Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: USS Gravely (DDG-107)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: USS Gravely (DDG-107) Page: <<   < prev  134 135 [136] 137 138   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: USS Gravely (DDG-107) - 6/8/2018 5:28:22 PM   
Schr75


Posts: 803
Joined: 7/18/2014
From: Denmark
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CptRoss

Hi, I was trying to find the USS Gravely (DDG-107) (cannot post Wikipedia link because of new user restriction).
Maybe worth an add to the database.

It is an Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyer in the United States Navy commissioned 2010


Hi CptRoss

The Gravely is a flight IIA burke.
There are 6 of those in the DB, just pick the relevant model and rename it the Gravely.

See pic.

If every named unit was in the DB, it would be HUGE. That´s why there is only one of each type.

Søren




Attachment (1)

(in reply to CptRoss)
Post #: 4051
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/8/2018 10:05:26 PM   
TheOttoman

 

Posts: 139
Joined: 12/14/2017
Status: offline
New Platform Request
_________
#1
Vehicles (ELINT TRAC Processing Van) - United States (Army), 1989

General Data
Service Life: 1989 - 1998
Category: Mobile Vehicle
General Armor: None
Damage Points: 1
Mast Height: 0m
Length: 10m
Vehicle/Component Dispersal Radius: 0m
Width: 3m
Area: 30m

OODA cycle:
Detection: 15 seconds
Targeting: 0 seconds (all)
Evasion: 15 seconds

Missile Defense: 1 Harpoon / SLAM / Maverick equivalents

Sensors/EW
1x Mk1 Eyeball

Comms / Datalinks
Interoperable Data Link [Secure]
Common Data Link Class I[Secure]

Signatures
Signature Type: Front/Side/Rear
Visual Detection Range: 0.6nm / 0.6nm / 0.6nm
Visual Classification Range: 0.2nm / 0.2nm / 0.2nm
Infrared Detection Range: 2nm / 2nm /2nm
Infrared Classification Range: 0.2nm / 0.2nm / 0.2nm
Radar, A-D Band (30-2000 MHz): -2 dBsm, 0.63 sq. m / -2 dBsm, 0.63 sq. m / -2 dBsm, 0.63 sq. m
Radar, E-M Band (2-100 GHz): -2 dBsm, 0.63 sq. m / -2 dBsm, 0.63 sq. m / -2 dBsm, 0.63 sq. m

_________
#2
Vehicles (ELINT ETRAC Processing Van x2) - United States (Army), 1996

General Data
Service Life: 1996 - 2005
Category: Mobile Vehicle
General Armor: None
Damage Points: 2
Mast Height: 0m
Length: 20m
Vehicle/Component Dispersal Radius: 10m
Width: 6m
Area: 120m

OODA cycle:
Detection: 15 seconds
Targeting: 0 seconds (all)
Evasion: 15 seconds

Missile Defense: 1 Harpoon / SLAM / Maverick equivalents

Sensors/EW
1x Mk1 Eyeball

Comms / Datalinks
Interoperable Data Link [Secure]
Common Data Link Class I[Secure]
Common Data Link Class II[Secure]
Common Data Link Class III[Secure]

Signatures
Signature Type: Front/Side/Rear
Visual Detection Range: 0.6nm / 0.6nm / 0.6nm
Visual Classification Range: 0.2nm / 0.2nm / 0.2nm
Infrared Detection Range: 2nm / 2nm /2nm
Infrared Classification Range: 0.2nm / 0.2nm / 0.2nm
Radar, A-D Band (30-2000 MHz): -2 dBsm, 0.63 sq. m / -2 dBsm, 0.63 sq. m / -2 dBsm, 0.63 sq. m
Radar, E-M Band (2-100 GHz): -2 dBsm, 0.63 sq. m / -2 dBsm, 0.63 sq. m / -2 dBsm, 0.63 sq. m


Sources:
https://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/systems/etrac.htm
https://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/systems/images/etrac_trac_van.jpg
https://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/systems/images/etrac_trac_van2.jpg
https://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/systems/images/2vans_etrac.jpg
https://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/systems/cdl.htm
https://fas.org/irp/doddir/army/lsn6app1.htm

(in reply to Temple)
Post #: 4052
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/10/2018 10:54:51 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
CR929 airliner request:

https://newsroom.aviator.aero/pjsc-uac-and-comac-approved-the-general-layout-of-cr929-aircraft/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CRAIC_CR929

quote:

