly)

AN/SLQ-61 Lightweight Tow (LWT) Torpedo Defense Mission Module
Suggest same characteristics as nixie
http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/news/defence-news/2018/may-2018-navy-naval-defense-news/6197-u-s-navy-completes-lightweight-torpedo-defense-mission-module-testing.html

(in reply to hellfish6)
Post #: 4003
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/11/2018 11:34:34 PM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hongjian

And new loadout option; Z-9D with four YJ-9 lightweight AShM (two per stub-wing)


More pictures:





_____________________________


(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 4004
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/14/2018 3:35:58 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline 		Mr. Ragnar or mikmyk

Could you please add more DB3k update for us?

Thank you!

BD

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 4005
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/14/2018 3:41:12 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline 		Jassm-ER now in services of F-15e

http://www.janes.com/article/77892/jassm-er-achieves-foc-on-f-15e-strike-eagle

(in reply to BDukes)
Post #: 4006
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/15/2018 11:17:07 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline 		Suggest LARK-1 to be in DB3000 to simulate 5-Gen fighter in training scenarios:

https://www.twitter.com/HenriKenhmann/status/996073187669458945
https://www.twitter.com/xinfengcao/status/812252888995012608 (specifications)



_____________________________


(in reply to BDukes)
Post #: 4007
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/19/2018 6:15:15 PM   
ARCNA442

 

Posts: 158
Joined: 4/7/2018
Status: offline 		I have noticed what appears to be an oversight with the RIM-116 RAM - none of the four versions in the database can be used against surface targets. However, this capability was added to the weapon (I believe in Block I, but I'm not sure).

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 4008
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/21/2018 10:44:21 PM   
ExNusquam

 

Posts: 513
Joined: 3/4/2014
From: Washington, D.C.
Status: offline 		Would it be possible to add the rest of the DigitalGlobe/MDA constellation? They're fairly powerful overhead sensors.

Worldview-3:
Orbital Parameters: 620.4 km x 621.3 km, 97.8° inclination
Launch Date: 13 August 2014
Sensors:
Generic Satellite Visual Camera - 675 NM range, Visual, 3rd Generation, Surface/Ground Search
Generic Satellite IR Camera - 675 NM Range, Infrared , 3rd Generation, Surface/Ground Search

Worldview-4:
Orbital Parameters: 619.3 km x 622.4 km, 97.9° inclination
Launch Date: 11 November 2016
Sensors:
Generic Satellite Visual Camera - 675 NM range, Visual, 3rd Generation, Surface/Ground Search

Radarsat-2:
Orbital Parameters: 798 km x 799.8 km, 98.6° inclination
Launch Date: 14 December 2007
Sensors:
Generic Satellite SAR - 650 NM

Also, some of the DSP constellation needs extended lifespans. Per a 2015 article in Aviation Week DSP-16 was still on orbit after 24 years, and was the oldest DSP satellite. DSP-23 failed in September of 2008, but the database still has it available in 2010

(in reply to ARCNA442)
Post #: 4009
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/22/2018 4:13:12 PM   
jun5896

 

Posts: 216
Joined: 1/17/2015
Status: offline 		I found some mistake on database.

- T-50 PAK-FA(2017) -> Su-57 PAK-FA(2017)

- F-16XL Falcon(Hypothetical unit)




It can be equipped with CBU-97/B SFW.
But CBU-97/B SFW does not apply to loadouts. It is set to another weapon.

- UK Phantom II FG.1(CWDB)



That was changed incorrect name on db 474v. It was Phantom II FG.1 before database.

- F-4J Phantom II(1972~1974 Both marines, navy - CWDB)



I know that, AIM-7F Sparrow III introduced in 1976.

Is it correct?


- Su-30SM/Su-30M2 Flanker G

http://www.janes.com/article/79996/russia-navy-deploys-su-30sm-fighters-to-syria

It was equipped R-77 Vympel missile in syria.


And I suggest some new units on database.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_001A_aircraft_carrier
It will be commissioned on 2018 ~ 2019. Would you add new chinese carrier on next database?


Than, It is little more exciting for hypothetical units.

