Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? Page: <<   < prev  145 146 [147] 148 149   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 12/16/2018 11:54:52 PM   
Broncepulido

 

Posts: 385
Joined: 9/26/2013
Status: offline 		Also only experimiental use cited here:

https://testpilot.ru/russia/mikoyan/kh/22/

Quote:
Аппаратура головки самонаведения первоначально отрабатывалась на летающей лаборатории Ту-16К-22.

Google Translator:
The equipment of the homing head was initially worked out on the Tu-16K-22 flying laboratory.

(in reply to Broncepulido)
Post #: 4381
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 12/20/2018 10:53:23 PM   
orca

 

Posts: 501
Joined: 11/6/2013
Status: offline 		Can the following units be made available for cargo:

Multi-Mission Launcher [15 cells]
NASAMS (with MIM-120B)
vehicle (AN/TPQ-36A)
vehicle (NTAS FLIR/LR)
radar (AN/TPS-80 G/ATOR)

I'm hoping to use them in a scenario I'm currently working on.

thanks for considering

(in reply to Broncepulido)
Post #: 4382
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 12/21/2018 3:40:33 PM   
LORDPrometheus

 

Posts: 131
Joined: 1/8/2018
Status: offline 		New request.

Can the semi-cancelled MEADS System be added as a hypothetical unit to the USA, Germany, and italy?

Missile is Patriot-PAC-3 supplemented by IRST-SL for german systems. It is 360 degree fire capable.

Not a ton of details on the radar used but the fire control radar is an x-band AESA made in germany not much available. The surveillance radar haseven less information and is listed as 'UHF' on wikipedia. My bet is it is either c band or D band and based on the AN/FPS-117 as it appeares to have the same shape and dimensions. This is also supported by Lockheed Martin being the contractor for the missiles and Surveillance radar.

< Message edited by LORDPrometheus -- 12/21/2018 3:44:22 PM >

(in reply to orca)
Post #: 4383
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 12/23/2018 9:52:22 AM   
Broncepulido

 

Posts: 385
Joined: 9/26/2013
Status: offline 		HMS Queen Elizabeth gets her Phalanx Block !B:
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/aircraft-carrier-hms-queen-elizabeth-begins-having-phalanx-guns-fitted/

(in reply to LORDPrometheus)
Post #: 4384
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 12/24/2018 9:49:10 AM   
jun5896

 

Posts: 216
Joined: 1/17/2015
Status: offline 		F-23 Black Widow II(2016) radar range is only 120nm.

Please upgrade AN/APG-77(v)1 AESA long-range.

(in reply to Broncepulido)
Post #: 4385
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 12/24/2018 10:11:03 AM   
jun5896

 

Posts: 216
Joined: 1/17/2015
Status: offline 		I think Japan will possess aircraft carriers. They announced Izumo-class can convert ski-jump carrier, Also they has plan to purchase 42 F-35B.

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/12/18/asia/japan-aircraft-carriers-intl/index.html

< Message edited by jun5896 -- 12/24/2018 10:30:54 AM >

(in reply to jun5896)
Post #: 4386
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 12/26/2018 4:58:36 AM   
orca

 

Posts: 501
Joined: 11/6/2013
Status: offline 		Is it possible to make M142 HIMARS transportable as cargo on a C-130? It seems it should be based on DB mass, area data in DB but I'm not able to load. Using db build 476 and command v1.14 build 998.15.

thanks

https://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/spec-ops-c-130-drops-off-mobile-rocket-launcher-in-the-1702362936
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M142_HIMARS

(in reply to orca)
Post #: 4387
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 12/28/2018 11:33:04 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline 		Please add new Thailand Frigate FFG 471 Tachin (KDX-I Variant) x2. IOC 2018

https://www.reddit.com/r/WarshipPorn/comments/aa9smu/thai_frigate_htms_tachin_ffg471_entering_hong/

http://canadianpower.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Tachin-class_Guided_Missile_Frigate

http://defense-studies.blogspot.com/2018/12/dsme-hands-over-htms-tachin-frigate-to.html

https://thaimilitaryandasianregion.wordpress.com/2016/01/11/royal-thai-navys-dw-3000f-frigate-armament/


(in reply to orca)
Post #: 4388
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 12/29/2018 7:02:39 AM   
KC45


Posts: 240
Joined: 11/23/2017
From: JPN
Status: offline 		By the KDX-1 illuminated P-1 incident, P-1 detect STIR180 Firing Control Radar. I checked P-1 in CMANO couldn't detect K band emissions. SO can you add specs about it for P-1'S "J/HQL-109B" or just add RWR for it?

https://youtu.be/s93-l68D3Eo?t=358

Thanks

_____________________________

Steam CMANO Japanese Community(unofficial).