Images:




CRAIC CR929-600 (2026+)

Seating: 258 (3-Class)-416 (1-Class)
Length: 63.25 m (207.5 ft)
Wingspan: 58-61 m / 190-200 ft
Height: 17.9 m / 58.7 ft
Fuselage width: 5.92 m / 19.4 ft
Fuselage height: 6.07 m / 19.9 ft
Cabin max width: 5.61 m / 18.4 ft
MTOW: 208.8–234 t (460,000–516,000 lb)
Payload: 48.83–50.4 t (107,700–111,100 lb)
Fuel: 103.7 t (229,000 lb)
Turbofans: 2x TBA (RR & GE for early batches)
Thrust: 70,800-78,000 lbf (315-347 kN)
Cruise: Mach 0.85 (490 kn; 908 km/h)
Range: 12,000 km / 6,480 nmi


< Message edited by Dysta -- 6/10/2018 11:02:33 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to TheOttoman)
Post #: 4053
RE: RE:MYANMAR NAVY - 6/11/2018 8:30:30 AM   
Rory Noonan

 

Posts: 2816
Joined: 12/18/2014
From: Brooklyn, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Triode

#608 - PLASN-9786 Delta III Stretch
still have SS-N-18 missiles, this is wrong

#647 - PLASN-9852 [Belgorod]
have wrong sonars systems in database it is MGK-501 Skat-KS in reality:

"Separately it is necessary to dwell on the products of the enterprises of the Concern "Okeanpribor" for the PLASN project 09852. The prototype GAK "Kizuch" was installed on the submarine project 945A order. 3004 (B-336 "Pskov"), the manufacture of hardware devices was conducted at the Taganrog plant "Priboy" from 2011 to 2013. On the basis of this GAK, variants were developed both for upgraded submarines of projects 945M and 971M (Kizhuch-945M and Kizhuch-971M) and for the PLASN of Project 09852, which was named "Kizhuch-PM" (PM is probably for "Remounting"). The order for the implementation of R & D on the subject "Kizhuch-M" was placed by the lead contractor (CDB MT "Rubin") directly to JSC "Concern" Okeanpribor ". In turn, the contract for the manufacture and supply of prototypes of devices for low-frequency R & D products "Kizhuch-PM" for order 664("Belgorod") for the amount of 414 million rubles was signed between the Concern "Oceanpribor" and the plant "Priboy" on July 1, 2014. [Annual report of OJSC Concern Okeanpribor for 2014, annual reports of OJSC Taganrog Plant Priboy for 2011-14].
http://bmpd.livejournal.com/1378165.html in russian

So, PLASN 09852 Belgorod should have MGK-540M Kizhuch sonar

#609 - NORSUB-5 [Pr.10831 Losharik]
in database dont have sonar , in reality :
"In addition, the enterprises of the Concern are developing a family of Gneiss products. The family includes the following options:
"Gneiss-SPE" for the AGS project 10831 (head 210 AS-12 aka AS-31 aka Losharik),
"Gneiss-5MK" for the AGS project 1910 (head №01402 АS-15),
"Gneiss-5K.1" for the AGS of the project 1851.1 (head 01431/09431 AS-35),
"Gneiss-PM" for the under construction PL of the project 09852,
"Gneiss-09787" for the currently modernized PLA of the project 09787 (head 381 BS -64, order 07381),
As well as for the SS PL project 09786 (head 398 "Orenburg").
In the integrated structure of the Concern, the head organization for the implementation of R & D "Triton-Gneiss" (for #607 - Triton-NN [Pr.21310]), is the Kirov branch of OJSC Concern Okeanpribor. Installation work on the installation of the product "Gneis" to order 402 was started by JSC "Vodtranspribor-Pusk" in 2012. And are ongoing to the present, for 2015g. Scheduled running and inter-departmental tests. In 2014 The enterprise started the installation of the product "Gneiss-09787" to order 07381, for 2015. Planned installation of the complex to order 01431 [Annual reports of JSC "Vodtranspribor-Start" for 2012-14]."

So,Pr.10831 Losharik have sonar "Gneiss-SPE"


also for "upgraded submarines of projects 945M and 971M" see :
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=3959861
and
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=4066939

quote:

MGK-540M


There's essentially zero data on the MGK-540M set that I can find. Are you able to provide data for me to create the upgraded sensor package?

