Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? Page: <<   < prev  147 148 [149] 150 151   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/5/2019 11:24:25 AM   
KC45


Posts: 240
Joined: 11/23/2017
From: JPN
Status: offline 		Large amount of requests

service ceiling of F-15
F-15 and the variant have 60000ft service ceiling. (45000 for now)
https://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/f-15sg-multi-role-fighter-aircraft/
https://www.pearlharboraviationmuseum.org/exhibits/mcdonnell-douglas-f-15a-eagle-fighter/
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/aircraft/fighter/f15/

F-35A (Air Force,2020,DBID#4223) for Japan
GBU-39 SDB1 (Expect same loadout of USA’s F-35A of 2019’s)
http://www.mod.go.jp/atla/souhon/supply/jisseki/rakusatu/index3.html
The reference is from the deals of Japanese military made, not much English resources.
https://www.militaryaerospace.com/articles/2018/01/small-diameter-bomb-sdb-smart-munitions.html (English resources I found, no detailed info)

F-35A (Japan,2021)
JSM (Joint Strike Missiles, expect same loadout of Norway F-35)
http://www.mod.go.jp/e/d_budget/pdf/300914.pdf (Reference of JSM/Defense Related Budget Request for JFY2019) The year is based on Norway’s. Might be change.


F-35B(Air Force) for Japan (around 2021?)
AIM-120C-7, GBU-39 SDB, GBU-12 and GBU-31 -Same as F-35A(Japan)
https://www.defensenews.com/air/2018/12/10/japans-potential-buy-of-100-more-f-35s-would-have-big-international-significance/
Still unknown about F-35B can equip JSM or not.

Confirmed F-15J with JASSM, but no details. The improvement will contain adding improved Electronic Warfare equipment, increasing weapon mount… etc. I’ll keep watching.


I need Removal of "Probe Refueling" properties from Japanse F-4EJkai.
There is no refernce showing Japanse F-4EJkai have the air refueling ability, Japan remove it because of the style of the military.
This is important for modern air warfare withoute air refueling system, it change the game balance of scenario.
DB#1996 F-4EJ kai
DB#136 F-4EJ kai
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_F-4_Phantom_II_non-U.S._operators#Japan

_____________________________

Steam CMANO Japanese Community(unofficial).

(in reply to Rory Noonan)
Post #: 4441
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/5/2019 11:28:08 AM   
KC45


Posts: 240
Joined: 11/23/2017
From: JPN
Status: offline 		Japanese Satellite
I’ll request Japanese Information Gathering Satellite, for simulating more realistic warfare for scenario.

http://www.astronautix.com/i/igs.html
IGS-1A/B,IGS-3A,IGS-4A/B,IGS-5A,IGS-6A.IGS-7A,IGS-8A/B,IGS-9A,IGS O-5/R-5,IGS O-6/R-6

IGS O-6
https://www.n2yo.com/satellite/?s=43223
IGS R-6
https://www.n2yo.com/satellite/?s=43495

Additional Information
IGS-1A :(2003-2008)EO/IR Satellite but not greate Optical resolution, Expect Early 1990 technology. http://www.asahi.com/special/nuclear/TKY200306070230.html (Japanese Reference that explaining bad resolution)

According to Japanese wikipedia, 1st and 2nd Generation SAR satellite has L-band SAR. Not sure about later Generation SAR but assume they are I band.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_Gathering_Satellite (The list of satellite in wikipedia)
I don’t mind about you use NORAD or JPN gov destination.

_____________________________

Steam CMANO Japanese Community(unofficial).

(in reply to KC45)
Post #: 4442
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/5/2019 11:29:09 AM   
KC45


Posts: 240
Joined: 11/23/2017
From: JPN
Status: offline 		They are high speed boat, so players might get hard to identify missile boats and this. Also the these ships can give some change in convoy mission.
https://www.incat.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/military_dossier.pdf (7th page)

Boeing 929 (High speed, hydrofoil boat) Commercial/civilian hydrofoil boat
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_929
http://www.boeing.com/history/products/jetfoil-hydrofoil.pagehttp://www.boeing.com/history/boeing/hydro.html


HSC Condor Rapide (Hull 045)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HSC_Condor_Rapide (wiki)
https://www.incat.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Hull-045-86m-mini-spec.pdf (Official, lack of the displacement?)