(in reply to BDukes)
Post #: 4389
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 12/29/2018 8:01:56 AM   
Rory Noonan

 

Posts: 2816
Joined: 12/18/2014
From: Brooklyn, NY
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KC45

By the KDX-1 illuminated P-1 incident, P-1 detect STIR180 Firing Control Radar. I checked P-1 in CMANO couldn't detect K band emissions. SO can you add specs about it for P-1'S "J/HQL-109B" or just add RWR for it?

https://youtu.be/s93-l68D3Eo?t=358

Thanks


This is getting a bit ridiculous, don't you think?

_____________________________


(in reply to KC45)
Post #: 4390
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 12/29/2018 11:16:37 AM   
KC45


Posts: 240
Joined: 11/23/2017
From: JPN
Status: offline 		Yes both ROK that lying, and Japanese politians who is tring this problem bigger.

_____________________________

Steam CMANO Japanese Community(unofficial).

(in reply to Rory Noonan)
Post #: 4391
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 12/30/2018 12:51:09 AM   
jun5896

 

Posts: 216
Joined: 1/17/2015
Status: offline 		Please add this loadouts for MiG-35/MiG-35D

A/A : AA-12 Adder B[R-77-1], Heavy(Air Superiority, BVR AAM) : 2 x AA-11 Archer[R-73] 6 x AA-12 Adder B[R-77-1,RVV-SD] 1 x 1500 liter Drop Tank

MiG-29K/KUB can armed above loadouts, MiG-35/D are missed 6 Vympel loadouts.

< Message edited by jun5896 -- 12/30/2018 12:52:10 AM >

(in reply to KC45)
Post #: 4392
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 12/30/2018 11:07:47 AM   
tiag

 

Posts: 91
Joined: 6/21/2018
Status: offline 		Newest Variant of the S-125 missing in current DB:

S-125-2TM
Sources:
(it seems I cannot post links?!)

Some key info:
- Use missiles 5V27 (all variants)
- Four Missiles per launcher...quad rails as some older SA-3s
- Mobility increased according to Tetraedr: 15-20 minutes deployment after moving
- P-18T Radar as search and acquisition
- Max Engagement Range is 19nm. 5V27DE in the 2M version is 16nm.


Users known: Kazakhstan, Vietnam (list may not be complete).

< Message edited by tiag -- 12/30/2018 11:16:55 AM >

(in reply to jun5896)
Post #: 4393
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 1/3/2019 4:38:23 PM   
CV60


Posts: 992
Joined: 10/1/2012
Status: offline 		Minor database correction to DB3000 Weapon_878 SA-20b (48N6M). Janes gives the warhead size as 180kg, vice 150. Also, max target speed is 5442 knots and Range v. ABM is 5-40 km , and 2,000-25,000m altitude (ballistic missile)

< Message edited by CV60 -- 1/4/2019 7:08:08 PM >

(in reply to tiag)
Post #: 4394
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 1/4/2019 3:27:24 AM   
antonytrentini

 

Posts: 1
Joined: 1/4/2019
Status: offline 		I'd like to request three simple additions to the DB3000 database for a large scenario I am working on:

*A load-out of 24-36 x MALD-J for the 2019 version of the B-1B. Noting the light weight and compact size of the MALD-J, this seems like a reasonable 'what if', especially for those players looking to experiment with the arsenal aircraft concept.

*A sub-launched version of the LRASM that can be launched from any VLS or 533mm TT equipped submarine. Noting the missile can already be launched from surface-ship VLS cells, this also seems like a reasonable 'what if'.

*An Australian version of the EA-18G with NGJ, noting Australia is jointly funding the development with the US. As I'm a new member I can't post links, but googling AIR5349 Phase 6 will show the RAAF's plans for the system, and various trade press publications have carried reporting that show Australia and the US have entered into a cooperative development program for the NGJ.