_____________________________


(in reply to Triode)
Post #: 4054
RE: RE:MYANMAR NAVY - 6/11/2018 9:47:28 AM   
Filitch


Posts: 423
Joined: 6/25/2016
From: St. Petersburg, Russia
Status: offline
Deleted


< Message edited by Filitch -- 6/11/2018 10:21:34 AM >

(in reply to Rory Noonan)
Post #: 4055
RE: RE:MYANMAR NAVY - 6/11/2018 1:20:43 PM   
temkc5

 

Posts: 97
Joined: 10/11/2015
Status: offline
#1956 Infantry battalion(Generic)

Not sure what App 6 means but could the above-mentioned unit be taken off placeholder status?


_____________________________

Non mihi, Non tibi, Sed nobis


(in reply to Filitch)
Post #: 4056
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/12/2018 10:36:31 PM   
PCFRIM

 

Posts: 3
Joined: 6/12/2018
Status: offline
Hi!
The Chinese J-16 was built for the PLAAF, not the PLANAF, the same as the JD-16.
Also new weapon request
HQ-9C, incorporating the active-radar homing mode

(in reply to temkc5)
Post #: 4057
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/18/2018 5:49:24 AM   
TheOttoman

 

Posts: 139
Joined: 12/14/2017
Status: offline
The Tarawa class LHA accommodate 4 LCU 1610 landing craft (#1455). According to the database, the landing craft has 13 tons of diesel fuel. The problem is that all versions of the Tarawa class in the database do not carry diesel fuel so the landing craft cannot refuel. In order to refuel all four landing craft once, it will take 52 tons of diesel fuel. Since LCU has a range of 1200nm on a single tank, I don't think it would take more than 60 tons

I am requesting to have the entries for the Tarawa class to have an addition of 60 tons of diesel to the fuel.

Database entries: #364, 430, 444, 502, 676, and 1084.

(in reply to PCFRIM)
Post #: 4058
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/18/2018 8:35:25 AM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
Request new loadout options: Yu-10 torpedo (#3084) and tube-launched version of YJ-18 AShM (#2868) for the Type 093B Shang-class SSN (#590).

Recent official images shows that the Shang-class is equipped with those new weapons.



< Message edited by Hongjian -- 6/18/2018 8:37:16 AM >

(in reply to TheOttoman)
Post #: 4059
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/20/2018 6:34:54 AM   
Raptorx7_slith

 

Posts: 380
Joined: 7/27/2013
Status: offline
The SU-34 Fullback's (2017) radar can only detect units on the water or in the air, is this working as intended or an error?

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 4060
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/20/2018 10:44:13 AM   
User2

 

Posts: 118
Joined: 1/14/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: raptorx7

The SU-34 Fullback's (2017) radar can only detect units on the water or in the air, is this working as intended or an error?


I've already reported it in 2017 here http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=4374001
Lots of planes lack ground search capabilities

(in reply to Raptorx7_slith)
Post #: 4061
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/20/2018 8:52:47 PM   
Dimitris

 

Posts: 13282
Joined: 7/31/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: raptorx7
The SU-34 Fullback's (2017) radar can only detect units on the water or in the air, is this working as intended or an error?


Are we talking about ground vehicles? If you remember, we had the same conversation about F-15E radars not detecting tanks sitting still.

_____________________________


(in reply to Raptorx7_slith)
Post #: 4062
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/20/2018 9:09:55 PM   
Rory Noonan

 

Posts: 2816
Joined: 12/18/2014
From: Brooklyn, NY
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: raptorx7

The SU-34 Fullback's (2017) radar can only detect units on the water or in the air, is this working as intended or an error?


quote:

ORIGINAL: User2

I've already reported it in 2017 here http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=4374001
Lots of planes lack ground search capabilities


Hey guys, can you post some saves showing unusual behaviour in this tech support thread?

This issue is a pretty well worn path but if there's a genuine issue and improvements can be made the tech support forum is the place for it to happen.

_____________________________


(in reply to User2)
Post #: 4063
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/20/2018 9:11:37 PM   
Dimitris

 

Posts: 13282
Joined: 7/31/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: User2
Currently in the game lots of multirole crafts does not have ground search capabilities. Actually all currently operational Russian crafts, even those that were especially designed for ground attack role like su-24/su-34, do not see even large buildings on the ground. That's a shame. Even old su-24 radar can see moving ground targets in real life, let alone large ones.
Meanwhile most US multirole crafts, even old ones (ex. A-6E, 1975), see ground targets. The only exception I've found is multirole f-16. F-16 (at least multirole mods) should see ground targets too.
Most chinese crafts have the same problem too in the game. Only some future crafts (2017-2018+) where given ground search capabilities.

