Canoerebel
Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002 From: Northwestern Georgia, USA Status: offline
|
There will be a temptation to see what happened as inevitable. That recent events are primarily because it is late in the game and the Allies have too much firepower. I don't think so, any more than an Allied victory at Normandy was "inevitable." Eisenhower prepared a speech in case the Allies had to withdraw; one of the air commanders strongly recommended that they not use the airborne troops, lest they incur 80% casualties; the Allies were concerned that an Allied defeat might prod Russia into seeking a separate peace, etc. In hindsight, D-Day has that air of inevitability. IN foresight, it didn't. The same thing here. Erik is gifted and crafty. HIs air force seems immensely strong and large. Until the October naval battle at Shikuka, his navy seemed overpowering, given it was fighting defensively in its own territory and had incurred few losses during the game. His army is untouched. His points lead big. He had months or years to craft his defenses in depth and to prepare forts. As far as I know, he is flush with supply. Against that, the Allies had to penetrate, take, establish, hold, withstand, and eventually attack. Attacking is almost always more costly then defending (part of the reason why Allied losses in Western Europe were always higher than Wermacht losses). Taking over the game in March 1944, the tasks to perform seemed insurmountable, especially given Erik's abilities as a player. There is much fighting left and Erik will sting many times. He still has a large points lead and it will be tough for me to reach 2x anytime in 1945. But no longer does it seem like the Allies cannot prevail. There's a chance now.
|