(in reply to CV60)
Post #: 4395
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 1/4/2019 8:27:31 PM   
LORDPrometheus

 

Posts: 131
Joined: 1/8/2018
Status: offline 		So I was looking into missing weapons and realized that the Kh-15/AS-16 "kickback" is not represented properly.

Firstly it is only being carried by the Tu-160 which should be able to hold 12 on its 2 rotary racks. However the weapon is also carried by the Tu-22M with 6 on the internal rotary rack and up to 4 under the wings. The Su-33 and Su-34 are also able to carry the weapon likely 1 centerline or 2 with one under each wing.

There are 3 versions of the missile however only one is in game.

Kh-15 standard nuclear version already in game

The Kh-15S/A anti shipping missile with an active radar seeker and 150kg conventional warhead.

The Kh-15P anti radiation missile variant with a 150kg conventional warhead.

I doubt that the Su-33 and Su-34 carry the nuclear versions.

Beyond the Kh-15 there are a few other weapons I would love to see in game.

3M54AE- air launched Kalibr cruise missile used by Su-35 and probably Tu-142 and Tu-22M

3M54AE1- anti shipping version of above

3M14AE- lighter version for use by MiG-35

(in reply to antonytrentini)
Post #: 4396
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 1/5/2019 2:30:50 PM   
AndrewJ

 

Posts: 2318
Joined: 1/5/2014
Status: offline 		The Ka-25BSh Hormone A (#2300) has a loadout called VTT-1, RGB-1. However, this loadout does not actually include the RGB-1 sonobuoys. (The three other ASW loadouts do include the sonobuoys.)




Could the loadout be updated to include the sonobuoys? (Or the loadout name changed if the sonobuoys aren't supposed to be there.) These forces are used in Guner98's Mediterranean Fury 1 scenario.

(in reply to LORDPrometheus)
Post #: 4397
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 1/12/2019 12:25:47 AM   
orca

 

Posts: 501
Joined: 11/6/2013
Status: offline 		The 35mm Oerlikon Millennium GDM-008 anti-air PH is only 25% when other similar modern CIWS have a much higher PH. Can the PH be increased to make it comparable to other similar systems? Especially given its unique shrapnel projectile method.


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rheinmetall_Oerlikon_Millennium_Gun
https://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/the-seven-deadliest-naval-close-in-weapon-systems-1568291678

(in reply to AndrewJ)
Post #: 4398
RE: Russian hypo weapons and renewal information - 1/12/2019 9:42:42 PM   
Pancor


Posts: 71
Joined: 6/18/2015
From: Indonesia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pancor

Hello

it looks like the F-15S has been reengine apparently in 2008 to F110-GE-129C
source
http://www.geaviation.com/press/military/military_20071003.html

and in 2012 it was upgrade again by BAE system it include AN/ALQ-239 Digital Electronic Warfare Systems (DEWS)/AN/AAR-57 Common Missile Warning Systems (CMWS)
source
http://www.airforce-technology.com/news/newsbae-to-support-rsaf-f-15s-fighters-upgrade-programme

+

The DEWS For the F-15SA is the AN/ALQ-239 while the CMWS for the same aircraft is the AN/AAR-57
source
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiwh82shaDNAhUeSI8KHYu0C04QFggkMAE&url=https%3A%2F%2Fgovtribe.com%2Fproject%2Fja-redacted-spe4a514r1324-pr-0053690550-nsn-1730005887919&usg=AFQjCNGoZd8Y36_s6JRbVGuuDNXurtcVnA

Thanks


bump...

(in reply to Pancor)
Post #: 4399
RE: Russian hypo weapons and renewal information - 1/14/2019 5:54:47 PM   
Tiramisu

 

Posts: 63
Joined: 11/23/2018
Status: offline 		I belief there is a wrong information of the #2100 - AA-2b Atoll [R-3R]. In the sensors-table the DB is saying it has Semi-Active Radar Homing (SARH), but I think the R-3R should be an infrared missile.

< Message edited by Tiramisu -- 1/14/2019 5:55:57 PM >

(in reply to Pancor)
Post #: 4400
RE: Russian hypo weapons and renewal information - 1/14/2019 10:37:36 PM   
Scorpion86

 

Posts: 239
Joined: 2/26/2017
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tiramisu
I belief there is a wrong information of the #2100 - AA-2b Atoll [R-3R]. In the sensors-table the DB is saying it has Semi-Active Radar Homing (SARH), but I think the R-3R should be an infrared missile.