Actually it is a big issue. While the game is focused at Air-Naval warfare, most SAM systems are ground based, so ground search radars should be given more love.


Please submit your save files and references sources here: http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4497357 . Thanks.

_____________________________


(in reply to User2)
Post #: 4064
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/20/2018 10:08:31 PM   
Raptorx7_slith

 

Posts: 380
Joined: 7/27/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: apache85

quote:

ORIGINAL: raptorx7

The SU-34 Fullback's (2017) radar can only detect units on the water or in the air, is this working as intended or an error?


quote:

ORIGINAL: User2

I've already reported it in 2017 here http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=4374001
Lots of planes lack ground search capabilities


Hey guys, can you post some saves showing unusual behaviour in this tech support thread?

This issue is a pretty well worn path but if there's a genuine issue and improvements can be made the tech support forum is the place for it to happen.


Yeah I could have worded this better. I've tested it against moving ground targets at various altitudes and the like but then I wen't and looked in the DB and it actually doesn't have ground search capability (It only has surface search, and air search) which I was surprised by, I figured it would have since it was an attack aircraft, so I posted here more to ask if it was a db error!

Trust me I am happy with your explanations about radar performance and the like from a while back, this was more of a "Huh, I figured this thing would have that capability" More than anything else, hence posting it in here.






< Message edited by raptorx7 -- 6/20/2018 10:23:05 PM >

(in reply to Rory Noonan)
Post #: 4065
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/20/2018 11:53:42 PM   
TheOttoman

 

Posts: 139
Joined: 12/14/2017
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: raptorx7

quote:

ORIGINAL: apache85

quote:

ORIGINAL: raptorx7

The SU-34 Fullback's (2017) radar can only detect units on the water or in the air, is this working as intended or an error?


quote:

ORIGINAL: User2

I've already reported it in 2017 here http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=4374001
Lots of planes lack ground search capabilities


Hey guys, can you post some saves showing unusual behaviour in this tech support thread?

This issue is a pretty well worn path but if there's a genuine issue and improvements can be made the tech support forum is the place for it to happen.


Yeah I could have worded this better. I've tested it against moving ground targets at various altitudes and the like but then I wen't and looked in the DB and it actually doesn't have ground search capability (It only has surface search, and air search) which I was surprised by, I figured it would have since it was an attack aircraft, so I posted here more to ask if it was a db error!

Trust me I am happy with your explanations about radar performance and the like from a while back, this was more of a "Huh, I figured this thing would have that capability" More than anything else, hence posting it in here.








That's weird, I don't show a Su-34 Fullback from 2017 in the database, and the one I have (#3723) is listed for 2015 *and* does have ground radar.

What is the platform number, and which database are you using? I'm on Build 473

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Raptorx7_slith)
Post #: 4066
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/21/2018 12:31:51 AM   
Raptorx7_slith

 

Posts: 380
Joined: 7/27/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheOttoman


quote:

ORIGINAL: raptorx7

quote:

ORIGINAL: apache85

quote:

ORIGINAL: raptorx7

The SU-34 Fullback's (2017) radar can only detect units on the water or in the air, is this working as intended or an error?


quote:

ORIGINAL: User2

I've already reported it in 2017 here http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=4374001
Lots of planes lack ground search capabilities


Hey guys, can you post some saves showing unusual behaviour in this tech support thread?

This issue is a pretty well worn path but if there's a genuine issue and improvements can be made the tech support forum is the place for it to happen.


Yeah I could have worded this better. I've tested it against moving ground targets at various altitudes and the like but then I wen't and looked in the DB and it actually doesn't have ground search capability (It only has surface search, and air search) which I was surprised by, I figured it would have since it was an attack aircraft, so I posted here more to ask if it was a db error!

Trust me I am happy with your explanations about radar performance and the like from a while back, this was more of a "Huh, I figured this thing would have that capability" More than anything else, hence posting it in here.








That's weird, I don't show a Su-34 Fullback from 2017 in the database, and the one I have (#3723) is listed for 2015 *and* does have ground radar.

