Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Occupation of Ankara (Turkey)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Strategic Command Series >> Strategic Command WWII: World at War >> Occupation of Ankara (Turkey) Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Occupation of Ankara (Turkey) - 3/7/2019 6:02:00 AM   
gamer78

 

Posts: 536
Joined: 8/17/2011
Status: offline 		After capturing Egypt my opponent declare war to Turkey and capture capital Ankara with Afrika Korps in a few turns. Should it be that easily done. If it was that easy then Germans should have done it in WW2. Turkey was very careful to be neutral in the war and Ismet Pasha did everything for it. Quick occupation of Anatolia seems unrealistic to me.

< Message edited by gamer78 -- 3/7/2019 6:09:23 AM >
Post #: 1
RE: Occupation of Ankara (Turkey) - 3/7/2019 6:26:25 AM   
Markiss


Posts: 334
Joined: 8/29/2018
From: US Midwest
Status: offline 		The alternate capital being in Istanbul is problematic, as that is the direction the attack is likely coming from. Why would you move your capital closer to the axis of attack? Not real wise.
Maybe Turkey could have multiple alternative capitals depending upon the direction of attack? It needs to be more dynamic than it is, right now Turkey is far too easy of a conquest. It should be a logistical nightmare, instead it is all too easy.
Let's see the Axis have to fight their way across the whole country, then you would see some hesitation to attack it. Partisans should be a bear too. Right now, they just lay down and give up.
Have you ever met a Turk?!!! If you had, they would not be so easy to conquer in this game.

_____________________________

Lock up your wife and children now,
It's time to wield the blade..

(in reply to gamer78)
Post #: 2
RE: Occupation of Ankara (Turkey) - 3/7/2019 7:57:40 PM   
BillRunacre

 

Posts: 4945
Joined: 7/22/2013
Status: offline 		I'll have a think about this and look at their Partisan settings too.

_____________________________

Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FurySoftware

We're also on Facebook! https://www.facebook.com/FurySoftware/

(in reply to Markiss)
Post #: 3
RE: Occupation of Ankara (Turkey) - 3/7/2019 9:42:29 PM   
xwormwood


Posts: 1149
Joined: 8/28/2000
From: Bremen, Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: gamer78

After capturing Egypt my opponent declare war to Turkey and capture capital Ankara with Afrika Korps in a few turns. Should it be that easily done. If it was that easy then Germans should have done it in WW2. Turkey was very careful to be neutral in the war and Ismet Pasha did everything for it. Quick occupation of Anatolia seems unrealistic to me.


I guess with Rommel having captured Egypt and Palestine, Turkey would have been very tempted to side with the Axis.
At the very least it would have been trying to please the Axis to be able to stay out of the WW2 mess.

_____________________________

"You will be dead, so long as you refuse to die" (George MacDonald)

(in reply to gamer78)
Post #: 4
RE: Occupation of Ankara (Turkey) - 3/7/2019 9:48:36 PM   
Markiss


Posts: 334
Joined: 8/29/2018
From: US Midwest
Status: offline 		Hi BIll,
I played a game recently where the Axis declared war on Turkey, used aircraft to destroy the unit in Ankara, and landed paras to take the capital. The capital then moved to Istanbul, right into the waiting arms of his offensive, and fell the next turn, with the Axis barely having to move its units. It does seem a little too easy.
Although it makes sense historically and culturally to have the alternate capital be Istanbul, being right on the border, it is too vulnerable to attack from the European side.
If the Russians attack, it is a wonderful choice, but not so against the Axis. Is it possible to have different alternate capitals depending on who declares war?




_____________________________

Lock up your wife and children now,
It's time to wield the blade..

(in reply to BillRunacre)
Post #: 5
RE: Occupation of Ankara (Turkey) - 3/8/2019 1:46:11 PM   
Numdydar

 

Posts: 3211
Joined: 2/13/2004
Status: offline 		If the Germans get past Suez and are close to the southern Turkey border, then that should have a major impact on Turkey's swinging to the Axis. This should be even more pronounced if the Germans are past Rostov. Maybe even bring them into the war automatically.

The leadership of Turkey at the time was not stupid by any means. The Germans getting into the Middle East would have dramatically increased their need for a rail line back to Europe. Turkey would have known this and would be far more likely to join the Germans versus trying to stay neutral. As they could see how well that turned out for other neutral countries by this point in the war.