HSC Natchan World (Hull 065)
This one is so important for my scenario, Japan decided use this ship during war for convoy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HSC_Natchan_World
https://www.incat.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/hull-065-112m-mini-spec.pdf
http://jsw.newpacificinstitute.org/?p=8758 (the news of Japan use this ship for national defence)

_____________________________

Steam CMANO Japanese Community(unofficial).

(in reply to KC45)
Post #: 4443
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/5/2019 11:30:42 AM   
KC45


Posts: 240
Joined: 11/23/2017
From: JPN
Status: offline 		PG 824 Hayabusa (DB1335)
Hayabusa class craft lack ESM system, but it is important to detect hostile unit by ESM without emit any radar, so I request those sensors.

Sensors/EW
(ADD)
Model:1x NOLR-9B /Max Range:500nm /Notes:ELINT /Abilities: Late 1990 Technology, Air Search, Surface Search, OTH(Surface Wave), Specific Emitter ID

Model:1x OAX-2 /Max Range: around 100 nm? /Notes:Infrared /Abilities:Infrared, 3rd Generation Imaging Technology, Air Search, Surface Search, Ground Search(fixed), Ground Search(mobile), Heading Info (No Weapon Director system)

Model:1x J/OPS-20C (Same as the radar that “DD 115 Akizuki(DB2293)” has)

Model:1x J/OPS-18-3 (Same as the J/OPS-18-1 radar that “DD 122 Hatsuyuki(DB1746)” has, but the technology should be late 1990’s)

(Remove)
Madel:1x J/OPS-28C

and... I also request for adding dock for this ship. small dock for RHIB.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hayabusa-class_patrol_boat

http://www.vspg.net/jmsdf/pg824.html (Japanese reference)


< Message edited by KC45 -- 2/6/2019 2:18:56 AM >

_____________________________

Steam CMANO Japanese Community(unofficial).

(in reply to KC45)
Post #: 4444
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/5/2019 6:13:32 PM   
Ancalagon451

 

Posts: 330
Joined: 1/4/2018
Status: offline 		http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/26347/the-navy-is-ripping-out-underperforming-anti-torpedo-torpedoes-from-its-supercarriers

Not sure to what exent CATs have been included in the DB but, if this is true, then the relevant units will have to be updated.

Ancalagon

(in reply to KC45)
Post #: 4445
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/8/2019 12:41:31 AM   
rmunie0613

 

Posts: 202
Joined: 1/2/2018
Status: offline 		2 Requests for next database

1- Any chance to get a weapon record added to the db3k for RIM 156A SM2ER Block IVA with the IR backup? It is a cancelled weapon system, but is in the database already, but there is no way to actually use it as there are no weapon records involving it.

2- Any chance to add cargo capacity to the Cargo ships such as the RoRos prepositioned at Diego Garcia?

Thanks in advance!
R

(in reply to Ancalagon451)
Post #: 4446
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/9/2019 11:43:54 AM   
anlgzl

 

Posts: 41
Joined: 3/18/2018
Status: offline 		Hi,

Do you have any plan to add ;

1) TCG Anadolu (L-408) amphibious assault ship (LHD) for Turkish Navy.
2) HÜRKUŞ-C LIGHT ATTACK/ARMED RECONNAISSANCE AIRCRAFT for Turkish Air Force.

(in reply to rmunie0613)
Post #: 4447
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/9/2019 1:16:44 PM   
orca

 

Posts: 501
Joined: 11/6/2013
Status: offline 		Can you add- JSOW-ER

“The U.S. Navy says it will begin deploying a cruise missile derivative of the stealthy AGM-154 Joint Stand-Off Weapon glide bomb, or JSOW, no later than the end of 2023, as an option for its F/A-18E/F Super Hornets and F-35C Joint Strike Fighters.”

Can you add to loadout for F/A-18’s and F-35?


