Slitherine

quote:

ORIGINAL: CptRoss

Hi, I was trying to find the USS Gravely (DDG-107) (cannot post Wikipedia link because of new user restriction).
Maybe worth an add to the database.

It is an Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyer in the United States Navy commissioned 2010

quote:

Images:




CRAIC CR929-600 (2026+)

Seating: 258 (3-Class)-416 (1-Class)
Length: 63.25 m (207.5 ft)
Wingspan: 58-61 m / 190-200 ft
Height: 17.9 m / 58.7 ft
Fuselage width: 5.92 m / 19.4 ft
Fuselage height: 6.07 m / 19.9 ft
Cabin max width: 5.61 m / 18.4 ft
MTOW: 208.8–234 t (460,000–516,000 lb)
Payload: 48.83–50.4 t (107,700–111,100 lb)
Fuel: 103.7 t (229,000 lb)
Turbofans: 2x TBA (RR & GE for early batches)
Thrust: 70,800-78,000 lbf (315-347 kN)
Cruise: Mach 0.85 (490 kn; 908 km/h)
Range: 12,000 km / 6,480 nmi

quote:

ORIGINAL: Triode

#608 - PLASN-9786 Delta III Stretch
still have SS-N-18 missiles, this is wrong

#647 - PLASN-9852 [Belgorod]
have wrong sonars systems in database it is MGK-501 Skat-KS in reality:

"Separately it is necessary to dwell on the products of the enterprises of the Concern "Okeanpribor" for the PLASN project 09852. The prototype GAK "Kizuch" was installed on the submarine project 945A order. 3004 (B-336 "Pskov"), the manufacture of hardware devices was conducted at the Taganrog plant "Priboy" from 2011 to 2013. On the basis of this GAK, variants were developed both for upgraded submarines of projects 945M and 971M (Kizhuch-945M and Kizhuch-971M) and for the PLASN of Project 09852, which was named "Kizhuch-PM" (PM is probably for "Remounting"). The order for the implementation of R & D on the subject "Kizhuch-M" was placed by the lead contractor (CDB MT "Rubin") directly to JSC "Concern" Okeanpribor ". In turn, the contract for the manufacture and supply of prototypes of devices for low-frequency R & D products "Kizhuch-PM" for order 664("Belgorod") for the amount of 414 million rubles was signed between the Concern "Oceanpribor" and the plant "Priboy" on July 1, 2014. [Annual report of OJSC Concern Okeanpribor for 2014, annual reports of OJSC Taganrog Plant Priboy for 2011-14].
http://bmpd.livejournal.com/1378165.html in russian

So, PLASN 09852 Belgorod should have MGK-540M Kizhuch sonar

#609 - NORSUB-5 [Pr.10831 Losharik]
in database dont have sonar , in reality :
"In addition, the enterprises of the Concern are developing a family of Gneiss products. The family includes the following options:
"Gneiss-SPE" for the AGS project 10831 (head 210 AS-12 aka AS-31 aka Losharik),
"Gneiss-5MK" for the AGS project 1910 (head №01402 АS-15),
"Gneiss-5K.1" for the AGS of the project 1851.1 (head 01431/09431 AS-35),
"Gneiss-PM" for the under construction PL of the project 09852,
"Gneiss-09787" for the currently modernized PLA of the project 09787 (head 381 BS -64, order 07381),
As well as for the SS PL project 09786 (head 398 "Orenburg").
In the integrated structure of the Concern, the head organization for the implementation of R & D "Triton-Gneiss" (for #607 - Triton-NN [Pr.21310]), is the Kirov branch of OJSC Concern Okeanpribor. Installation work on the installation of the product "Gneis" to order 402 was started by JSC "Vodtranspribor-Pusk" in 2012. And are ongoing to the present, for 2015g. Scheduled running and inter-departmental tests. In 2014 The enterprise started the installation of the product "Gneiss-09787" to order 07381, for 2015. Planned installation of the complex to order 01431 [Annual reports of JSC "Vodtranspribor-Start" for 2012-14]."

So,Pr.10831 Losharik have sonar "Gneiss-SPE"


also for "upgraded submarines of projects 945M and 971M" see :
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=3959861
and
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=4066939

quote:

MGK-540M

quote:

ORIGINAL: raptorx7

The SU-34 Fullback's (2017) radar can only detect units on the water or in the air, is this working as intended or an error?

quote:

ORIGINAL: raptorx7
The SU-34 Fullback's (2017) radar can only detect units on the water or in the air, is this working as intended or an error?

