sPzAbt653
Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/3/2007 From: east coast, usa Status: offline
|
quote:
I doubt that's true for anybody else & I doubt it will happen, but as a customer I feel entitled to whine on about it anyway. It's not really a whine, keep in mind it is a contribution, as Ralph is not a closed loop in the development process. He very much listens to what we say, and has the very difficult job of determining what are viable complaints, and what are reasonable expectations given limits to coding time and UI changes. Which is why I suggested earlier to make more specific points as opposed to blanket statements. quote:
To improve the editor any more than it's already been improved would almost require a code re-write and I doubt that will ever happen in my lifetime. I would disagree with this opinion as Ralph has proved otherwise and has confirmed his desire to continue improvement, especially in the beta forum. However, like I said, any changes will be made within the current framework. Also in defense of TOAW, I'll add that there are thousands of scenarios designed with this system by hundreds of designers over a period of 20 years. If the Editor was crap, how could this be possible ? By comparison, SC has been around for twelve years [since SC1?] and has less than 15 scenarios. The editor is difficult to work with, especially the map making process. How many scenarios does Advanced Tactics have and how long has it been around ? I have no idea, I'm asking.
|