DB details:
Add Williams International WJ24-8 turbojet - so same speed as ADM-160 MALD
Add 2 way datalink and CEC
Include IR guidance
Otherwise the same as JSOW [AGM-154]C-1 block 3


http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/26418/navy-to-field-cruise-missile-variant-of-its-smart-jsow-glide-bomb-that-will-fit-inside-f-35c
http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/20446/jassm-is-grabbing-headlines-but-the-navys-own-stealthy-weapon-is-set-to-get-way-more-capable

< Message edited by orca -- 2/9/2019 3:36:59 PM >

(in reply to anlgzl)
Post #: 4448
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/9/2019 1:18:20 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline 		Please note Indian Rajput updates

4 Bramos launcher (instead of Styx and Bramos mix of prior versions)

Picture

https://twitter.com/CavasShips/status/1081084297556213761

Thank!

(in reply to orca)
Post #: 4449
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/9/2019 1:35:30 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline 		Consider add hardened mounts for Israeli Arrow Sites?

Picture

https://twitter.com/reutersanders/status/1094187352321413121

(in reply to BDukes)
Post #: 4450
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/11/2019 12:05:43 AM   
Clockmaster77


Posts: 43
Joined: 1/16/2019
From: near Rome, Italy
Status: offline 		Consider to add this wonderful hypothetical plane:
Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow

Technical data available at this link:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avro_Canada_CF-105_Arrow

Ok, it has never entered service, but the 5 prototypes has demonstrated great performances. It would be an exceptional entry for hypothetical cold-war era scenarios. Please...

(in reply to BDukes)
Post #: 4451
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/11/2019 3:55:07 PM   
Schr75


Posts: 803
Joined: 7/18/2014
From: Denmark
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Clockmaster77

Consider to add this wonderful hypothetical plane:
Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow

Technical data available at this link:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avro_Canada_CF-105_Arrow

Ok, it has never entered service, but the 5 prototypes has demonstrated great performances. It would be an exceptional entry for hypothetical cold-war era scenarios. Please...


Hi Clockmaster

Check out CWDB entry # 3114 and # 3489.
I think you will be pleasantly surprised

Søren

(in reply to Clockmaster77)
Post #: 4452
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/11/2019 6:00:58 PM   
Clockmaster77


Posts: 43
Joined: 1/16/2019
From: near Rome, Italy
Status: offline 		what a gaffe... I didn't check in the CWDB...

< Message edited by Clockmaster77 -- 2/11/2019 6:01:32 PM >

(in reply to Schr75)
Post #: 4453
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/11/2019 6:49:46 PM   
KLAB


Posts: 355
Joined: 2/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Clockmaster77

what a gaffe... I didn't check in the CWDB...

It would still be a nice addition to the DB3K given that had it entered service the performance was good enough for it still to be an effective platform well into the millennia,
Arrow with AMRAAM?
K

(in reply to Clockmaster77)
Post #: 4454
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/11/2019 8:41:47 PM   
cdnice


Posts: 179
Joined: 5/7/2009
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Status: offline 		Check these out:

http://www.superarrow.ca/

https://fighterjetsworld.com/2018/06/21/the-rise-of-the-6th-generation-super-arrow/



_____________________________



(in reply to KLAB)
Post #: 4455
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/12/2019 3:46:58 AM   
Clockmaster77


Posts: 43
Joined: 1/16/2019
From: near Rome, Italy
Status: offline 		I Know that Project, its fantastic, but it is not an hypothetical real unit but a fictional one.
Bye

(in reply to cdnice)
Post #: 4456
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/12/2019 8:42:42 PM   
KLAB


Posts: 355
Joined: 2/27/2007
Status: offline 		For consideration of amending the range and designation of the 9M96.
Via Google translate so make of it what you will but the text is from an RG / Russian MOD again referring to what appears to be the 9M96M with a range of 150km not the earlier 120km of the 9M96. Given the development time of the 9M96 it makes sense that it has skipped to the modernised extended range variant before even entering service.
And as it's only just been type certified Gorshkovs in service date could be put to 2019?
https://rg.ru/sila/
https://rg.ru/2019/02/11/gosispytaniia-novejshego-zrk-poliment-redut-zaversheny.html
11.02.2019  
3:15 am
State tests of the shipborne air defense system "Polyment-Redut" completed. RIA News.