Facebook
Twitter

quote:

ORIGINAL: raptorx7

The SU-34 Fullback's (2017) radar can only detect units on the water or in the air, is this working as intended or an error?

quote:

ORIGINAL: User2

I've already reported it in 2017 here http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=4374001
Lots of planes lack ground search capabilities

quote:

ORIGINAL: User2
Currently in the game lots of multirole crafts does not have ground search capabilities. Actually all currently operational Russian crafts, even those that were especially designed for ground attack role like su-24/su-34, do not see even large buildings on the ground. That's a shame. Even old su-24 radar can see moving ground targets in real life, let alone large ones.
Meanwhile most US multirole crafts, even old ones (ex. A-6E, 1975), see ground targets. The only exception I've found is multirole f-16. F-16 (at least multirole mods) should see ground targets too.
Most chinese crafts have the same problem too in the game. Only some future crafts (2017-2018+) where given ground search capabilities.

Actually it is a big issue. While the game is focused at Air-Naval warfare, most SAM systems are ground based, so ground search radars should be given more love.

Facebook
Twitter

quote:

ORIGINAL: apache85

quote:

ORIGINAL: raptorx7

The SU-34 Fullback's (2017) radar can only detect units on the water or in the air, is this working as intended or an error?

quote:

ORIGINAL: User2

I've already reported it in 2017 here http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=4374001
Lots of planes lack ground search capabilities

Hey guys, can you post some saves showing unusual behaviour in this tech support thread?

This issue is a pretty well worn path but if there's a genuine issue and improvements can be made the tech support forum is the place for it to happen.

quote:

ORIGINAL: raptorx7

quote:

ORIGINAL: apache85

quote:

ORIGINAL: raptorx7

The SU-34 Fullback's (2017) radar can only detect units on the water or in the air, is this working as intended or an error?

quote:

ORIGINAL: User2

I've already reported it in 2017 here http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=4374001
Lots of planes lack ground search capabilities

Hey guys, can you post some saves showing unusual behaviour in this tech support thread?

This issue is a pretty well worn path but if there's a genuine issue and improvements can be made the tech support forum is the place for it to happen.

Yeah I could have worded this better. I've tested it against moving ground targets at various altitudes and the like but then I wen't and looked in the DB and it actually doesn't have ground search capability (It only has surface search, and air search) which I was surprised by, I figured it would have since it was an attack aircraft, so I posted here more to ask if it was a db error!

Trust me I am happy with your explanations about radar performance and the like from a while back, this was more of a "Huh, I figured this thing would have that capability" More than anything else, hence posting it in here.

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheOttoman

quote:

ORIGINAL: raptorx7

quote:

ORIGINAL: apache85

quote:

ORIGINAL: raptorx7

The SU-34 Fullback's (2017) radar can only detect units on the water or in the air, is this working as intended or an error?

quote:

ORIGINAL: User2

I've already reported it in 2017 here http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=4374001
Lots of planes lack ground search capabilities

Hey guys, can you post some saves showing unusual behaviour in this tech support thread?

This issue is a pretty well worn path but if there's a genuine issue and improvements can be made the tech support forum is the place for it to happen.

Yeah I could have worded this better. I've tested it against moving ground targets at various altitudes and the like but then I wen't and looked in the DB and it actually doesn't have ground search capability (It only has surface search, and air search) which I was surprised by, I figured it would have since it was an attack aircraft, so I posted here more to ask if it was a db error!

Trust me I am happy with your explanations about radar performance and the like from a while back, this was more of a "Huh, I figured this thing would have that capability" More than anything else, hence posting it in here.

That's weird, I don't show a Su-34 Fullback from 2017 in the database, and the one I have (#3723) is listed for 2015 *and* does have ground radar.

What is the platform number, and which database are you using? I'm on Build 473

quote:

ORIGINAL: SeaQueen

I really like "#605 - Structure (Tunnel Entrance)" because it encourages the construction of complex deeply buried sites. Does there exist an equivalent structure but armored with a blast door, similar to "#915 - A/C Underground Aircraft Shelter Entrance (Blast Doors)?"

I'd also suggest similar small, critical, hard to find and hit targets for the construction of deeply buried hardened complexes like air/ventilation shafts. These complexes might be very much like airbases, with many possible entrances, air supply points, and deeply buried facilities distributed over a wide area which might be struck.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dysta

And add unit garrison feature as well. TEL-based missile sites can house a dozen of those in the tunnel, and can be reloaded from inside if the missile is small enough.

quote:

ORIGINAL: apache85

quote:

MGK-540M

There's essentially zero data on the MGK-540M set that I can find. Are you able to provide data for me to create the upgraded sensor package?

quote:

So I noticed that the earlier DB3K versions (like B440) have drop tanks for the F-35. I'm just wondering why were they removed?