A cursory look through Wikipedia will tell you the R-3R was a later SARH version of the AA-2 Atoll.

(in reply to Tiramisu)
Post #: 4401
RE: Russian hypo weapons and renewal information - 1/15/2019 2:09:34 AM   
Tiramisu

 

Posts: 63
Joined: 11/23/2018
Status: offline 		It seems like I got confused by the DB-page of the R-3R. It should be telling us something about the R-3R itself, but instead it describes the R-3S, which made me believe the R-3R in CMANO would be an IR-missile:
quote:

The AA-2a ATOLL (R-3S) is a short range, air-to-air, uncooled infrared homing missile. It is a solid fuel rocket. The original R-3 and R-3S are direct copies of the AIM-9B Sidewinder and many parts are interchangeable with the AIM-9B.

(in reply to Scorpion86)
Post #: 4402
RE: Russian hypo weapons and renewal information - 1/15/2019 3:38:40 PM   
DMAN

 

Posts: 98
Joined: 1/11/2019
Status: offline 		Hi!
Is it possible to have the following classes added please:

Samuel Gompers-class destroyer tender
Yellowstone class-destroyer tender
Emory S. Land-class submarine tender (the preceding L.Y. Spear-class is there...great!)
Hunley-class submarine tender
Simon Lake-class submarine tender
Fulton-class submarine tender
Pigeon-class submarine rescue ship
Haven-class hospital ship
Vulcan-class repair ship
Safeguard-class salvage vessel
Bolster-class salvage vessel
Keystone State-class crane ship
Maumee-class oiler
Powhatan-class tugboat

They were all in service after the DB3000 cut-off year of 1979; some were even commissioned after that year.
If you need references I could help with that (I don't have Jane's like you guys do, nor any other "official" sources; just Dr Google).

Also, HMAS Stalwart, another destroyer tender that is not yet in the database. Could this also be added, please?

Thanks in advance!

< Message edited by DMAN -- 1/15/2019 4:03:40 PM >

(in reply to Tiramisu)
Post #: 4403
RE: Russian hypo weapons and renewal information - 1/15/2019 3:50:56 PM   
Gunner98

 

Posts: 5508
Joined: 4/29/2005
From: The Great White North!
Status: offline
quote:

Samuel Gompers and Yellowstone class destroyer tenders


I can second that request. I have plans for the AD-38 & 41 in future scenarios and could easily retrofit Indian Ocean Fury #1 to include AD-42. Not critical but good for story line.

B

_____________________________

Check out our novel, Northern Fury: H-Hour!: http://northernfury.us/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/

(in reply to DMAN)
Post #: 4404
RE: Russian hypo weapons and renewal information - 1/15/2019 4:14:09 PM   
DMAN

 

Posts: 98
Joined: 1/11/2019
Status: offline 		Thanks, mate!

I think those classes are always overlooked.
And they would enhance what is already quite a comprehensive database.

(in reply to Gunner98)
Post #: 4405
RE: Russian hypo weapons and renewal information - 1/15/2019 8:33:52 PM   
Rory Noonan

 

Posts: 2816
Joined: 12/18/2014
From: Brooklyn, NY
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DMAN

Hi!
Is it possible to have the following classes added please:

Samuel Gompers-class destroyer tender
Yellowstone class-destroyer tender
Emory S. Land-class submarine tender (the preceding L.Y. Spear-class is there...great!)
Hunley-class submarine tender
Simon Lake-class submarine tender
Fulton-class submarine tender
Pigeon-class submarine rescue ship
Haven-class hospital ship
Vulcan-class repair ship
Safeguard-class salvage vessel
Bolster-class salvage vessel
Keystone State-class crane ship
Maumee-class oiler
Powhatan-class tugboat

They were all in service after the DB3000 cut-off year of 1979; some were even commissioned after that year.
If you need references I could help with that (I don't have Jane's like you guys do, nor any other "official" sources; just Dr Google).

Also, HMAS Stalwart, another destroyer tender that is not yet in the database. Could this also be added, please?

Thanks in advance!


No problem so long as you can provide the data and references.

Here's an example of a well formatted request.

