Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

BB-57

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> BB-57 Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
BB-57 - 1/27/2019 3:43:38 PM   
tanksone


Posts: 390
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: St Paul, Mn.
Status: offline
Hi, can't remember if this has been posted already. Found it on another site and is a pretty good read.
https://www.history.navy.mil/content/history/nhhc/research/library/online-reading-room/title-list-alphabetically/w/war-damage-reports/uss-south-dakota-bb57-war-damage-report-no57.html?fbclid=IwAR3RAnzII6gBy7NI5wQFaTHAgT6Nrfe6V1UY_hPQfVykCfbU6tx3cT3J-Pg

Post #: 1
RE: BB-57 - 1/27/2019 6:10:40 PM   
spence

 

Posts: 5400
Joined: 4/20/2003
From: Vancouver, Washington
Status: offline
I know this has been posted before but here is the official USN report of the damage to HIJMS Kirishima inflicted by USS Washington. Just thought it might be neat to have both damage reports in the same thread for comparison.

http://www.navweaps.com/index_lundgren/Kirishima_Damage_Analysis.pdf

(in reply to tanksone)
Post #: 2
RE: BB-57 - 1/28/2019 8:25:15 AM   
Buckrock

 

Posts: 578
Joined: 3/16/2012
From: Not all there
Status: offline
Actually it's not some official USN report on the Kirishima. It's an essay by the author Robert Lundgren primarily making the arguement that a sketch by the Kirishima's Chief DCO of hit locations from USS Washingtons 16" shells is a better guide to what may have happened to the Kirishima than that stated in other Japanese accounts or in the "official" USN account (based mainly on Washington's AAR). If the sketch was correct, it doubles the number of 16" hits received by the Kirishima as recorded in previous accounts.

_____________________________

This was the only sig line I could think of.

(in reply to spence)
Post #: 3
RE: BB-57 - 1/28/2019 3:52:50 PM   
Elessar2


Posts: 883
Joined: 11/30/2016
Status: offline
One thing I've noticed with many of these wreck discoveries is how, shortly after they go under, intact, from sustained flooding damage, one of the magazines then goes off. Yamato & Mushashi being 2 other notable examples.

(in reply to Buckrock)
Post #: 4
RE: BB-57 - 1/28/2019 7:05:54 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elessar2

One thing I've noticed with many of these wreck discoveries is how, shortly after they go under, intact, from sustained flooding damage, one of the magazines then goes off. Yamato & Mushashi being 2 other notable examples.

And HMS Barham ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdrISbwy_zI

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Elessar2)
Post #: 5
RE: BB-57 - 1/28/2019 7:57:18 PM   
Denniss

 

Posts: 7902
Joined: 1/10/2002
From: Germany, Hannover (region)
Status: offline
this may happen if you did not flood your magazines. In case of flooding damage you don't think of adding more water to the ship, causing even more instability.
A different example is Bismarck, although it had not used much of its ammo nothing exploded due to being scuttled with water flooding into everything inside the hull. Magazines were very likely flooded first, being prepared for emergency flooding.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 6
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> BB-57 Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.172