1. F-16XL is not exist since 2001. Would you make a more detailed up to this day?
It will be upgrade AN/APG-68(v)9 CCIP on 2003, and It will equipped AN/APG-83 SABR AESA on 2017~2018.

2. F-14E Super Tomcat line-up - need more detalied.



That is F/A-18E/F Super Hornet - sensors tab.



It is F-14E Advanced Super Tomcat's sensors tab.

If F-14E adopted NATF project, Also It will be changed to follow hornet's upgrade.
As well as AN/APG-71(v) renovate AESA radar follow weapon development trends.

3. Russian Su-33 Flanker D, Yak-141 Freestyle

I understand Yak-141 is exist instead of MiG-29C variants.
But Yak-141(2015) can be equipped R-77-1 air-to-air missile. It range 60nm, But Yak-141's radar
(N-109M Topaz) can not support completely. That radar max range are 50nm. It needs more long range
radar.

Would you add hypothetical Su-33 loadouts?

S-8KO Rocket, S-13B Rocket, S-25OFM Rocket
Kh-31A ASM, Kh-31P ARM, Kh-31AD ASM, Kh-31PD ARM, Kh-25MP ARM
RBK-500 Cluster bomb
FAB-500M-54~62, FAB-1000-62 GPB.


I owe you for your services every day.

Thank you :)


< Message edited by jun5896 -- 5/23/2018 7:43:36 AM >

(in reply to ExNusquam)
Post #: 4010
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/23/2018 10:47:59 PM   
KC45


Posts: 240
Joined: 11/23/2017
From: JPN
Status: offline 		JASDF(Japanese Air Force)bought GBU-39 SDU by Mutual Defense Assistance at 2015. At same time they bought AIM-9X so it is for F-35.

The source is from Japanese Air Systems Research Center so it's true but written by Japanese. It is at Japanese Air Systems Research Center of 調達情報の公表 of "平成２７年度　月別契約情報／随意契約（基準以上）（Excelファイル)" It is excel File.

_____________________________

Steam CMANO Japanese Community(unofficial).

(in reply to jun5896)
Post #: 4011
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/24/2018 11:03:42 PM   
giantsquid

 

Posts: 270
Joined: 9/8/2014
From: Milan, Italy
Status: offline 		JF-17 plane for Pakistani Air Force, updated info

Here is some suggestion according to latest sources:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAC/PAC_JF-17_Thunder
https://defence.pk/
http://quwa.org/2015/08/30/jf-17-iii-jf-17-block-3/


For all versions
Agility 3,5 (like Mig-21 bis) ?
Add chaff/flare dispenser

Block II
Add surface search radar
Possibility to carry new WMD-7 targeting pods
CM-400AKG anti ship missile

Block III
Add MAW, part of a new EW suite
Add AESA radar
Add HMD
Add generic IRST, like J-10B
Maybe PL-10 AAM
Possibility to employ ECM pod
Possibility to carry new WMD-7 targeting pods

(in reply to KC45)
Post #: 4012
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/25/2018 2:09:48 PM   
RenegadeResolute

 

Posts: 3
Joined: 5/25/2018
Status: offline 		Would it be possible to create a database entry for the concept ship "Dreadnought 2050"? It's a concept ship designed in response to an informal design challenge by the U.K. Ministry of Defense (MOD) and Royal Navy. The ship is designed for technologies which in some cases don't exist yet in real life or in the Command MANO database. Such as being semi-submersible, fusion drive powered, capable of 50kts top speed, and a tethered quad-copter running off power from the ship carrying sensors and possibly a laser CIWS system instead of a main mast.
I know the concept is something a bit over the horizon of the current time periods explored in the databases, but I feel it would be an interesting addition to play around with.

(in reply to giantsquid)
Post #: 4013
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/25/2018 2:15:32 PM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RenegadeResolute

Would it be possible to create a database entry for the concept ship "Dreadnought 2050"? It's a concept ship designed in response to an informal design challenge by the U.K. Ministry of Defense (MOD) and Royal Navy. The ship is designed for technologies which in some cases don't exist yet in real life or in the Command MANO database. Such as being semi-submersible, fusion drive powered, capable of 50kts top speed, and a tethered quad-copter running off power from the ship carrying sensors and possibly a laser CIWS system instead of a main mast.
I know the concept is something a bit over the horizon of the current time periods explored in the databases, but I feel it would be an interesting addition to play around with.