RIA News Photo: Pavel Lvov / RIA News
Completed state tests of the Polimen-Redut anti-aircraft missile system for frigates of Project 22350.

This was announced by the Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy, Admiral Vladimir Korolev, speaking at the assembly of the St. Petersburg Maritime Assembly, the newspaper Krasnaya Zvezda writes .

Photo: Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Earlier, in November, the Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation, Sergei Shoigu, spoke about the conduct of more than ten launches of Polyment-Redut missiles on various types of targets during state tests in the Northern Fleet. According to him, the capabilities of the air defense system make it possible to hit any existing and promising means of air attack.

"Polyment-Redut" - an anti-aircraft missile system of the sea-based with the installation of a vertical launch for the Navy of Russia. Able to hit air targets within a radius of 150 and at an altitude of up to 30 kilometers.

The first frigate of the project 22350 “Admiral Gorshkov”, equipped with the “Polyment-Redut” air defense system, joined the Russian Navy in July 2018. It is expected that the second ship of this type - the " Admiral Kasatonov " - will be commissioned before the end of 2019.

Thanks for considering
K

< Message edited by KLAB -- 2/12/2019 8:44:46 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Clockmaster77)
Post #: 4457
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/13/2019 4:57:25 PM   
Clockmaster77


Posts: 43
Joined: 1/16/2019
From: near Rome, Italy
Status: offline 		Battleship Novorossiysk (1949-1955).
Just... please think about that glorious ship, used as a training ship in the Soviet Navy (1949-55).
It was completed in 1914 for the Kingdom of Italy as "Giulio Cesare". Recommissioned/modified in 1937 (it served in Royal Italian Navy in WWII). Then it was sell to Soviet Union in 1949 to pay part of Italian War Debts towards Soviet Union.
The ship was armed with a main battery of thirteen 305 mm/46 Model 1909 guns in three triple-gun turret and two twin-gun turrets. The secondary battery comprised eighteen 120 mm (4.7 in) guns, all mounted the sides of the hull. Giulio Cesare was also armed with fourteen 76 mm (3.0 in) guns. She was equipped with three submerged 450 mm (17.7 in) torpedo tubes. The belt armor was 250 mm thick.
After the end of World War I, the number of 50-caliber 76 mm guns was reduced to 13, mounted on the turret tops, and six new 40-caliber 76 mm anti-aircraft (AA) guns were installed abreast the aft funnel. In addition two license-built 2-pounder AA guns were mounted on the forecastle deck.
When she was sell to Soviet Union all Italian light AA guns were replaced by eighteen 37 mm 70-K AA guns in six twin mounts and six singles. Soviet Union wants to replace her with Soviet built 305 mm guns, but the ship sunk in 1955.

It would be great in some mine sweep scenario in the early cold war era: it was sunk by a German WWII mine in Sevastopol in 1955, with the tragical loss of 608 sailors. But some uncontrolled rumors says that a group of italian navy veteran frogmen sabotaged the ship for retaliation: and this is great for a Scenario! If the developers will add this Ship (and perhaps some post wwII italian MAS vehicles) I promise I'll create a scenario about this highly fictional interpretation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_battleship_Giulio_Cesare

https://www.revolvy.com/page/Italian-battleship-Giulio-Cesare

Goodbye!



< Message edited by Clockmaster77 -- 2/13/2019 4:58:48 PM >

(in reply to KLAB)
Post #: 4458
RE: US Army / USMC Units - 2/13/2019 7:15:59 PM   
TheOriginalOverlord

 

Posts: 440
Joined: 6/20/2000
From: The Marines
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheOriginalOverlord


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheOriginalOverlord

Could we get the USS Des Moines 1957 from CWDB put in here along with a "hypothetical" version with late 80s upgrades like this?

