Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 12/9/2018 4:51:30 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Port Moresby invasion goes off without a hitch, the two divisions there will wait a day for disruption in the teens to go down, and then attack. PM will fall very quickly with only a skeleton force there from the Allies.

The two divisions will then re-board their ships and head back for future operations.

The KB, sans four fleet carrier (2 at the invasion and 2 finishing off radar upgrades) is not even spotted.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 301
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 12/31/2018 12:27:37 PM   
DanSez


Posts: 1023
Joined: 2/5/2012
Status: offline
Happy New Year Page 2 Resurrection Bump!

How is the war progressing?
Hope all is well to Lowpe and the readers of these threads.


I will be watching New Horizon's Ultima Thule approach just after midnight East Coast Time. See you waaaay out there.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 302
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 1/3/2019 12:31:33 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
A much need break for the Holidays and the war is back on...several developments on the family front will likely cause more shortages of reporting as my eldest son's marriage is fast approaching and a joyous time sink.

(in reply to DanSez)
Post #: 303
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 1/4/2019 8:14:57 PM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline
Congrats!



_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 304
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 1/5/2019 12:23:39 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Nearing the end of September, 1942

This is the result of overstacking and only 4 heavy artillery units at Chungking. When bombardments started the AV of the defenders was over 9,000.

A strong army group is headed up from the south, and the rest of China will fall prior 1943.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 305
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 1/5/2019 12:32:52 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
Hey Lowpe, can you post a world map? I'm curious to see how things look. Thanks!

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 306
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 1/5/2019 3:34:41 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Here you go Mike,






Not too concerned about cleaning up the small Allied bases, but rather trying to focus now on achieving av, which means taking Chungking and the rest of China quickly (I have been somewhat lazy here to date), capturing a few more islands in the Aleutians, stalling in Burma and somehow holding onto Ceylon...i think that will put me awfully close.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 1/5/2019 3:38:15 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 307
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 1/5/2019 3:50:05 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
End of September, 1942

I am beginning to think the fastest route to Chungking from the south is thru LangSon to Nanning and then up north, and not thru Canton, like I went this game. The LangSon route is main roads all the way, although the Haiphong port is a bit smallish.

I have built up LangSon to size 9 runways, as it is not a malaria swamp, on railroads to Saigon, and can provide air support to Hainan. In the early game, Helens & Sallys can fly to strike China very easily, and be home for sake in comfort.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 308
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 1/8/2019 3:47:40 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
End of September, 1942


Main action in the Aleutians...

The last day goes out with a bang...Sitkin again....however, the 4E beasties take a toll night bombing, shooting down the fighters and not so much damage on the ground.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 1/8/2019 3:50:37 AM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 309
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 1/8/2019 3:49:48 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
And the follow up bombardment finds B17s on the Aleutian Island...woohoo!






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 310
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 1/8/2019 5:15:00 AM   
njp72

 

Posts: 1372
Joined: 9/20/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

End of September, 1942


Main action in the Aleutians...

The last day goes out with a bang...Sitkin again....however, the 4E beasties take a toll night bombing, shooting down the fighters and not so much damage on the ground.







Love catching Allied transport ships well played

No troops onboard though and where are his DDs? Unlike Mike to leave convoys so uncovered?

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 311
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 1/8/2019 9:58:23 AM   
mind_messing

 

Posts: 3393
Joined: 10/28/2013
Status: offline
quote:

I am beginning to think the fastest route to Chungking from the south is thru LangSon to Nanning and then up north, and not thru Canton, like I went this game. The LangSon route is main roads all the way, although the Haiphong port is a bit smallish. I have built up LangSon to size 9 runways, as it is not a malaria swamp, on railroads to Saigon, and can provide air support to Hainan. In the early game, Helens & Sallys can fly to strike China very easily, and be home for sake in comfort.


That's an interesting vector - there's not a great many Chinese units deployed in the area and the roads are pretty good. The only issue I see is that it's hard to get a large number of units deployed along this vector early in the war, given that most of the CEA is bogged down further east. Kweiyang seems to be the key hex for defending Chungking from the south, as after that the road network opens up so much that it's difficult for the Chinese to defend forward.

I wouldn't beat yourself up, however, you've investing Chungking and the rest of China is going to collapse in short order.

Onwards to Burma!

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 312
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 1/8/2019 1:31:21 PM   
GetAssista

 

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mind_messing
quote:

I am beginning to think the fastest route to Chungking from the south is thru LangSon to Nanning and then up north, and not thru Canton, like I went this game. The LangSon route is main roads all the way, although the Haiphong port is a bit smallish. I have built up LangSon to size 9 runways, as it is not a malaria swamp, on railroads to Saigon, and can provide air support to Hainan. In the early game, Helens & Sallys can fly to strike China very easily, and be home for sake in comfort.