What is the platform number, and which database are you using? I'm on Build 473


That was a typo sorry, I am talking about the SU-34 (2015) version and its slot back radar does not have ground search capability. Your image is exactly what I see so I don't know what you're talking about, maybe you're getting confused by the LLTV below it which does have ground search.

(in reply to TheOttoman)
Post #: 4067
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/21/2018 3:27:36 AM   
TheOttoman

 

Posts: 139
Joined: 12/14/2017
Status: offline
Okay.. now I understand what you're talking about...

Confusion abounds.

(in reply to Raptorx7_slith)
Post #: 4068
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/21/2018 8:42:43 AM   
Filitch


Posts: 423
Joined: 6/25/2016
From: St. Petersburg, Russia
Status: offline
Slot back (#6 in database) has no capabilities "Land Search - Fixed Facility", "Land Search - Mobile Unit". While AN/APG-70 (#1765) has ones. Database version - 473.

(in reply to TheOttoman)
Post #: 4069
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/21/2018 1:44:55 PM   
Broncepulido

 

Posts: 385
Joined: 9/26/2013
Status: offline
Actually the Su-34 radar is Leninets V004, a PESA radar not related with the original series of NATO named Slot Back radar for Su-27 variants.
Between other performances:
- Maximum range 97,2 nm against aerial targets.
- Maximum range 135 nm against naval targets.
- Typical ground target range 81 nm.
- AFV target range 40,5 nm.
- Capable of tracking 10 targets simultaneously, capable of engage four naval targets or four aerial targets simultaneously, or a mix of both.
- PESA, Passive Electronically Scanned Radar.
- Is also a TFR/Terrain Following Radar.
- Compatible for designation of air-to-air target for R-77/AA-12 Adder and variants, R-27/AA-10 Alamo and R-73/AA-11 Archer missiles.
- X-Band.

- The existence or use in Su-34 of a sometimes annonced rear-facing search or air-to-air missiles fire control radar is in doubt.

Sources:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-34
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D1%83-34#%D0%A0%D0%9B%D0%A1


< Message edited by Broncepulido -- 6/22/2018 12:14:49 AM >

(in reply to Filitch)
Post #: 4070
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/21/2018 9:35:53 PM   
SeaQueen


Posts: 1451
Joined: 4/14/2007
From: Washington D.C.
Status: offline
I really like "#605 - Structure (Tunnel Entrance)" because it encourages the construction of complex deeply buried sites. Does there exist an equivalent structure but armored with a blast door, similar to "#915 - A/C Underground Aircraft Shelter Entrance (Blast Doors)?"

I'd also suggest similar small, critical, hard to find and hit targets for the construction of deeply buried hardened complexes like air/ventilation shafts. These complexes might be very much like airbases, with many possible entrances, air supply points, electrical supply points, fuel supply points, water supply points, and deeply buried facilities distributed over a wide area which might be struck.

https://www.nap.edu/read/11282/chapter/4#15
https://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/intro/bunker.htm
https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB439/


< Message edited by SeaQueen -- 6/22/2018 4:12:57 PM >

(in reply to Broncepulido)
Post #: 4071
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/22/2018 5:24:10 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SeaQueen

I really like "#605 - Structure (Tunnel Entrance)" because it encourages the construction of complex deeply buried sites. Does there exist an equivalent structure but armored with a blast door, similar to "#915 - A/C Underground Aircraft Shelter Entrance (Blast Doors)?"

I'd also suggest similar small, critical, hard to find and hit targets for the construction of deeply buried hardened complexes like air/ventilation shafts. These complexes might be very much like airbases, with many possible entrances, air supply points, and deeply buried facilities distributed over a wide area which might be struck.



And add unit garrison feature as well. TEL-based missile sites can house a dozen of those in the tunnel, and can be reloaded from inside if the missile is small enough.



_____________________________


(in reply to SeaQueen)
Post #: 4072
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/22/2018 7:38:54 AM   
Rory Noonan

 

Posts: 2816
Joined: 12/18/2014
From: Brooklyn, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dysta

And add unit garrison feature as well. TEL-based missile sites can house a dozen of those in the tunnel, and can be reloaded from inside if the missile is small enough.



That's a lot more complicated than it is to type.

Much more appropriate for the feature request thread.