Des Moines class late 80's upgrade...4 x CIWS (white) 4 x Mk141 quad (yellow) 2x quad ABL tomahawk (red) Figure in new radars and ECM same as the Iowas etc... an Iowa "lite" if you will



Thanks!



quote:

ORIGINAL: TheOriginalOverlord

Noticed "US" F-4D and Es (and also J/S models) in the 80s are still equipped with AIM9Js and AIM7E/Fs. Wouldn't the 80s loadouts have the 9L/Ms and 7Ms(Ps)?


RAF FG.1s already have 9Ls etc..

thanks for any update to those..



bump...


bump...

_____________________________

Semper Fi!

Jeremy


(in reply to TheOriginalOverlord)
Post #: 4459
RE: US Army / USMC Units - 2/14/2019 12:23:27 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline 		Updates for HIMARS launchers (Sources Sipri arms databases and link belows)

Add Jordan (2012-2014) x12.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SdNJaqa3eyM

Singapore 2010-2011 x18

https://www.army.mil/article/66233/singapore_himars_commissioning_ceremony

Polish Purchase x20

https://missilethreat.csis.org/poland-to-purchase-himars/

https://defence-blog.com/army/poland-us-sign-deal-for-himars-rocket-launchers.html

Thank!



< Message edited by BDukes -- 2/14/2019 12:29:44 PM >

(in reply to TheOriginalOverlord)
Post #: 4460
RE: US Army / USMC Units - 2/14/2019 1:21:58 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline 		Please add Venezuelian Target Vehicles/systems

Marine, Army and Paratrooper infantry units please add.

T-72M1 Tanks 2013 x91

https://www.flickr.com/photos/colombia_militar/29082025504

AMX-30B Tank (1973-1974) x 82-> Modernized to AMX-30V in 1989. Lot of no game stuff but modern fc system add. See pictures and change in post below.

https://aw.my.com/en/forum/showthread.php?150057-French-tanks-13-the-AMX-30

https://www.infodefensa.com/es/2019/01/03/noticia-modernizacion-amx30v-sortea-embargo-venezuela.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

https://defence-blog.com/army/venezuelan-army-has-disclosed-some-details-of-its-amx-30-mbt-upgrade-program.html

AMX-13/90 1989-1990 x31

http://tanknutdave.com/the-french-amx-13-tank/

http://i.imgur.com/KBkVd.jpg

EE-11 Erutu 1983-1984 31 Marine Corp Unit

http://i.imgur.com/qljA2AY.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/vOngtYb.jpg

https://americamilitar.com/venezuela/100-armada-nacional-bolivariana-p63.html

LVTP-7 Marine Unit 1971 x12

http://i.imgur.com/FxVzDSD.jpg

Scorpion 90 1989-1991 x84

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Df51B89WAAA1M8e.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/SHOQo77.jpg

https://s22.postimg.cc/lj3ao8hrl/IMG_2112.jpg

BMP-3M (2011-2013) Army (Stabber Missile Equipped)

https://www.fav-club.com/2013/12/11/vehiculo-blindado-de-combate-de-infanteria-bmp-3/

http://survincity.com/2010/05/31-mechanized-brigade-sun-venezuela-received-the/

BTR-80A (2011-2014) x 114 (Both 14.7 and 2A37 30mm version)

https://www.fav-club.com/2014/04/16/vehiculo-blindado-de-transporte-de-personal-8x8-btr-80a/

https://i.imgur.com/B2QhUXI.jpg

AMX-Mk-F3 155mm (1973) x 12

http://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/coldwar/France/F3_155mm.php

http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z271/davidprada/DSC00747.jpg

2S23 Nona (2011-2013) Army. *Note 4 per battalion so maybe 4 mount unit?

http://i.imgur.com/ok5RM.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/UrAyQ.png

2S19 Msta-S (2011-2013) x48

https://www.gettyimages.in/detail/news-photo/russian-made-venezuelan-army-2s19-msta-s-152mm-self-news-photo/118294553

https://i.imgur.com/J7UmrMf.jpg

BM-21 Grad (2011) x24

https://www.armyrecognition.com/may_2014_global_defense_security_news_uk/venezuela_has_successfully_tested_russian_mlrs_multiple_rocket_launchers_bm-21_and_smerch_1305141.html