Just be aware that formatting and referencing aside, the priority for database additions is determined chiefly by providing the most scenario and database 'bang' for the development hour 'bucks'; quick fixes to existing platforms, additions of new and significant platforms, and fixes to broken things take priority over addition of esoteric or obscure platforms, or minor details that don't affect gameplay.

The overarching intent of this thread and the database in general is to allow the creation of more community made scenarios, not just to form a comprehensive list of everything that has ever existed.

_____________________________


(in reply to DMAN)
Post #: 4406
RE: Russian hypo weapons and renewal information - 1/16/2019 4:25:28 AM   
DMAN

 

Posts: 98
Joined: 1/11/2019
Status: offline 		Hi apache,

I understand the prioritisation of additions.

Hopefully the actual functionality/utility of the platforms I requested will be added in the future so that more in-depth/complex community-created scenarios can be built.

I figured that if 9mm and 5.56mm mounts/weapons and individual infantry units are present or considered (I saw on the forum mention of this), then critical, high-value logistics platforms would most certainly tick the right boxes.

Nice link, BTW. I'll have a crack at that request format when I get a chance.

Thanks for your patience.

(in reply to Rory Noonan)
Post #: 4407
RE: Russian hypo weapons and renewal information - 1/20/2019 8:40:40 AM   
Scorpion86

 

Posts: 239
Joined: 2/26/2017
Status: offline 		Hi there!
In this instalment, I'm mainly pointing out inconsistencies in the use of FLIR pods. In most cases, there is an inconsistency between the name of the loadout and the FLIR pod used in it. Also, I also request the use of the Litening AT pod in many AA loadouts, as is practice in other countries using the Hornet.

#3799 – F-16AM Falcon MLU
- In the AIM-120B 202 + Litening 4, AIM-120B 400 + Litening 4, AIM-9X Heavy + Litening 4 and AIM-9X Light + Litening 4 loadouts, the PANTERA pod is used instead of the Litening 4 pod mentioned in the loadout’s description

#2048, #4103 – F/A-18D Hornet
- There should be AA loadouts using the Litening AT pod, as in other countries’ Hornets
- The Litening ER pod is erroneously used instead of the Litening AT pod in the Mk77 & Mk77 short-range loadouts

#712, #3857 – F/A-18F Hornet
- There should be AA loadouts using the Litening AT pod, as in other countries’ Hornets
- The AN/ASQ-228 ATFLIR Terminator II pod is erroneously used instead of the Litening AT pod in the GBU-38 & GBU-38 light loadouts

#2325, #3856, #2326, #4575, #4683 – F/A-18A+ Hornet
- There should be AA loadouts using the Litening AT pod, as in other countries’ Hornets
- The AN/ASQ-228 ATFLIR Terminator II pod is erroneously used instead of the Litening AT pod in the Mk82 Snakeye & Mk82 Snakeye short-range loadouts

#2046, #2097, #3712, #3912 – F/A-18A Hornet
#3283, #3284, #3910, #3911 – F/A-18B Hornet
#1086, #3826, #977, #4573, #4685 – F/A-18C Hornet
#4640, #4688 – F/A-18C+ Hornet
#4104, #4105, #4106, #4576, #4687, #1088, #3827, #575, #4572, #4686 – F/A-18D Hornet
- There should be AA loadouts using the Litening AT pod, as in other countries’ Hornets

(in reply to DMAN)
Post #: 4408
RE: Russian hypo weapons and renewal information - 1/20/2019 8:52:28 AM   
Scorpion86

 

Posts: 239
Joined: 2/26/2017
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: apache85

No problem so long as you can provide the data and references.

Here's an example of a well formatted request.


I am proud and humbled that you have chosen one of my requests as an example! Thank you, apache85!

(in reply to Rory Noonan)
Post #: 4409
RE: Russian hypo weapons and renewal information - 1/20/2019 4:29:18 PM   
FrangibleCover

 

Posts: 23
Joined: 1/20/2019
Status: offline 		The Colombian Mirage 5COR recon aircraft, DB #3066, doesn't have any internal cameras. The CORs had the same R nose as other Mirage 5s so it should have the same 4x Generic Visual Reconnaissance Cameras as the Mirage 5BR #3064.

(in reply to Scorpion86)
Post #: 4410
Page:   <<   < prev  145 146 [147] 148 149   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? Page: <<   < prev  145 146 [147] 148 149   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.592