_____________________________


(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 4073
RE: RE:MYANMAR NAVY - 6/22/2018 8:33:35 AM   
Triode

 

Posts: 283
Joined: 9/26/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: apache85

quote:

MGK-540M


There's essentially zero data on the MGK-540M set that I can find. Are you able to provide data for me to create the upgraded sensor package?


MGK-540M "Kizhuch" is updated version MGK-540 "Skat-3", early called "Skat-3M", with some modernization based on MGK-600B elements,
as examle they have unified software p.239-241:
http://www.oceanpribor.ru/docs/Proceedigns_of_ISTOC-2016(348p.).pdf



P.S. also Irtysh TASS, part of MGK-600 "Irtysh-Amphora" and MGK-600B "Irtysh-Amphora-B-055A", according to Boris Voronkov (hydroacoustic engineer, creator of optical hydrophones elements) have range 320km , dont know what he mean as "open press" may be some specialized journal, cant find it:
"In the open press there was information that the hydro-acoustic complex MGK-600B Irtysh-Amfora-B-055 was installed on the Borey submarine, have range (320 km) surpassing that of the Virginia (230 km). Note that these SSNs are installed GAK operating operating in the frequency range of 10-480 hertz Domestic "Irtysh-Amfora" is equipped with piezoceramic hydro-backgrounds, working in the area of sound frequencies, which in water at the distance of 10 kilometers are weakened by a factor of 10. Accordingly, the SJSC "Irtysh-Amfora" can successfully work with targets, in the acoustic spectrum of which there are intense sound components - fast-moving surface ships. To discover low-noise submarines of the probable enemy, whose radiation is mainly in the infrasonic range, this GAK is less suitable
https://www.ashurbeyli.ru/public/flippingbook/vpk32018/20/assets/basic-html/page9.html

< Message edited by Triode -- 6/22/2018 8:44:06 AM >

(in reply to Rory Noonan)
Post #: 4074
RE: RE:MYANMAR NAVY - 6/25/2018 6:30:21 PM   
Vulcan607

 

Posts: 97
Joined: 2/8/2018
Status: offline
Could you add the A7F Strikefighter prototype such a cool jet that really should have been adopted

_____________________________


(in reply to Triode)
Post #: 4075
RE: RE:MYANMAR NAVY - 6/27/2018 5:59:22 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
J-11A has confirmed to have new HMD helmet, very likely to be capable of using off-bore targeting missiles like PL-10:





_____________________________


(in reply to Vulcan607)
Post #: 4076
RE: RE:MYANMAR NAVY - 6/27/2018 9:02:45 AM   
Rain08

 

Posts: 92
Joined: 7/18/2016
Status: offline
So I noticed that the earlier DB3K versions (like B440) have drop tanks for the F-35. I'm just wondering why were they removed?

< Message edited by Rain08 -- 6/27/2018 9:06:05 AM >

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 4077
RE: RE:MYANMAR NAVY - 6/27/2018 9:37:19 AM   
Sharana


Posts: 343
Joined: 2/3/2016
Status: offline
quote:

So I noticed that the earlier DB3K versions (like B440) have drop tanks for the F-35. I'm just wondering why were they removed?


Because they don't exist yet and no one but Israel wanted drop tanks for their F-35s. So when such are created (for Block 4 if I remember correctly in 4-5 years they will be added to the Israeli F-35s in the DB. But others aren't going to be using them.

_____________________________


(in reply to Rain08)
Post #: 4078
US Army / USMC Units - 6/27/2018 12:55:26 PM   
SeaQueen


Posts: 1451
Joined: 4/14/2007
From: Washington D.C.
Status: offline
US HMMWV w/TOW Missile

http://www.armyrecognition.com/humvee_hmmwv_variants_light_tacticale_vehicle/m1045_m1045a1_m1045a2_hmmwv_humvee_anti-tank_missile_tow_carrier_vehicle_technical_data_sheet_pictur.html
https://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/m966.htm


< Message edited by SeaQueen -- 6/27/2018 1:11:27 PM >

(in reply to Sharana)
Post #: 4079
RE: US Army / USMC Units - 6/29/2018 2:38:27 AM   
cdnice


Posts: 179
Joined: 5/7/2009
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Status: offline
Other than in each release notes is there something/someplace that has an aggregate of all the DB additions? Tks

_____________________________



(in reply to SeaQueen)
Post #: 4080
Page:   <<   < prev  134 135 [136] 137 138   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: USS Gravely (DDG-107) Page: <<   < prev  134 135 [136] 137 138   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.797