BM-30 Smerch (2013) x12

https://www.armyrecognition.com/may_2014_global_defense_security_news_uk/venezuela_has_successfully_tested_russian_mlrs_multiple_rocket_launchers_bm-21_and_smerch_1305141.html

SR-5 MRLS (2014-2015) X 18

https://americamilitar.com/venezuela/100-armada-nacional-bolivariana-p57.html

M-114A1 155mm Artillery 1963 x18

https://americamilitar.com/venezuela/145-ejercito-nacional-bolivariano-p14.html

M-101A 105mm Artillery 1963 x 36

Thank!


< Message edited by BDukes -- 2/14/2019 2:42:00 PM >

(in reply to BDukes)
Post #: 4461
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/17/2019 4:22:09 PM   
F4U7Corsair


Posts: 14
Joined: 2/16/2015
Status: offline 		#1872, 1873 - MICA EM, MICA IR

Both missiles have essentially the same avionics and guidance with different sensor heads. They should thus have the same flags, namely:

Cooperative Engagement (CEC). the MICA can be fired from L16 tracks.
https://www.meretmarine.com/fr/content/la-dga-receptionne-le-1000eme-missile-air-air-mica
quote:

le Mica peut être tiré sur des cibles situées derrière l'avion grâce à une désignation d'objectif transmise via liaison de données (L16)

The MICA can be fired on targets behind the aircraft thanks to DL target designation (L16)


https://www.mbda-systems.com/press-releases/mica-firing-success-from-french-air-force-rafale/
quote:

A second Rafale, acting as wingman, acquired the target and provided target designation information to the first aircraft via the Link 16 data link


Lock On After Launch (LOAL).
https://www.mbda-systems.com/?action=force-download-attachment&attachment_id=15322
quote:

Missile guidance
• Strap-down inertial reference unit
• Active RF monopulse doppler seeker
• Passive imaging IR seeker
• Data-link
• Lock-On After Launch
• Lock-On Before Launch


It also needs to be able to be fired from IRST or ESM tracks. I observed that the MICA EM currently cannot.
https://www.mbda-systems.com/?action=force-download-attachment&attachment_id=15322
quote:

Target designation modes
• Onboard aircraft radar
• Electro-optical sensors
• Helmet mounted sight (HMS)
• Autonomous lock-on from the seeker’s own IRST scans


http://www.defesanet.com.br/rafale/noticia/10893/Shooting-Down-an-Aggressor-on-My-Six--Vive-la-difference-
quote:

This allowed us to designate the target from any source (EM / IR / Laser Threat Detection - Electromagnetic Threat Detection / Infrared / Laser), when the security bubble around the Rafale was invad-ed, and to execute the missile launch “over the shoulder.” Over the shoulder means that a MICA can be fired at a target located at position six o’clock (behind the aircraft) without changing flight direction.


CEC and passive firing most definitely applies to #961 and #371 METEOR too (I'm not sure of the relevance of LOAD for ARH missiles?).

< Message edited by F4U7Corsair -- 2/17/2019 4:26:51 PM >

(in reply to KC45)
Post #: 4462
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/17/2019 8:11:49 PM   
orca

 

Posts: 501
Joined: 11/6/2013
Status: offline 		Can you add EA-18G Growler block iii as a hypothetical unit?

Would be same upgrade as current block iii in DB including reduces RCS and conformation fuel tanks. No IRST.