I think DB3000 will only take 2030s concept units at the farthest, and has to be officially confirmed that the country has the plan to build it. Otherwise, it will not even to be considered as hypothetical unit (like Russian future carrier 23000E, and HMS QE with EMALS upgrade).

_____________________________


(in reply to RenegadeResolute)
Post #: 4014
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/27/2018 10:12:22 AM   
jun5896

 

Posts: 216
Joined: 1/17/2015
Status: offline 		Sturgeon-class submarine database something wrong.

CWDB

1975-1977 Sturgeon has only mounted AN/BQQ-5A(v)2 sonar.
1978 Sturgeon are changed AN/BQQ-2 sonar.

DB3K

All Sturgeon are mounted AN/BQQ-2 old sonar, it is inferior to Permit-class submarine.


< Message edited by jun5896 -- 5/28/2018 11:37:40 PM >

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 4015
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/28/2018 2:38:10 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline 		Hellos

Portugeuse Korteanuer updates

http://www.janes.com/article/79824/portuguese-m-class-frigates-prepare-for-mid-life-upgrade

Work will include installing new combat management and electronic warfare systems, as well as upgrading the PHS-36 hull-mounted sonar, Goalkeeper close-in weapon system, and Harpoon missile fire-control system. The frigates’ Mk 46 lightweight torpedoes launching systems will be upgraded to the Mk 54 standard, which performs better in littoral waters, while the RIM-7P SeaSparrow point defence missile system will be replaced with the RIM-162 Evolved SeaSparrow Missile (ESSM).

(in reply to jun5896)
Post #: 4016
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/28/2018 2:40:28 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline 		Another update. Look NZ Anzac

http://www.janes.com/article/79680/hmnzs-te-kaha-begins-refit

The vessel will receive an upgraded combat management system (CMS) based on Lockheed Martin’s CMS 330, in addition to the integration of other sensors, the Sea Ceptor anti-missile system, and a combat systems trainer, to be refitted for further service.

Thank You

(in reply to BDukes)
Post #: 4017
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/28/2018 3:04:31 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline 		Add Yemen/Houthi Burkan Missiles

https://breakingdefense.com/2018/05/houthi-missiles-the-iran-connection-scuds-are-not-dead-yet/

Look like have North K Scud too!

http://www.janes.com/images/assets/330/72330/Yemeni_rebels_enhance_ballistic_missile_campaign.pdf

http://www.janes.com/article/77382/third-burkan-2h-missile-shows-no-sign-of-saudi-intercept

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burkan-2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burkan-1



< Message edited by BDukes -- 5/28/2018 3:10:22 PM >

(in reply to BDukes)
Post #: 4018
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/28/2018 3:43:16 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline 		Please Add Improved Z-18G China Army

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avicopter_AC313

https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/defense/2018-01-10/china-introduces-new-transport-helicopter

http://china-defense.blogspot.com/2018/05/photos-of-day-air-assault-drill-of.html

http://chinesemilitaryreview.blogspot.com/2012/08/improved-chinese-z-8-transport.html

(in reply to BDukes)
Post #: 4019
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/28/2018 3:46:42 PM   
miller7219

 

Posts: 220
Joined: 4/7/2007
Status: offline 		The RGM-84A Harpoon IP (#1612) may be hanging around on mounts in error, well past it's service life. Initial version began 1977 and is showing on mounts in the DB3000 as late as 2003. The IB and IC version entered service early-late 80s and I would think would have replaced the IP entirely by 1990.

US Ships, such as the Iowa, Belknap, Long Beach, Bainbridge, and California all show in DB3000 as using the IP until 1990 or later. The Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, and Japan all show platforms with the IP well into the 1990s and as late as 2003.

I'm not an expert. I edit the mount myself to the IB or IC versions when I play a scenario with these platforms. Easy enough to do, but thought this might be a minor DB3000 "typo".



(in reply to Scar79)
Post #: 4020
Page:   <<   < prev  132 133 [134] 135 136   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues Page: <<   < prev  132 133 [134] 135 136   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.016