So I would say that if Palestine, Syria, and Rostov are captured/controlled by the Germans, then Turkey enters the war automatically. Or maybe better, no Allied troops in Palestine/Syria and Rostov captured.

But there is no way Turkey would have tried to remain neutral when surrounded by German territory and no Allied presence anywhere close by. At that point it would have been pretty obvious that Turkey had to join or die.


(in reply to Markiss)
Post #: 6
RE: Occupation of Ankara (Turkey) - 3/8/2019 7:27:36 PM   
BillRunacre

 

Posts: 4945
Joined: 7/22/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Markiss

Is it possible to have different alternate capitals depending on who declares war?



Alas not, and Smyrna is the place that springs to mind as a third alternative but that is also in the west, albeit not quite as accessible as Istanbul. But it would still give them some greater potential to resist for longer.

_____________________________

Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FurySoftware

We're also on Facebook! https://www.facebook.com/FurySoftware/

(in reply to Markiss)
Post #: 7
RE: Occupation of Ankara (Turkey) - 3/9/2019 5:49:20 AM   
ewr

 

Posts: 39
Joined: 2/20/2017
Status: offline 		As a Turkish citizen who is interested in both ww1 and ww2 history of our young republic, i can clearly advice Erzurum as the third alternative capital to Turkey. In Turkish Independence war (between 1919-1923) when Greek offensives advance through Ankara, parliment discussed moving capital to Kayseri, Sivas or Erzurum. So it will be also historically correct.

< Message edited by ewr -- 3/9/2019 6:42:03 AM >

(in reply to BillRunacre)
Post #: 8
RE: Occupation of Ankara (Turkey) - 3/9/2019 8:08:03 PM   
gamer78

 

Posts: 536
Joined: 8/17/2011
Status: offline 		Pressure in 1943 was at top level. Even those locations- Egypt and Syria- not captured by Axis. It is often said İsmet Pasha experience in Greek&Turkish War resulted in neutral diplomacy. How bad war is.

For not quick occupation of Turkey I think anti-air tech and fully mobilized army at least in capital(s) is necessary.In my pbem game it was in late summer 1942 occupation occurred. Otherwise it will be a gamey move to Baku for already weak Russians.

(in reply to BillRunacre)
Post #: 9
RE: Occupation of Ankara (Turkey) - 3/11/2019 4:02:27 AM   
ElvisJJonesRambo


Posts: 1345
Joined: 2/6/2019
Status: offline 		@gamer78 --- Hey, this sounds like our game? Cannot remember, got like 7 going on at once.

(in reply to gamer78)
Post #: 10
RE: Occupation of Ankara (Turkey) - 3/11/2019 8:30:46 PM   
BillRunacre

 

Posts: 4945
Joined: 7/22/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ewr

As a Turkish citizen who is interested in both ww1 and ww2 history of our young republic, i can clearly advice Erzurum as the third alternative capital to Turkey. In Turkish Independence war (between 1919-1923) when Greek offensives advance through Ankara, parliment discussed moving capital to Kayseri, Sivas or Erzurum. So it will be also historically correct.


Excellent! Thanks ewr, I did think of Erzurum but didn't know if it could be a potential capital, so it's good to know it could be, and I'll add it to their list.

_____________________________

Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FurySoftware

We're also on Facebook! https://www.facebook.com/FurySoftware/

(in reply to ewr)
Post #: 11
RE: Occupation of Ankara (Turkey) - 3/11/2019 10:35:32 PM   
gamer78

 

Posts: 536
Joined: 8/17/2011
Status: offline 		I think Erzurum does not have so much distance from Ankara. What Markiss mention -and I agree with- it should be logistical problem for Axis if they plan a route to Baku from conquest of Turkey. If map is smaller then Turkey needs a bit technology and already mobilized army in capitals as surprised war declaration didn't happen historically and there was already pressure...
quote:

ORIGINAL: ElvisJJonesRambo

@gamer78 --- Hey, this sounds like our game? Cannot remember, got like 7 going on at once.


Yes it is


< Message edited by gamer78 -- 3/11/2019 10:41:19 PM >

(in reply to ElvisJJonesRambo)
Post #: 12
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Strategic Command Series >> Strategic Command WWII: World at War >> Occupation of Ankara (Turkey) Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.484