That's an interesting vector - there's not a great many Chinese units deployed in the area and the roads are pretty good. The only issue I see is that it's hard to get a large number of units deployed along this vector early in the war, given that most of the CEA is bogged down further east. Kweiyang seems to be the key hex for defending Chungking from the south, as after that the road network opens up so much that it's difficult for the Chinese to defend forward.


It all depends on how Allies reshuffle their infantry. They are perfectly capable of railing several corps to cover LangSon/Nanning direction early if they somehow guess your intentions correctly. Compared to e.g. the east route being the best for Sian geographically thanks to the initial disposition, Chungking is far away and hence does not have the best route with Allies having ample time to cover any particular direction. But not every direction at once

(in reply to mind_messing)
Post #: 313
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 1/8/2019 4:55:48 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mind_messing

quote:

I am beginning to think the fastest route to Chungking from the south is thru LangSon to Nanning and then up north, and not thru Canton, like I went this game. The LangSon route is main roads all the way, although the Haiphong port is a bit smallish. I have built up LangSon to size 9 runways, as it is not a malaria swamp, on railroads to Saigon, and can provide air support to Hainan. In the early game, Helens & Sallys can fly to strike China very easily, and be home for sake in comfort.


That's an interesting vector - there's not a great many Chinese units deployed in the area and the roads are pretty good. The only issue I see is that it's hard to get a large number of units deployed along this vector early in the war, given that most of the CEA is bogged down further east. Kweiyang seems to be the key hex for defending Chungking from the south, as after that the road network opens up so much that it's difficult for the Chinese to defend forward.

I wouldn't beat yourself up, however, you've investing Chungking and the rest of China is going to collapse in short order.

Onwards to Burma!


It really depends on if/where your opponent defends. I've "defended" four times now, and attacked towards it twice.

The fastest route has been from the south, even though it takes slightly longer to get your units into place. I'm pretty sure I've told people for years that Sian is a sideshow that should only be used to tie up some Chinese while your main thrust occurs elsewhere (and of course, a Chinese defender can take advantage of this area as well in a rope-a-dope). The yellow roads just take too damn long and don't let you use your best advantage over the Chinese (even in alternate scenarios where they get more AT): tanks.

Stick to the grey roads. There are 2, or really 2-plus, options here: Kweiyang or Changteh-Chihkiang, both of which converge afterwards and allow you 2 options for approaching Chungking.

Anything else is just wasting time.



Certain areas of coastal China are also more defensible than it may otherwise appear, due to the relative force dispositions at game start and also somewhat dependent on where the main concentration(s) of IJA forces is/are. Lang Son/Nanning can fall into this bucket.

< Message edited by Lokasenna -- 1/8/2019 4:56:24 PM >

(in reply to mind_messing)
Post #: 314
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 1/8/2019 5:05:05 PM   
mind_messing

 

Posts: 3393
Joined: 10/28/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

quote:

ORIGINAL: mind_messing

quote:

I am beginning to think the fastest route to Chungking from the south is thru LangSon to Nanning and then up north, and not thru Canton, like I went this game. The LangSon route is main roads all the way, although the Haiphong port is a bit smallish. I have built up LangSon to size 9 runways, as it is not a malaria swamp, on railroads to Saigon, and can provide air support to Hainan. In the early game, Helens & Sallys can fly to strike China very easily, and be home for sake in comfort.


That's an interesting vector - there's not a great many Chinese units deployed in the area and the roads are pretty good. The only issue I see is that it's hard to get a large number of units deployed along this vector early in the war, given that most of the CEA is bogged down further east. Kweiyang seems to be the key hex for defending Chungking from the south, as after that the road network opens up so much that it's difficult for the Chinese to defend forward.

I wouldn't beat yourself up, however, you've investing Chungking and the rest of China is going to collapse in short order.

Onwards to Burma!


It really depends on if/where your opponent defends. I've "defended" four times now, and attacked towards it twice.

The fastest route has been from the south, even though it takes slightly longer to get your units into place. I'm pretty sure I've told people for years that Sian is a sideshow that should only be used to tie up some Chinese while your main thrust occurs elsewhere (and of course, a Chinese defender can take advantage of this area as well in a rope-a-dope). The yellow roads just take too damn long and don't let you use your best advantage over the Chinese (even in alternate scenarios where they get more AT): tanks.

Stick to the grey roads. There are 2, or really 2-plus, options here: Kweiyang or Changteh-Chihkiang, both of which converge afterwards and allow you 2 options for approaching Chungking.

Anything else is just wasting time.



Certain areas of coastal China are also more defensible than it may otherwise appear, due to the relative force dispositions at game start and also somewhat dependent on where the main concentration(s) of IJA forces is/are. Lang Son/Nanning can fall into this bucket.