Thanks for considering

(in reply to F4U7Corsair)
Post #: 4463
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/17/2019 11:51:53 PM   
KLAB


Posts: 355
Joined: 2/27/2007
Status: offline 		http://nevskii-bastion.ru/saar-45-israel/
http://www.iai.co.il/2013/36694-46743-en/Business_Areas_Land.aspx
Worthy of note for future DB update consideration please.
The Green Dragon appears to be in service on at least one SAAR 4.5.
(I have only checked the in DB3K viewer not the most current DB so apologies in advance if it's in the newest incarnation).
The article has a photo of a SAAR-45-ISRAEL with an aft launcher for the Green Dragon loitering munition and details of the weapon itself.
On a similar note the Russians would appear to be developing their own loitering attack UAV.KUB-BLA.
https://rg.ru/2019/02/17/koncern-kalashnikov-predstavil-samovzryvaiushchijsia-bespilotnik.html

< Message edited by KLAB -- 2/17/2019 11:55:29 PM >

(in reply to orca)
Post #: 4464
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/19/2019 1:15:22 PM   
Pancor


Posts: 71
Joined: 6/18/2015
From: Indonesia
Status: offline 		I was just surfing in the Database DB3000

When i come to Iver Huitfeldt Class -#2331 - Final Weapon Outfit, 2015
Up until now the Iver Huitfeldt class i've seen has never fitted with 127mm, only the two 76mm OTO-Melara

as reference i've took at Alamy photo as per 22 April 2018 the gun still sport two 76mm OTO-Melara although with the CIWS in-Place


https://www.alamy.com/kdm-niels-juel-f363-an-iver-huitfeldt-class-frigate-operated-by-the-royal-danish-navy-passing-gourock-at-the-start-of-exercise-joint-warrior-18-1-image208394115.html

So maybe could the Iver Huitfeld Class -#2331 - Final Weapon Outfit, 2015 change its gun from 127mm to 2x OTO-Melara 76mm
Thanks

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Pancor -- 2/19/2019 1:19:35 PM >

(in reply to KLAB)
Post #: 4465
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/19/2019 5:11:54 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline 		New Singapore Type 218SG Submarine.(IOC 2021) Invincible

https://twitter.com/CavasShips/status/1097751850286305281

http://www.defense-aerospace.com/articles-view/release/3/200107/thyssenkrupp-launches-first-type-218sg-submarine-for-singapore.html

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/spore-navy-launches-first-of-its-four-new-submarines

http://gentleseas.blogspot.com/2015/09/key-tkms-type-218sg-details-revealed.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invincible-class_submarine



< Message edited by BDukes -- 2/19/2019 5:12:55 PM >

(in reply to Pancor)
Post #: 4466
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/19/2019 5:56:06 PM   
Ancalagon451

 

Posts: 330
Joined: 1/4/2018
Status: offline 		Requesting ground launching versions of Alamo B & D for current war in Yemen scenarios.

One of them already exists here, which uses the air launched versions, and so it has an unrealistic long range, due to the range of the missiles being calculated for a platform with a substantial horizontal speed and vertical altitude, and not for a static ground one.

There are of course no performance data available but this source estimates a reduction in range of, at least, half max.

So conservative numbers would be 18-20nm for Alamo B and 30-33nm for Alamo D

Ancalagon

< Message edited by Ancalagon451 -- 2/19/2019 9:06:24 PM >

(in reply to BDukes)
Post #: 4467
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/21/2019 3:19:29 AM   
CrazyIvan101

 

Posts: 37
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline 		Could we get a hypothetical GBI variant with multiple kill vehicles? The previous Multiple kill vehicle program was cancelled and then restarted. Each GBI should be able to carry 6 KKV's at minimum based on the video below.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsPKYDcfw4k


(in reply to Ancalagon451)
Post #: 4468
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/25/2019 3:25:22 AM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline 		Requesting torpedo defense mortar/decoy system for the Type 056 Jiangdao-class light frigate.

https://www.bilibili.com/video/av42787962?share_medium=android&share_source=copy_link&bbid=PQk7Xm5cbgw_CTwKdgp2infoc&ts=1549438933443


(in reply to CrazyIvan101)
Post #: 4469
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/28/2019 3:35:05 AM   
BurntChickenDot

 

Posts: 8
Joined: 7/20/2018
Status: offline 		I'm not sure if this has been posted already, but as far as I am aware the Blackburn Buccaneer should be carrier capable. At the moment it is not.

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 4470
Page:   <<   < prev  147 148 [149] 150 151   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? Page: <<   < prev  147 148 [149] 150 151   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.234