Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

What Decisive Campaigns: Barbarossa gets right

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Decisive Campaigns: Barbarossa >> What Decisive Campaigns: Barbarossa gets right Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
What Decisive Campaigns: Barbarossa gets right - 8/28/2018 10:50:46 AM   
Templer_12


Posts: 1700
Joined: 1/5/2009
From: Germany
Status: offline
Interesting opinion of a player about some things Decisive Campaigns: Barbarossa gets right.

-> Decisive Campaigns: Barbarossa - A Historical Review
Post #: 1
RE: What Decisive Campaigns: Barbarossa gets right - 8/28/2018 10:47:03 PM   
lancer

 

Posts: 2963
Joined: 10/18/2005
Status: offline
Hi Templer,

Thanks for the link.

Those three months of guzzling vodka and schnapps under a swaying palm tree, doing nothing but reading, taking notes and teaching my birds to tweet marching songs, appear to have paid off.

Interestingly the overiding impression I got from that exercise is how much disparity of opinion and fact there was for an event that happened less than 80 years ago.

History is, I suspect, a moving target.

Cheers,
Cameron

(in reply to Templer_12)
Post #: 2
RE: What Decisive Campaigns: Barbarossa gets right - 8/29/2018 3:04:48 AM   
wodin


Posts: 10762
Joined: 4/20/2003
From: England
Status: offline
I can tell you what it does wrong..and wrong in a BIG way!! There seems to be no future games using this engine.

I'd love a more tactical small scale game..dealing with lower ranking officers and tactics etc.

_____________________________


(in reply to lancer)
Post #: 3
RE: What Decisive Campaigns: Barbarossa gets right - 8/29/2018 7:09:42 AM   
lancer

 

Posts: 2963
Joined: 10/18/2005
Status: offline
Hi Wodin,

There's another Matrix game called Vietnam '65 (follow on is Afghanistan '11).

Excellent tactical games, but with a focus on the people involved, rather than just a bunch of units, they could have been a lot more.

You could have a lot of fun with stuff like Lieutenant Gonzales starting to stress out 'cause he's got himself and his platoon lost in the jungle. Again.

I think wargames in general would benefit from a more 'people orientated design' rather than being a bunch of dry numbers. Numbers don't fight battles, people do. As a player you can connect with people and feel a greater sense of immersion.

There are a number of shining examples of games outside of the niche that do this well and have been very successful, eg. Crusader Kings, Rimworld, Dwarf Fortress, etc. Seems to be pretty much ignored by those who make wargames though.

I'm not sure why as they could do with all the help they can get.

Cheers,
Cameron


(in reply to wodin)
Post #: 4
RE: What Decisive Campaigns: Barbarossa gets right - 8/29/2018 7:52:50 AM   
Templer_12


Posts: 1700
Joined: 1/5/2009
From: Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lancer

Hi Wodin,

There's another Matrix game called Vietnam '65 (follow on is Afghanistan '11).

Excellent tactical games, but with a focus on the people involved, rather than just a bunch of units, they could have been a lot more.

You could have a lot of fun with stuff like Lieutenant Gonzales starting to stress out 'cause he's got himself and his platoon lost in the jungle. Again.

I think wargames in general would benefit from a more 'people orientated design' rather than being a bunch of dry numbers. Numbers don't fight battles, people do. As a player you can connect with people and feel a greater sense of immersion.

There are a number of shining examples of games outside of the niche that do this well and have been very successful, eg. Crusader Kings, Rimworld, Dwarf Fortress, etc. Seems to be pretty much ignored by those who make wargames though.

I'm not sure why as they could do with all the help they can get.

Cheers,
Cameron



Nah...

There you have to do without Tigers, tank rushes, Kesel battles, winter torments, the demanding Decisive Campaigns AI, tea with Mr. H, and Cameron's budgies...

Side note:
If you like the video: Decisive Campaigns: Barbarossa - A Historical Review leave the guy a thumbs up or a comment.



< Message edited by Templer_12 -- 8/29/2018 7:58:28 AM >

(in reply to lancer)
Post #: 5
RE: What Decisive Campaigns: Barbarossa gets right - 9/2/2018 6:27:49 PM   
Jakse

 

Posts: 56
Joined: 6/18/2013
Status: offline
Yeah, you guys should totally support that guy! (Thank you for the kind words and support, seriously!) I'm happy anytime people watch and get excited about DC:Barbarossa. I think my channel does a poor job hiding how much of a DC fanboy I am.

(in reply to Templer_12)
Post #: 6
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Decisive Campaigns: Barbarossa >> What Decisive Campaigns: Barbarossa gets right Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.438