That's more or less the conclusions I've came to. Sian leads to Chungking, but over a horrible, meandering yellow road. Luichow/Chihkiang leads to Chungking over a nice paved road ideal for the IJA. It also helps with supply, which can be a problem with Sian.

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 315
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 1/9/2019 11:56:53 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
1st week of September, 1942

Fun and games continue in the Aleutians, especially at Sitkin, but the Raleigh leads a 2 CL, 6 or so DD SAG aggressively against IJN shipping, skirmishing with two BB, clashing with a CL 4 DD TF, before and encountering a trio of 4 vp DD and the final daytime skirmish, they sink all three...

Two cruiser forces nail Sitkin, sinking convoys, a destroyer, and four or five PT boats.








Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 316
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 1/9/2019 11:59:05 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Some sample skirmishes, nice Allied TF much like the one the Brooklyn led before being sunk. First night

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Oct 01, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Buldir Island at 156,50, Range 2,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
BB Haruna
BB Hiei
BB Kirishima, Shell hits 3
DD Satsuki
DD Sawakaze
DD Hakaze
DD Shiokaze
DD Yukaze
DD Hokaze
DD Tachikaze
DD Namikaze

Allied Ships
CL Raleigh
CL Trenton, Shell hits 3
DD Sims, Shell hits 1
DD Hughes
DD Hammann
DD Walke, Shell hits 2
DD Mugford
DMS Fox
DMS Perry

2nd Night

Night Time Surface Combat, near Buldir Island at 156,50, Range 2,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
CL Nagara, Shell hits 1
DD Kuroshio
DD Tokitsukaze, Shell hits 1
DD Michishio, Shell hits 1
DD Natsugumo, Shell hits 1, on fire
DD Ikazuchi, Shell hits 1, on fire

Allied Ships
CL Raleigh, Shell hits 2
CL Trenton
DD Woodworth
DD Sims
DD Hughes
DD Hammann
DD Helm, Shell hits 1
DD Mugford
DD Sterett, Shell hits 6

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 317
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 1/10/2019 12:01:10 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
A nice bombardment at Chungking,

Ground combat at Chungking (76,45)

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 2133 troops, 140 guns, 90 vehicles, Assault Value = 1923

Defending force 279889 troops, 679 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 7537

Allied ground losses:
1083 casualties reported
Squads: 46 destroyed, 25 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 3 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 2 (1 destroyed, 1 disabled)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 318
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 1/10/2019 12:58:02 AM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
What a meat grinder at Chunking.

Lots of bloody noses for the Allies elsewhere.

Very good work.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 319
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 1/10/2019 10:48:12 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
An interesting case study here, in Luzon.

The Allies like to park a sub right in Manila harbor...so I transferred an excellent (skill 70 ASW) Lilly squadron and set them to ASW at 80% 0 range. They can spot the sub, but don't attack, and I noticed the altitude was set at 5k. Now, several years back I ran some very unscientific tests to check if altitude had any bearing on the number of attacks generated, and then I concluded that it didn't seem to.

But, I lowered them down this turn to 2k.

Also in the hex is a squadron of three 15knot SC, pretty good for Japan at this point in the game, and today I swapped two commanders out.

Will be curious to see if they can nail this sub.

Morning detection:

Ki-48-Ib Lily reports submarine at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports oil slick at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports object under water at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports object near surface at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports periscope wake at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports shape below surface at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports shadow in water at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports suspected submarine at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports conning tower at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports possible submarine at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports periscope at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports possible submarine at 79, 77 near Manila

Ki-48-Ib Lily from 208th Sentai attacking a O19 Class class SS at 125,48 (I put this here, to show that I do get attacks)

Afternoon reports

Ki-48-Ib Lily reports shadow in water at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports turbulence in water at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports shadow in water at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports turbulence in water at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports possible submarine at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports possible submarine at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports shadow in water at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports object near surface at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports object under water at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports submarine wake at 79, 77 near Manila





Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 320
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 1/10/2019 10:49:01 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

What a meat grinder at Chunking.

Lots of bloody noses for the Allies elsewhere.

Very good work.


Thanks, I keep trying. Working on testing a deep bombardment to hit those island based B17s.


(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 321
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 1/10/2019 10:51:31 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
10/2/45 Nakajima 45 engine productions starts tonight. My best Frank A factory is at 25 repaired 5 damaged.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 322
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 1/11/2019 3:18:27 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Early October, 1942

Allies love their minefields, and are set to lay some at Sitkin, the site of many a naval skirmish. Several small destroyer only task forces are heading in for a night time skirmish with the ubiquitous PT boat TFs and then hopefully the CMs preferably before the minefield is sown.

