leverkuhn
Posts: 40
Joined: 12/11/2017 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: No idea quote:
ORIGINAL: leverkuhn quote:
ORIGINAL: No idea According to wiki, 1347 Tigers were built since 1942 to 1944. The problem doenst seem to be a high production, but low losses, as has been said many times. Ps. I havent done any testing, but, from all my games, I think the problem with low losses comes because of very low attrition. This is, very low non combat losses. In order to probe your point, you would need to replicate historical events in-game (i.e. a decisive soviet victory by early 1945 with a former stampede through western SU and huge numbers of german units routed, pocketed and surrendered) and see whether those casualties stack up. There's no point in expecting similar heavy tank casualties in a game like this where the germans are in much better shape and have not suffered significant encirclements. I am talking about NON combat casualties, which are very low in the game, so encirclements and defeats are irrelevant Might as well be, but even if you're right, the Axis side would be no worse than now with more attrition casualties, as those spare tanks cannot be used anyway. In the end, both of us are probably right. Non-combat losses are low AND the game should reward good axis players by letting them activate more heavy tanks.
|