While the Allies think I am focusing on Sitkin, 9 CA split into two SAGs are heading on a circuitous route to bombard Umnak, the home of the B17 scourge. Can they get within striking range undetected?







Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 323
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 1/11/2019 3:47:14 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Showing the extreme Allied buildup, at least to me for this date, in the Great Cold Northern waters.

It is kind of funny, I was willing to cede these waters to the Allies, but then they went in with such a big force at Attu (2 div) I had to surround and destroy them. If they had gone in very small, or slower, I probably would never have bothered.

The Allies were sending multiple divisions against my pitifully out classed JNAF ENG units...talk about disparity of force.










Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 324
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 1/11/2019 4:57:44 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

An interesting case study here, in Luzon.

The Allies like to park a sub right in Manila harbor...so I transferred an excellent (skill 70 ASW) Lilly squadron and set them to ASW at 80% 0 range. They can spot the sub, but don't attack, and I noticed the altitude was set at 5k. Now, several years back I ran some very unscientific tests to check if altitude had any bearing on the number of attacks generated, and then I concluded that it didn't seem to.

But, I lowered them down this turn to 2k.

Also in the hex is a squadron of three 15knot SC, pretty good for Japan at this point in the game, and today I swapped two commanders out.

Will be curious to see if they can nail this sub.

Morning detection:

Ki-48-Ib Lily reports submarine at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports oil slick at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports object under water at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports object near surface at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports periscope wake at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports shape below surface at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports shadow in water at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports suspected submarine at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports conning tower at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports possible submarine at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports periscope at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports possible submarine at 79, 77 near Manila

Ki-48-Ib Lily from 208th Sentai attacking a O19 Class class SS at 125,48 (I put this here, to show that I do get attacks)

Afternoon reports

Ki-48-Ib Lily reports shadow in water at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports turbulence in water at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports shadow in water at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports turbulence in water at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports possible submarine at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports possible submarine at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports shadow in water at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports object near surface at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports object under water at 79, 77 near Manila
Ki-48-Ib Lily reports submarine wake at 79, 77 near Manila






Where did this image come from? What are the numbers?

Tracker and turn numbers?

< Message edited by Lokasenna -- 1/11/2019 4:58:11 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 325
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 1/11/2019 5:25:58 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Load tracker with maps, select maps, filter for sub sightings. A great, great tool. Those are turn numbers where enemy subs were spotted.

I have posted this image several times before in my AARs...

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 326
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 1/11/2019 7:16:04 PM   
DanSez


Posts: 1023
Joined: 2/5/2012
Status: offline

another lesson learned.
(or relearned).


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 327
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 1/11/2019 8:08:29 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Load tracker with maps, select maps, filter for sub sightings. A great, great tool. Those are turn numbers where enemy subs were spotted.

I have posted this image several times before in my AARs...


Apparently I missed it.

Does it work only off of enemy subs that are actually detected on the map on a given turn? If so, it will be missing out on some that were spotted momentarily during the replay but then moved (and reset their minimum DL, although not necessarily their max DL) during the rest of the turn resolution, no?

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 328
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 1/12/2019 1:07:50 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Three squadrons of 3 destroyers each steam into Sitkin, at least those are their orders. One squadron wanders into Adak, and its big minefield, and surprise...no mines are hit. I guess our recon has been doing their job...and this spells opportunity.

Meanwhile the destroyers that make Sitkin find PT boats and SC sinking a few, while one destroyer blunders into a mine...we missed the accursed Allied minelayers...but the damaged destroyer retreats into Adak...where it is not aerially attacked.

So, the next day, three Kongo's and their blessed 30kt speed run into Adak to deliver some IJN justice on the planes there, but first they are surprised to see Raleigh and many destroyers...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 329
RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 1/12/2019 1:11:07 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
A torpedo hit registers in the opening salvo...unfortunately, I didn't have the ships to send in a screening SAG. But the old WW1 Omaha is sent to the bottom.

Night Time Surface Combat, near Adak Island at 162,52, Range 4,000 Yards

Allied aircraft
no flights

Allied aircraft losses
SOC-1 Seagull: 1 destroyed

Japanese Ships
BB Haruna
BB Hiei
BB Kirishima, Shell hits 1
BB Ise, Shell hits 7, Torpedo hits 1, on fire
DD Uzuki
DD Satsuki
DD Kikuzuki
DD Sawakaze, Shell hits 1
DD Yukaze
DD Hokaze
DD Tachikaze, Shell hits 2, on fire
DD Namikaze

Allied Ships
CL Raleigh, Shell hits 12, and is sunk
DD Woodworth, Shell hits 1
DD Sims
DD Hughes
DD Anderson, Shell hits 2
DD Hammann
DD Mustin
DD Walke, Shell hits 1
DD Mugford, Shell hits 5, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 330
Page:   <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.719